WPC 2BP Z Courier 10cpi3|x  wx6X@8;X@HP LaserJet IIISiHPLASIII.PRSXx6X@HZ%tX@5~z2/ 6 t IIIsiHP3SI.PRSSXx6X@,\,VЁX@3|g  03-20-95 12:00p TXT  2naBibliogrphy6NBibliography!=(!8@ M*!) @E Doc Init@N6NInitialize Document Style@ N*!) @E    I. 1. A. a.(1)(a) i) a)DocumentҲa1DocumentE+!)Document StyleA!=(!8@ S*!F *  ׃  a2DocumentE+!)Document StyleA!=(!8@ S*!*    2FqeLea3DocumentE+!)Document StyleA!=(!8@ S*!0     a4DocumentE+!)Document StyleA!=(!8@ S*!   . a5DocumentE+!)Document StyleA!=(!8@ S*!  a6DocumentE+!)Document StyleA!=(!8@ S*!  2 pH p (  a7DocumentE+!)Document StyleA!=(!8@ S*! ` ` ` a8DocumentE+!)Document StyleA!=(!8@ S*! ` ` ` Tech InitT6NInitialize Technical Style@ T*!) @E  1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 .1 Technicala1Technical+!)Technical Document StyleA!=(!8@ U*! 4!     2<   #  a2Technical+!)Technical Document StyleA!=(!8@ U*! *    a3Technical+!)Technical Document StyleA!=(!8@ U*!'   a4Technical+!)Technical Document StyleA!=(!8@ U*!&   a5Technical+!)Technical Document StyleA!=(!8@ U*!&   . 2'n  x * a6Technical+!)Technical Document StyleA!=(!8@ U*!&!"  . a7Technical+!)Technical Document StyleA!=(!8@ U*!&#$  . a8Technical+!)Technical Document StyleA!=(!8@ U*!&%&  . Pleading@V6NHeader for numbered pleading paper*!) @E'(   ,#6X@@# X  y*dddyy*dddy HH1 HH2 HH3 HH4 HH5 HH6 HH7 HH8 HH9 H10 H11 H12 H13 H14 H15 H16 H17 H18 H19 H20 H21 H22 H23 H24 H25 H26 H27 H28   Ӳ2XYpq!e1) @[6NA!=(!8@ [*!) @E)*2) @\6NDocument Style=(!8@ \*!) @E+,` ` ` 3) @]6NDocument Style=(!8@ ]*!) @E- . . 4) @^6NDocument Style=(!8@ ^*!) @E /0 2#e)p!5) @_6NDocument Style=(!8@ _*!) @E 12 6) @`6NDocument Style=(!8@ `*!) @E*34   7) @a6NDocument Style=(!8@ a*!) @E56` ` ` 8) @b6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @E878@   2U )9) @c6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @EA9:@` `  ` ` ` 10) @d6NDocument Style=(!8@ d*!) @E0; <    11) @e6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @EJ=>` ` @  ` `  12) @f6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @E S?@` `  @  2!"#}$E13) @g6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @E!\AB` `  @hh# hhh 14) @h6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @E"eCD` `  hh#@( hh# 15) @i6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @E#nEF` `  hh#(@- ( 16) @j6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @E$wGH` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp 2%H&'( 17) @k6NDocument Style=(!8@ k*!) @E%FIJ *  ׃  18) @l6NTechnical Document Style@ l*!) @E&&KL  . 19) @m6NTechnical Document Style@ m*!) @E'&MN  . 20) @n6NTechnical Document Style@ n*!) @E(*OP    28!)*o+ , 21) @o6NTechnical Document Style@ o*!) @E)'QR   22) @p6NTechnical Document Style@ p*!) @E*&ST   23) @q6NTechnical Document Style@ q*!) @E+4U$V     24) @r6NTechnical Document Style@ r*!) @E,&WX  . 27#-j!.e!/pT"0s"25) @s6NTechnical Document Style@ s*!) @E-&YZ  . Heading 2t6NUnderlined Heading Flush Leftt*!) @E.[\ Heading 1u6NCentered Heading(!8@ u*!) @E/]^* Ã  Bullet List6NIndented Bullet List8@ v*!) @E0_`` ` ` 27%1qi#2e#3e?$4$26) @w6NDocument Style=(!8@ w*!) @E1a b . 27) @x6NDocument Style=(!8@ x*!) @E2 cd 28) @y6NDocument Style=(!8@ y*!) @E3 ef 29) @z6NDocument Style=(!8@ z*!) @E4*gh   2'5pi%6%7n&8('30) @{6NDocument Style=(!8@ {*!) @E5ij` ` ` 31) @|6NDocument Style=(!8@ |*!) @E60k l    32) @}6NDocument Style=(!8@ }*!) @E7Fmn *  ׃  33) @~6NTechnical Document Style@ ~*!) @E8&op  . 2)*9':d(;)<)34) @6NTechnical Document Style@ *!) @E9&qr  . 35) @6NTechnical Document Style@ *!) @E:*st    36) @6NTechnical Document Style@ *!) @E;'uv   37) @6NTechnical Document Style@ *!) @E<&wx   2,=[*> +?+@,38) @6NTechnical Document Style@ *!) @E=4y$z     39) @6NTechnical Document Style@ *!) @E>&{|  . 40) @6NTechnical Document Style@ *!) @E?&}~  . 41) @6NDocument Style=(!8@ *!) @E@F *  ׃  2Revised 11/92 XREPORTS@6NBID, ACT, CTG=(!8@ *!) @EK6 ,   CPartIB@6NCompendium Part 1B!8@ *!) @EL  B#Xw P7XP# Method IO1`T(#@Part I: Dichot ă yxmdddy#6X@@# Part I: Dichot`(#@Method IO1 ă yx\dddyc#Xw P7XP#yxdddy Revised 11/92` (#FPage  X#6X@ @#yxdddy Page `(#>Revised 11/92 X2vLM <NAOFPKCPart2A@6NCompendium Part 2: Method A *!) @EM  B#Xw P 7XP# Method IO1`(#0Part 2: XRay Fluorescence Analysis ă yxmdddy#6X@ @# Part 2: XRay Fluorescence Analysis `(#@ Method IO1 ă yxLdddyc#Xw P 7XP#yxdddy Revised 11/92` (#FPage  X#6X@ @#yxdddy Page `(#>Revised 11/92 Xstdmethod6NPart 1-Std Method!8@ *!) @EN  B#Xw P7XP# Method IO2`(#8Part 1: Standard Method ă yxmdddy#6X@@# Part 1: Standard Method `(#@ Method IO2 ă yxLdddyc#Xw P7XP#yxdddy Revised 11/92` (#FPage  X#6X@@#yxdddy Page `(#>Revised 11/92 XCstdmethod6NCompendium--Part 1, Standard Method*!) @EO  B#Xw P7XP# Method IO2`(#8Part 1: Standard Method ă yxmdddy#6X@@# Part 1: Standard Method `(#@ Method IO2 ă yxLdddyc#Xw P7XP#yxdddy Revised 11/92` (#FPage  X#6X@@#yxdddy Page `(#>Revised 11/92 XCondensed Pr6NCondensed print: Line printer, 1/2" margin T/B@EPE'#H H@;@# XX  #H H@;@#2PQsLROSOTNP2 col conden6NCondensed print 2-column (2 std pages on one) @EQ '3  XX  XXX #H H@;@# X|81҇Heading@6NChapter Heading=(!8@ *!) @ER3  *  ׃  Right Par6NRight-Aligned Paragraph Numbers*!) @ES<@    Subheading6NSubheadingA!