WPC. *{&JQYܴ5qQDX2( (v>(bdB0}O=&󄒖i/,6 ,B=3s=_bmhuwBxThyZY7nwX#!U N %? 0(Ew@m4 m 0e . 1J 0D 0*c 0@x B* 0D B 0@@Y 0@ 0D_ 0wN^ f(a* 0> 0 0h 0 0 0U"N 0L 0pLG D3 D+ 0Kf<a> 1uR 72f A 1_Za 0D BHP LaserJet 4050 Series PCL 60xhH  Z6Times New Roman RegularX($ 2 !"#$%Ӎ($~3|x% UA, B,Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 54#)2Quick A.   .0    teleconference RTI VOC OGC&subcategorization OCEadsorbersrulemakingEapenMushetMathai OPPTNorberg RMA ERMEfirdHedbergWillwerthMajiliteShimkoRobartUretekKress HyteVenkataPanchakarla DEPWoodringMcManusMooresvilleNCDEHNRAtholtarpsgeomembranes MEKDimethylformamideadsorber ppmvexchangers PTEs RTO !"#$%`CEIMQUY]aAutoList1!!!!!!!!i)1)a)(3$ !  (;3$2#  0  .3  0  2c0Quick ""0   H  )  _   `     h      p   [February16,2001Final] &0 d d(3$ !   d2c0Quick 220 Level 1Level 2Level 3Level 4Level 52b0Quick 0 (3$ !  (O;$0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#lT*TABLE A(b$0  0` (#(#2#   .3  0 ` (#` (#(xir$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#2#(  0  )3  0 (# (#($0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#2#(  a  )3  0h(#(#(F$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#2#(   )3  0h(#h(#($0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#2#  0  )3  0(#(#({$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#2#  a  )3  0p(#(#(9 Z6Times New Roman Regular>c$"Small Circle"0 >b$Large Circle0 'dxd'dxd( $ Figure  1  TABLE B3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)/i)P,+&OLE 2.0 Box <=8C HKKKK 6*  _   `     h      p [RevisedFebruary16,2001] 3$37;?CGKOS-*+xTABLE A(3$ !    d !  _ 8=XXdd8?T  _MEMORANDUM L  DATE:  ` December12,2000  L   SUBJECT: 0 ` StakeholderteleconferencetoreviewthepreliminaryMACTfloordetermination (  forthefabriccoatingsubcategoryofthefabriccoating,printing,anddyeingsourcecategory ` (#` (#  FROM:  ` SteveYorkandAltonPeters,RTI    TO:    ` VinsonHellwig,EPA/OAQPS/ESD/CCPG h ______________________________________________________________________________ I.  Purpose  l ThepurposeoftheteleconferencewasfortheUSEnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)toprovideabriefingofthepreliminaryMACTfloordeterminationforthefabriccoatingsubcategorytostakeholdersforreviewandcomment.r^X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AXr II.  DateandPlace     November30,2000  U.S.EPA  N.C.MutualBuilding  Durham,NorthCarolina III.  Participants  $h" Seethelistofparticipantsattheendofthismemorandum. IV.  MeetingSummary  '#& VinsonHellwigoftheEPAchairedtheteleconferenceandopenedwithintroductionsofparticipantsandanoverviewofthepurposeoftheteleconference.Mr.HellwigthenconductedtheEPAbriefing,followingtheattacheddocumentwhichwasdistributedbeforethe x+&*  teleconference.Forsupplementalinformationprovidedduringthebriefingandtopicsthatwerediscussedbytheparticipants,thefollowingparagraphspresentsummariesofinformationprovidedandissuesraised.Thepagenumberpresentedparentheticallywitheachtopicreferstothecorrespondingpageintheattachedbriefingdocument.[Asnotedinthe(Page2)summarybelow,EPAhasdeterminedthatcoatingfiberglasssubstrateswillbecoveredundertheFabric_NESHAP_.Pages2,3,4,7,and9ofthebriefingdocumenthavebeenrevisedtoreflecttheadditionofonefacilitytothedatabase.The_MACT_Ԁfloorswerenotaffected.] FabricCoating_MACT_ԀSurvey(Page2)   P Mr._Hellwig_Ԁnotedthatregardingthecoatingoffiberglasssubstrates,EPAisdetermininginternallywhetherthisprocesswillbecoveredunderthepaperandotherwebcoating_NESHAP_orunderfabriccoating.[Note:CoatingoffiberglasssubstrateswillbecoveredundertheFabric_NESHAP_.] HAPEmissionsfromFabricCoatingOperations(Page3)  r  Mr._Hellwig_ԀstatedthatbecauseofthesmallproportionofHAPemissionsfromfabriccoatingoperationsreportedtobecomingfromancillaryoperations,alotoftimeandeffortwillnotbespentevaluatingcontrolsforthesesources.Workpracticerequirementsfortheancillaryoperationswillbeevaluated. SummaryofControlDeviceUsebyFacilitiesinFabricCoatingIndustry_MACT_ԀDatabase 4 (Page4)  * Mr._Hellwig_Ԁobservedthattheaffectedfacilitywillbedefinedasthecontiguousfacility,encompassingallofthefabriccoatinglinesatthefacility.Thiswillallowforaveragingacrossthecoatinglinesinafacility.Inresponsetoaquestionregardingtheavailabilityofthedatabase,Mr._Hellwig_Ԁstatedthatthedetaileddatabaseisnotavailablebecauseitcontainsconfidentialbusinessinformation(CBI).Mr._Hellwig_Ԁalsonotedthatthedatabasecontainsreportedefficiency,butnottheageofthecontroldevice.Inaddition,Mr._Hellwig_Ԁstatedthatthedatabaseincludesinformationoncoatinglineswithdifferentapplicationtechniques,butthatthisinformationhasnotbeenbrokenoutsincethecontrolsarebasicallyidentical.Astakeholdersubmittedthatcontrolsmaybedifferentforcoatingprocessesinvolvedintennisballmanufacturing. RepresentativenessofControlDevicePerformanceData(Page5)  %!