ÿWPCI fp–q‘0Gùé-ânðû}‚%ëÆâªœðxv‰HʰTQ22œ"!AN¬ñfêZ½û ¾©øë´ÿs`OÒp¸újÊ%°o/ ›R´óù‘­ýnÐz)R‡™¢šêž¤Æ ïU½§æì;É,ÅéÜ0Å\t†]òÌ3GY><ÃKÄÑß(›©¯‹TàZXýãÖL2$„K¡º¨±6„KͲ²hÐz\`¡Ò±q)²הê[±°ÅŒZ»+Tx>ØÎ¾WÙGo¼›´…Vy øâý#cˆ³Z[0\UG˜ P@z {uswÒÊ^ÎzöÈÈ”—yÅÖ½;Ô\äó'?3‚VC˜°ò”lS×mI–:&ˆ É÷C‡f&¼ÿƒ¡ ¨§>Êg¥à'¼ÚÏã× )åÁ 6‰¡‹ÏºÄa˜ÅÍ -\I>ðéùÄÄ-@lÛ¹ä#LL¿]_ËauäË…~Pð~ŒLu¿h%‚mè8vdïíÙäTFÚŒK©o!sKç{ø4hhå îkèijÓʵ—z&ö¦C 9ÿð¶·ŒÀŽ¥[ªW‚ùç~£i?ßík*6~¦$t’¨?ÍM*øHwK49NÔyÒç /]ù`WÅF»ës¼€¯Îk®Õc+W#!ÂUNã %1 0(7 1‡_ 1uæ 0c[ ^ ¾ w@Ê 4  - m/ 1‡F 1‡Í 1‡T 1‡Û 1‡b 1‡é 1‡p 1‡÷ 1‡~ 1‡ 1‡Œ 1‡ 1‡š 1‡! 1‡¨ 1‡/ 1‡¶ 1‡= 1‡Ä 1‡K 1‡Ò 1‡Y 1‡à 1‡g 1‡î 1‡u 1‡ü 1‡ƒ 1‡  1‡‘Rfjal²€ 0D2Nv´xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx B,˜HP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 6ÈÈ,,,,ÈÈ0(ÖÃ9 Z‹6Times New Roman RegularX($¡¡(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList1I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.3#37=CIQYag­­1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(;3£$´´Ô2#ÔÚ  Ú0Ú  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  àæl1*Æ d 0ƒefgDhEiEjUkDlEmÑÓ·(mã3|xmÿU‹ÿÀÀÀ(EhCEKQW]cioAutoList2IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(UhCEKQW]cioAutoList3IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(ehCEKQW]cioAutoList4IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(uhCEKQW]cioAutoList5IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(…hCEKQW]cioAutoList6IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(•hCEKQW]cioAutoList7IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(¥hCEKQW]cioAutoList8IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(µhCEKQW]cioAutoList9IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(Õ£EGMSY_ekqAutoList10IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(å£EGMSY_ekqAutoList11IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(õ£EGMSY_ekqAutoList12IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(¤EGMSY_ekqAutoList13IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII(jùEGMSY_ekqAutoList14IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(zùEGMSY_ekqAutoList15IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ŠùEGMSY_ekqAutoList16IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(šùEGMSY_ekqAutoList17IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ªùEGMSY_ekqAutoList18IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ºùEGMSY_ekqAutoList19IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(jùEGMSY_ekqAutoList20IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(zùEGMSY_ekqAutoList21IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ŠùEGMSY_ekqAutoList22IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(šùEGMSY_ekqAutoList23IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ªùEGMSY_ekqAutoList24IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ºùEGMSY_ekqAutoList25IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ÊùEGMSY_ekqAutoList26IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ÚùEGMSY_ekqAutoList27IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(êùEGMSY_ekqAutoList28IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(úùEGMSY_ekqAutoList29IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ªùEGMSY_ekqAutoList30IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV(ºùEGMSY_ekqAutoList31IVIVIVIVIVIVIVIV  