=(!8@ *!) @ET.   2RU[QV[oQW[QX[%RSMALL8PT@6N A!=(!8@ *!) @EULARGE 13PT6N A!=(!8@ *!) @EVFINE 6PT@6N A!=(!8@ *!) @EWSMALL 8PT6N A!=(!8@ *!) @EX2oTY[RZ[ S[hS\aTVRY LRG 21PT6N A!=(!8@ *!) @EYEX LRGE 30PT6N A!=(!8@ *!) @EZHVBold @6NHelv Bold 11 pt + Helv 11 pt *!) @E[''#> p0Qp##Yo> PQP#n1) @6NHanging indent [1 Tab]8@ *!) @E\ 2V]jT^s U_|~U`Un2) @6NHanging Indent [2 Tabs]8@ *!) @E]` ` n3) @6NHanging Indent [3 Tabs]8@ *!) @E^` `  n4) @6NHanging Indent [4 Tabs]8@ *!) @E_$` `  n5) @6NHanging Indent [5 Tabs]8@ *!) @E`-` `  hh#2XaVbu?Wc~Wd2Xn6) @6NHanging Indent [6 Tabs]8@ *!) @Ea6` `  hh#(-n1) @6NJustified Hanging Indent [1 Tab]*!) @Eb -n2) @6NJustified Hanging Indent [2 Tabs]*!) @Ec ` ` -n3) @6NJustified Hanging Indent [3 Tabs]*!) @Ed% ` `  2]]eXf{YgZhZ-n4) @6NJustified Hanging Indent [4 Tabs]*!) @Ee. ` `  -n5) @6NJustified Hanging Indent [5 Tabs]*!) @Ef7 ` `  hh#-n6) @6NJustified Hanging Indent [6 Tabs]*!) @Eg@ ` `  hh#(RESUMES@6NFORMATS RESUMES FOR PROPOSALS: 3/10/89!) @EhOX `Њ X   A#6X@@#X ` TIMOTHY A. HALL EXPERIENCE (continued) A X 2gi]j5^k^l _TRB) @6NTimes Roman bold 11 pt + Times Roman Reg) @Ei''#&d4 pE&p##&h4 PE&P#QBOLD @6NHelv Bold 10pt + Letter Gothic 16.66 pitch) @Ej''#`D4pp##H|@@#BOLD) @6NHelv Bold 11 pt + Letter Gothic*!) @Ek''#&lD4p &p##&d|@!&@#Q8) @6NStored Header & Headings for Question 8) @El#H|@"@# XX    '3 y- dddy #`D4p#p# 8. Work by Firm or Joint Venture Which Best Illustrates Current Qualifications Relevant To This Project#H|@$@# y- dddy #`D4p%p#n %{ % '+ ICFKAISER ENGINEERS %%/2B{ { E%%Pe. ' 'SEstimated Cost (in thousands) nn %%/2Bd.{ { ECompletion%%P ' 'S++\++\Work For a.nn Project Name b.Nature of Firm's%%/c.2Owner'sB{ { EDate (Actual%%P ' 'SEntire++\Which Firm nn & Location Responsibility%%/2Name & AddressB{ { Eor Estimated)%%P ' 'SProject++\Is Responsible#H|@&@# y-  dddy n! ', 2vmgnnosp2]tQ7) @6NStored Header & Footer for Question 7!) @Em '3  @@   #6X@'@# @@@@ y/@dddy #`D4p(p# 7.Brief Resumes of Key Persons, Specialists, and Individual Consultants Anticipated for this Project.#H|@)@# y/@dddy#6X@*@# @@@@ y/@dddy #H|@+@#ID hereQ10) @6NStored Header & Footer for Question 10!) @En '3  @@   C #6X@,@#  y-dddy #`D4p-p# 10.Use this space to provide any additional information or description of resources (including any computer design capabilities) supporting  your firm's qualifications for the proposed project.#H|@.@# y-dddyCT#6X@/@#  ID hereTDefault Para6NDefault Paragraph Font8@ *!) @Eofooter @6NfooterA!=(!8@ *!) @Ep (# ` hp x (#2zqlvr-ws,xtypage number6Npage number!=(!8@ *!) @Eqa1complevel+!)Compendium auto numbering!=(!8@ *!rVQ # P07P# .  #&m P17&P# a2complevel+!)Compendium auto numbering!=(!8@ *!s]1 #&m P27&P#  #&m P37&P# a3complevel+!)Compendium auto numbering!=(!8@ *!tZ '#&m P47&P#   #&m P57&P#2{|u3zv {wq{xq |a4complevel+!)Compendium auto numbering!=(!8@ *!uZ'` ` #&m P67&P#  #&m P77&P#a5complevel+!)Compendium auto numbering!=(!8@ *!v1` `   a6complevel+!)Compendium auto numbering!=(!8@ *!wa7complevel+!)Compendium auto numbering!=(!8@ *!x2~yq|z}{}|,~a8complevel+!)Compendium auto numbering!=(!8@ *!ya1MRIREPORT+!)MRI Report with Level 1 flushed left8@ *!z& .0  a2MRIREPORT+!)MRI Report with Level 1 flushed left8@ *!{$   a3MRIREPORT+!)MRI Report with Level 1 flushed left8@ *!|'   2}~~qqva4MRIREPORT+!)MRI Report with Level 1 flushed left8@ *!}0 . a5MRIREPORT+!)MRI Report with Level 1 flushed left8@ *!~(. . a6MRIREPORT+!)MRI Report with Level 1 flushed left8@ *!a7MRIREPORT+!)MRI Report with Level 1 flushed left8@ *!2'qa8MRIREPORT+!)MRI Report with Level 1 flushed left8@ *!a1LEVEL 5E+!)Using 1-5 levels for paragraph numbering@ *!& .0  a2LEVEL 5E+!)Using 1-5 levels for paragraph numbering@ *!$   a3LEVEL 5E+!)Using 1-5 levels for paragraph numbering@ *!' . 2HY߃qfqׄa4LEVEL 5E+!)Using 1-5 levels for paragraph numbering@ *!'   . a5LEVEL 5E+!)Using 1-5 levels for paragraph numbering@ *!(  . . a6LEVEL 5E+!)Using 1-5 levels for paragraph numbering@ *! a7LEVEL 5E+!)Using 1-5 levels for paragraph numbering@ *!2&qzYqDqa8LEVEL 5E+!)Using 1-5 levels for paragraph numbering@ *!a150E+!)