$ Regardingthe98percentefficiencyroutinelyguaranteedforregenerativeorrecuperativethermaloxidizersinthefirstyearofoperation,astakeholderquestionedwhatefficiencyshouldbeexpectedafterthefirstyear.Mr._Hellwig_Ԁsubmittedthatsince99percentdestructionefficiencyisinthedatabase,EPAassumesthat98percentisattainablelongterm.InresponsetoaquestionofwhetherthedestructionefficienciesinthedatabaserepresentdestructionofVOCorHAP,Mr. P+&* _Hellwig_ԀrespondedthatitrepresentsVOCdestruction,butthatmostvolatileHAPisVOCandVOCisbeingusedasasurrogateforHAP.AstakeholderaskedifsourcesnotreportingHAPemissionsarereportingpollutionprevention(P2)measures.Mr._Hellwig_ԀansweredthatP2isnotreportedinthedatabase,butthatmostsourcesreportingHAPemissionsrequiretheuseofHAPascarriersforthepolymersbeingapplied. QualityofCaptureEfficiencyData(Page6)  , | Mr._Hellwig_ԀnotedthatforapermanenttotalenclosuremeetingMethod204criteria,thecaptureefficiencyisdefinedas100percent.  _MACT_ԀFloorDetermination(Page7)    Becausediscussionofthe_MACT_ԀfloordeterminationconsistedofquestionsfromstakeholderswithresponsesfromEPA,aquestionandanswerformatisusedtosummarizethediscussionofthistopicasfollows.Question:0 ` Iftherearefewerthan30facilitiesinthedatabase,arentthetopfiveusedinthe R _MACT_Ԁfloordetermination? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thetopfiveareonlyusediftheentiresourcecategoryhasfewerthan30 &v facilities.AccordingtheOfficeofGeneralCounsel(OGC),forasourcecategorywithmorethan30facilities,thetop12percentofthedatabasedefinesthe_MACT_floor. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` IsthereamemorandumfromOGCregardingusingthetop12percentofthe  database? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` No,thisisbasedonverbalcommunicationwithOGC.Itisalsobasedon  statutorylanguageintheCleanAirAct.Section112(d)(3)states ...categoryorsubcategoryshallnotbelessstringent,andmaybemorestringentthan!`` (#` (# 0  0` (#(#(A)theaverageemissionlimitationachievedbythebestperforming12percentoftheexistingsources(forwhichtheadministratorhasemissionsinformation)... ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Howmanyfacilitiesareinthefabriccoatingindustry?"X ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Therearearound200facilitieswithabouthalfofthefacilitiesbeingareasources."B!` (#` (# Question:0 ` AnothergroupwithinEPAhastakensyntheticminorsoutofthe_MACT_Ԁfloor $ # analysis;shouldtheybeincludedhere? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` AccordingtoOGC,syntheticminorsshouldbeincluded.&!%` (#` (# Question:0 ` Wastheageofthefacilityconsideredinthe_MACT_Ԁfloordetermination?n(#'` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Afacilitywouldnotbeincludedifitjustbeganoperationwithinthelastyear. X)$( Thiswouldnotapplybecausethefabriccoatingdatabaseisa1997database. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whyarethereonly18companiesinthedatabase?,f'+` (#` (# Answer:0 ` OMBapprovalwouldhavebeenrequiredtosurveymorecompanies;therefore,  distributionwaslimited.ThefacilitiesinthedatabaserepresentedmorethantwentypercentoftheestimatedpopulationoffacilitiesintheU.S.forthiscategory. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WerentquestionnairessentoutinsomesourcecategorieswiththegenericICR, B  whichhadalreadybeenapprovedbyOMB? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` ThegenericICRwasonlyusedifagreementhadbeenreachedwiththe  f stakeholderspriortodistribution. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whywasallinformationfromsitevisitsnotused? $ ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Facilitiesthatwerevisitedlimitedtheinformationgatheredbecausethevisits   werearrangedthroughtradeassociationsandprioragreementsprecludedgatheringallinformationinsomecases.InothercasestheinformationincludedCBIandwasnotincludedinthedatabaseforpurposesofdeterminingthefloor.Theinformationgatheredatthesitevisitswasexaminedanditwasdeterminedthattheinformationwouldnotaffectthefloorfacilityresultsorthenumberoffacilitiesinthefloor. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WillthestandardapplyonlytofacilitiesinSICcodes2295,2296,3052and ^ 3069? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` TheapplicabilitywillnotbebasedonSICcodes,itwillapplytofabriccoatingas 2 definedintherule.Fabriccoatingwillbedefinedbasicallyastheapplicationofasurfacecoatingfilmtoatextilesubstrate. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Willextrusionbeincludedinthecoatingdefinition?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` ExtrusionprocessesweknowofhavelittleornoHAP.Weareconsidering t whethertoallowaveragingofextrusionsolidsinthecompliancedeterminationfortheemissionratelimit. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Extrusionistheonlyprocessatmyfacilitythatwouldbecoveredbythis  l _NESHAP_.Willtherebeade_minimus_? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Node_minimus_Ԁisplannedfortheapplicabilityatthispoint.Theextrusion !@  processwouldbecoveredbythe_NESHAP_Ԁonlyifitemits_HAPs_. ` (#` (#  FloorforOverallControlEfficiency(Page8)  $# Aswasthecasewiththeabovetopic,becausediscussionoftheFloorforOverallControlEfficiencyconsistedofquestionsfromstakeholderswithresponsesfromEPA,aquestionandanswerformatalsoisusedtosummarizethediscussionofthistopicasfollows.Question:0 ` Giventhatperformancetestsaregenerallyunderidealconditions,arethesetests 6*%) representativeofwhatsoutthere? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` The_MACT_Ԁfloorisbasedonwhatisbeingachievedbythebestfacilities.It  ,Z'+ shouldbenotedthatthe97and98percentoverallcontrolefficienciesarebasedoncontrolofapplicationanddrying/curinganddoesnotincludeancillaryoperationssuchasmixingandcleaning. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Therearefacilitiesthatoperatewithoutaddoncontrols.Hasastudyofcontrol X costsbeendone? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,thecostsofinstallingcontrolsandupgradingexistingsystemsarebeing , | evaluated. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Inthecaseofthreadbonding,someprocessesarecontrolledwhileprocessesthat  :  usematerialswithoutVOCarenotcontrolled.AreuncontrolledprocessessuchasthreadbondingprocessesthatusenonVOCchlorinatedcompoundsgroupedwithotherprocesses? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,becausethecontrolsarethesame,i.e.,thermaloxidationwithscrubbingor   carbonadsorption.Controlofchlorinatedcompoundsbytheseaddoncontrolshasbeendemonstratedoverthepast30yearsatsimilarsources. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Controlofchlorinatedcompoundsisnotinthefabriccoatingdatabase;shouldnt : 98percentcontrolofchlorinatedcompoundsbedocumentedinthedatabasetosaythatitisachievable? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Theachievabilityof98percentcontrolcanbedocumentedbyreferencetoother H documentsdemonstratingcontrolofchlorinatedcompounds.Thesamecontroltechnologies,thermaloxidationandcarbonadsorption,areusedonthesametypesofsources,i.e.threadbonding.Whenusingthermaloxidationwithachlorinatedcompound,ascrubberisneededtoneutralizeandremovetheacidgases.Theadditionofthescrubberforonetypeofcontrolisallthatdifferentiatesthecontrolofchlorinatedcompoundsfromother_HAPs_Ԁinthissourcecategory,andthedemonstrationofthistechnologyonsimilargasstreamsiswelldocumented. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Aretotalenclosuresusedinallindustrygroups?2` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Theuseoftotalenclosureshasbeendemonstratedinmanyindustrieswithsimilar  l applicationprocesses,whethertheyareusedinallindustrygroupsisnotavalidpoint.Totalenclosuresareusedineachofthefabriccoating_MACT_Ԁfloorfacilities. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Istheeconomicimpactbeingevaluatedofgoingbeyondthefloor?$#` (#` (# Answer:0 ` No,theemissionlimitswillbebasedonthefloor.% $` (#` (# Question:0 ` Canyouidentifythefloorfacilities?l'"&` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Ourcurrentpolicyistonotidentifythefloorfacilities.Therefinedfacilitydata V(#' fromthe_MACT_ԀdatabaseincludingthefloorfacilitiesarepresentedinTable1oftheattachment. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Isntitabigleapfromthe95percentcurrentlyrequiredbyrulesbasedonthe +N'+ _CTG_Ԁto97percent? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wearelimitedbyguidanceandthestatuteonhowtocalculatethefloor;within  theguidancethe_MACT_Ԁfloorhasbeencalculatedindifferentways,eachyieldingthe97percentOCEforexistingsources. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` The_MACT_Ԁfloorisbasedonthreefacilities;isthatrepresentativeofallofthe B  fabriccoatingthatisoutthere? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wefeelthedatabaseisrepresentative.Thedatabasecontainsavarietyof  f applicators,avarietyofendproducts,andarangeofcompanysizes. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whatcompliancedemonstrationwillberequired? $ ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Controlequipmentwillrequireperformancetestingtodemonstratecompliance   withthefacilityOCEortheemissionratelimit.Fortheemissionratelimit,thecompliancedemonstrationistypicallybasedontheaveragemonthlyemissionrate.IfthereisseasonalvariationinHAPemissionsintheindustry,a12monthrollingaveragecomplianceperiodcanbespecified.Inthecaseofmiscellaneousmetalparts,theindustrysubmitteddatademonstratingseasonalvariationinHAPemissions.Itshouldbenotedthatifafacilityhasmultiplefabriccoatinglines,compliancedemonstrationisonafacilitybasis,allowingaveragingacrossthefabriccoatinglinesinthefacility. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Arentthedatainthedatabaseusedtoderivetheemissionratelimitannualdata?2` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,butEPAenforcementwantsthecompliancedemonstrationtobebasedon  monthlyaveragedata. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Doesntthisjustaffectthecompliancedemonstrationduringthefirstyear?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,butEPAenforcementpreferstoseecompliancedemonstratedonamonthly t basisanddoesnotwantafacilitytopotentiallyoperateoutofcompliancefortheentirefirstyearthestandardisineffect. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` DoesthedeterminationofpoundsofHAPemittedincludecureHAP? l` (#` (# Answer:0 ` WehavenocureHAPdatanow,thedataanalysisisbasedonHAPthatisinthe !V coatingmaterialasapplied.Itisnotanticipatedthatcure_HAPs_Ԁwillbeincludedinthecompliancedemonstration,howeverthisisbasedonanabsenceofdata. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whataboutwasteshippedoffsite?$#` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Inperformingmassbalancecalculations,materialsthathavebeenshippedoffsite % $ canbedeductedaslongasthereissupportingdocumentation,suchasthe_RCRA_wastemanifest. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whatkindofworkpracticesarebeingconsidered?@)$(` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Allthatisbeingconsiderednowareworkpracticessuchascoversonmixing **z%) tanksandcontainers.Therewillprobablybenorequirementsforventingstoragetankstocontroldevices.+N'+` (#` (# ?T H   Question:0 ` Ifthecoatingismixedoffsite,wouldthatcompanybesubjecttothis_MACT_?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Acompanythatproducescoatingsmightbesubjecttoanother_MACT_.` (#` (# Question:0 ` Willtherebespecificstandardsforthreadbondingusingmethylenechloride?X` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wewilllookatthecostofcontrollingmethylenechloride.Itismoreexpensive B  tocontrolchlorinatedHAPwithoxidationthannonchlorinatedHAP.Costisnotafactorinthe_MACT_Ԁfloordetermination;however,wemustevaluatetheimpactonsmallbusiness. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Willthecontrolofmethylenechlorideemissionsbeconsidereddifferently? $ ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wedonthaveinformationavailabletowarrantseparatingthreadbonding.   Threadbondingispresentlycoveredbythe_NSPS_Ԁalongwithotherfabriccoatingprocessesanditisincludedinthis_NESHAP_. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Hastherebeenconsiderationofsubcategorizationwithinfabriccoating?f ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wehavelookedatsubcategorizationandseenoneedforitbasedonemissions P characteristicsandthetypesofcontrolsbeingused. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` CanfacilitySICcodesandtypesofcontrolsbeingusedbeaddedtothetable ^ showingthefabriccoatingaveragefacilityOCE? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,SICcodesandtypesofcontrolswillbeadded.2` (#` (# Question:0 ` WoulditbepossibletorequirealowerOCEforcarbonadsorbersbecauseofthe  solventrecovery?Onehundredpercentcapturecannotbeachievedintennisballmanufacturingbecauseofthephysicalconfiguration.Aflatproductisnotbeingcoated;tennisballsarebeingcoated.Thestandardmightbringinotherindustriesthatarecoatingproductsthatarenotflat,suchasbasketballs. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Adsorberscanachieve97percentrecovery,sowecannotrequirelowerOCE H basedonperformanceoftheaddoncontroldevice.However,wedoneedtoknowifthereareotherfacilitiesthatdonotdowebcoatingoffabric,possiblyfromtradeassociationsthatareparticipating. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Istherethepossibilityofplanksinthissubcategory?"*!` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wehaventseendifferencesinemissionsandthetypesofcontrolsusedtosupport #" planks. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whathappensinthecaseofoverlappingstandardsapplyingtothesame &!% equipment? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wearetryingtoavoidhavingdifferentstandardsapplytothesameequipment, V(#' e.g.,inthepaperandotherwebcoatingproposal,ifanypaperandotherwebsubstrateiscoated,onlythepaperandotherwebstandardapplies. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whataboutthecoatingoftirecordandothercordonthesameequipment?+N'+` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Applicabilitymightbebasedonpredominantuse.,8(,` (#` (# ЇQuestion:0 ` Howwilltheapplicationoftwodifferentcoatingssubjecttodifferent_MACTs_Ԁto  thesamesubstratebehandled? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Weareawareofcaseswheredifferentcoatingssubjecttodifferent_MACTs_Ԁare  appliedindifferentpartsoftheplant.Coatingsappliedonthesamelineshouldbesubjecttoone_MACT_.Stakeholdersshouldmakeusawareofsituationswheredifferentcoatingsappliedtothesamesubstratearesubjecttodifferent_MACTs_. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Paperworkisbecomingincreasinglyburdensomewithdifferent_MACTs_Ԁwith  f differentrequirements.Canthepaperworkbesimplified? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` ThecoatingsgroupatEPAhasidentifiedalotofoverlapissuesbetweencoating  :  standardsandistryingtosimplifypaperwork. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Isastartup,shutdown,andmalfunctionplanrequiredforacontroldevice? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whatisthescheduleforthisrulemaking?f ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Draftingofthestandardwillbeginnextmonthwithproposalscheduledfornext P Spring.WecouldpossiblyhaveanotherconferencecallinJanuary. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whatwillthetimingbeforlanguageonthedefinitions?^` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thespecificlanguageintherulemakingpackage,suchasindefinitions,islikely H tochangeduringtheinternalreviewprocess.Wewilltrytokeepstakeholdersinformed,butwillnotpostdraftlanguageontheEPAwebpage. ` (#` (#  IV.ActionItems   L 4$33/L 3   3Z`2$3  0    EPAwillcontactJohnEapenofA&Econcerningapotentialsitevisittocollect j informationonthenewthermaloxidizerthathasbeeninstalledtocontrolVOCemissionsfromsomeofthethreadbondinglinesattheMountHollyPlantandtocollectinformationonmethylenechlorideemissionsfromthreadbondingprocesses.3Z``݌ (#(# Ќ   3   3\b2$3  0    StakeholdershavebeenencouragedtosubmitdatatoEPAconcerningtheseasonalnature !L  ofHAPemissionsfromfabriccoatingprocessesandalsoinformationthatcanbeusedindefiningfabriccoatingversusfabricfinishing.3\bb݌ (#(# Ќ   3   3c2$3  0    EPAwillcontactKenMushetofPennRacquetSportstocollectinformationaboutthe % $ uniquetennisballmanufacturingprocess.3c'd݌ (#(# Ќ   3   3:e2$3  0    StakeholdershavebeenrequestedbyEPAtosubmitinformationconcerningthe b(#' applicationofdifferentcoatingscoveredbydifferent_MACT_Ԁstandardstothesamesubstrateonthesamelineorinthesamefacility.3:eee݌ (#(# Ќ   3   3f2$3  0    FacilitySICcodesandthetypesofaddonemissioncontrolsusedhavebeenaddedto  ,Z'+ Table1onpage9oftheattachedbriefingdocument.3fg݌,D(,(#(# Ќ  @^ ^ ListofParticipantsinNovember30,2000FabricCoating  @jj#Teleconference *ddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,<dd ,<dd +  W   Participant +WPW + Affiliation $PW $Vinson_Hellwig_   EPA/_OAQPS_/_ESD_/_CCPG_   KenMushet   X PennRacquetSports   X PaulMathai     EPA/OPPT     JulieFleming   T  _ATMI_   T  TraceyNorberg    RMA    DavidDunn  P  ERMSoutheast,Inc.  P  JohnEapen  ~  American&Efird,Inc.  ~  MichaelHedberg  L TheGoodyearTire&RubberCompany  L MikeWillwerth  z MajiliteManufacturing,Inc.  z AndyShimko  H SeamanCorporation  H BillRobart  v Uretek,Inc.  v VeronicaKress  D TheGatesRubberCompany  D MikeBell  r CoatsAmericanCompany  r HyteJohnson  @ BFGoodrichSafetySystems  @  VenkataPanchakarla  n! FloridaDEP  n" DavidWoodring  <# TheGoodyearTire&RubberCompany  <$ GuyLowe  j % CoatsAmericanCompany  j & TonyMcManus  !8' MooresvilleOfficeNCDEHNR  !8( NathanCobb  f#) AtholCorporation  f#* SteveYork  $4 + ResearchTriangleInstitute  $4 , AltonPeters  b&!- ResearchTriangleInstitute b&!.    |'".    3@% ATTACHMENT     @!XX PRELIMINARY_MACT_ԀFLOORDETERMINATION: N  @FABRICCOATING,PRINTING,ANDDYEING_MACT_Ԁ!   @  FABRICCOATINGSUBCATEGORY@)For@ StakeholderTeleconference@  "November30,2000 #XX!q#XXX@  EMISSIONSTANDARDSDIVISION $ @OFFICEOFAIRQUALITYPLANNINGANDSTANDARDS@ U.S.ENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCY@U U RESEARCHTRIANGLEPARK,N.C.  '0#    *Z% & 1 X#&X> X & 1Ts#& 1 ! X&X> @C C FABRICCOATING_MACT_ԀSURVEY   #&X> X !& 1t#& 1  X&X>(b  (bu0    EPAdevelopedtwolistsofcompanieswithfabriccoatingoperations N throughthe1996toxicreleaseinventory(TRI)withsupplementalinformationaboutnumberofemployees,products,andwhetherP2effortshadbeenundertakenfromliteraturesourcesandstakeholdercontacts(buu݌ (#(# Ќ  6XX4 XXX6(b  (b{w0    Twodifferentsurveyquestionnairesweresent,eachto9companies,inthe X  summerof1998(b{ww݌ (#(# Ќ  b  !"#$%(p34b 3     3x2!3  0 4   Onegrouptocompaniesthatcoatindustrialfabrics(SICcode2295)3xy݌ 4(#4(# Ќ   3     3y2!3  0 4   Onegrouptocompaniesthatperformcordtreatingandsurfacecoating   operationsforrubbercoatedfabric(SICcodes2296,3052,and3069)3y z݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  (b  (b){0    Responseswerereceivedfrom22facilities;informationfromthe22 & facilitiesthatreperesent c   pms   onstitutes the_MACT_Ԁfloordatabasecontainsatotalof21facilities(b){D{݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b=}0    Examplesofproductsmanufacturedfromfabriccoatedbythefacilitiesin  \ thedatabaseinclude:(b=}X}݌ (#(# Ќ   ;   ;5~0  2!3  04(#(#  rubberbeltsandhosesforautomotiveuse;5~`~݌B4(#4(# Ќ   3     3&2!3  0 4   coatedfabricsforuseastarps,hotairballoons,awnings,andouterwear T (raincoats)3&]݌ 4(#4(# Ќ     3   3T2!3  0 4   commercialaircraftevacuationslides3T݌x4(#4(# Ќ   3     3-2!3  0 4   geomembranes3-d݌4(#4(# Ќ   3     32!3  0 4   speakerdiaphragmsurrounds30݌4(#4(# Ќ   3     3Ԃ2!3  0 4   luggage 3ۄ݌ 4(#4(# Ќ   3     32!3  0 4   hotairballoons 3Ԃ ݌ 4(#4(# Ќ   3     3u2!3  0 4   tennisandracquetballs3u݌!4(#4(# Ќ   #4 #&X> X & 1{u#& 1 ! X&X> @E E HAPEMISSIONSFROMFABRICCOATING  Ѐ@vv%OPERATIONS  < #&X> X !