Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us


    1. The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, 1969: United States.
    2. Executive Order 13514: Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy and Economic Performance, 2009, Federal Register.
    3. USDA, National Report on Sustainable Forests-2010, June 2011, Forest Service.
    4. Holdren, J.P., Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-being. Science, 2008. 319(5862): p. 424-434.
    5. Kastenhofer, K. and C. Rammel, Obstacles to and potentials of the societal implementation of sustainable development: a comparative analysis of two case studies. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2005. 1(2): p. 5-13.
    6. World Commission on Environment and Development, Our Common Future. 1987, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    7. Nations, U., 2005 World Summit Outcome: 60/1, in Resolution adopted by the General Assembly2005, United Nations.
    8. Office of Government Commerce, Sustainability, in Achieving Excellence in Construction Procurement Guide2007, Office of Government Commerce: London, United Kingdom.
    9. Adams, W.M., The future of sustainability: Re-thinking environment and development in the twenty-first century, in Thinkers Meeting, January 29-31, 20062006, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources.
    10. Schoolman, E.D., et al., How interdisciplinary is sustainability research? Analyzing the structure of an emerging scientific field. Sustainability Science, 2012. 7(1): p. 67-80.
    11. Bettencourt, L.M.A. and J. Kaur, Evolution and structure of sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2011. 108(49): p. 19540-19545.
    12. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, World conservation strategy: Living resource conservation for sustainable development, 1980, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: Gland, Switzerland.
    13. Kates, R.W., et al., Sustainability science. Science, 2001. 292(5517): p. 641-642.
    14. Clark, W.C. and N.M. Dickson, Sustainability science: The emerging research program. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003. 100(14): p. 8059-8061.
    15. Parris, T.M. and R.W. Kates, Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2003. 28: p. 559-586.
    16. Meadows, D., Thinking in Systems: A primer, ed. D. Wright. 2008, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing Company. 240.
    17. Holling, C.S., Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems, 2001. 4(5): p. 390-405.
    18. Fiksel, J., et al., The triple value model: A systems approach for sustainable solutions. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 2012 Forthcoming.
    19. Bruins, R.J.F., et al., A new process for organizing assessments of social, economic, and environmental outcomes: Case study of wildland fire management in the USA. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2010. 6(3): p. 469-483.
    20. U.S. EPA, Guidance on the development, evaluation, and application of environmental models, Office of the Science Advisor. Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling., Editor 2009, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    21. EPA, U.S., Community Engagement Initiative: Implementation Plan 1.0, OSWER, Editor 2010, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    22. U.S. EPA, EPA Customer Service Plan, 2011, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    23. EPA, U.S., Community Engagement Initiative: Action Plan, OSWER, Editor 2010, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    24. U.S. EPA, Public Involvement Policy of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Policy, Editor 2003, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    25. Fawcett, S.B., et al., Using empowerment theory in collaborative partnerships for community health and development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1995. 23(5): p. 677-697.
    26. U.S. EPA, EPA's Environmental Justice Collaborative Problem-Solving Model, Office of Environmental Justice, Editor 2008, U.S. EPA,: Washington, DC.
    27. U.S. EPA, Integrated Modeling for Integrated Environmental Decision Making: White Paper, Office of the Science Advisor. Office of Research and Development and Chesapeake Bay Program Office., Editor 2008, U.S. EPA,: Washington, DC.
    28. National Research Council, Sustainability and the U.S. EPA, 2011, The National Academies: Washington, DC.
    29. U.S. EPA, Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses, National Center for Environmental Economics. Office of Policy, Editor 2010, U.S. EPA,: Washington, DC.
    30. Feather, P., D. Hellerstein, and T. Tomasi, A discrete-count model of recreational demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995. 29(2): p. 214-227.
    31. Hilger, J. and W.M. Hanneman, The Impact of Water Quality on Southern California Beach Recreation: A Finite Mixture Model Approach (CUDARE Working Papers 1074), in CUDARE Working Papers2008, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics & Policy: Berkeley, CA.
    32. Leggett, C.G. and N.E. Bockstael, Evidence of the effects of water quality on fesidential land rrices. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2000. 39(2): p. 121-144.
    33. Poor, P.J., et al., Objective versus subjective measures of water clarity in hedonic property value models. Land Economics, 2001. 77(4): p. 482-493.
    34. Paterson, R.W. and K.J. Boyle, Out of sight, out of mind? Using GIS to incorporate visibility in hedonic property value models. Land Economics, 2002. 78(3): p. 417-425.
    35. Geoghehan, J., L.A. Wainger, and N.E. Bockstael, Spatial landscape indices in a hedonic framework: An ecological economics analysis using GIS. Ecological Economics, 1997. 23(3): p. 251-264.
    36. Wilson, M.A. and S.R. Carpenter, Economic valuation of freshwater ecosystem services in the United States: 1971-1997. Ecological Applications, 1999. 9(3): p. 772-783.
    37. Barkmann, J., et al., Confronting unfamiliarity with ecosystem functions: The case for an ecosystem service approach to environmental valuation with stated preference methods. Ecological Economics, 2008. 65(1): p. 48-62.