@A!=(!8@ *!1a250E+!)@A!=(!8@ *!a350E+!)@A!=(!8@ *!2qXqɇq:qa450E+!)@A!=(!8@ *!a550E+!)@A!=(!8@ *!a650E+!)@A!=(!8@ *!a750E+!)@A!=(!8@ *! 2qNpa850E+!)@A!=(!8@ *!!"a1EPA.STYE+!)EPA Style with TOC marking!=(!8@ *!L# $  *SECTION ؃ *׃ a2EPA.STYE+!)EPA Style with TOC marking!=(!8@ *!-% & a3EPA.STYE+!)EPA Style with TOC marking!=(!8@ *!'' (  2ƍPՌqUa4EPA.STYE+!)EPA Style with TOC marking!=(!8@ *!$)*  a5EPA.STYE+!)EPA Style with TOC marking!=(!8@ *!'+, ĩ a6EPA.STYE+!)EPA Style with TOC marking!=(!8@ *!$-. . a7EPA.STYE+!)EPA Style with TOC marking!=(!8@ *!/02:qia8EPA.STYE+!)EPA Style with TOC marking!=(!8@ *!12a152E+!)Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8@ *!834@   a252E+!)Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8@ *!A56@` `  ` ` ` a352E+!)Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8@ *!J78` ` @  ` `  2Vlϑa452E+!)Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8@ *!S9:` `  @  a552E+!)Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8@ *!\;<` `  @hh# hhh a652E+!)Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8@ *!e=>` `  hh#@( hh# a752E+!)Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8@ *!n?@` `  hh#(@- ( 2BXYa852E+!)Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers!8@ *!wAB` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp CEL) @6NSets 8 for Header CEO8@ *!) @ECDAppend Cvr6NFormat for Appendix Cover Sheets*!) @EJEF= h #[4  p8G;##[4  p9G;#VOCDOC.STY6NStyle sheet for VOCDOC Report*!) @EZGH#Yo> P:QP#   | \ <|\< !Њ0c#Yo> P;QP#   | \ <|\< ! CH91310 $ 2.t]+SSۛNotes @6NHelv. small type below tables*!) @E8IJ'#mM2P<P#NOTES:#mM2P=P#Report @6NPechan formal reports8@ *!) @EKL#&G\  P>&P# (08@Footnote@6NFootnote for reports (schoolbook)*!) @EMN (08@HPX!"#_P?P#Resume @6NPechan staff resume format 09/03/91*!) @EOP#eP@ P#P 0 pP02Z`˞1st tier (A)6NHeading for 1st-tier section *!) @E'Q R'#wX pAC&# #wX pBC&#2nd tier (1)6Nheading for 2nd-tier section *!) @E0S T'#vz  xCC&# #vz  xDC&#3rd tier (a)6NHeading for 3rd-tier section *!) @E9U V'#vz  xEC&#` `  #vz  xFC&#4th tier (i)6NHeading for 4th level8@ *!) @EBW X'#vz  xGC&#` `   #vz  xHC&#2H֡sChapterhead6Ntop of chapter=(!8@ *!) @E0Y Z'*#_X pIC#у #_X pJC#Bullet @ 6NBullet (Schoolbook)8@ *!) @E%[\` ` ` "   Source @!6NSources for tables!8@ !*!) @E9]^'#<2PKP#SOURCE:` ` ` #<2PLP#Envelope@"6N#10 envelope w/o return address 09/03/91) @E_` V,  ` h  h 23gPTable Title6Nformats table titles in Pechan reports!) @E0a b'D*#:x2pMCX#у#:x2pNCX#Appendix Cov6Nformats text for appendix cover sheet!) @E=cd'  D*#2PO ##2PP #Table Text6Nformats text in Pechan tables%*!) @E'ef'#Yo> PQQP##Yo> PRQP#") @&6NSmall Circle!=(!8@ &*!) @Egh"2qlqݧqNa11st level+!)@""A!=(!8@ '*!'ij  a21st level+!)@""A!=(!8@ '*!kla31st level+!)@""A!=(!8@ '*!mna41st level+!)@""A!=(!8@ '*!op2qqbqөqDa51st level+!)@""A!=(!8@ '*!qra61st level+!)@""A!=(!8@ '*!sta71st level+!)@""A!=(!8@ '*!uva81st level+!)@""A!=(!8@ '*!wx2ìx_qqRa12 levelE+!)@00A!=(!8@ (*!yz  a22 levelE+!)@00A!=(!8@ (*!*{| a32 levelE+!)@00A!=(!8@ (*!}~a42 levelE+!)@00A!=(!8@ (*!2qqfq׭qHa52 levelE+!)@00A!=(!8@ (*!a62 levelE+!)@00A!=(!8@ (*!a72 levelE+!)@00A!=(!8@ (*!a82 levelE+!)@00A!=(!8@ (*!2qq\qͯq>[1]}@_Nc!X@iN)F N X@[2]}@_Nc!X@iN)F N X@[3]}@_Nc!X@iN)F N X@[4]}@_Nc!X@iN)F N X@2qqRqñq4[5]}@_Nc!X@iN)F N X@[6]}@_Nc!X@iN)F N X@[7]}@_Nc!X@iN)F N X@[8]}@_Nc!X@iN)F N X@2Be0ײcv\dpdXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularX6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@ @<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P 7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@ @<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P 7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@ @<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXw P7XP* `*Times New Roman (TT)X6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularH H@;@3 HA`$Arial (TT)H H@;@3 HA`$Arial (TT)H H@;@3 HA`$Arial (TT)> p0Qp.> AArial (TT)Yo> PQP,o> A`Arial (TT)6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New Regular&d4 pE&p.4 *Times New Roman (TT)&&h4 PE&P/4 `*Times New Roman (TT)&`D4pp0D4AArial (TT)H|@@6|A`$Arial (TT)&lD4p &p1D4AArial (TT)&&d|@!&@7|A`$Arial (TT)&H|@"@6|A`$Arial (TT)`D4p#p0D4AArial (TT)H|@$@6|A`$Arial (TT)`D4p%p0D4AArial (TT)H|@&@6|A`$Arial (TT)6X@'@<4 9Z .Courier New Regular`D4p(p0D4AArial (TT)H|@)@6|A`$Arial (TT)6X@*@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularH|@+@6|A`$Arial (TT)6X@,@<4 9Z .Courier New Regular`D4p-p0D4AArial (TT)H|@.