& 1#& 1  X&X>(b  (bj0    TotalHAPemissionsforthe2 0 1facilitiesinthe_MACT_Ԁdatabasereporting : actualfacilityHAPemissionswere123142tonsin1997(bj݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bˇ0    ThedistributionofHAPemissionsbyHAPwasasfollows:(bˇ݌p (#(# Ќ  c    c20 4   Toluene0 4(#4(#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#47%c݌ (#(# Ќ  c    c20 4   MEK0 4(#4(#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#34%c݌ (#(# Ќ  c    c20 4   Hexane0 4(#4(#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#8%c݌ (#(# Ќ  c    c20 4   Dimethylformamide0h4(#4(#0h(#h(#0(#(#3%cŋ݌ (#(# Ќ  c    c20 4   AllOthers04(#4(#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#8%c݌, (#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    ThedistributionofHAPemissionsbyunitoperationwasasfollows:(b݌P(#(# Ќ  c    cO20 4   Coatingapplication/curing04(#4(#0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#95.7%cOv݌$t(#(# Ќ  c    cV20 4   AncillaryoperationsincludingcV}݌64(#4(# Ќ     4 storage,mixing,andequipmentcleaning0  4.3%H(#(#   Z #&X> X & 1J#& 1 ! X&X> @qqSUMMARYOFCONTROLDEVICEUSEBYFACILITIESIN  @FABRICCOATINGINDUSTRY_MACT_ԀDATABASE  < (b  #&X> X !& 1#& 1  X&X>(b0    134facilitieshavecontroldevicesinstalled(b݌d(#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Thereare269controlledcoatinglines(bɒ݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bu0    Ofthe269controlledcoatinglines,thenumbercontrolledbytypeofcontrol   deviceinclude:(bu݌ (#(# Ќ  c    c20 4   Thermaloxidizer0h4(#4(#0h(#h(#136c݌2 (#(# Ќ  c    cf20 4   Catalyticoxidizer0h4(#4(#0h(#h(#3cf݌D (#(# Ќ  c    c:20 4   Carbonadsorber0h4(#4(#0h(#h(#9c:a݌V (#(# Ќ  c    c 20 4   Electrostaticprecipitator04(#4(#1c 2݌h (#(# Ќ   *z #&X> X & 1ܑ#& 1 ! X&X> @REPRESENTATIVENESSOFCONTROLDEVICE  @--"PERFORMANCEDATA  < #&X> X !& 1 #& 1  X&X>(b  (b0    Controlefficiencydeterminedbytestinggenerallydonewhencontrol : deviceisnew,possiblywithhighinletHAPloadings(b݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b 0    Maximumdestructionefficienciesareonlyachievedathighinletloadings(b $݌p (#(# Ќ  (b  (bߚ0    Reportedinletloadingbyfabriccoatingfacilitiesrangedfromlessthan100   ppmvto8,500ppmv(bߚ݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b؛0    Performancetestsarerelativelyshortduration(approximatelyonehour)(b؛݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Destructionefficiencymaydegradeovertime,e.g.,becauseofleakingheat >  exchangersorleakingisolationvalves(bȜ݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Aliteraturereviewindicatesthefollowing:(bӝ݌$t(#(# Ќ  c    cq20 4   99percentdestructionisachievableunderidealconditions,lower H efficienciesaretypicalundernormaloperatingconditionscq݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  c    c20 4   Alternationbetweenbedsinaregenerativethermaloxidizerresultsin l destructionefficienciesgenerallybelow99percentc݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  c    c20 4   AnEPAstudyconcludesthat98percentVOCreductionor20ppmvby  compoundexitconcentrationisthehighestcontrollevelachievableforallnewincineratorscנ݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Atelephonesurveyofvendorsindicatesthat98percentefficiencyisthe  ( routineguaranteeforregenerativeorrecuperativethermaloxidizersinthefirstyearofoperation(b݌ (#(# Ќ   $^ #&X> X & 1ט#& 1 ! X&X> @QUALITYOFCAPTUREEFFICIENCYDATA   #&X> X !& 1r#& 1  X&X>(b  (b$0    Datavalidationofthebasisofhighcaptureefficiencyclaimsindicatedthe (x following:(b$?݌ (#(# Ќ  c    c20 4   Ofthe6facilitiesreportedtobeoperatingwithpermanenttotal ^  enclosures(PTEs),enclosuresonlinesin3facilitieshadbeenproperlyverifiedasPTEsusingMethod204c;݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  c    cd20 4   Onlythedatafromthe3facilitiesdeterminingcaptureefficiencyusing   Method204wereusedintheMACTfloordatabasecd݌ 4(#4(# Ќ     #&X> X & 1#& 1 ! X&X> @ _MACT_ԀFLOORDETERMINATION   (b  #&X> X !& 1#& 1  X&X>(b?0    All212facilities(includingfacilitieswithCBIresponses)inthefabric (x coatingMACTdatabasearemajororsyntheticminorfacilities(b?݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Thesetof212facilitieswasusedtoidentifythetopperforming12percentof ^  facilitiesforcoatinglinecontrol(bѩ݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b֪0    DatafromtheCBIfacilitiesarenotpresentedherein;theinformationinthe   CBIfileswasexaminedtodeterminethatnoneoftheCBIfacilitiesare_MACT_Ԁfloorfacilities(b֪݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b:0    SomefacilitiesmaychosetolimitHAPemissionsthroughacombinationof ,  lowHAPcoatingsandaddoncontrolsorthroughtheuseofwaterbornecoatings(b:U݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bk0    Toallowforthesesituations,EPAintendstoprovideanemissionratelimit $t inadditiontotheoverallcontrolefficiency(OCE)limit(bk݌ (#(# Ќ   H #&X> X & 1}#& 1 ! X&X> @FLOORFOROVERALLCONTROLEFFICIENCY   #&X> X !