To be included in this list a case must satisfy two criteria: (1) the case involved violations to which EPA's Audit Policy was applicable, and (2) the regulated entity involved in the case was granted some level of relief from gravity-based penalties under the Policy. Accordingly, cases to which the Audit Policy did not apply and/or in which no relief was granted are not included here. Cases are organized by date of resolution, with the most recent resolutions being at the top.
| Johnson Mathey Ceramics Corp. |
Location: |
Fairfield, Ohio |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
David Star |
| |
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA |
| Date of disclosure: |
9-13-99 |
| Date of resolution: |
7-25-00 |
| How resolved: |
NOD |
| % GPB reduced: |
100% |
| Additional notes: |
None |
Midwest Grain Products of Illinois |
Location: |
Pekin, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Anthony Silvasi |
| |
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA, IUR |
| Date of disclosure: |
10-14-99 |
| Date of resolution: |
8-18-00 |
| How resolved: |
NOD |
| % GPB reduced: |
100% |
| Additional notes: |
None |
| North American Plastics Corp. |
Location: |
Aurora, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
James Entzminger |
| |
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA 311 & 312 |
| Date of disclosure: |
12-30-99 |
| Date of resolution: |
6-1-00 |
| How resolved: |
NOD |
| % GPB reduced: |
100% |
| Additional notes: |
None |
| American Lock Co. |
Location: |
Crete, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Deirdre Tanaka |
| |
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA |
| Date of disclosure: |
8-24-99 |
| Date of resolution: |
11-28-00 |
| How resolved: |
CAFO |
| % GPB reduced: |
100% |
| Additional notes: |
None |
| Crossroads Farms Dairy |
Location: |
Indianapolis, Indiana |
| $ 5,000 penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Terence Bonace |
| |
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA 313 |
| Date of disclosure: |
12-21-99 |
| Date of resolution: |
1-11-01 |
| How resolved: |
CAFO |
| % GPB reduced: |
$5,000 |
| Additional notes: |
None |
| |
 |
| Bradford White Corp. |
Location: |
Middleville, MI |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Tom Crosetto |
| |
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA 312 & 313 |
| Date of disclosure: |
7-21-00 |
| Date of resolution: |
1-13-01 |
| How resolved: |
NOD |
| % GPB reduced: |
100% |
| Additional notes: |
None |
| Occidental Chemical |
Location: |
Kenton, Ohio |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Tom Crosetto |
| |
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA 312 & 313 |
| Date of disclosure: |
10-30-99 |
| Date of resolution: |
1-19-01 |
| How resolved: |
NOD |
| % GPB reduced: |
100% |
| Additional notes: |
None |
| Moses Cohen & Sons Inc. |
Location: |
Cincinnatti, Ohio |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
James Entzminger |
  |
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA |
| Date of disclosure: |
12-9-99 |
| Date of resolution: |
5-8-00 |
| How resolved: |
NOD |
| % GPB reduced: |
100% |
| Additional notes: |
None |
| Decor Gravure Corp. |
Location: |
Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Heidi Bogda |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
RCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
03-05-99 |
|
Date of resolution: |
05-03-00 |
|
How resolved: |
NOD |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
|
|
|
| Lambent Technologies |
Location: |
Skokie, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Dierdre Tanaka |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
07-02-99 |
|
Date of resolution: |
01-28-00 |
|
How resolved: |
NOD |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
| Barnes International |
Location: |
Chicago, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Robert Smith |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
04-15-99 |
|
Date of resolution: |
08-11-99 |
|
How resolved: |
NOD |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
|
|
|
| Dynachem |
Location: |
Georgetown, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Susan Prout |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
05-19-98 |
|
Date of resolution: |
07-21-99 |
|
How resolved: |
NOV |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
|
|
|
| Cousins Foods, Ltd. |
Location: |
Chicago, Illinois |
| 75% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Bob Beauchamp |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
11-20-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
04-07-99 |
|
How resolved: |
CACO |
|
% GPB reduced: |
75% |
|
Additional notes: |
Cousins informed U.S. EPA that the Armitage facility also used at least one hazardous substance above the TPQ, and that it had not submitted a tier II form for calendar year 1996. The proposed penalty in the complaint will be $1,500 and the amount in the CACO under rhe 75% reduction is $375. |
|
|
|
| Samson Hydrocarbons Co. |
Location: |
Saint Clair County, Michigan |
| 75% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Sabrina Argentieri |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
SDWA Section 1423 (UIC) |
|
Date of disclosure: |
10-27-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
02-03-99 |
|
How resolved: |
CACO |
|
% GPB reduced: |
75% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
| Keystone Steel & Wire |
Location: |