@6|A`$Arial (TT)6X@/@<4 9Z .Courier New Regular P07P*`&m P17&P)`&&m P27&P)`&&m P37&P)`&&m P47&P)`&&m P57&P)`&&m P67&P)`&&m P77&P)`&[4  p8G;.X 2Times New RomanBoldTT[4  p9G;.X 2Times New RomanBoldTTYo> P:QP,o> A`Arial (TT)Yo> P;QP,o> A`Arial (TT)mM2P<P02`mM2P=P02`&G\  P>&P* `*Times New RomanTT&_P?P)`eP@ P)` wX pAC&.X 2Times New Roman Bold (TT)&wX pBC&.X 2Times New Roman Bold (TT)&vz  xCC&-z  @Times New Roman Bold Italic (TT)&vz  xDC&-z  @Times New Roman Bold Italic (TT)&vz  xEC&-z  @Times New Roman Bold Italic (TT)&vz  xFC&-z  @Times New Roman Bold Italic (TT)&vz  xGC&-z  @Times New Roman Bold Italic (TT)&vz  xHC&-z  @Times New Roman Bold Italic (TT)&_X pIC.X 2Times New Roman Bold (TT)_X pJC.X 2Times New Roman Bold (TT)<2PKP,o> A`ArialTT<2PLP,o> A`ArialTT:x2pMCX22AArial Bold (TT)X:x2pNCX22AArial Bold (TT)X2PO 22 2PP 22 Yo> PQQP,o> A`Arial (TT)Yo> PRQP,o> A`Arial (TT)Xx6X@SX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularX2PTP6QAZ*Helvetica RegularXx6X@UX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@VX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@WX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@XX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@YX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@ZX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@[X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@\X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@]X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@^X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@_X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@`X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@aX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@b7X@<6X9`(CourierXXx6X@cX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@d7X@<6X9`(CourierXx6X@e7X@<6X9`(CourierXXx6X@fX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@gX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@h7X@<6X9`(CourierXXx6X@iX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@jX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@kX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@lX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@mX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@nX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@oX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@pX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@qX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@rX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@sX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@tX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@uX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@vX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@wX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@xX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@yX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@zX@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@{X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@|X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@}X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@~X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@7X@<6X9`(CourierXx6X@7X@<6X9`(CourierXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXx6X@7X@<6X9`(CourierXx6X@7X@<6X9`(CourierXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXZ6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXZ6X@@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@7X@<6X9`(CourierXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@7X@<6X9`(CourierXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXx6X@7X@<6X9`(CourierXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@7X@<6X9`(CourierXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier NewTTXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXx6X@X@<6X9`("Courier 10cpiXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<4 9Z .Courier New RegularXXx6X@X@<09Z .Courier New RegularXlevel1 ]=@6W]Chapter Heading=(8]"=*@ ].E-.* ׃level2 ]>@6W]Section Heading=(8]">*@ ].E/0  level3 ]?@6W]Sub-Section Heading8]"?