& 1®#& 1  X&X>(b  (bv0    ThecoatinglineOCEwascalculatedasafacilitywideaverageforevery N facilitywithsufficient,nonCBIinformationinthedatabase(bv݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Thecalculationprocedurewasasfollows:(b݌4 (#(# Ќ  c    cK20 4   Calculateanarithmeticaveragefacilitycaptureefficiency(arithmetic X  averageforallcoatinglines)cKr݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  c    cU20 4   Calculateanarithmeticaveragefacilitydestruction(forfacilitieswith |  thermaloxidizers)orrecovery(forfacilitieswithcarbonadsorbers)efficiency(arithmeticaverageforallcontroldevicesreceivingHAPemissionsfromcoatinglinesinthefacility)cU|݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  c    c20 4   CalculateaveragefacilityOCE(productofaveragefacilitycapture   efficiencyandaveragefacilitydestructionorrecoveryefficiency)c"݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  (b  (b'0    Table1listsallfacilitiesinthe_MACT_ԀdatabasewithsufficientnonCBI J informationtocalculateaveragefacilityOCE(b'B݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bW0    Facilitieswithunsubstantiatedcaptureefficiencieswereremovedfromthe 0 _MACT_Ԁfloordetermination,resultingintheremovalof2facilities,whichwerereplacedwiththenextbestperformingfacilities(bWr݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bܷ0    ReportedOCEforthetop12percentrangedfrom93.1to99.3percentand x averaged98.1percent(bܷ݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bӸ0    Becauseofconcernswiththerepresentativenessofcontroldevice   performancedata,thedestructionefficienciesofthe2facilitiesusingthermaloxidizersinthe_MACT_Ԁfloorwereadjustedto98percent(bӸ݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bV0    The_MACT_Ԁfloorforexistingsourceswasdeterminedtobe97percent $F  facilitywidecoatinglineOCE(bVq݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bq0    A98percentfacilitywidecoatinglineOCEwasdeterminedtobethe ,(|#! _MACT_Ԁfloorfornewsources;notechnologywasidentifiedthatcouldachieveabetterOCEthantheuseofapermanenttotalenclosuretocaptureHAPemissionsfromcoatingapplicationstationsandathermaloxidizertodestroyHAPemissionsfromapplicationandthecuringoven(bq݌ t,'%(#(# Ќ  #X & 1t##XXXV#8H  Table1.FabricCoatingAverageFacilityOCEa yXX  *x15dd<dd <<dd <(#(#x,dd",dd",dd",dd",dd",dd"+    FacilityRank  z FacilitySICCode  z TypeofAddonControlDeviceb  z  FacilityOCÈ(%)c  z  CaptureEfficiency(%)d  z ControlDeviceEfficiency(%)d 4* z  ?1?4d1d VL(  ?1 ? @2295@Vd2295 7-+ @2295 @ 7RTOd 7-  33333X@99.333333X@7d99.3d ZP+ 33333X@99.3 33333X@ Y@100.0Y@Zd100.0d ZP, Y@100.0 Y@ 33333X@99.333333X@Zd99.3d VL+ 33333X@99.3 33333X@  @2@V2 VL( b  @2 @ ا@3052ا@V3052 7-+ b ا@3052 ا@ 7TO 7-  b X@99.0X@799.0 ZP+ b X@99.0 X@ Y@100.0Y@Z100.0 ZP, b Y@100.0 Y@ X@99.0X@Z99.0 VL+ b X@99.0 X@  @3@Vd3d 4*(^    @3 @ 4dNA  ^ ! TOd 7- ^ " X@98.9X@7d98.9d ZP+^ # X@98.9 X@ Y@100.0Y@Zd100.0d ZP,^ $ Y@100.0 Y@ X@98.9X@Zd98.9d VL+^ % X@98.9 X@  @4@V4 VL( &  @4 @ @2295@V2295 7-+ ' @2295 @ 7RTO 7-  ( LX@97.2LX@797.2 ZP+ ) LX@97.2 LX@ Y@100.0Y@Z100.0 ZP, * Y@100.0 Y@ LX@97.2LX@Z97.2 VL+ + LX@97.2 LX@  @5@Vd5 4*( F ,  @5 @ 42295,3069   F - CA 7-  F . X@96.0X@796.0 ZP+ F / X@96.0 X@ Y@100.0Y@Z100.0 ZP, F 0 Y@100.0 Y@ X@96.0X@Z96.0d VL+ F 1 X@96.0 X@  @6@V6 VL(B 2  @6 @ @2295@V2295 7-+B 3 @2295 @ 7TO 7- B 4 33333W@95.333333W@795.3 YO+B 5 33333W@95.3 33333W@ X@99.0X@Y99.0 YO+B 6 X@99.0 X@ 33333X@96.333333X@Y96.3 VL+B 7 33333X@96.3 33333X@  @7@V7 VL( 8  @7 @ ڮ@3949ڮ@V3949 7-+ 9 ڮ@3949 ڮ@ 7CA 7-  : fffffFW@93.1fffffFW@793.1 YO+ ; fffffFW@93.1 fffffFW@ X@98.0X@Y98.0 YO+ < X@98.0 X@ W@95.0W@Y95.0 VL+ = W@95.0 W@   @8 @V8 VL(* >   @8  @ @2295@V2295 7-+* ? @2295 @ 7TO 7- * @ V@91.9V@791.9 YO+* A V@91.9 V@ 33333sW@93.833333sW@Y93.8 YO+* B 33333sW@93.8 33333sW@ X@98.0X@Y98.0 VL+* C X@98.0 X@  "@9"@V9 VL(&vD  "@9 "@ ا@3052ا@V3052 7-+&vE ا@3052 ا@ 7CA 7- &vF 33333V@90.833333V@790.8 YO+&vG 33333V@90.8 33333V@ 33333X@99.833333X@Y99.8 YO+&vH 33333X@99.8 33333X@ V@91.0V@Y91.0 WM+&vI V@91.0 V@  $@10$@W10 5+)rJ  $@10 $@ 52295,3052  rK CO  rL NAe  rM NA 7- rN W@94.0W@794.0 WM+rO W@94.0 W@  &@11&@W11 WM)P  &@11 &@ @2295@W2295 7-+Q @2295 @ 7CO  R NA  S NA 7- T V@90.0V@790.0 WM+U V@90.0 V@  (@12(@W12 WM) ZV  (@12 (@ @2295@W2295 7-+ ZW @2295 @ 7NCf   ZX NC   ZY NC   ZZ NC 5+  Z[  *@13*@513 WM)V\  *@13 *@ @2295@W2295 7-+V] @2295 @ 7NC  V^ NC  V_ NC  V` NC 5+ Va  ,@14,@514 WM)b  ,@14 ,@ @2295@W2295 7-+c @2295 @ 7NC  d NC  e NC  f NC 5+ g  .@15.@515 WM)>h  .@15 .@ ا@3052ا@W3052 7-+>i ا@3052 ا@ 7NC  >j NC  >k NC  >l NC 5+ >m  0@160@516 WM):n  0@16 0@ @3069@W3069 7-+:o @3069 @ 7NC  :p NC  :q NC  :r NC 5+ :s  1@171@517 WM)t  1@17 1@ ا@3052ا@W3052 7-+u ا@3052 ا@ 7NC  v NC  w NC  x NC 5+ y  2@182@518 5+)"z  2@18 2@ 5CBI  "{ CBIg  "| CBI  "} CBI  "~ CBI 5+ "  3@193@519 5+) n  3@19 3@ 5CBI   n CBI   n CBI   n CBI   n CBI 5+  n  4@204@520 5+)j!  4@20 4@ 5CBI  j! CBI  j! CBI  j! CBI  j! CBI 5+ j!  5@215@521 5+)"  5@21 5@ 5CBI  " CBI  " CBI  " CBI  " CBI 5+ "  6@226@5  " 22 5+)$R  6@22 6@ 5 CBI "  $R ""  $R CBI"#  $R ##  $R CBI#$  $R $$  $R CBI$%  $R %%  $R CBI% $R    a0  IncludesaveragefacilityOCEforallfacilitiesintheMACTdatabasewithsufficientnonCBIinformationtocalculate %  averagefacilityOCE.ForfacilitieswithoutanaveragefacilityOCE,thereasontheOCEwasnotcalculatedisnoted. (#(# b0  RTO=RegenerativeThermalOxidizer;TO=ThermalOxidizer;CA=CarbonAdsorber;CO=CatalyticOxidizer.'b"(#(# c0  Productofaveragefacilitycaptureandcontrolefficienciesascalculatedfromdatareportedbyfacility.'