    38. Freeman, A.M., The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Methods. Second Edition. ed. 2003, Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
    39. Executive Order 12291: Federal Regulation, 1981, Federal Register: United States.
    40. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review, 1993, Federal Register: United States.
    41. U.S. EPA. Partnership on Flame Retardant Alternatives for Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). Design for the Environment: An EPA Partnership Program 2011; Available from: http://epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/hbcd/index.htm.
    42. Office of Management and Budget, Regulatory Analysis, 2003, Office of Management and Budget,: Washington, DC.
    43. U.S. EPA, The benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act, 1970 to 1990: Prepared for U.S. Congress, Office of Air and Radiation. Office of Policy., Editor 1997, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    44. U.S. EPA, The Benefits and costs of the Clean Air Act 1990 to 2010: EPA Report to Congress, Office of Air and Radiation. Office of Policy., Editor 1999, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    45. U.S. EPA, The Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act from 1990 to 2020: Final Report, Office of Air and Radiation, Editor 2011, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    46. Moller, A. and S. Schaltegger, The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco-efficiency analysis. Journal of Industiral Ecology, 2005. 9(4): p. 73-83.
    47. Brattebø, H., Toward a methods framework for eco-efficiency analysis? Journal of Industiral Ecology, 2005. 9(4): p. 9-11.
    48. McDonough Braungart Design Chemistry, Sustainable Business: Minimization vs. Optimization, 2010: Charlottesville, VA.
    49. National Council for Advanced Manufacturing, The NACFAM Sustainability Framework Model, 2010.
    50. BASF Chemical Corp. Eco-Efficiency Analysis. 2011; Available from: http://www.basf.com/group/corporate/en/sustainability/eco-efficiency-analysis/index. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    51. Lehni, M. and J. Pepper, Eco-efficiency: Creating more value with less impact, 2000, World Business Council for Sustainable Development: North Yorkshire, UK.
    52. BASF Chemical Corp. Eco-Efficiency Analysis. 2012; Available from: http://www.basf.com/group/corporate/en/sustainability/eco-efficiency-analysis/eco-efficiency-analysis. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    53. Bohne, R.A., H. Brattebø, and H. Bergsdal, Dynamic eco-efficiency projections for construction and demolition waste recycling strategies at the city level. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008. 12(1): p. 52-68.
    54. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacific (UNESCAP). Environment and Development Division., Eco-Efficiency Indicators: Measuring Resource-use Efficiency and the Impact of Economic Activities on the Environment, 2010, United Nations.
    55. Saling, P., et al., Eco-efficiency analysis by BASF: The method. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2002. 7(4): p. 203-218.
    56. Kuosmanen, T., Measurement and analysis of eco-efficiency: An economist's perspective. Journal of Industiral Ecology, 2005. 9(4): p. 15-18.
    57. Verfaillie, H. and R. Bidwell, Measuring eco-efficiency: A guide to reporting company performance, 2000, World Business Council for Sustainable Development
    58. Papmehl, A., The Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line. (Book Review). CMA Management, 2003. May.
    59. U.S. EPA, "Green Servicizing" for a More Sustainable US Economy: Key concepts, tools and analyses to inform policy engagement, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Editor 2009, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    60. U.S. EPA, Valuing the Protection of Ecological Systems and Services: A Report of the EPA Science Advisory Board, Office of the Administrator. Science Advisory Board., Editor 2009, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    61. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis, 2005, World Resources Institute: Washington, DC.
    62. Scarlett, P.L. and J.W. Boyd, Ecosystem Services: Quantification, Policy Applications, and Current Federal Capabilities, in RFF Discussion Paper 11-132011, Resources for the Future: Washington, DC.
    63. Industrial Economics Inc., Unpublished White Paper.
    64. Costanza, R., et al., The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 1997. 387(6630): p. 253-260.
    65. Bockstael, N.E., et al., On measuring economic values for nature. Environmental Science and Technology, 2000. 34(8): p. 1384-1389.
    66. U.S. EPA. Benefits and Costs of the Clean Air Act. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/air/sect812/index.html.
    67. Vincent, J.R., Green accounting: From theory to practice. Environment and Development Economics, 2000. 5(1): p. 13-24.
    68. Hecht, J.E., Environmental accounting: Where we are now, where we are heading. Resources, 1999. Spring(135): p. 14-17.
    69. United Nations Environment Programme. Environmental and economic accounting. 2012; Available from: http://www.unep.ch/etb/areas/valuationEnvAcc.php. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    70. Muller, N.Z., R. Mendelsohn, and W. Nordhaus, Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. The American Economic Review, 2011. 101(5): p. 1649-1675.
    71. United Nations, Handbook of national accounting: Integrated environmental and economic accounting, in Studies in Methods2003, United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank.
    72. Nordhaus, W.D. and E.C. Kokkelenberg, Nature's numbers: Expanding the national economic accounts to include the environment. 1999, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
    73. Hecht, J.E., Environmental Accounting: What's It All About?, 1997, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), The World Conservation Union: Washington, DC.
    74. Council, N.R., Hidden costs of energy: Unpriced consequences of energy production and use. 2010, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    75. U.S. EPA. Environmental Accounting Project. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/ppic/pubs/busmgt.pdf (PDF) (26 pp, 206K).
