Jump to main content.


Wetland Protection Project Grants Request for Initial Proposals

Overview Information

Funding Opportunity Description:

Award Information

Eligibility Information

Proposal and Submission Information

APPLICATION REVIEW INFORMATION

Award Administration Information

Agency Contact(s)

OVERVIEW:

Federal Agency Name: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, Division of Environmental Planning and Protection, Water Programs Branch, Wetlands Protection Section

Funding Opportunity Title: Wetland Protection Project Grants Request for Initial Proposals

Announcement Type: Initial Announcement

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA): 66.436: Surveys, Studies, Investigations, Demonstration and Training Grants relating to the Clean Water Act, Section 104(b)(3) Exit EPA disclaimer

Action Date(s)


Proposal Due Dates
Postmarked or emailed by September 17, 2004
EPA Region 2 review / evaluation
October 18, 2004
Request for Complete Application
October 25, 2004
Receipt of Complete Application
Postmarked no later than
November 22, 2004
Expected funding decision
January 21, 2005
Expected grant award notification
January 28, 2005

I Funding Opportunity Description

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 2, Division of Environmental Planning and Protection (DEPP), Water Programs Branch (WPB), Wetlands Protection Section is soliciting proposals for surveys, studies, investigations, demonstrations and training grants related to wetlands protection. EPA is authorized to award the referenced grants under the statutory authority of Section 104(b)(3) of the Clean Water Act (CWA). EPA's Administrator is authorized to make grants to State water pollution control agencies, interstate agencies, other public or nonprofit agencies, institutions, organizations, and individuals for the purposes of prevention, reduction, and elimination of pollution. Under the CWA 104(b)(3) statutory authority, grant efforts may conduct and promote the coordination and acceleration of research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the causes, effects, extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of water pollution. The Clean Water Act has defined wetlands as waters of the United States and recognizes the contribution of the nation's wetlands to our water quality. The enduring mission of the Wetlands Protection Program is to encourage and enable others to act effectively in protecting and restoring the nation's wetlands and associated ecosystems. This announcement refers to CFDA 66.436: Surveys, Studies, Investigations, Demonstration and Training Grants Exit EPA disclaimer.

Priority for funding 2004 Wetland Protection Project Grants will be directed in the following areas:

Watershed-based Wetland Restoration and Management
Focus: research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies pertaining to wetland restoration projects within local or regional stream or watershed management programs.

Assessing/Monitoring Wetland Health and Condition
Focus: research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies pertaining to wetland condition in one or more watershed(s) using established methodologies for biological and/or landscape level assessment. Methodologies must have been tested and verified for accuracy. Findings should be published in publicly available reports and/or on a World Wide Web site.

Wetland Resource Awareness
Focus: research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies to identify and promote the importance of wetlands among local or regional planning, regulation, education, and/or conservation entities, e.g., (but not limited to) improving understanding of the natural resource contribution of wetlands in a locality or region; education-outreach projects; facilitation of a wetland protection coalition.

These funding priorities are emphasized but not limiting. Surveys, Studies, Investigations, Demonstrations and Training grants may be used towards any effective wetlands protection and/or restoration effort that is consistent with CWA Section 104(b)(3) statutory authority.

ll Award Information

Grant funds are awarded through a competitive process. This year Region 2 anticipates the availability of approximately $60,000 for wetlands protection project grants.

The number of proposals that will be requested to submit a complete application and the number of applications recommended for award will depend upon the quality of the proposals received and the relative amount of funding requests in the context of fiscal year 2004 Region 2 monies. EPA reserves the right to reject all proposals or applications and make no awards.

These awards are project grants. Each grant project must be completed with the initial award of funds. There is no renewal of these grant awards. Funding and project periods can extend for more than one year, no longer than five years, and preferably within one to three years.

III Eligibility Information

Assistance under this program is generally available to States, territories, Indian Tribes, and possessions of the U.S., public and private universities and colleges, hospitals, laboratories, other public or private nonprofit institutions, and individuals.

Threshold Criteria for Eligibility
Nonprofit organizations described in Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code that engage in lobbying activities as defined in Section 3 of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 Exit EPA disclaimer are not eligible to apply.

Proposals which do not comply with the Clean Water Act 104(b)(3) statutory authority are not eligible. Under the CWA 104(b)(3) statutory authority, grant efforts may conduct and promote the coordination and acceleration of research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating to the causes, effects, extent, prevention, reduction, and elimination of water pollution. Wetlands are defined in the Clean Water Act as waters of the United States. An example of an ineligible proposal is one which constructs a dam or performs dredging on a private lake for maintenance purposes.