RTIAlmod;var TPYinorganics VHAPminimissubcategorizedelistingtimelines VOC CFR VVV CEMSvolatiles SSMUSEPABeegleGuilfordˆTABLE A ¨Ý ƒ0¯)ÝÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò ò[FINAL€January€8,€2001]ó ó(3¯$©©Ý ƒ!ÝÝ  Ý ªÝ ƒ0¯)ÝÝ  ÝÔ_Ôà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àò ò[DRAFT€November€29,€2000]ó ó dÝ ƒ!ÝÝ  ÝÔ_Ôò òòòÑ8€d XXdìdÈ8ÑÑ  ÑÔ_ÔMEMORANDUMóóó óÐ ° ÐÌò òDATE:ó óà0 ` àà0¸ ` (#` (#àNovember€29,€2000Јظ (#¸ (# ÐÌò òSUBJECT:ó óà0 ` àà0¸ ` (#` (#àAmerican€Textile€Manufacturers€Institute€(ATMI)/US€EnvironmentalÐ d´ ÐProtection€Agency€(EPA)€MACT€Development€Meeting€for€FabricÏPrinting,€Coating,€and€DyeingÐ ¸ (#¸ (# ÐÌò òFROM:ó óà0 ` àà0¸ ` (#` (#àSteve€York€and€Alton€Peters,€RTIÐ h¸ (#¸ (# ÐÌò òTO:ó óà0  àà0` (#(#àà0¸ ` (#` (#àVinson€Hellwig€and€Paul€Almodð;ðvar,€EPA/OAQPS/ESD/CCPGÐô D ¸ (#¸ (# ÐÌ______________________________________________________________________________ÌÌÌÓL€ 5h(3LÓò òÝ ‚3£ ÝÝ  ÝÝ‚3£œÝÔ25hÔÚ  ÚIÚ  Ú.Ô3  Ôà0  àÝ  Ýà ` àPurposeó ó݃3£œÇ݌Дä (#(# ÐŒÝ  ÝÌThe€purpose€of€the€meeting€was€to€review€the€status€and€discuss€issues€and€questions€concerningÏthe€development€of€the€MACT€standard€for€fabric€coating,€printing,€and€dyeing.ÌÌÓL€ Eh((LÓò òII.€à0  àà0` (#(#àDate€and€PlaceÐ0€` (#` (# ÐÌó óà0  àà0` (#(#àOctober€11,€2000€ÐX` (#` (# Ðà  àà ` àU.S.€EPAÌà  àà ` àN.C.€Mutual€BuildingÌà  àà ` àDurham,€NCÌò òÌØØÓL€ ¤((LÓIII.à  àà0 ` àAttendeesó óФô` (#` (# ÐÌà  àà ` àSee€Attachment€1.ÌÌØØÓL€ +ºù((LÓò òIV.€€€€à0  àà0` (#(#àMeeting€Summaryó óÐT!¤` (#` (# ÐÌMr.€Paul€Almodð;ðvar€and€Mr.€Vinson€Hellwig€of€EPA€chaired€the€meeting.€€Meeting€participantsÏdiscussed€the€items€in€a€September€25,€2000€letter€from€ATMI€(see€Attachment€2).€€The€letterÏaddressed€ATMIððs€concerns€regarding€MACT€development€for€the€fabric€coating,€printing,€andÏdyeing€source€category.€€The€following€paragraphs€summarize€the€discussions€of€the€generalÏquestions,€specific€questions,€and€future€action€items€listed€in€Attachment€2.ÌÌò òòòñmñÖ€/ÿÿÖñmññmñÖ€2ÿÿÖñmñGeneral€Questionsóóó óÐ ´($' ÐÌRegarding€the€schedule€for€the€fabric€MACT,€EPA€noted€that€proposal€is€targeted€for€April€2001,Ïwith€the€final€rule€scheduled€for€promulgation€1€year€after€proposal.Ð x+È&*  ЇRegarding€the€question€of€whether€new€source€MACT€will€be€the€same€as€existing€sourceÏMACT,€EPA€responded€that€for€slashing,€new€and€existing€source€MACT€will€be€the€same;€forÏcoating,€new€source€MACT€will€be€more€stringent;€and€for€dyeing€and€finishing,€new€andÏexisting€source€MACT€will€probably€be€the€same,€though€more€analysis€is€needed.