Peoria, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Mary McAuliffe |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
RCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
05-30-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
01-19-99 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
Case resolved with letter. No formal complaint was filed, and no violations were pursued (in essence, due to the company's satisfying the criteria set forth in EPA's audit policy, EPA decided not to bring a case at all against the company). |
|
 |
 |
| Mallinckrodt, Inc. |
Location: |
Mundelein, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Richard Clarizio |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
FIFRA Section 25 |
|
Date of disclosure: |
Original, 04-11-96; Supp., 05-23-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
11-04-98 |
|
How resolved: |
CACO |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% ($719,800) |
|
Additional notes: |
The Consent Agreement resolves over two hundred instances of Mallinckrodts improper branding and shipping of regulated pesticides; seven instances of failing to notify EPA of adverse effects on domestic animals from its pesticides and thirteen instances of failing to maintain appropriate records for child resistant packaging. The Consent Agreement represents a significant reduction in the penalty from $808,000.00 to $88,200.00 as a result of Mallinckrodts timely and complete disclosure of most of these violations under EPAs audit policy.
BACKGROUND: On November 4, 1998, the Region simultaneously filed with the Regional Hearing Clerk a Complaint and Consent Agreement and Consent Order (CACO) for the Mallinckrodt, Inc. The violations alleged in these documents were the result of Mallinckrodts compliance audit of its facility in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The compliance audit took Mallinckrodt approximately one year to complete given the scope and complexity of its operations. During this time period Mallinckrodt made 28 separate disclosures of potential violations.
The Region determined that a majority of the violations were reported in compliance with the self-disclosure criteria contained in EPAs Self-Disclosure Policy. For these violations the Region also determined that there was negligible economic benefit. Consequently, under the Self-Disclosure Policy the Region reduced the gravity based component of the penalty by 100% thus eliminating penalties of $587,500.00.
The Region also determined that Mallinckrodt did not comply with the Self-Disclosure Policy for certain other violations and thus did not qualify for the 100% reduction of the gravity based penalty. The Region did, however, determine that Mallinckrodt qualified under the FIFRA penalty policy for a 60% reduction in the gravity based penalty due to its self-disclosure and cooperation. Consequently, the Region reduced the penalty from $220,500.00 to $88,200.00. |
| Tioxide Americas, Inc. |
Location: |
Downers Grove, Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Thor Ketzback |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA, EPCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
06-19-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
08-19-98 |
|
How resolved: |
Issuance of NOV |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
| East Ohio Gas |
Location: |
Cleveland, Ohio |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
John Steketee |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA Section 15 |
|
Date of disclosure: |
06-08-95 |
|
Date of resolution: |
07-13-98 |
|
How resolved: |
CACO |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% ($1,247,460) |
|
Additional notes: |
On July 13, 1998, Region 5 filed a Consent Agreement and Consent Order
resolving 161 alleged violations of the Toxic Substances Control Act and the PCB regulation. The violations had been self-disclosed to the Agency by the East Ohio Gas Company (EOG). Pursuant to U.S. EPAs Self-Disclosure Policy, Region V reduced the gravity portion of the proposed civil penalty of $1,247,460 by 100% and required EOG to pay a penalty of $193,260, which represented the economic benefit to EOG of the disclosed violations. As part of the settlement, EOG also certified that is currently in compliance with TSCA. |
|
 |
 |
| North Star Steel |
Location: |
Monroe, Michigan |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Christine Liszewski |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
CAA, CWA, RCRA, EPCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
05-16-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
06-23-98 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
Case resolved with letter. No formal complaint was filed, and no violations were pursued (in essence, due to the company's satisfying the criteria set forth in EPA's audit policy, EPA decided not to bring a case at all against the company). |
| North Star Steel |
Location: |
St. Paul, Minnesota |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Christine Liszewski |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
CAA, CWA, RCRA, EPCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
05-16-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
06-23-98 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
Case resolved with letter. No formal complaint was filed, and no violations were pursued (in essence, due to the company's satisfying the criteria set forth in EPA's audit policy, EPA decided not to bring a case at all against the company). |
| North Star Steel |
Location: |