    76. National Policy Consensus Center. Community Sustainability. 2012; Available from: http://www.policyconsensus.org/issues/sustainability.html. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    77. U.S. EPA, Environmental justice collaborative problem solving cooperative agreement program: FY2003-2004 awards, 2004, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    78. U.S. EPA. Environmental justice: Federal interagency working group on environmental justice. 2012; Available from: http://epa.gov/compliance/ej/interagency/.
    79. Lennertz, B., A. Lutzenhiser, and T. Failor, An introduction to charrettes. National Charrette Institute. Planning Commissioners Journal,, 2008. 71.
    80. U.S. EPA, The charrette: Redevelopment by design: An introduction to reuse planning workshops for Superfund sites, Conflict Prevention and Resolution Center, Editor 2010, U.S. EPA,: Washington, DC.
    81. U.S. EPA. International programs: Public participation guide. 2012; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/international/public-participation-guide/index.html.
    82. U.S. EPA, Partnerships for sustainable communities:South Lincoln redevelopment project lessons learned report, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Office of Brownfields and Land Revitalization., Editor 2011, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    83. U.S. EPA, EPA's Action Development Process: Interim Guidance on Considering Environmental Justice During the Development of an Action, 2010, OPEI Regulatory Development Series, Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation.
    84. Clinton, W.J., Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations (Presidential Memorandum Accompanying Executive Order 12898), Office of the President, Editor 1994: Washington, DC.
    85. Cole, L.W. and S.R. Foster, From the Ground Up: Environmental Racism and the Rise of the Environmental Justice Movement. 2001, New York, NY: New York University Press.
    86. Ringquist, E.J., Assessing evidence of environmental inequalities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2005. 24(2): p. 223-247.
    87. Brulle, R.J. and D.N. Pellow, Environmental justice: Human health and environmental inequalities. Annual Review of Public Health, 2006. 27: p. 103-124.
    88. Liu, F., Environmental Justice Analysis: Theories, Methods, and Practice. 2001, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.
    89. U.S. EPA, An update on ongoing and future EPA actions to empower communities and advance the integration of environmental justice in decision making and research, Office of Environmental Justice. Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance., Editor 2011, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    90. Council on Environmental Quality, Environmental justice: Guidance under the National Environmental Policy Act, Executive Office of the President, Editor 1997, White House: Washington, DC.
    91. U.S. EPA, Final guidance for consideration of environmental justice in Clean Air Act 309 reviews, Office of Federal Activities, Editor 1999, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    92. U.S. EPA, Final guidance for incorporating environmental justice concerns in EPA's NEPA compliance analyses, Office of Federal Activities, Editor 1998, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    93. U.S. EPA, Plan EJ 2014: Science tools development: Implementation plan, Office of Research and Development, Editor 2011, U.S. EPA,: Washington, DC.
    94. Federal Geographic Data Committee. Geospatial platform. 2011; Available from: http://www.geoplatform.gov/.
    95. U.S. EPA, Urban atlas will help foster community sustainability, Office of Research and Development, Editor 2011, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    96. U.S. EPA. Modeling at EPA. 2012; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/epahome/models.htm.
    97. U.S. EPA, Beyond the horizon: Using foresight to protect the environmental future, Science Advisory Board. Environmental Futures Committee., Editor 1995, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    98. U.S. EPA, Shaping our environmental future: Foresight in the Office of Research and Development, Office of Research and Development. Office of Science Policy, Editor 2007, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    99. Schoemaker, P.J.H., Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. MIT Sloan Management Review, 1995. 36(2): p. 25-40.
    100. Swart, R.J., P. Raskin, and J. Robinson, The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change, 2004. 14(2): p. 137-146.
    101. Glenn, J.C. and T.J. Gordon, Futures Research Methodology Version 3.0, 2009, The Mellennium Project.
    102. Peterson, G.D., G.S. Cumming, and S.R. Carpenter, Scenario planning: A tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology, 2003. 17(2): p. 358-366.
    103. Rowe, G. and G. Wright, The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 1999. 15(4): p. 353-375.
    104. Mietzner, D. and G. Reger, Advantages and disadvantages of scenario approaches for strategic foresight. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2005. 1(2): p. 220-239.
    105. Olson, B. and A. Street, Foresight: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2002, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    106. Gunther, R., et al., 2015: Scenarios for the future of human resource management, 2005, Society for Human Resource Management: Alexandria, VA.
    107. KPMG, Expect the unexpected: Building business value in a changing world, 2012, KPMG International.
    108. Siddiqui, A.S. and C. Marnay, Addressing an uncertain future using scenario analysis, Environmental Energy. Technologies Division., Editor 2006, U.S. Department of Energy. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Berkeley, CA.
    109. World Health Organization. Gothenburg Consensus Statement. 1999; Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/en/what-we-do/health-topics/environmental-health/health-impact-assessment. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    110. Quigley, R., et al., Health impact assessment: International best practice principles, in Special Publication Series No. 52006, International Association for Impact Assessment,: Fargo, ND.
    111. International Finance Corporation, Introduction to health impact assessment, 2009, International Finance Corporation: Washington, DC.
