Jump to main content.


Making the Program Faster, Fairer, and More Efficient (Continued)


4-1 | 4-2 | 4-3 | 4-4 | 4-5 | 4-6 | 4-7 | 4-8 | 4-9 | 4-10 | 4-11 | 4-12 | 4-13 | 4-14 | 4-15 | 4-16 | 4-17

ENHANCING CLEANUP EFFECTIVENESS AND CONSISTENCY
EPA has initiated several ongoing reforms to ensure that cleanups are cost-effective and reflect the most recent advances in science and technology. Partially because of these reforms, three times as many Superfund sites have been cleaned up in the past seven years than in all the prior years of the program combined.

Some of the more significant advances in cleanup effectiveness and consistency are described below.

An Example of Innovative Technology and Cost Savings in Indiana

At the Seymour Recycling site in Indiana, bio-remediation, an innovative technology, resulted in significant cost savings. During actions to remove the immediate threat posed by the site, EPA discovered that bacteria were naturally aiding in the remediation of soils on-site. The remedial design accommodated this discovery by relocating a planned ground water treatment works one-third of a mile downslope to utilize the bio-remedial activities occurring naturally in the soil. By taking advantage of this natural process, EPA could construct a smaller ground water treatment facility, which resulted in substantial savings.

Implementing Technological Innovations
SARA established a preference for treatment of hazardous wastes and created a demand for alternatives to land disposal. New innovative treatment technologies grew from this demand to provide more permanent, less costly solutions, for dealing with contaminated materials.

The Superfund Innovative Technology Evaluation (SITE) Program was established to meet this increased demand for alternative technologies. The SITE Program has provided demonstrations of new technologies at particular sites, resulting in average cost savings of over 70 percent per site. The total cost savings for innovative treatment as opposed to conventional treatment is estimated at $2.1 billion.

De-watering at Velsicol Chemical Corp. site in Michigan
De-watering at Velsicol Chemical Corp. site in Michigan

Superfund's Technology Innovation Office works to break down barriers to using new technologies by providing a wealth of technical information, including:

Related Links

Technology Innovation Office Home Page
CLU-IN
EPA REACH IT
Federal Remediation Technologies Roundtable

EPA has worked to form several partnerships to improve the coordination of research and development efforts between academia, private industry, and the Federal government. They include: an industry/government partnership to find innovative solutions to high priority problems; a petroleum refinery partnership for improved solutions for ground water contamination; a partnership with State dry cleaners cleanup programs; and an interagency partnership to collaborate across the Federal government on technology demonstrations and evaluations.

Construction of protective cap at Tulalip Landfill site in Washington
Construction of protective cap at Tulalip Landfill site in Washington

EPA also promotes the research and development of innovative technologies by sharing the risk with PRPs who select remedies employing low-cost, high performance technologies. EPA will "underwrite" these innovative approaches by agreeing to reimburse up to 50 percent of the cost if the innovative remedy fails and a subsequent remedy is required.

These risk-sharing agreements work. At the Douglassville Disposal site in Pennsylvania, EPA amended an incineration remedy to a chemical dehalogenation remedy using lime-based stabilization. The use of this innovative technology resulted in savings of $36 million.

Technologies Used to Make Sites Safe

Today, there are as many ways to clean up a Superfund site as there are types of sites. EPA tailors the techniques and technologies to community needs and to the individual problems posed by different areas of a site. Here are some of the cleanup techniques that EPA developed to make sure that all areas of a site are safe:

  • REMOVAL: Physically removing toxic contaminants from the site to a facility that can safely handle the waste.

  • TREATMENT: Treating the waste at the site to remove the toxic contaminants from the soil, sediment, or ground water.

  • RECYCLING: Treating or converting toxic waste material to make it safe and reusing it for other purposes.

  • CONTAINMENT: Placing covers over or barriers around waste to prevent migration and to keep people from coming into contact with the waste.

  • SOLIDIFICATION: Physically binding or enclosing toxic contaminants within a stabilized mass like cement.

  • STABILIZATION: Inducing chemical reactions between a stabilizing agent (such as lime, Portland cement, fly ash, or kiln dust) and the contaminants to reduce their mobility.

  • BIOREMEDIATION: Breaking down toxic contaminants by using natural microorganisms.

  • CHEMICAL TRANSFORMATION: Detoxifying contaminants by transforming their chemical structure.

  • NATURAL ATTENUATION: Using natural biotransformation processes such as dilution, dispersion, volatilization, biodegradation, adsorption, and chemical reactions to reduce contaminant concentrations to acceptable levels.

  • INCINERATION: Using extremely high temperatures (1,600-2,200°F) to render organic contaminants harmless.


Page 4-9  

«--  Back | Top | Next  --»
20 Years of Protecting Human Health and the Environment

 

OSWER Home | Superfund Home | Innovative Technologies Home.


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.