|
|
|||||||||
|
American Heritage Rivers Keystone Project Proposals 2002TABLE OF CONTENTSBlackstone-Woonasquatucket River
Upper Susquehanna-Lackawanna Rivers
Summary of Champion Agencies by Project for All AHRI Rivers 116 IntroductionThe first set of Keystone Project Proposals for the American Heritage Rivers Initiative (AHRI) were prepared in 2000 to stimulate activity among participants in each designated watershed, and to provide tangible results from focused federal assistance called for in Executive Order 13061 which established the Initiative. Beyond celebrating their successes in partnership building and planning, river communities wanted help securing the needed funds or cutting through red-tape in the federal bureaucracy for specific important projects that focused on one or more of the three legs of the AHRI stool-environmental protection, historical/cultural preservation and economic development. Following the development of project proposals, champion agencies were identified, and a working group was developed to facilitate the completion of the projects. Many of the Keystone Projects proposed in 2000 have been accomplished, and some are partially implemented. The AHRI 2002 Annual Report, Rivers Uniting Communities, details these accomplishments. Again in 2002, community partners and their River Navigators have identified projects to enhance the rivers and quality of life in each community. This report, a compilation of the second round of proposals for all 14 rivers, spans as wide a range of projects as the rivers are different. It is divided into sections by river, and cross-referenced at the end by federal champion agency. Some project proposals are continuations of activities already underway, while others are in the early stages of development. Therefore, the level of detail as to participants, costs, and other items varies substantially among the proposals. Overall, these "Keystones" are the top priorities of AHRI river communities on which they expect Federal agency partners to focus. The Keystone process is the single most important mechanism for translating local needs into Federal action under AHRI. The AHRI Federal Interagency Working Group has developed a process to work with each river community as they jointly develop a team of the appropriate partners to implement each Keystone project proposal, shown on the next page. It is expected that these project proposals are starting points, and they will undergo adjustments and refinements as the AHRI Task Force and Working Group work with the River Navigators and community partners to shepherd the projects toward implementation. The river communities look forward to suggestions on how to improve the proposals or better describe the projects, and thoughts on which federal partner might be the best one to champion each project. It may require a back and forth process to map the best course through the many available federal agency programs and other mechanisms to implement each proposal. Process for implementing the 2002 KeystonesRiver Navigators assist river communities as they identify the Keystone Projects from their Plans of Action. River Navigators forward Keystone Projects to AHR Task Force. The Task Force distributes the Keystone Projects to the Working Group. The Working Group (WG) reviews the projects and assigns one or two WG members as leads for each project (generally, an employee of the Champion agency identified by the sponsors). A contact group is formed for each project consisting of the project lead from the Champion agency and representatives of other champion partner agencies, if identified in the keystone project proposal. The contact group may include agency people in field and regional offices and may need to obtain input from the entire WG. Contact groups meet and review their proposals to understand the funding and assistance needs of each, identify barriers to their implementation, recommend how they may be strengthened, and identify the necessary actions. Project leads provide feedback to the River Navigators to clarify issues and strengthen the proposals. For example, they may suggest that the River Navigators and Community Partners submit their proposal at the field or regional level where funding decisions are made, or suggest a project will get attention but not in the current funding cycle. Contact groups may decide from the start to have the River Navigator and appropriate local partners participating in all their discussions by conference call. The AHRI Interagency Committee meets to discuss projects and review progress. These Principals may request that the Principal Deputies Committee monitor the progress of implementing Keystone projects and update the Principals at every Interagency Committee meeting. The Principals (or their deputies) will be asked to concur with Champion assignments, suggest improvements in the process, and recommend additional or revised actions. Champions promote their projects in funding and assisting agencies, using top-down and bottom-up methods, as appropriate. They avoid undue pressure and embarrassment on any decision-maker in the hierarchy. They are expected to seek priority for focused federal assistance on these projects, in whatever way can be accomplished within established rules and regulations. The Working Group and Task Force work together to monitor progress and report back to the Principals and their deputies.
|
|
|
||
|
|