    112. Bhatia, R., A guide for health impact assessment, California Department of Public Health, Editor 2010, California Department of Public Health: San Francisco, CA.
    113. Human Impact Partners, A Health Impact Assessment Toolkit: A Handbook to Conducting HIA, 3rd Edition, 2011, Human Impact Partners: Oakland, CA.
    114. World Health Organization. Health Impact Assessment: About HIA. 2011; Available from: http://www.who.int/hia/en/. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    115. National Research Council. National research council provides guidance on use of health impact assessment. 2011; Available from: http://www.rwjf.org/publichealth/product.jsp?id=72817. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    116. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health impact assessment. 2011; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/healthyplaces/hia.htm.
    117. Dannenberg, A.L., et al., Use of health impact assessment in the U.S: 27 Case Studies, 1999-2007. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2008. 34(3): p. 241-256.
    118. U.S. EPA. Scoping a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. 2009; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/region9/nepa/PortsHIA/index.html.
    119. Human Impact Partners, Los Angeles and Long Beach maritime port HIA scope: Working Draft, 2010, Human Impact Partners.
    120. Grunig, J.E., Publics, audiences and market segments: Segmentation principles for campaigns, in Information Campaigns: Balancing Social Values and Social Change, C.T. Salmon, Editor. 1989, Sage Publications, Inc.: Newbury Park, CA. p. 199-228.
    121. McKenzie-Mohr, D., New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: Promoting sustainable behavior: An introduction to community-based social marketing. Journal of Social Issues, 2000. 56(3): p. 543-554.
    122. USEPA and USEDOE. Energy Star. 2011; Available from: http://www.energystar.gov.
    123. U.S. EPA. Sunwise: A program that radiates good ideas. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/sunwise/.
    124. Interorganizational Committee on Guidelines and Principles for Social Impact Assessment. Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment. 1994; Available from: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/social_impact_guide.htm.
    125. Vanclay, F., International principles for social impact assessment: Their evolution. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 2003. 21(1): p. 5-11.
    126. Vanclay, F., Conceptual and methodological advances in social impact assessment, in The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances, H.A. Becker and F. Vanclay, Editors. 2003, Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.: Cheltenham. p. 1-12.
    127. Turnley, J.G., Assessing social impacts in the Superfund process: Final, Office of Superfund Remediation Technology Innovation, Editor 2004, Galisteo Consulting Group Inc.: Albuquerque, NM.
    128. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA/NMFS Council operational guidelines – Fishery management process.Appendix 2(g): Guidelines for assessment of the social impact of fishery management actions, U.S. Department of Commerce, Editor 2007.
    129. Becker, H.A., Theory formation and application in social impact assessment, in The International Handbook of Social Impact Assessment: Conceptual and Methodological Advances, H.A. Becker and F. Vanclay, Editors. 2003, Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.: Cheltenham. p. 129-142.
    130. Sadler, B., et al., Topic 13: Social Impact Assessment, in UNEP Environmental Impact Assessment Training Resource Manual2002, United Nations Environmental Programme: Geneva. p. 461-490.
    131. Burdge, R.J. and F. Vanclay, Social impact assessment: A contribution to the state of the art series. Impact Assessment, 1996. 14(1): p. 59-86.
    132. Burdge, R.J. and F. Vanclay, Social impact assessment, in Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, F. Vanclay and D. Bronstein, Editors. 1995, Wiley: Chichester, United Kingdom. p. 31-65.
    133. U.S. Department of Commerce. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Marine Fisheries Service., NMFS strategic plan for fisheries research, U.S. Department of Commerce, Editor 2007, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration: Silver Spring, MD.
    134. Andrews, E.S., et al., Guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: Social and socio-economic LCA guidelines complementing environmental LCA and Life Cycle Costing, contributing to the full assessment of goods and services within the context of sustainable development., C. Benoit, Editor 2009, UNEP-SETAC Life Cycle Initiative.
    135. Wellman, B., Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance, in Social structures: A network approach, B. Wellman and S.D. Berkowitz, Editors. 1988, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge. p. 19-61.
    136. Borgatti, S.P., et al., Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 2009. 323(5916): p. 892-895.
    137. Reagans, R. and B. McEvily, Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003. 48(2): p. 240-267.
    138. Granovetter, M.S., The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 1973. 78(6): p. 1360-1380.
    139. Lavoie, E.T., et al., Chemical alternatives assessment: Enabling substitution to safer chemicals. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010. 44(24): p. 9244-9249.
    140. Eliason, P. Current Alternatives Assessment and Related Legislation. IC2 Safer Alternatives Assessment 2011; Available from: http://www.ic2saferalternatives.org/page/Current+Alternatives+Assessment+and+Related+Legislation. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    141. Clean Production Action. Principles for Safer Chemicals. BizNGO 2011; Available from: http://www.bizngo.org/guidingPrinciples.php. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    142. U.S. EPA. About Us. Design for the Environment: An EPA Partnership Program 2012; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/about/index.htm.
    143. U.S. EPA. Alternative Assessments. Design for the Environment: An EPA Partnership Program 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/dfe/alternative_assessments.html.
    144. U.S. EPA. BPA Alternatives in Thermal Paper Partnership. Design for the Environmenta: An EPA Partnership Program 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/bpa/index.htm.