Youngstown, Ohio |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Christine Liszewski |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
CAA, CWA, RCRA, EPCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
05-16-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
06-23-98 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
Case resolved with letter. No formal complaint was filed, and no violations were pursued (in essence, due to the company's satisfying the criteria set forth in EPA's audit policy, EPA decided not to bring a case at all against the company). |
| Republic Engineered Steels |
Location: |
Canton, Ohio |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Christine Liszewski |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
CAA, CWA, RCRA, EPCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
02-25-97, 04-21-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
06-23-98 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
Case resolved with letter. No formal complaint was filed, and no violations were pursued (in essence, due to the company's satisfying the criteria set forth in EPA's audit policy, EPA decided not to bring a case at all against the company). |
| Slater Steels, Inc. |
Location: |
Fort Wayne, Indiana |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Christine Liszewski |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
CWA, RCRA |
| Ft. Wayne Specialty Alloys Division |
Date of disclosure: |
04-30-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
06-10-98 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
Case resolved with letter. No formal complaint was filed, and no violations were pursued (in essence, due to the company's satisfying the criteria set forth in EPA's audit policy, EPA decided not to bring a case at all against the company). |
|
 |
 |
| Consolidated Container Corp. |
Location: |
Minneapolis, Minnesota |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Roger Grimes |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA (non-313) |
|
Date of disclosure: |
01-28-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
04-10-98 |
|
How resolved: |
Issuance of NOV |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% ($68,760) |
|
Additional notes: |
Self-disclosure indicated that entity had violated EPCRA in ten separate ways, but had corrected all ten violations promptly and in accordance with Self-Disclosure Policy. It was determined that 100% of penalty that would have been sought would be eliminated. |
| Austeel Lemont Co., Inc. |
Location: |
Illinois |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Christine Liszewski |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
CWA, RCRA, CAA, EPCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
07-11-97 |
|
Date of resolution: |
03-31-98 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
Case resolved with letter. No formal complaint was filed, and no violations were pursued (in essence, due to the company's satisfying the criteria set forth in EPA's audit policy, EPA decided not to bring a case at all against the company). |
| Olin Corporation |
Location: |
East Alton, Illinois |
| 75% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Gaylene Vasaturo |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
RCRA, Section 3008 |
|
Date of disclosure: |
111-22-96 |
|
Date of resolution: |
01-08-98 |
|
How resolved: |
CACO |
|
% GPB reduced: |
75% |
|
Additional notes: |
Administrative Complaint & Proposed Penalty Order issued 10-24-97. Olin signed a CACO on 12-18-97, in which it consented to a civil penalty in the amount of $23,699. |
| INX International Ink Company |
Location: |
Elk Grove Village, Illinois |
| 75% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Thor Ketzback |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA Section 312 |
|
Date of disclosure: |
12-19-95 |
|
Date of resolution: |
September 1997 |
|
How resolved: |
CACO |
|
% GPB reduced: |
75% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
| Armstrong World Industries |
Location: |
Hilliard, Ohio |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
John Steketee |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA Section 312 |
|
Date of disclosure: |
05-03-96 |
|
Date of resolution: |
07-02-97 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
|
 |
 |
| Thomas Saginaw Ball Screw |
Location: |
Saginaw, Michigan |
| $5,000 penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Janice Loughlin |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
EPCRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
11-92 |
|
Date of resolution: |
02-21-96 |
|
How resolved: |
CACO |
|
% GPB reduced: |
$5,000 (percent unavailable) |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
| Stepan Company |
Location: |
Chicago, Illinois |
| 20% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Richard Wagner |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
FIFRA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
04-08-94 |
|
Date of resolution: |
08-25-95 |
|
How resolved: |
CACO |
|
% GPB reduced: |
20% ($2800) |
|
Additional notes: |
A subsequent violation was also disclosed in 11-94. |
| Midwestern Machinery |
Location: |
Minneapolis, Minnesota |
| 100% penalty reduction |
Attorney contact: |
Unknown/Program: R. Tanasijevich |
|
Relevant statute(s): |
TSCA |
|
Date of disclosure: |
Not available |
|
Date of resolution: |
05-23-95 |
|
How resolved: |
Letter |
|
% GPB reduced: |
100% |
|
Additional notes: |
None. |
|
 |
 |