Skip common site navigation and headers
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Ground Water & Drinking Water
Begin Hierarchical Links EPA Home > Water > Ground Water & Drinking Water > Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List > Perchlorate > Teleconference on Perchlorate with Tribal Environmental Representative End Hierarchical Links

 

Teleconference on Perchlorate with Tribal Environmental Representative

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION 9

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 May 6, 1998MEMORANDUMSUBJECT: Teleconference on Perchlorate with Tribal Environmental RepresentativeFROM: Kevin P. Mayer, H-6-4TO: Perchlorate Steering Committee Tribal Participants Keith Takata, Director, Region 9 Superfund Division


On April 24th, we held a teleconference with Matt Leivas (Chemehuevi), Connor Byestewa(CRIT), John Swenson (Cocopah), Dr. Karen Medville (ASU, Intertribal Science Advisor) andmyself to discuss perchlorate issues critical to Native American Tribes.

Communication was the principle concern expressed:

1) EPA and the California web site give the impression that perchlorate contamination of water supplies is an extensive, serious problem. There is no indication that tribes in California other than those along the Colorado River have been made aware of the issue by either federal or state officials.

2) It is apparent that state and local agencies and water suppliers were identified as important stakeholders very early in the process while tribes were not initially considered.

3) Even after the tribes were contacted, the level of involvement has not been adequate. A primary example is the scheduling conflict between the Stakeholder Forum in Henderson and the National T~bal Environmental Council meeting on the exact same dates. The tribal representatives strongly recommended another stakeholders meeting at a later date to allow full participation by the tribes.

4) Input from tribes was not solicited for the report to congress on perchlorate issues (due April 27) nor for the perchlorate conference background papers. EPA should provide these documents to the tribes as soon as they are released and be prepared to incorporate tribal issues in subsequent documents.

5) There is no evidence of participation by Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Indian Health Service or the Bureau of Reclamation.

6) The tribes requested a list of names, phone numbers and addresses of the participants in the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee

Attendance at Henderson

Key environmental people from several of the tribes along the Colorado River will be unable to attend the Henderson Stakeholders Forum. Many tribes have only one senior environmentalofficial who would be able to fully participate and contribute on technical aspects of perchlorateeffects on tribal resources. In addition to providing meeting proceedings, there should be afollow-up meeting for tribes to allow interchange with the range of agencies and scientificdisciplines present at the stakeholders forum.

Resources for sampling and interpretation of technical results are needed by the tribes. TheChemehuevi spent tribal resources to test their water supplies for perchlorate and confirmed thepresence of perchlorate at about 7 ppb in Lake Havasu. None of the other tribes have had theirwater tested for perchlorate. The non-detect results from Yuma need to be confirmed.

Other Priorities The tribes recognize that EPA and the other agencies place a high importance on researching thetoxicity of perchlorate inhuman drinking water and on developing treatment technologies.However, after these two priorities there appears to be a sharp drop-off in commitment to studysome issues important to the tribes. Among the information needs are: Analysis of perchlorate uptake and translocation into irrigated crops Research on a range of agricultural effects (e.g., productivity, accumulation in soil) Effects on fish and wildlife. Other potential and perceived effects on recreational use of the river. Recreation impacts (on fishing, swimming, boating) are a very high concern not only for protection of tribal members but for the important recreational and resort business.

Position statements Some discussion was held concerning the most effective way of communicating the needs of thevarious tribes. There is no single spokesperson for the tribes since they are different entities withdifferent concerns that do not always overlap. At least one tribe is planning to write a letterstating that tribe's position. This letter will be available to be presented at the HendersonStakeholder's Forum, and I committed to reading it to the attendees. Letters to elected officialsand to Carol Browner were also mentioned for prioritizing resources to perchlorate issues.



Safewater Home | About Our Office | Publications | Links | Office of Water | En Español

 
Begin Site Footer

EPA Home | Privacy and Security Notice | Contact Us