    145. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Chapter 2: SIDS, the SIDS Plan, and the SIDS Dossier, in Manual for Investigation of HPV Chemicals2005, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    146. U.S. EPA, Design for the environment program alternatives assessment criteria for hazard evaluation: Version 2.0, Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics, Editor 2011, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    147. Rossi, M., J. Tickner, and K. Geiser, Alternatives assessment framework: Of the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production: Version 1.0, 2006, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production. University of Massachusetts Lowell. : Lowell, MA.
    148. U.S. EPA. High production volume (HPV) challenge. 2012; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/hpv/.
    149. U.S. EPA. Furniture Flame Retardancy Partnership. Design for the Environment: An EPA Partnership Program 2011; Available from: http://epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/flameret/index.htm.
    150. U.S. EPA. Flame Retardants in Printed Circuit Boards Partnership. Design for the Environment: An EPA Partnership Program 2011; Available from: http://epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/pcb/index.htm.
    151. U.S. EPA. Flame-Retardant Alternatives for DecaBDE Partnership. Design for the Environment: An EPA Partnership Program 2011; Available from: http://epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/decaBDE/index.htm.
    152. Global Footprint Network, National Footprint Accounts, 2010 Edition, 2010, Global Footprint Network: Oakland, CA.
    153. Fiksel, J., Analysis methods for design decisions, in Design for Environment: A Guide to Sustainable Product Development: Second Edition. 2009, McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.: New York, NY.
    154. Bringezu, S., H. Schutz, and S. Moll, Rationale for and interpretation of economy-wide materials flow analysis and derived indicators. Journal of Industiral Ecology, 2003. 7(2): p. 43-64.
    155. Schutz, H. and M.J. Welfens, Sustainable development by dematerialization in production and consumption - strategy for the new environmental policy in Poland, in Wuppertal Papers2000, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy Wuppertal, Germany.
    156. van der Voet, E., et al., Policy review on decoupling: Development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries, 2005, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy. CE Solution for Environment, Economy and Technology: Leiden, the Netherlands.
    157. Greenhouse Gas Protocol. The Greenhouse Gas Protocol. 2011; Available from: http://www.ghgprotocol.org/. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    158. Carbon Trust. Carbon footprinting. 2011; Available from: http://www.carbontrust.com/resources/reports/footprinting/carbon-footprinting. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    159. International Organization for Standardisation, Greenhouse gases – Part I: specification with guidance at the organization level for quantification and reporting of greenhouse gas emissions and removals, 2006, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.
    160. N-Print. Nitrogen Footprint Calculator. 2011; Available from: http://www.n-print.org/sites/n-print.org/files/footprint_sql/index.html#/home. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    161. International Nitrogen Initiative. International Nitrogen Initiative. 2011; Available from: http://initrogen.org/. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    162. Morrison, J., P. Schulte, and R. Schenck, Corporate water accounting: An analysis of methods and tools for measuring water use and its impacts, 2010, United Nations Environment Programme. Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics: Oakland, CA.
    163. Gerbens-Leenes, P.W. and A.Y. Hoekstra, Business water footprint accounting: A tool to assess how production of goods and services impacts on freshwater resources worldwide, in Value of Water Research Report Series2008, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. International Institute for Hydraulic and Environmental Engineering. Institute for Water Education.: Delft, the Netherlands.
    164. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Global Water Tool. 2011; Available from: http://www.wbcsd.org/work-program/sector-projects/water/global-water-tool.aspx. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    165. Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies. Water Impact Index. 2011; Available from: http://www.veoliawaterst.com/sustainability/water-footprint-indicator/. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    166. Reisinger, H., et al., Material flow analysis (MFA) for resource policy decision support: Position paper of the interest group on the sustainable use of natural resources on the needs for further development of MFA-based indicators, 2009, European Network of the Heads of Environment Protection Agencies.
    167. Water Footprint Network. Introduction. 2011; Available from: http://www.waterfootprint.org/ Exit EPA Disclaimer
    168. Ewing, B., et al., Ecological footprint atlas 2010, 2010, Global Footprint Network: Oakland, CA.
    169. Odelacy, D., Personal Communication. Office of Environment Health and Engineering. Indian Health Service, M. Naujokas, Editor 2011.
    170. U.S. EPA. Smart Growth: Project Summaries. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/sgia_communities.htm.
    171. U.S. EPA, Request for Quotation: Ecological Footprint analysis for California sustainability indicators suite, 2011, EPA Region 9.
    172. World Health Organization. International Programme on Chemical Safety., Human exposure assessment, in Environmental Health Criteria2000, United Nations Environment Programme. International Labour Organization. World Health Organization.: Geneva.
    173. Zartarian, V., T. Bahadori, and T. McKone, Adoption of an official ISEA glossary. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 2005. 15(1): p. 1-5.
    174. U.S. EPA, Guidelines for Exposure Assessment, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Editor 1992, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC. p. 22888-22938.
    175. U.S. EPA. What is Green Engineering. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/greenengineering/pubs/whats_ge.html.
    176. U.S. EPA. Green Chemistry Program at EPA. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/greenchemistry/pubs/epa_gc.html.