*@ ].E 1 2 2 jpte^eBfhlevel4 ]@@6W]Sub-sub Section (lowest referenced level)@ ].E 3 4subscriptA@6W] 'E =(8]"A*@ ].E56Letter B]B@6W]Begin letter: Advance, insert date*@ ].Em78#XpD4PXP#  X7D3 1, 4D Letter M]E@6W]Begin letter, insert merge codes*@ ].E9:#XpD4PXP#X  6D3 1, 4D 66first name~ 66last name~ 66address~ Dear 66salutation~: 2\l^Rjj/kksuperscript@6W] 'E =(8]"F*@ ].E;<Normal ]G@6W] 'E =(8]"G*@ ].E'=>#Xr\ PXP#a1Right Par+*@Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8]"N*8OP@   a2Right Par+*@Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8]"N*AQR@` `  ` ` ` 2Tol2mmna3Right Par+*@Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8]"N*JST` ` @  ` `  a4Right Par+*@Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8]"N*SUV` `  @  a5Right Par+*@Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8]"N*\WX` `  @hh# hhh a6Right Par+*@Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8]"N*eYZ` `  hh#@( hh# 2roNprqrqa7Right Par+*@Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8]"N*n[\` `  hh#(@- ( a8Right Par+*@Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers8]"N*w]^` `  hh#(-@pp2 -ppp a1a22=xr5rr9urwa3Word222NullWord222Null#/x PX##/x PX#WP DefaultsWP DefaultsX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135#x6X@CX@##/x PX#ORD-1ORD 1st Level HeadingJyvSECTION 2Xzox{xvyyiyORD StyleORD Format75     ` ORD-33rd Order Header h: ORD-44th Order Header }.ש ORD-55th Order Header !ĩ2؅{zj{o{Usecond posisecond position? 1X header1bold,1st position< CPt2ICAPCompendium Part II:ICAP   X #Xw P7{wXP# Method IO1`(#=Part II: ICAP ă   yxmdddy ?  Part II: ICAP `(#@ Method IO1 ă   yxLdddy  #Xw P7{wXP#yxdddy  X  Revised 11/92`a (#DPage  ă2  yxdddy  ?  Page `(#>Revised 11/92 ăX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:Revised 11/92 ăXX2k u&XORD-22nd Order Header y [ CPart1XXMethod XX-YYYDX   X #Xw P7zXP# Method XXYYY`U(#>Part I: PM10 ă   yxmdddy0 ?  Part I: HiVol`(#@Method IO1 ă   yxLdddyL  #Xw P7zXP#yxdddy  X  Revised 11/92`a (#DPage  ă"  yxdddy  ?  Page `(#>Revised 11/92 ăX` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:><q*"xxxxWWxxxWWkkxxx design capacity greater than 0.1m3 that must remain uncovered or continuously vented for waste stabilization processes. For the containers required to use Container Level1 controls, the final rule requires that the off-site material be managed either: (1)in a container that meets the relevant DOT regulations on packaging hazardous materials for transportation under 49CFR parts173, 178, 179, and 180; (2)a covered container that meets the requirements specified in the final rule. No additional requirements are specified by the final rule for containers complying with the applicable DOT regulations. In the case when an owner or operator elects to comply with the'\+)) covered container requirements (i.e., non-DOT containers), the container must be equipped with a tight-fitting cover that has no visible gaps, spaces, holes, or other openings. The rule does require a visual inspection when the cover is applied and, thereafter, annually if the container remains in on-site storage for a period longer than 1year. No testing for detectable organic emissions using Method21 is required. No recordkeeping and reporting are required under the final rule for containers using Container Level1 controls. For the containers required to use Container Level2 controls, the final rule requires that the off-site material be managed in one of the following: (1)a container that meets the relevant DOT regulations on packaging hazardous materials for transportation under 49CFR parts173, 178, 179, and 180; or (2)a container that has been demonstrated within the preceding 12months to operate with no detectable organic emissions by using Method21; or (3)a container that has been demonstrated within the preceding 12months to be vapor-tight by using Method27. No additional requirements are specified by the final rule for containers complying with the applicable DOT regulations. Specific design, operating, inspection and monitoring, repair, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for containers tested using either Method21 or 27 are specified in the rule. For the containers required to use Container Level 3 controls, the final rule requires that an open container be placed in an enclosure vented through a closed-vent system to a control device or a covered container be vented directly to a control device. If an enclosure is used, the enclosure is to be designed in accordance with the criteria for a permanent total enclosure as specified in 40CFR 52.741, AppendixB, ProcedureT " Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary Total Enclosure. Requirements for loading off-site material into a container have been revised since proposal. Under the final rule there are no requirements for loading off-site material into containers)\+)) using Container Level1 controls. For containers using Container Level2 controls, the loading requirements have been revised to allow flexibility to use any appropriate loading method that will minimize exposure of the off-site material to the atmosphere and thereby reduce organic air emissions, to the