All entities submitting proposals in response to this solicitation must meet the eligibility criteria above and all proposed project activities and costs must be eligible under the authorizing statute discussed in Section I. Funding Opportunity Description. Proposed projects must take place in one or more Region 2 states, i.e., New York, New Jersey, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the Territory of the Virgin Islands. Proposals that do not meet these threshold criteria will be rejected without further evaluation

IV. Application and Submission Information

Project proposals should be mailed or e-mailed - with a subject header stating 2004 Wetland Protection Project Grant proposal - to Kathleen Drake:

Kathleen Drake
Wetlands Protection Section
EPA Region 2
290 Broadway
New York, NY 10007-1866

Telephone: (212) 637-3817
e-mail: Drake.Kathleen@epa.gov

Any information that you consider confidential should be clearly marked. EPA will make confidentiality decisions in accordance with 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B. Exit EPA disclaimer

The deadline for the submission of proposals is a postmark or e-mail date no later than September 17, 2004 . If mailed, please submit two copies. If e-mailed, please attach proposal as a WordPerfect, Microsoft Word, or Adobe Acrobat pdf file. If proposals are not e-mailed or post marked by 9/17/04, they will be rejected and will not be considered for funding.

Proposals must include:

Proposals will be reviewed and ranked using the evaluation criteria noted below. Submission of the proposal is the most significant phase in the competitive process. Those applicants whose proposals receive high rank in the evaluation criteria will be requested, by October 25, 2004 via e-mail or telephone, to submit a complete application. A complete application includes all items noted in the EPA Region 2 Web page, Grant Application Kit . Application forms can be printed from that web site or requested from Kathleen Drake (see Contacts, section VII).

Complete applications should be mailed to :

Mr. Roch Baamonde,
Chief, Grants and Contracts Management Branch,
EPA Region 2
290 Broadway, New York, NY 10007-1866,

post marked no later than November 22, 2004. If a complete application is not post marked by 11/22/04, the application will be rejected and will not be considered for funding.

Applications may be subject to Executive Order 12372, "Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs." The application kit includes information and contacts for this process

Grant applicants submitting a complete application package will be required to provide a Dun and Bradstreet (D&B) Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) number when applying for Federal grants or cooperative agreements. Organizations can receive a DUNS number in one day, at no cost, by calling the dedicated toll-free DUNS Number request line at 1-866-705- 5711 or by visiting http://www.dnb.com Exit EPA disclaimer . Submission of proposals does not require a DUNS number.

Quality assurance/quality control and peer review, are sometimes applicable to grants awards (see 40 CFR 30.54 and 40 CFR 31.45). A Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) will require coordination with the EPA Region 2 offices. If a work plan involves environmental measurements or use of existing environmental data, an approved QAPP is required prior to the onset of data collection or application. Please request a copy of the Region 2 Quality Assurance Project Plan guidance from Kathleen Drake. Submission of proposals does not require inclusion of quality assurance plans. Contact Kathleen Drake (see Section VII. Agency Contacts, below) with quality assurance plan questions.

Submission Dates and Times
 
Proposal Due Dates
Postmarked or emailed by September 17, 2004
EPA Region 2 review / evaluation
October 18, 2004
Request for Complete Application
October 25, 2004
Receipt of Complete Application
Postmarked no later than
November 22, 2004
Expected funding decision
January 21, 2005
Expected grant award notification
January 28, 2005

Funding Restrictions Exit EPA disclaimer
Grants are available to support recipients' allowable direct and indirect costs incident to approved scopes of work in accordance with established EPA policies and regulations, i.e., EPA's General Grant Regulations (40 CFR Part 30 and 40 CFR Part 31). Costs will be determined in accordance with OMB Circular No. A-87 (State/local governments, Indian Tribes); OMB Circular No. A-21 (educational institutions) and OMB Circular No. A-122 (nonprofit institutions).

V. Application Review Information

Evaluation Criteria
Proposals meeting the threshold criteria discussed in Section III above will be evaluated against the criteria below. Priority in the selection process will be given to those proposals addressing the Funding Priorities identified in Section I above (noted in Criteria 1 in the table below).

States, Territories, Indian Tribes, and State-chartered universities have the opportunity to apply for EPA Wetland Program Development Grants (WPDG). Therefore, preference in the award of Wetland Protection Project grants will be shown to eligible entities other than States, Territories, Indian Tribes, and State-chartered universities.

 

Criteria
Components Considered
1) Adherence to 2004 Funding Priorities

Priority in the selection process will be given to projects that address the funding priorities

Watershed-based Wetland Restoration and Management
Focus: research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies pertaining to wetland restoration projects within local or regional stream or watershed management programs.

Assessing/Monitoring Wetland Health and Condition
Focus: research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies pertaining to wetland condition in one or more watershed(s) using established methodologies for biological and/or landscape level assessment. Methodologies must have been tested and verified for accuracy. Findings should be published in publicly available reports and/or on a web site.