    177. Anastas, P.T. and J.B. Zimmerman, Design through the 12 Principles of Green Engineering. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003. 37(5): p. 94A-101A.
    178. Zimmerman, J.B. Design of Sustainable, Resilient Infrastructure Systems. in US-Japan Workshop on Life Cycle Assessment of Sustainable Infrastructure Materials. 2009. Sapporo, Japan.
    179. Mulholland, K.L., R.W. Sylvester, and J.A. Dyer, Sustainability: Waste minimization, green chemistry and inherently safer processing. Environmental Progress, 2000. 19(4): p. 260-268.
    180. Fiksel, J., A framework for sustainable materials management. Journal of Materials, 2006. 58(8): p. 15-22.
    181. U.S. EPA, Framework for an EPA chemical safety for sustainability research program, Office of Research and Development, Editor 2011, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    182. Anastas, P.T. and J.C. Warner, Green chemistry: Theory and practice. 1998, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    183. Anastas, P.T. and J.C. Warner, The 12 Principles of Green Chemistry, 1998, Yale University. Center for Green Chemistry & Green Engineering: New Haven, CT.
    184. CrossLab. Green Chemistry: E-Separation Solutions. 2009; Available from: http://chromatographyonline.findanalytichem.com/lcgc/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=626137. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    185. Lapkin, A. and D. Constable, eds. Green Chemistry Metrics: Measuring and Monitoring Sustainable Processes. 2009, John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, United Kingdom.
    186. U.S. EPA. Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/greenchemistry/pubs/pgcc/presgcc.html.
    187. U.S. EPA. EPA Projects and Programs. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/greenchemistry/pubs/programs.html.
    188. Fiksel, J., Design for Environment: A guide to sustainable product development: Second Edition. Second Edition ed. 2009, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
    189. Abraham, M.A. and N. Nguyen, "Green engineering: Defining the principles" - Results from the Sandestin Conference. Environmental Progress, 2003. 22(4): p. 233-236.
    190. McDonough, W., et al., Applying the principles of green engineering to cradle-to-cradle design. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003. 37(23): p. 434A-441A.
    191. U.S. EPA. Green Engineering: Industry. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/greenengineering/pubs/industry.html.
    192. National Research Council, Sustainability and the U.S. EPA. 2011, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    193. Lotze-Campen, H., Integrated models: Integrated assessment, 2011, IVM. Institute for Environmental Studies.
    194. Jakeman, A.J. and R.A. Letcher, Integrated assessment and modelling: features, principles and examples for catchment management. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2003. 18(6): p. 491-501.
    195. U.S. EPA. Framework for Risk Analysis of Multi-Media Environmental Systems (FRAMES). 2011; Available from: http://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=56091.
    196. Stahl, C., et al., Toward sustainability: A case study demonstrating transdisciplinary learning through the selection and use of indicators in a decision-making process. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2011. 7(3): p. 483-498.
    197. Industrial Economics, Inc., Narragansett Bay Sustainability Pilot Project: Phase I Report, 2011.
    198. Chesapeake Bay Program. Chesapeake Bay Program: Science, Restoration, and Partnership. 2011; Available from: http://www.chesapeakebay.net. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    199. U.S. EPA. Council for Regulatory Environmental Modeling. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/crem/.
    200. U.S. EPA, Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice, Office of Research and Development. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Editor 2006, U.S. EPA: Cincinnati, OH.
    201. Bare, J.C., et al., Midpoints versus endpoints: The sacrifices and benefits. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2000. 5(6): p. 319-326.
    202. National Institute of Building Sciences. Building for environmental and economic sustainability (BEES). Whole Building Design Guide 2011; Available from: http://www.wbdg.org/tools/bees.php. Exit EPA Disclaimer
    203. Curran, M.A., M. Mann, and G. Norris, The international workshop on electricity data for life cycle inventories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2005. 13(8): p. 853-862.
    204. International Organization for Standardisation, Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework, 2006, International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland.
    205. Rebitzer, G., et al., Life cycle assessment: Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications. Environment International, 2004. 30(5): p. 701-720.
    206. Lewandowska, A. and Z. Foltynowicz, New direction of development in environmental life cycle assessment. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 2004. 13(5): p. 463-466.
    207. U.S. EPA. Risk Management Air Research: Models and Databases. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/appcd/combustion/cec_models_dbases.html
    208. U.S. EPA. User's Guide for WARM. Climate Change - Waste 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/wycd/waste/calculators/Warm_UsersGuide.html.
    209. U.S. EPA. Clean Energy & Climate Change - Green Site Cleanups. Pacific Southwest, Region 9 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/region9/climatechange/green-sites.html.
    210. U.S. EPA. EPA lifecycle analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from renewable fuels. Fuels and Fuel Additives 2009; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/renewablefuels/420f10006.pdf.
    211. U.S. EPA. Sustainable materials management: The road ahead. Wastes - Information Resources 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/smm/vision.htm.
    212. Fiksel, J., Sustainability and resilience: Toward a systems approach. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 2006. 2(2): p. 14-21.
    213. Carpenter, S., et al., From metaphor to measuremen: Resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 2001. 4(8): p. 765-781.