€€Also,Ïregarding€the€new€source€definition,€EPA€noted€that€the€General€Provisions€to€Part€63€define€aÏnew€source€as€any€affected€source€the€construction€or€reconstruction€of€which€is€commencedÏafter€the€Administrator€first€proposes€a€relevant€emission€standard.€€Additionally,€classificationÏof€a€new€line€as€a€reconstructed€line€is€governed€by€the€definition€of€reconstruction,€i.e.,€the€fixedÏcapital€cost€of€the€new€components€exceeds€50€percent€of€the€fixed€capital€cost€required€toÏconstruct€a€comparable€new€source.ÌÌThere€was€a€discussion€as€to€whether€the€MACT€would€cover€area€sources.€€EPA€noted€that€areaÏsources€are€not€anticipated€to€be€covered€by€the€rule.€€EPA€further€noted€that€a€source€isÏconsidered€to€be€an€entire€facility€and€that€EPA€does€not€require€a€negative€declaration€for€areaÏsources.€€EPA€added€that€a€source€could€take€limits€to€operate€as€a€synthetic€area€source€and€thatÏrecords€would€probably€be€required€to€document€that€HAP€emissions€do€not€exceed€10€tons€perÏyear€(TPY)€of€a€single€HAP€or€25€TPY€of€all€HAP€combined.ÌÌATMI€questioned€whether€inorganics€will€be€regulated€under€this€standard.€€EPA€responded€thatÏthere€have€been€no€indicators€that€inorganics€are€being€emitted€and€that€the€rule€is€intended€at€thisÏtime€to€address€only€VHAP.€€Regarding€recent€facility€tours€by€EPA,€it€was€noted€that€no€newÏquestions,€concerns,€or€issues€were€encountered.€€ÌÌATMI€sought€clarification€on€the€actual€or€potential€annual€HAP€emission€level€at€which€EPAÏconsiders€a€facility€a€significant€source€of€HAPs.€€EPA€noted€that€the€determination€is€based€onÏpotential€to€emit,€and€that€the€level€was€10€TPY€of€a€single€HAP€or€25€TPY€of€a€combination€ofÏHAP.€€EPA€also€added€that€facility„wide€emissions€determine€whether€a€facility€is€considered€aÏmajor€source€as€opposed€to€emissions€per€separate€process€(e.g.,€HAP€emissions€from€dyeing)Ïand€that€a€true€area€source€would€not€be€used€in€the€MACT€floor€analysis.€ÌÌRegarding€a€question€whether€a€source€can€be€split€for€HAP€major€source€determination€by€SICÏcodes,€EPA€responded€that€this€would€not€be€done€since€processes€are€regulated€as€opposed€toÏSIC€codes.€€ATMI€asked€whether€a€coating€MACT€template€had€been€developed.€€EPA€notedÏthat€there€is€an€internal€template€and€that€the€metal€furniture€and€large€appliances€MACTÏstandards€will€follow€the€template.€€Each€of€these€standards€is€scheduled€for€proposal€by€the€endÏof€the€calendar€year.€€ÌÌThere€was€a€question€from€ATMI€as€to€whether€a€model€fabric€plant€would€be€developed€forÏEPAððs€economic€impact€analysis.€€EPA€responded€there€will€be€model€plants€for€coating.€€EPAÏnoted€that€model€plants€are€not€anticipated€for€slashing€because€suppliers€indicated€that€there€willÏbe€no€increased€cost€for€low„HAP€PVA.