extent practical considering the physical properties of the off-site material and good engineering and safety practices. Examples of container loading procedures that the EPA considers to meet these requirements include, but are not limited to, using a submergedfill pipe or other submergedfill method to load liquids into the container; a vaporbalancing system or a vaporrecovery system to collect and control the vapors displaced from the container during filling operations; or a fitted opening in the top of a container through which the regulatedmaterial is filled, with subsequent purging of the transfer line before removing it from the container opening. The inspection, monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for containers have been significantly simplified from those proposed. Owners and operators of containers using either Container Level 1 or Container Level2 controls in accordance with the provisions of the rule are required to visually inspect the container and its cover and closure devices to check for defects at the time the owner or operator first accepts possession of the container at the facility site with the exception of those containers emptied within 24 hours of being received. Also, in the case when a container used for managing regulatedmaterial remains at the facility site for a period of 1 year or more, the container and its cover and closure devices are to be visually inspected to check for defects at least once every 12 months. There are no requirements for periodic Method 21 leak monitoring of containers. There are no recordkeeping nor reporting requirements under this final rulemaking for containers using either Container Level 1 or Container Level2 controls.&\+))Ԍ1.1.8 Transfer System Standards The major change to the transfer system standards is the addition of specific requirements for individual drain systems to the final rule. #Xx6X@X@#The designation of which individual drain systems are required to use controls#Xx6X@X@# is specified in 40 CFR 63 subpartDD " National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations. #Xx6X@X@# The specific air emission control requirements are specified in 40CFR 63 subpartRR " National Emission Standards for Individual Drain systems. Other revisions have been made#Xx6X@X@#, where relevant and appropriate, so that the requirements for transfer systems other than an individual drain system are consistent with the requirements established for the other types of offsite material management units. 1.1.9 Process Vent Standards In response to comments, several changes have been made to the air emission control requirements for process vents under the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. The term "enclosed treatment unit" proposed for the rule has been deleted from the final rule and replaced with a definition for the term "process vent." The EPA decided to use this new term to clarify which vents must connected to a control device under the rule. The final rule has also been revised to require an average emission reduction of at least 95 percent by weight in total HAP emissions from the combination of all affected process vents at the plant site (i.e., all process vents that are a part of the affected sources subject to the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP). 1.1.10 Equipment Leak Air Standards The EPA has not included in the final OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP a definition for "ancillary equipment" as was originally proposed. Instead, the specific equipment types subject to equipment leak standards under the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP are listed directly in the applicability section of the rule (63.690). These equipment types are consistent with other NESHAP equipment leak standards. )\+))Ԍ1.1.11 Control Device and ClosedVent System Standards Revisions to the control device and closedvent system standards consist of incorporating changes to the closedvent system and control device requirements so that these requirements are consistent and uptodate with the general decisions the EPA has made regarding NESHAP inspection, monitoring, maintenance, repair, malfunctions, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for organic emission control devices. Also, to improve the readability and user understanding of the requirements, the format used to present the standards has been revised. In the final rule, all of the requirements for a particular type of control device (e.g., vapor incinerator, carbon adsorber, or condenser) are grouped together. 