|
The Sole Source Aquifer (SSA) Program is authorized
by Section 1424(e) of the Safe Drinking Water Act of
1974 (Public Law 93-523, 42 U.S.C. 300 et. seq), which
states:
"If the Administrator determines, on his own
initiative or upon petition, that an area has an aquifer
which is the sole or principal drinking water source
for the area and which, if contaminated, would create
a significant hazard to public health, he shall publish
notice of that determination in the Federal Register.
After the publication of any such notice, no commitment
for federal financial assistance (through a grant,
contract, loan guarantee, or otherwise) may be entered
into for any project which the Administrator determines
may contaminate such aquifer through a recharge zone
so as to create a significant hazard to public health,
but a commitment for federal assistance may, if authorized
under another provision of law, be entered into to
plan or design the project to assure that it will
not so contaminate the aquifer".
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines a
sole or principal source aquifer as one which supplies
at least 50 percent of the drinking water consumed in
the area overlying the aquifer. EPA guidelines also
require that these areas have no alternative drinking
water source(s) which could physically, legally, and
economically supply all those who depend upon the aquifer
for drinking water. For convenience, all designated
sole or principal source aquifers are usually referred
to simply as a "sole source aquifer".
|
 |
| Petition
for Designation |
|
|
|
|
Any person may apply for SSA designation. A "person"
is any individual, corporation, company, association,
partnership, state, municipality, or federal agency.
A petitioner is responsible for providing EPA with hydrogeologic
and drinking water usage data, and other technical and
administrative information required for assessing designation
criteria.
In 1987, EPA published the Sole
Source Aquifer Designation Petitioner Guidance
to assist those interested in preparing and submitting
petitions to EPA regional offices. The document provides
procedures and criteria for proposing aquifer boundaries,
determining whether an aquifer is the sole or principal
source of drinking water, and for evaluating alterative
sources of drinking water.
In general, the designation decision process takes
a minimum of six months from the time that the petitioner
submits a complete petition to EPA. The process may
take less or more time, depending on the technical complexity
of the petition, and on the number of petitions that
may be undergoing review within the EPA regional office
at that time.
In New England, EPA requests that persons interested
in filing a petition contact our office and set up a
meeting with our staff. During the meeting, EPA will
provide information about the benefits of the program,
examples of past petitions and the types of information
necessary for designation, and will discuss appropriate
boundaries (based on your goals and the hydrogeology
of the area) for the proposed Sole Source Aquifer.
|
 |
| Project
Review Authority & Coordination |
|
|
|
|
Designation of an aquifer as a "sole source aquifer"
provides additional protection to the aquifer by giving
EPA authority to review all proposed federal financially
assisted projects which have the potential to
contaminate the SSA area. Proposed projects that are
funded entirely by state, local, or private concerns
are not subject to EPA review. The reviews are designed
to reduce the risk of ground
water contamination which could pose a health hazard
to those who use it. Generally, project reviews
have been conducted on projects associated with:
- highway improvements and new road construction
- airport expansions;
- transportation centers and maintenance facilities
- large developments receiving federal grants or loans
- large wastewater treatment facilities
- water system improvements
- new construction of rail lines
These reviews are not targeted for family residences
or small scale development projects unless there is
federal financial assistance and a substantial
risk for contamination to the aquifer or to public water
supplies within it.
EPA has developed Memorandums of Understanding (MOU)
with federal funding agencies to establish review responsibilities
under the SSA program and to list categories of project
which should or should not be referred to EPA for review.
The goal of the MOU is to assure that each project in
the designated SSA area that is to receive federal financial
assistance from the involved federal agency is designed
and conducted in a manner that will prevent the introduction
of contaminants into the aquifer in quantities that
may create a significant hazard to the health of people
who rely upon the aquifer. A summary of current MOUs
developed between federal agencies and the New England
Office is available. These MOUs are updated periodically
to reflect changes in overall ground water protection
through passage of new or revised state regulations
and improved environmental design capability. EPA's
New England Office plans to update its MOUs in the near
future. The updated MOUs will likely reduce referral
of many small-scale projects already subject to state
regulation for EPA review.
Most projects referred to EPA for review meet all federal,
state, and local ground water protection standards and
are approved without any additional conditions being
imposed. Occasionally, EPA may determine that the project
poses a significant risk to human health through ground
water contamination. EPA would then seek to jointly
work with the involved federal agency and project proponent
to modify the project proposal to better integrate protection
of the ground water resource. This process may lead
to changes in project design or the agreement to conduct
additional pollution prevention activities as a condition
of funding.
|
 |
| Public
Awareness and Participation |
|
|
|
|
SSA designation increase the public's awareness of
the nature and value of local ground water resources
by demonstrating the link between an aquifer and a community's
drinking water supply. Often, the realization that an
area's drinking water originates from a vulnerable underground
supply can lead to an increased willingness to protect
it. The public also has an opportunity to participate
in the SSA designation process by providing written
comments to EPA or participating in an EPA-sponsored
public hearing prior to the designation decision.
|
 |
| Resource
Characterization |
|
|
|
|
Important information on the boundaries, hydrogeologic
materials, and water use patterns of an area's aquifer
must be documented by a petitioner seeking SSA designation.
Following EPA's technical review of a petition, this
information is summarized by the agency in a technical
support document that is made available for public review.
Following designation, a Federal Register notice is
published to announce and summarize the basis for EPA's
decision.
|
 |
| Limitations
of the Program |
|
|
|
|
Sole source aquifer designation provides only limited
federal protection of ground water resources which serve
as drinking water supplies. It is not
a comprehensive ground water protection program. Protection
of ground water resources can best be achieved through
an integrated and coordinated combination of federal,
state, and local efforts. For example, local wellhead
protection programs designed and implemented by communities
to protect the recharge areas of public water supply
wells, should complement contaminant source controls
and pollution prevention efforts being managed at various
levels of government. Such coordination ensures that
all ground water activities meet the same protection
goal without duplication of time, effort, and resources.
Although designated aquifers have been determined to
be the "sole or principal" source of drinking
water for an area, this does not imply that they are
more or less valuable or vulnerable to contamination
than other aquifers which have not been designated by
EPA. Many valuable and sensitive aquifers have not been
designated simply because nobody has petitioned EPA
for such status or because they did not qualify for
designation due to drinking water consumption patterns
over the entire aquifer area. Furthermore, ground water
value and vulnerability can vary considerably both between
and within designated aquifers. As a result, EPA does
not recommend using SSA status as the sole or determining
factor in making land use decisions that may impact
ground water quality. Rather, site-specific hydrogeological
assessments should be considered along with other factors
such as project design, construction practices, and
long-term management of the site.
|
 |
Sole
Source Aquifers and Massachusetts
Environmental Laws |
|
|
|
|
The State of Massachusetts provides added protection
for Sole Source Aquifers [310 CMR 16.40 (3a)6]against
potential contamination from solid waste facilities
and underground storage tanks. Solid waste facilities
may not be located in a Sole Source Aquifer unless there
are no existing or potential public or private water
supplies downgradient of the site and there are alternative
existing or potential public water supplies available
to meet the town's needs.
New or expanded underground storage tanks for non-residential
purposes must meet enhanced construction specifications
and have a mechanism for leak detection.
|
|