€€€EPA€also€noted€that€further€data€analysis€is€needed€toÏdetermine€whether€model€plants€would€be€necessary€for€dyeing€and€finishing.€€ÌÐ h+¸&* ÐATMI€questioned€whether€the€fabric€MACT€will€reference€other€MACTs.€€EPA€replied€that€thisÏwould€be€a€stand„alone€rule€and€that€it€would€not€reference€provisions€in€other€MACTs€directly.ÏEPA€noted€the€rule€applicability€will€address€overlap€issues€with€the€paper€and€other€web€coatingÏ(POWC)€and€printing€and€publishing€MACTs.ÌÌATMI€questioned€whether€de€minimis€levels€of€1€percent€HAP€concentration€and€0.1€percentÏcarcinogen€concentration€were€being€built€into€the€MACT.€€EPA€stated€that€HAP€content€of€Ïmaterials€will€be€limited€and€facilities€will€be€required€to€keep€purchasing€records.€€EPA€alsoÏnoted€that€further€evaluation€was€necessary€to€determine€if€limits€will€be€set€for€dyeing€or€by€dyeÏclass,€etc.,€and€further€stated€that€it€had€yet€to€be€determined€how€de€minimis€HAP€materialÏwould€affect€averaging.ñeñ€ñdñò òÔÿÔò ò[Note:€We€later€say€that€1/0.1€percent€will€count€as€zeros.€€Page€5]ó óñdññeññfñ€ñfññdñ€ñdññeññdñó óñdññeññgññdñòòÔÿÔñdññgñ(Typically€a€one€percent€limit€of€HAP€in€materials€is€counted€as€a€zeroÏwhen€averaging€of€coating€materials.)€ò òñdñûÿÿdûüÿÿdüñdñó óñgññdñÔÿÔóóñdññgñ€EPA€stated€that€they€would€try€not€to€subcategorize€withinÐ Ô$  Ðdyeing€and€finishing,€because€subcategories€would€limit€flexibility€since€averaging€acrossÏsubcategories€cannot€be€done.€€€ÌÌATMI€asked€how€EPA€will€address€the€overall€HAP€usage€versus€emissions€issue€for€glycolÏethers,€metals,€and€other€chemicals.€€EPA€stated€that€the€vendor€studies€provided€by€industry€hadÏbeen€received€and€reviewed.€€Metals€were€found€not€to€be€emitted,€but€there€was€insufficient€dataÏto€draw€a€conclusion€about€glycol€ethers.€€There€were€no€data€on€the€cut€of€the€glycol€ethersÏbeing€used€that€are€HAP.€€ATMI€also€asked€whether€EPA€has€been€able€to€evaluate€the€impact€ofÏthe€glycol€ether€definition€change€on€the€textile€industry.€€EPA€stated€that€there€were€no€data€toÏevaluate€any€possible€change€and€suggested€that€the€information€has€to€come€from€vendors.€ÏATMI€also€asked€how€EPA€would€use€information€on€the€breakdown€of€glycol€ether€usageÏwithin€the€industry€if€such€information€was€available.€€EPA€replied€that€this€information€wouldÏbe€used€to€estimate€HAP€emissions€and€to€determine€the€major/minor€source€status€of€facilities.€€ÌIn€addition,€EPA€noted€that€in€the€absence€of€detailed€information€including€Henryððs€LawÏconstants€and€process€conditions,€it€would€be€assumed€that€all€glycol€ether€is€HAP€and€is€emitted.ÌÌATMI€questioned€the€current€status€of€the€methanol€delisting€petition.€€EPA€noted€that€theÏpetition€was€on€hold€now€and€that€it€will€probably€be€2€to€3€months€before€there€is€anyÏmovement.€€ATMI€also€asked€how€sources€that€are€not€considered€significant€contributors€ofÏHAP€will€be€addressed.