    214. Vugrin, E.D., et al., Measurement of system resilience: Application to chemical supply chains, in Fourth Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Conference on Mathematics for Industry: Challenges and Frontiers2009, Society for Industiral and Applied Mathematics: San Francisco, CA.
    215. Gunderson, L.H. and C.S. Holling, eds. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. 2002, Island Press: Washington, DC.
    216. Walker, B. and D. Salt, Resilience Thinking: Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World. 2006, Washington, DC: Island Press.
    217. Fiksel, J., Designing resilient, sustainable systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003. 37(23): p. 5330-5339.
    218. Folke, C., Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 2006. 16(3): p. 253-267.
    219. Resilience Alliance, Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: Workbook for practitioners. Version 2.0, 2010, Resilience Alliance.
    220. Chen, Y., E.G. Irwin, and C. Jayaprakash, Dynamic modeling of environmental amenity-driven migration with ecological feedbacks. Ecological Economics, 2009. 68(10): p. 2498-2510.
    221. Walker, B., et al., Resilience, adaptability and tranformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 2004. 9(2): p. 5.
    222. Pettit, T.J., J. Fiksel, and K.L. Croxton, Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 2010. 31(1): p. 1-21.
    223. Korhonen, J. and T.P. Seager, Beyond eco-efficiency: a resilience perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2008. 17(7): p. 411-419.
    224. Holling, C.S., Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973. 4: p. 1-23.
    225. Resilience Alliance. Resilience Alliance: Research on resilience in social-ecological systems - a basis for sustainability. 2011; Available from: http://www.resalliance.org/.
    226. National Research Council, Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment. 2009, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    227. Bahr, N.J., System Safety Engineering and Risk Assessment: A Practical Approach. 1997, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
    228. Landoll, D.J., The Security Risk Assessment Handbook: A Complete Guide for Performing Security Risk Assessment. 2006, Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications.
    229. Hiles, A., ed. The Definitive Handbook of Business Continuity Management: Third Edition. 2011, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.: West Sussex, United Kingdom.
    230. Stewart, M.G. and R.E. Melchers, Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Engineering Systems. 1997, London, United Kingdom: Chapman & Hall.
    231. U.S. EPA, Child-specific exposure factors handbook (Final Report), Office of Research and Development. National Center for Environmental Assessment., Editor 2008, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    232. U.S. EPA, Protecting Children's Health: The National Pesticide Program, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention. Office of Pesticide Programs., Editor 2010, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    233. U.S. EPA, Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment, National Center for Environmental Assessment. Risk Assessment Forum., Editor 2003: Washington, DC.
    234. U.S. EPA, Framework for Human Health Risk Assessment to Inform Decision Making, Office of Research and Development. Risk Assessment Forum., Editor 2012, U.S. EPA.
    235. U.S. EPA, Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment, Office of Research and Development. Risk Assessment Forum., Editor 1998, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC. p. 26846-26924.
    236. U.S. EPA, Strategy for Research on Environmental Risks to Children, Office of Research and Development, Editor 2000: Washington, DC.
    237. U.S. EPA. Policy on Evaluating Risk to Children. Office of the Science Advisor (OSA) 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/spc/2poleval.htm.
    238. U.S. EPA. Current and Complete Activities by Topic. EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) 2011; Available from: http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/WebProjectsbyTopicBOARD!OpenView.
    239. National Research Council, Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process. 1983, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
    240. U.S. EPA, Human Health Risk Assessment (HHRA): Research and Assessment Framework, 2011, Office of Research and Development. National Center for Environmental Assessment.,.
    241. U.S. EPA, Science Policy Council Handbook: Risk Characterization, Office of Research and Development. Office of Science Policy., Editor 2000: Washington, DC.
    242. U.S. EPA, Interim Procedures & Guidelines for Health Risk and Economic Impact Assessments of Suspected Carcinogens, 1976, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC. p. 21402-21405.
    243. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Guidance on sustainability impact assessment, 2010, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
    244. van Drunen, M. and J. Bakkes. Sustainability A-Test. 2011; Available from: http://www.sustainabilitya-test.net/.
    245. Kasperczyk, N. and K. Knickel, Sustainability A-Test: Advanced Techniques for Evaluation of Sustainability Assessment Tools: D15: Final Case Study Report, 2006, IVM. Institute for Environmental Studies: Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
    246. U.S. EPA, U.S. Department of Transportation, and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Public involvement plan and toolkit for Las Cruces, Office of Sustainable Communities, Editor 2011, U.S. EPA,: Washington, DC.
    247. Parikh, P., et al., Application of market mechanisms and incentives to reduce stormwater runoff: An integrated hydrologic, economic and legal approach. Environmental Science & Policy, 2005. 8(2): p. 133-144.
    248. U.S. EPA, From Grey to Green: Sustainable Practices for Redeveloping a Vacant Shopping Center, 2010, U.S. EPA,: Washington, DC.
    249. U.S. EPA, Lithium-ion batteries and nanotechnology partnership: Assessing life-cycle impacts of lithium-ion batteries, Office of Research and Development. Design for the Environment Program., Editor 2010, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    250. White House Middle Class Task Force, Fact Sheet: President Obama's plan to make the U.S. the first country to put 1 million advanced technology vehicles on the road, Vice President of the United States, Editor 2011, White House: Washington, DC.