Wetland Resource Awareness
Focus: research, investigations, experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies to identify and promote the importance of wetlands among local or regional planning, regulation, education, and/or conservation entities, e.g., (but not limited to) improving understanding of the natural resource contribution of wetlands in a locality or region; education-outreach projects; facilitation of a wetland protection coalition.

2) Clarity of Work Plan

Clearly written and detailed proposals

No page limit

Work plans should include:
  • Contact information: project coordinator e-mail, telephone, address
  • Summary of key objectives, final products, and expected environmental results
  • Explanation of the project's role within the geographic region, organization, or agency
  • Thorough, concise description of work plan components
  • Budget and personnel commitment for work plan components
  • Projected time line
  • Performance measures and evaluation process
  • Demonstration of the ability to accomplish the work plan: appropriate background, academic training, field experience, and personnel
  • Explanation of project compliance with CWA 104(b)(3)statutory authority (refer to Section 1. Funding Opportunity Description).
3) Potential Environmental Results

Likelihood of positive environmental results in
the short and long-term

  • Demonstrated need for project
  • Sound science, qualified personnel, appropriate budget
  • Based on project(s) of demonstrated success
  • Incorporation of results/products into entity's broader mission/program operation
  • Consideration of long term planning and commitment
  • Ability to incorporate wetlands issues into on-going watershed planning efforts
  • Contribution to various water quality management programs
  • Partnerships developed or in place; coordination among organization
4) Transferability of Results
and/or Methods
  • Any data collected under the grant is of such quality that it can be relied on for other purposes (as appropriate)
5) Involvement/Commitment of the Applicant

Significant financial and personnel contribution and involvement of partners

  • Commitment of personnel
  • Not more than 50% of work plan contracted
  • Voluntary match
  • Intent to build upon the project
6) Consistency with EPA Goals

Government Performance Results Act and EPA Strategic Plan Goals which are:

  • achieve no net loss of wetlands or wetland function;
  • overall net gain of wetlands with additional focus on biological and functional measure
7) Success of Previous Projects Does not add value in the rating process for prior wetland grant recipients to give an automatic advantage over new applicants. In cases of inadequate and inappropriate prior grant performance, the criteria can lower an applicant's ranking; it allows consideration of poor past performance in the evaluation of current grant proposals.

A review panel of three to five EPA personnel will evaluate proposals. Criteria are of equal weight. A rating of 1 through 8 will be assigned to criteria 1 through 6. A sum of ratings will be tallied, with the highest attainable score being 48. Proposals will be ranked by the summed ratings - the highest sum of ratings will rank highest. The last criterion is considered only amongst prior grant recipients. This criterion does not add extra points in the rating process for prior EPA grant recipients to give an automatic advantage over new applicants. The criterion does, in cases of inadequate and inappropriate prior grant performance, lower an applicant's ranking; it allows consideration of poor past performance in the evaluation of current grant applications.


Review and Selection Process
Those proposals receiving a high rank in the evaluation criteria will be requested to submit a complete application. Application information appears in Section IV above. As noted earlier, the number of applications requested and the number of applications recommended for award will depend upon the quality of the proposals received and the relative amount of funding requests in the context of fiscal year 2004 Region 2 monies. EPA reserves the right to reject all proposals or applications and make no awards

VI. Award Administration Information

Notices
After receipt of a complete application, work plan, and budget, the Wetlands Protection Program and the Grants Office will perform a review of the entire package. Based on this review, recommendation for funding the awards will be forwarded to the Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management for decision. When all funding decisions are complete, a grant award notification, signed by the Assistant Regional Administrator for Policy and Management, will be mailed to recipients. An award document constitutes an offer to the recipient organization and sets forth the terms and conditions of the assistance agreement. Recipients will be required to sign the award document in triplicate and return these to:

Mr. Roch Baamonde,
Chief, Grants and Contracts Administration Branch,
EPA Region 2,
290 Broadway,
New York, NY 10007-1866.

As the assistance agreement is a legal document, an authorized representative of the organization must indicate acceptance with his or her signature. Non-award notification will be mailed or e-mailed to all participants that did not receive an award this fiscal year. For award appeals see 40 CFR Part 30.63 and Part 31, Subpart F. Exit EPA disclaimer

Administrative Requirements
Awards are subject to EPA's General Grant Regulations found in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40 Part 30 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations and CFR Title 40 Part 31 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments Exit EPA disclaimer .

Reporting

VII. Agency Contact

Kathleen Drake
(212) 637-3817
Drake.Kathleen@epa.gov

Wetlands Protection Section
EPA Region 2
290 Broadway
New York, NY 10007-1866

LocalNavigation


Jump to main content.