|
DRAFT--July 31, 1997
Introduction/Purpose
This document summarizes EPA's Tier I and Tier II definitions and screening
process for sites being addressed through voluntary cleanup programs.
Tier I sites are among those where EPA has historically taken cleanup
actions under the Federal Superfund program. Tier II sites are generally
representative of those where EPA has not historically taken Federal
Superfund cleanup actions. EPA intends that any party can use the process
outlined below to make Tier I/II designations. Understanding the potential
for Superfund involvement enables stakeholders to make more informed
property cleanup, transfer, and redevelopment decisions.
Defining Tier I and Tier II Sites
Tier I sites are those that have greater potential to require long-term
or emergency cleanup work under the Federal Superfund program. These
are sites which have a release of a hazardous substance, pollutant,
or contaminant that has caused, or is likely to cause, human exposure
or contamination of a sensitive environment. These sites typically involve
contamination of drinking water, surface water, air, or soils which
has either caused, or is likely to cause, exposure to nearby populations,
or has contaminated, or is likely to contaminate, sensitive environments
(such as wetlands, national parks, and habitats of endangered species,
etc). Tier II sites are those that have less potential to require long-term
or emergency cleanup work under the Federal Superfund program. This
includes sites which: 1) do not qualify for response under Superfund
(e.g., CERCLA petroleum exclusion sites); 2) score below 28.5 based
on EPA's Hazard Ranking System (HRS), 55 FR 51532; 3) are being adequately
addressed under other Federal statutes, subject to the restrictions
specified in Section III. A. "Scope and Applicability" of the MOA/VCP
guidance document; or 4) otherwise do not meet the criteria given above
for Tier I sites.
Screening Process
To conserve resources, EPA has employed a phased, progressively more
detailed screening process to identify Federal Superfund sites. Key
factors in making decisions about sites include whether a release of
hazardous substances has occurred or is likely to occur and determining
whether people or sensitive environments have been or are likely to
be impacted by the release. Only about 15 percent of the sites screened
by Superfund to date have required removal or remedial actions - most
are screened out. The Superfund screening process differs from the private
sector site evaluation approach which typically is interested in what
environmental liabilities and remediation costs are associated with
a site or property. Consequently, the private sector assessments focus
on collecting information on the property, not offsite impacts. The
Tier I/II screening process outlined below uses common elements of both
approaches and incorporates, when necessary, the data needed for EPA
to ensure human health and environmental issues are addressed.
The five major steps in making a Tier I/II determination include: 1)
Exclusions; 2) Phase I; 3) Expanded Phase I; 4) Limited Sampling; and
5) Extensive Sampling. Each step in the process involves gathering sufficient
information about a site and/or it's environs to determine whether the
site should be classified as Tier II or continue on to the next step
for additional information. Sites continuing in the process may ultimately
reach the final step, Extensive Sampling, which results in either a
Tier I or Tier II determination; however, a site should be classified
as Tier I at any step in this process if information indicates a release
of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant has caused, or is
likely to cause, human exposure or contamination of a sensitive environment.
EPA's HRS model can also be applied at any point in the assessment
process to assist parties in determining the likelihood of Federal Superfund
interest. Sites with an HRS score below 28.5 are considered Tier II
by the Agency and account for most of the sites assessed under Superfund.
The steps involved in making a Tier I/II determination are further
described in the Screening Process section of the Tier I/II Designation
and Screening Process document.
Conclusion
EPA believes the screening process described above can by used by any
party to determine whether a site, in most cases, would be Tier I or
Tier II. It enables parties to make many Tier I or Tier II designations
based on information collected as part of the private due diligence
process. Additional detail can be found in the attachment entitled "Tier
I/II Designation and Screening Process."
DRAFT - July 31, 1997 |