€€EPA€replied€that€true€area€sources€would€not€be€subject€to€the€rule€andÏthat€the€rule€would€not€apply€to€facilities€with€no€process€operations€in€the€defined€ñhññdñò òÔÿÔsubcategoriesó óòòÔÿÿÔñdññhñsubcategoryÏaffected€facilitiesñhññdñÔÿÔóóñdññhñ.ñiñ€ñiññjñÌñjññiñ€ñiñÌRegarding€ATMIððs€question€concerning€how€carpet€facility€data€were€being€used,€EPA€noted€thatÏbased€on€data€received,€only€two€carpet€mills€have€major€source€potential€to€emit€HAP.€€For€oneÏof€these€facilities,€the€process€that€puts€them€over€area€source€status€is€dyeing;€for€the€secondÏfacility€the€process€is€back€coating.€€EPA€is€evaluating€whether€to€cover€carpet€dyeing,€possiblyÏas€a€subcategory,€or€to€let€carpet€processes€go€to€a€case„by„case€determination.€€ñkññdñòòÔÿÔñdññkñIt€appears,Ïhowever,€there€is€no€reason€to€separate€carpet€manufacturing€processes€from€the€textileÏsubcategories.€ñkññdñÔÿÔóóñdññkñÌÐ h+¸&* ÐATMI€asked€what€the€Agencyððs€plan€is€to€address€the€ð ðonce€in,€always€inðð€rule.€€EPA€respondedÏthat€at€the€present€time,€there€is€no€change€but€that€discussion€of€this€rule€is€ongoing.€€EPA€notedÏthat€if€a€HAP€delisting€has€a€big€impact,€the€standard€might€be€amended€or€a€clarification€noticeÏmight€be€published.€€If€a€facility€is€no€longer€major€because€of€a€delisting,€it€may€just€be€requiredÏto€keep€records€of€material€use.ÌÌATMI€raised€the€issue€of€a€boiler€being€sold€to€a€separate€company€that€manages€and€operates€theÏboiler.€€The€boiler€would€not€be€under€common€ownership€and€presumably€would€not€beÏconsidered€in€the€major€source€determination€under€Title€V.€€ATMI€posed€two€possibleÏsituations,€one€in€which€all€of€the€steam€produced€is€used€onsite€and€the€second€in€which€some€ofÏthe€steam€goes€into€a€grid€for€sale€to€facilities€at€other€sites.€€EPA€will€check€with€Agency€legalÏcounsel€about€these€situations€and€respond€to€ATMI.€ÌÌATMI€asked€if€existing€major€HAP€sources€will€have€three€years€after€the€MACT€is€final€toÏavoid€the€standard€or€become€compliant.€€EPA€noted€that€at€this€time€that€is€correct.€€ATMIÏquestioned€the€timelines€for€the€various€notifications€required€under€the€MACT€rule.€€EPAÏreplied€that€initial€notification€was€to€be€no€later€than€1€year€after€promulgation,€that€complianceÏcertification€could€take€place€up€to€30€days€following€the€initial€compliance€period,€and€thatÏnotifications€for€new€or€modified€sources€could€take€place€120€days€after€startup€or€the€effectiveÏdate€of€the€subpart,€whichever€is€first.ÌÌATMI€asked€what€existing€or€upcoming€MACT€is€the€best€template€for€the€textile€rule.€€EPAÏsuggested€that€the€metal€furniture€and€large€appliance€rules€would€be€examples€of€the€types€ofÏoptions€that€would€be€provided€in€the€textile€rule.ÌÌATMI€asked€whether€mixing,€cleaning,€research€and€development,€and€wastewater€treatment€willÏbe€specifically€addressed€in€the€preamble€as€having€no€MACT€requirements.