    251. U.S. EPA. Lithium-ion Batteries and Nanotechnology Partnership. 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/lbnp/index.htm.
    252. U.S. EPA, Enhancing supply chain performance with environmental cost information: Examples from Commonwealth Edison, Anderson Corporation, and Ashland Chemical, Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics, Editor 2000, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    253. U.S. EPA. Smart growth implementation assistance. Smart Growth 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/smartgrowth/sgia.htm#back.
    254. Jones, M.C., ECOS Green Report: Case studies on state efforts to achieve sustainability, in Green Reports2012, The Environmental Council of the States: Washington, DC.
    255. Olson, R.L., The future of radiation protection: 2025: A handbook for improving radiation protection, 2002, Institute for Alternative Futures.
    256. U.S. EPA. Innovative tools help EPA scientists determine total chemical exposures: EPA scientists work to advance the science of chemical risk assessment. Science Matters 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/august2011/sheds.htm.
    257. U.S. EPA. Design for the Environment: An EPA Partnership Program. 2012; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/dfe/.
    258. U.S. EPA. What does the DfE label mean? Design for the Environment: An EPA Partnership Program 2011; Available from: http://epa.gov/dfe/pubs/projects/formulat/label.htm.
    259. Heberling, M.T., et al., San Luis Basin sustainability metrics project: A methodology for evaluating regional sustainability, Office of Research and Development. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Editor 2011, U.S. EPA,: Washington, DC.
    260. Scheuermann, K., Greener clean-ups: Estimating the environmental footprints of clean-up remedies, U.S. EPA Region 9, Editor 2012, U.S. EPA.
    261. U.S. EPA, Green Remediation Best Management Practices: Fact Sheets on Specific Remedies and Other Key Issues, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response., Editor 2012, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.
    262. U.S. EPA. Superfund & Green Remediation. Superfund 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/superfund/greenremediation/.
    263. U.S. EPA, Superfund Green Remediation Strategy, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation., Editor 2010, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC
    264. U.S. EPA, Methodology for understanding and reducing a project's environmental footprint, Office of Solid waste and Emergency Response. Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation., Editor 2012, U.S. EPA.
    265. U.S. EPA. Sustainable chemistry: An even darker shade of green: Innovative EPA researcher taps everday tools and plants to develop environmentally friendly ways to make chemicals and nanochemicals. Science Matters 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/june2011/sustainablechemistry.htm.
    266. E3: Economy Energy and the Environment. E3 on the ground in San Antonio, Texas. Accomplishments 2012; Available from: http://www.e3.gov/accomplish/san_antonio.html.
    267. U.S. EPA. Parking lots: Letting it soak in: EPA researchers are examining with "green" parking lot designs and permeable pavement as a way to reduce runoff and improve water quality. Science Matters 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/april2010/scinews_parking-lots-soak.htm.
    268. U.S. EPA. From disaster to recovery: Waste management planning and response: EPA scientists develop innovative tools to assist decision-makers manage wastes from natural and man-made disasters. Science Matters 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/september2011/wastemanagement.htm.
    269. U.S. EPA. Advancing the next generation (NexGen) of risk assessment. 2012; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/risk/nexgen/.
    270. U.S. EPA. EPA schools program. Healthy School Environments 2012; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/schools/programs.html.
    271. U.S. EPA. Sustainable watershed resources management - the Shepherd Creek pilot project. Science in Action: Innovative research for a sustainable future 2011; Available from: http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100E2O1.txt.
    272. U.S. EPA. Measuring sustainability: EPA scientists explore how to measure prosperity and environmental quality across the San Luis Basin, a large, rural area in south-central Colorado. Science Matters 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/december2011/sustainability.htm.
    273. U.S. EPA. Down the drain: Wetlands as sinks for absorbing reactive nitrogen: EPA scientists conduct the first continental-scale analysis to estimate how much nitrogen is removed by wetland ecosystems across the U.S. Science Matters 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/august2011/drain.html.
    274. Jordan, S.J., J. Stoffer, and J.A. Nestlerode, Wetlands as sinks for reactive nitrogen at continental and global scales: A meta-analysis. Ecosystems, 2011. 14(1): p. 144-155.
    275. U.S. EPA. Toward sustainability: Building a better understanding of ecosystem services: EPA researchers and partners are conducting a major study of the Tampa Bay estuary and its surrounding wetlands to quantify how natural ecosystems support human welfare. Science Matters 2011; Available from: http://www.epa.gov/sciencematters/april2011/tampabay.htm.
    276. Mell, P. and T. Grance, The NIST definition of cloud computing: Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S. Department of Commerce. National Institute of Standards and Technology., Editor 2011, U.S. Department of Commerce: Gaithersburg, MD.
    277. U.S. Geological Survey. Resilience. Science and Decisions Center 2012; Available from: http://www.usgs.gov/sdc/resilience.html.
    278. Anastas, P.T., ORD: The Path Forward. Memorandum to U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development, from Paul T. Anastas, Assistant Administrator, 2010, U.S. EPA: Washington, DC.

Top of page

Jump to main content.