1.1.12 Test Methods and Procedures For the final OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP, the EPA decided to allow an owner or operator to use any one of several existing EPA test methods for direct measurement of the VOHAP concentration of an offsite material. In addition, the EPA has made certain other changes to the rule to facilitate the use of organic concentration data obtained using other alternative test methods not specifically listed in the rule. The final rule allows an owner or operator to directly measure the volatile organic concentration using any one of the following methods: Method 305 in 40 CFR part 63, AppendixA; Method 25D in 40 CFR part 60, Appendix A; or Method 624, Method 1624, or Method 1625 in 40CFR part 136, Appendix A (when used in accordance with the procedure specified in the rule). In addition, an owner or operator may use any other alternative method that has been validated in accordance with the procedures specified in Sections 5.1 and 5.3 of Method 301 or specified in the #Xx6X@X@#40 CFR part 63#Xx6X@X@# AppendixD Alternative Validation Procedure for EPA Waste Methods. 1.1.13 Recordkeeping and Reporting The EPA has changed the recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the final OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP to reflect the revisions to the rule applicability and)\+)) technical requirements and reduce the burden of these requirements on owners and operators. #Xx6X@X@# 1.2 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS The EPA estimates that implementation of the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP will reduce HAP emissions from the source category on a nationwide basis by approximately 82 percent, from 52,000 Mg/yr to 9,000Mg/yr. @The EPA also estimated the reduction in volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions from the source category. The OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP is estimated to reduce nationwide VOC emissions by approximately 52,000Mg/yr. This value was calculated using the estimated nationwide HAP emission value times a value of approximately 1.2 to represent the ratio of VOCtoHAP constituents in the offsite material regulated under the rule. The value for this ratio was derived from information in the data base for the offsite waste and recovery operations source category. This derived value is lower than VOC-toHAP ratios indicated for other HAP emission sources. Thus, the procedure used to estimate nationwide VOC emissions for the source category is considered by the EPA to be conservative and may understate the actual quantity of VOC emission reduction that will occur from implementing the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. The EPA prepared estimates of the cost to owners and operators of implementing the requirements of the final Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP at plant sites the EPA expects are likely to be subject to the rule. The total nationwide capital investment cost to purchase and install the air emission controls that are required by the rule is estimated by the EPA to be approximately $42million. The total nationwide annual cost of the Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP is estimated to be approximately $18million per year. This corresponds to an average cost of approximately $420 per megagram of HAP controlled. Price increases in affected markets are projected at less(\+)) than 0.01percent of baseline price, and decreases in production are projected at less than 0.1percent. No businesses or facilities are projected by the EPA to close as a result of implementing the requirements of the final rule. For more information regarding the economic analysis, consult the Economic Impact Analysis of National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations available in the docket (Docket No.A-92-16). ` \+))   @1-2-@#Xx6X@X@#  ?,      l ! 