€€EPA€respondedÏthat€work€practices€would€likely€address€storing€and€mixing€in€all€subcategories€as€well€asÏcleaning€for€the€coating€subcategory.€€EPA€further€noted€that€wastewater€would€have€noÏrequirements€at€the€present€time€because€there€are€no€data€to€support€limits€and€that€research€andÏdevelopment€would€not€be€covered.ÌÌATMI€asked€how€unique,€one„of„a„kind€processes€or€situations€would€be€handled€under€theÏMACT.€€EPA€noted€that€they€would€be€treated€as€all€other€operations€in€the€subcategory,€with€noÏprovision€for€special€treatment,€or€on€a€case„by„case€basis€if€they€do€not€fit€into€a€subcategory.€ÏATMI€also€asked€if€the€industryððs€approach€to€confidential€business€information€(CBI)€inÏcollecting€dyeing€data€has€been€appropriate.€€EPA€replied€that€their€approach€to€using€the€sameÏtemplate€for€finishing€as€for€dyeing€was€appropriate€and€noted€that€emissions€data€cannot€be€heldÏconfidential.€ÌÌThere€was€a€question€from€ATMI€concerning€facilities€that€may€possibly€make€transitions€fromÏarea€sources€to€major€sources.€€EPA€noted€that€such€facilities€would€have€a€year€to€come€intoÏcompliance€and€180€days€to€demonstrate€compliance.Ð h+¸&* ЇATMI€asked€that,€if€it€could€be€determined€which€textile€facilities€planned€to€be€major€sources,Ïcould€the€MACT€rule€focus€on€them€alone.€€EPA€replied€that€the€schedule€needed€to€be€adheredÏto€as€closely€as€possible,€and€noted€that€true€area€sources€are€not€considered€in€the€MACT€floorÏdetermination.ÌÌThere€was€also€some€discussion€concerning€test€methods.€€EPA€noted€that€standard€EPA€methodsÏand€ASTM€methods€are€being€referenced€in€other€coating€rules.€€EPA€further€noted€that€StateÏVOC€rules€applying€to€fabric€coating€have€been€analyzed.€€Another€question€was€raised€by€ATMIÏconcerning€12„month€averaging.€€EPA€noted€that€there€is€some€seasonal€variation€in€the€apparelÏindustry,€but€that€additional€data€would€be€needed€to€support€the€need€for€an€annual€averagingÏperiod.€€EPA€also€noted€that€with€a€longer€averaging€time,€there€is€a€greater€risk€of€being€out€ofÏcompliance,€and€that€potentially€the€emission€limits€could€be€tighter.ÌÌò òòòSpecific€Issues€and€Questionsóóó óÐ ¬ü  ÐÌATMI€asked€why€EPA€initially€selected€the€fabric€MACT€subcategory€breakdown€as€1)€slashing,Ï2)€coating,€and€3)€dyeing,€finishing,€and€printing.€€EPA€replied€that€slashing€was€broken€out€Ïbased€on€the€data€presented;€coating€was€broken€out€because€there€were€similar€emissions€fromÏdifferent€coating€processes;€and€dyeing,€printing,€and€finishing€seem€to€be€done€at€the€sameÏfacilities€with€the€same€equipment.€€There€was€also€discussion€of€the€affected€source.€€EPA€notedÏthat€the€affected€source€would€be€all€lines€in€a€subcategory€in€the€facility€as€this€allows€averagingÏacross€lines.€€ATMI€noted€that€a€facility€that€only€dyes€or€finishes€canððt€as€readily€averageÏmaterials€with€high€and€low€HAP€contents.ÌÌThere€was€a€question€from€ATMI€about€the€format€of€the€standard.