Jump to main content.

Mercury Workgroup Meeting Presentations

November 30, 2004, Chicago Illinois

Documents & External Links Disclaimer
This Web page is included on the Environmental Protection Agency Web site as a courtesy to the Great Lakes Binational Toxics Strategy Mercury Workgroup. The content is provided by the Workgroup. Content included here does not represent Environmental Protection Agency policy or position and the Environmental Protection Agency cannot attest to the accuracy or currency of information provided on these pages.

All files are PDF

Tom Tyler, US Environmental Protection Agency Efforts to Form National Partnerships for Auto Mercury Switch Removal -- United States
Shelly Bonte-Gelok, Ontario Ministry of the Environment Efforts to Form National Partnerships for Auto Mercury Switch Removal -- Canada
John Reindl, Dane County, WI Recycling Manager Product Stewardship Institute Work on Mercury-Containing Thermostats
Arthur Dungan, Chlorine Institute Chlor-alkali Industry Mercury Use
Luke Trip, Commission for Environmental Cooperation Progress on North American Mercury Action Plan; Opportunities for CEC/GLBTS Cooperation
David Michaud, WE Energies Coal Blending for Mercury Emissions Reduction
Linda Barr, USEPA Office of Solid Waste EPA Mercury Use Reduction Program
Jon Heinrich, Wisconsin DNR State Utility Regulation–What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Pursuing Regulations at the State Level? -- Wisconsin DNR Perspective
Michael Murray, National Wildlife Federation State Utility Regulation–What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Pursuing Regulations at the State Level? -- National Wildlife Federation Perspective
Dennis Leonard, Detroit Edison State Utility Regulation–What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Pursuing Regulations at the State Level? -- Detroit Edison Perspective
Michael Murray Great Lakes Mercury Emissions Inventories

 

Local Navigation

Jump to main content.