APPENDIX B: UST Penalty Computation Worksheet OSWER Directive 9610.12 U.S. EPA Penalty Guidance For Violations of UST Regulations November 14, 1990
APPENDIX B
UST Penalty Computation WorksheetAssessments for each violation should be determined on separate worksheets and totaled. (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet.)
PART 1 - BACKGROUND
Company name________________________________________________
Regulation violated_____________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
Previous violations______________________________________________
____________________________________________________________
| Date of requirement______________ | Date of inspection_______________ |
| Date of compliance______________ | Explanation (if appropriate): |
| 1. Days of noncompliance_________ | |
| 2. Number of tanks______________ |
PART 2 - ECONOMIC BENEFIT COMPONENT
| Avoided Expenditures____________ | Basis:__________________________ |
| Delayed Expenditures____________ | Basis:__________________________ |
| Weighted Tax Rate______________ | Source:________________________ |
| Interest Rate___________________ | Source:________________________ |
Avoided = {Avoided + Avoided x Interest x Number} x (1 - Marginal)
Costs Expenditures Expenditures of Days Tax Rate
----------------------------
365 Days
3. Calculated Avoided Costs:______________________________________
Delayed = Delayed x Interest x Number
Costs Expenditures of Days
--------------------------------------------
365 Days
4. Calculated Delayed Costs:______________________________________
5. Economic Benefit Component:____________________ (carry figure to Line 16). (Line 3 + Line 4)
PART 3 - MATRIX VALUE FOR THE GRAVITY-BASED COMPONENT
| Potential for Harm:______________ | Extent of Deviation_____________ |
| 6. Matrix Value (MV):____________ | (from document page 16 or Appendix A) |
| 7. Per-tank MV:________________ | (if violation is per facility, the amount on Line 7 will be the same is the amount on Line 6) |
PART 4 - VIOLATOR-SPECIFIC ADJUSTMENTS TO MATRIX VALUE
| Percentage Change (+ or -) |
x | Matrix Value |
= | Dollar Adjustment (+ or -) |
Justification for Adjustment: | |
| 8. Degree of cooperation/ noncooperation |
________ |
_____ |
_________ |
|||
| 9. Degree of willfulness or negligence |
________ |
_____ |
_________ |
|||
| 10. History of noncompliance: |
________ |
_____ |
_________ |
|||
| 11. Unique factors: | ________ | _____ | _________ | |||
| 12.Adjusted Matrix Value (Line 7 + Lines 8-11) |
_________ |
PART 5 - GRAVITY-BASED COMPONENT
| Level of Environmental Sensitivity:_________________________ |
Justification: |
| 13. ESM (from document Page 21)_________________ | |
| 14. DNM (from document Page 21)_________________ |
Adjusted Environmental Days of
GRAVITY-BASED = Matrix x Sensitivity x Noncompliance
COMPONENT Value Multiplier Multiplier
15. Gravity-Based Component:_____________________________
(Line 12 x Line 13 x Line 14)
PART 6 - INITIAL PENALTY TARGET FIGURE
16. Economic Benefit Component:___________________________
(from Line 5)
17. Gravity-Based Component:_____________________________
(from Line 15)
18. Initial Target Penalty Figure:_____________________________
(Line 16 + Line 17)
SIGNATURE________________________________ DATE_________
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)