€€EPA€replied€that€the€formatÏwould€be€either€lb€HAP/lb€of€product€or€a€content€limit€expressed€as€lb€HAP/lb€coating€material.€ÏThere€was€some€discussion€about€averaging€across€all€materials€used€at€a€facility.€€EPAÏsubmitted€that€it€would€be€easier€to€average€everything€since€the€floor€would€be€based€onÏeverything.€€ñlñûÿÿdûñlñEPA€also€noted€that€materials€with€less€than€1€percent€HAP€or€0.1€percentÏcarcinogen€would€count€as€zero€HAP€and€that€this€should€be€written€into€the€rule€as€was€done€inÏthe€Wood€Furniture€MACT.ñlñüÿÿdüñlñ€€ATMI€pointed€out€that€basing€the€floor€only€on€HAP„containingÏmaterials€would€perhaps€penalize€the€facilities€that€have€taken€more€pollution€preventionÏmeasures.€€ATMI€also€questioned€how€a€dye€range€and€a€finishing€range€processing€the€sameÏfabric€would€be€accounted€for€with€the€lb€HAP/lb€fabric€format.€€It€was€agreed€that€it€may€beÏcleaner€to€limit€HAP€content€in€materials€as€purchased€using€the€lb€HAP/lb€coating€materialÏformat.€ÌÌATMI€asked€whether€the€concept€of€planks€would€be€used€to€support€averaging.€€EPA€noted€thatÏplanks€were€being€considered€at€an€earlier€time€but€that€there€was€not€enough€data€at€the€presentÏtime€to€incorporate€them.€€EPA€further€noted€that€for€planks€there€have€to€be€differences€inÏprocesses,€e.g.,€different€application€methods€and€suggested€that€after€proposal€the€industry€couldÏsubmit€data€making€the€case€for€planks.€€ATMI€also€asked€why€POWC€was€chosen€as€theÏapplicable€rule€for€sources€running€multiple€substrates.€€EPA€noted€that€it€fit€the€AgencyððsÐ h+¸&* Ðdefinition€of€web€coating€and€that€POWC€facilities€coat€a€lot€of€different€types€of€substrates.ÌÌATMI€asked€whether€EPA€is€considering€going€above€the€floor€for€any€subcategory.€€EPAÏreplied€that€going€above€the€floor€for€dyeing€and€finishing€is€being€considered€due€to€a€lack€ofÏdata,€but€that€with€data€supporting€a€floor,€there€would€be€no€need€to€look€above€the€floor.€€ATMI€Ïquestioned€whether€the€floor€for€slashing€would€be€set€at€less€than€or€equal€to€1€percent€HAPÏcontent€in€PVA.€€EPA€responded€that€the€limit€was€anticipated€to€be€established€as€such€with€theÏcompliance€demonstration€consisting€of€keeping€purchasing€records.€€ÌÌATMI€asked€what€the€basis€for€the€96€percent€HAP€reduction€MACT€floor€for€coating€is€andÏhow€coating€is€being€defined.€€EPA€replied€that€it€had€confirmed€that€some€sources€in€the€floorÏare€using€permanent€total€enclosures€for€100€percent€capture€and€that€the€MACT€floor€could€beÏas€high€as€97€percent.€€EPA€further€noted€that€the€sources€in€the€floor€use€thermal€oxidizers€orÏcarbon€adsorption€systems€and€permanent€total€enclosures.€€EPA€also€stated€that€coating€will€beÏdefined€in€the€MACT€and€that€the€definition€will€probably€be€based€on€material€being€applied€toÏa€substrate€surface€as€opposed€to€impregnating€the€substrate.