#(#(# d0  Arithmeticaverageofdatareportedbyfacilityifdifferentefficienciesreportedfordifferentlines.(#(#(# e0  NA=NotAvailable:)$(#(# f0  NC=NoControl)B%(#(# g0  CBI=ConfidentialBusinessInformation*%(#(# NOTE:The3MACTfloorfacilitiesaredhighlightedd.&y& 1 &  ,j'    #& & 1#& 1 !&FLOORFOREMISSIONRATE & 1  !& 1  (b  (b0    Datafromthefabriccoating_MACT_Ԁdatabasewereusedtocalculate N alternativefacilityemissionratelimitsforexistingandnewsources(b݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    ThealternativefacilityHAPemissionratewascalculatedbasedonapplying 4  the_MACT_ԀfloorOCEtoaprecontrolledfacilityHAPemissionraterepresentativeforthisindustry(b݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (bZ0    Thecalculationprocedurewasasfollows:(bZu݌| (#(# Ќ  c    c20 4   AssumingalloftheHAPincoatingsisemitted,calculateaveragepre   controlledfacilityHAPemissionrateintermsofpoundsofHAPperpoundofsolidsfromreportedHAPcontainingcoatingmaterialsused(includingthinningsolvents)c7݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  c    c20 4   Calculateaveragefacilitycontrolledemissionratebymultiplyingthe 8 precontrolledfacilityHAPemissionratebyoneminusthe_MACT_ԀfloorfacilitywidecoatinglineOCEc݌ 4(#4(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Table2listsallfacilitiesinthefabriccoating_MACT_Ԁdatabasewith 0 sufficientinformationtocalculatetheaverageprecontrolledfacilityemissionrateof4.16poundsofHAPemittedperpoundofsolids(b,݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Thealternativeemissionratelimitforexistingsourceswasdeterminedtobe x 0.12poundsofHAPemittedperpoundofsolids(b݌ (#(# Ќ  (b  (b0    Thealternativeemissionratelimitfornewsourceswasdeterminedtobe   0.08poundsofHAPemittedperpoundofsolids(b݌ !(#(# Ќ  #X & 1#XXX @N N Table2.FabricCoatingFacilityAverageEmissionRate1   *-.dddd"dd"dd"dd"dd"dd"15(#(#,dd",dd",dd",dd",dd",dd"+    FacilityNumber " TotalPoundsofHAPinCoatingMaterials2    TotalPoundsofSolidsinCoatingMaterials2    LbsofHAP/LbsofSolids3   EmissionRateat97%FacilityOCE   EmissionRateat98%FacilityOCE 4*   ?1?41 XN(F   ?1 ? '"A594933'"AX594,933 ]S-F  '"A594933 '"A A171733A]171,733 [Q-F  A171733 A Gz @3.46Gz @[3.46 YO+F  Gz @3.46 Gz @ ?0.10?Y0.10 YO+F  ?0.10 ? Q?0.07Q?Y0.07 VL+F  Q?0.07 Q?  @2@V2 WM(    @2 @ `Z@71078`Z@W71,078 [Q, ! `Z@71078 `Z@ 1@118751@[11,875 ZP, " 1@11875 1@ (\@5.99(\@Z5.99 YO+ # (\@5.99 (\@  ףp= ?0.18 ףp= ?Y0.18 YO+ $  ףp= ?0.18  ףp= ? Q?0.12Q?Y0.12 VL+ % Q?0.12 Q?  @3@V3 XN(B &  @3 @ H"#A626980H"#AX626,980 ]S-B ' H"#A626980 H"#A  @126370 @]126,370 [Q-B (  @126370  @ ףp= @4.96ףp= @[4.96 YO+B ) ףp= @4.96 ףp= @ 333333?0.15333333?Y0.15 YO+B * 333333?0.15 333333? ?0.10?Y0.10 VL+B + ?0.10 ?  @4@V4 XN( ,  @4 @ "#A643217"#AX643,217 ]S- - "#A643217 "#A `<@111558`<@]111,558 [Q- . `<@111558 `<@ Gz@5.77Gz@[5.77 YO+ / Gz@5.77 Gz@ (\?0.17(\?Y0.17 YO+ 0 (\?0.17 (\? Q?0.12Q?Y0.12 VL+ 1 Q?0.12 Q?  @5@V5 XN(> 2  @5 @ A452780AX452,780 ]S-> 3 A452780 A @113200@]113,200 [Q-> 4 @113200 @ @4.00@[4.00 YO+> 5 @4.00 @ Q?0.12Q?Y0.12 YO+> 6 Q?0.12 Q? {Gz?0.08{Gz?Y0.08 VL+> 7 {Gz?0.08 {Gz?  @6@V6 XN( 8  @6 @ I+A894152I+AX894,152 ]S- 9 I+A894152 I+A 8A2518478A]251,847 [Q- : 8A251847 8A ffffff @3.55ffffff @[3.55 YO+ ; ffffff @3.55 ffffff @ )\(?0.11)\(?Y0.11 YO+ < )\(?0.11 )\(? Q?0.07Q?Y0.07 VL+ = Q?0.07 Q?  @7@V7 XN(:>  @7 @ nW'A764855nW'AX764,855 ]S-:? nW'A764855 nW'A A340521A]340,521 [Q-:@ A340521 A @2.25@[2.25 YO+:A @2.25 @ Q?0.07Q?Y0.07 YO+:B Q?0.07 Q? ?0.05?Y0.05 VL+:C ?0.05 ?   @8 @V8 XN(D   @8  @ )A848199)AX848,199 ]S-E )A848199 )A 1A2653261A]265,326 [Q-F 1A265326 1A  @3.20 @[3.20 YO+G  @3.20  @ ?0.10?Y0.10 YO+H ?0.10 ? Q?0.06Q?Y0.06 VL+I Q?0.06 Q?  "@9"@V9 WM(6J  "@9 "@ U@16043U@W16,043 ZP,6K U@16043 U@ m@6509m@Z6,509 YO+6L m@6509 m@ Gz@2.46Gz@Y2.46 YO+6M Gz@2.46 Gz@ Q?0.07Q?Y0.07 YO+6N Q?0.07 Q? ?0.05?Y0.05 WM+6O ?0.05 ?  $@10$@W10 XN)P  $@10 $@  @34801 @X34,801 ZP,Q  @34801  @ @8548@Z8,548 YO+R @8548 @ HzG@4.07HzG@Y4.07 YO+S HzG@4.07 HzG@ Q?0.12Q?Y0.12 YO+T Q?0.12 Q? {Gz?0.08{Gz?Y0.08 WM+U {Gz?0.08 {Gz?  &@11&@W11 5+)2V  &@11 &@ 5CBI  2W CBI  2X CBI  2Y CBI  2Z CBI 5+ 2[  (@12(@512 5+)\  (@12 (@ 5CBI  ] CBI  ^ CBI  _ CBI  ` CBI 5+ a  *@13*@513 5+).~b  *@13 *@ 5CBI  .~c CBI  .~d CBI  .~e CBI  .~f CBI 5+ .~g  ,@14,@514 5+)h  ,@14 ,@ 5CBI  i CBI  j CBI  k CBI  l CBI  m   *zn   *zo   *zp   *zq   *zr   *zs AVG.   t    u  7-  v p= ף@4.16p= ף@74.16 YO+ w p= ף@4.16 p= ף@ Q?0.12Q?Y0.12 YO+ x Q?0.12 Q? {Gz?0.08{Gz?Y0.08;1/ y {Gz?0.08  {Gz? ;10  Listsallfacilitiesinthe_MACT_Ԁdatabasewithsufficientinformationtocalculateaverage "z facilityemissionrateintermsofpoundsofHAPemittedperpoundsofsolidsapplied. (#(# 20  Calculatedfromcoating/coatingcomponentandthinningsolventmaterialsreportedby $| facility. (#(# 30  CalculatedbydividingtotalpoundsofHAP(includingthinningsolvents)incoating T&!~ materialsbytotalpoundsofsolidsincoatingmaterials.