€€Regarding€the€inclusion€of€threadÏbonding€as€a€part€of€the€coating€subcategory,€EPA€stated€that€thread€bonding€is€already€coveredÏby€40€CFR€part€60,€subpart€VVV€and€that€there€is€no€reason€to€exclude€it.€ÌÌATMI€asked€if€continuous€emissions€monitoring€systems€(CEMS)€would€be€required€if€a€controlÏdevice€is€used.€€EPA€noted€that€it€is€anticipated€that€the€rule€will€allow€for€parametric€monitoringÏor€CEMS.ÌÌThere€was€discussion€concerning€emissions€from€pressurized€dyeing€processes.€€EPA€questionedÏwhether€the€process€is€vented€to€the€atmosphere€when€a€batch€is€completed.€€ATMI€indicated€thatÏthe€dye€bath€is€cooled€to€release€pressure€and€then€drained€before€opening€the€dye€machine,€andÏthat€there€are€no€releases€of€volatiles€to€the€atmosphere.ÌÌATMI€questioned€whether€a€start„up,€shutdown,€and€malfunction€(SSM)€plan€would€be€requiredÏwhenever€an€add„on€control€device€is€used€for€compliance€and€whether€a€SSM€plan€would€beÏrequired€when€a€compliant€coating€option€is€used.€€EPA€noted€that€a€SSM€plan€would€beÏnecessary€for€the€add„on€control€device,€and€therefore€would€not€be€required€for€compliantÏcoating€use.ÌÌò òòòFuture€Action€Itemsóóó óÐ $X" ÐÌThere€was€a€discussion€concerning€survey€data€use.€€EPA€noted€that€the€initial€survey€data€couldÏnot€be€used€without€the€facilities€being€identified€and€there€is€not€time€to€wait€for€the€facilityÏidentifications.€€There€was€agreement€that€the€more€recent€dyeing€data€should€be€better€than€theÏinitial€survey€data.€€EPA€noted€that€the€dyeing€data€seem€to€be€representative€of€the€industry€inÏterms€of€size€of€companies€and€geographic€distribution.€€ATMI€stated€that€the€finishing€dataÏwould€be€supplied€within€two€weeks€and€EPA€agreed€to€use€the€finishing€data€if€provided€withinÏ2€weeks.€€ATMI€asked€if€more€information€was€needed€about€printing.€€EPA€noted€that€furtherÐ h+¸&* Ðdata€could€be€provided€during€the€comment€period€after€proposal.ÌÌATMI€asked€if€the€proposal€would€be€available€for€ATMI€review€before€being€made€available€toÏthe€public.€€EPA€replied€that€the€entire€industry€should€have€the€same€information€and€thatÏquestions€could€not€be€responded€to€before€proposal.€€EPA€noted€further€that€particularly€duringÏthe€comment€period,€meetings€cannot€be€held€with€the€stakeholders;€everyone€must€have€theÏsame€information.ÌÐ  $ t Ðà@ÉÉ$ìàò òATTACHMENT€1ó óˆÐ ° Ðà  àà ` àà ¸ àà  àà h àà À àà  àà p àà È àà  àà x àà Ð àÌò òList€of€Attendees€for€October€11,€2000€ATMI/EPA€Meeting€Regarding€the€Fabric€Printing,Ð ˆØ ÐCoating,€and€Dyeing€MACT€Standardó óÐ tÄ ÐÔ*‹ƒ-V.ddd Xdd Xdd X°(#°(#‹ÔÔ,<dd ÔÔ,<dd ÔÔ+  ÔÐ  `° Ðò òAttendeeó óÐ  Ä Ðò òAffiliationó óÐ  Ä ÐPaul€Almodð;ðvarÐ  D ” ÐUSEPAÐ  D ” ÐRon€BeegleÐ  Ä   ÐMt.€Vernon€Mills,€Inc.Ð  Ä   ÐDavid€DunnÐ  D ”  ÐEnvironmental€Resources€ManagementÐ  D ”  ÐJulie€FlemingÐ  Ä  ÐATMIÐ  Ä  ÐVinson€HellwigÐ  D”  ÐUSEPAÐ  D”  ÐAlton€PetersÐ  Ä  ÐRTIÐ  Ä  ÐJimmy€SummersÐ  D” ÐGuilford€Mills,€Inc.Ð  D” ÐSteve€YorkÐ  Ä ÐRTIÐ Ä  Ð