2.0 COMMENTERS ON PROPOSED RULE ă The EPA proposed the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP on October 13, 1994 (59 FR 51913). The preamble to the proposed rule discussed the availability of the proposed regulatory text for the rule and the background information document (BID) (EPA453/R94070a) that presents information used in the development of the proposed rule. Comments from the public on the preamble, proposed regulatory text, and BID were solicited at the time of proposal. A 90-day comment period from October13, 1994 to January 11, 1995 (an initial 60 days plus a 30day extension) was provided to accept written comments from the public on the proposed rule. The opportunity for a public hearing was provided to allow interested persons to present oral comments on the rulemaking. However, the EPA did not receive a request for a public hearing, so a public hearing was not held. A total of 89 comment letters regarding the proposed Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP were received by the EPA. A copy of each comment letter is available for public inspection in the docket for the rulemaking (DocketNo.A-92-16). This docket is located at the EPA's Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, Waterside Mall, room 1500, 1st Floor, 401M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460.   The commenters, their affiliations, and the EPA docket number assigned to their correspondence is presented in Table21. Of the comment letters entered into the docket, 15of the letters are requests for extension of the public comment period, two letters are requests for confirmation that the 30-day extension was granted, one letter is a request for regulatory text, and one letter is a duplicate entry (docket entries IVD34 and IVD68). A comment letter for another rulemaking was incorrectly placed in the docket but has been subsequently deleted (docket entry IVD69). Consequently, 70letters were received by the EPA containing specific comments on the proposed(\+)) OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. The commenter affiliation distribution for these letters is as follows: 47individual companies, 14trade associations, 7State and local air pollution regulatory agencies (including one from STAPPA/ALAPCO), and 2Federal agencies.  ?  3'3'Standard'3'3StandardHP3SI.PRSSXx6X5~     9ddddKdd@ddddPdd@9 U 1  1 !(-*2-ؐ* TABLE  21. LIST OF PUBLIC COMMENTERS ON  ? # PROPOSED OFFSITE WASTE AND RECOVERY OPERATIONS NESHAP  #Z6X@l@# >2 5V ^ ddx !FdT\*7 X " " ^   A I A I"Docket A9216 EntryK Commenter name and addressK K"BDocket A92D16 EntryKS!Commenter name and address" A I A I2  7""IVD01 Robert L. Collings Morgan, Lewis & Bockius 2000 One Logan Square Philadelphia, PA 191036993} }"EIVD06} Thomas A. Kovacic, P.E. Senior Air Issues Specialist Dow Corning Corporation Midland, MI 486860995"2    K""IVD02 Barbara E. Ritchie Environmental Manager FMC Corporation Lithium Division Highway 161, Box 795 Bessemer City, NC 28016   "EIVD07  Hannah Kimball Manager, Envir. Policy & Operations The Boeing Company P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 981242207"    }""IVD03: David W. Gustafson Air Issues Manager !KThe Dow Chemical Company !K2030 Dow Center !KMidland, MI 48674 "EIVD08 Neil Jay King Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering !K2445 M Street, SW !KWashington, DC 200371420"  '  ""IVD04 Neil J. King Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering 2445 M Street, NW Washington, DC 200371420 "EIVD09 John N. Moore Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. Attorneys At Law 1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20036"'    ""IVD05: Mark S. Reimer Fort Howard Corporation P.O. Box 19130 Green Bay, WI 543079130/ /"EIVD10/ Doyle R. Pendleton Acting Deputy Director Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission P.O. Box 13087 Austin, TX 787113087  !>20}LLLK{!0 5V#Xx6X@X@#A(j*2-ؐ#Z6X@l@#i& r5   8 TABLE 21. (continued) i h !FdT\*7 X " "  AFTd\* X " " h "   IA A I""Docket A92j16 Entryx Commenter name and address "BDocket A92D16 EntryS^!Commenter name and address " IA A I'  ""IVD11Q D. E. Park Director, Corporate Environmental Affairs and Process Safety Albemarle Corporation 451 Florida Street Baton Rouge, LA 70801; ;"EIVD16; Donald J. Patterson, Jr. Beveridge and Diamond, P.C. 1350 I Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 200053311"'  '  ""IVD12x Elsie L. Munsell Department of the Navy Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Installations and Environment) 1000 Navy Pentagon Washington, DC 203501000b  b "EIVD17b  David M. Friedland Beveridge and Diamond, P.C. 1350 I Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 200053311"'    ;""AK AKIVD13F AKEdward C. Graves, P.E. AKStaff Environmental Engineer AKAshland Chemical Company Division of Ashland Oil, Inc. P.O. Box 2219 Columbia, OH 43216 "AKEIVD18 AKMichael J. Wax AKInstitute of Clean Air AKCompanies 1707 L Street, NW, Suite 570 Washington, DC 200364201"    b ""IVD14 Bryce E. Harthoorn, QEP Staff Engineer Deere and Company John Deere Road Moline, IL 612658098 "EIVD19 a1(yF *2-ؐDale L. McKinnon Technical Director Manufacturers of Emission Controls Assoc. 1707 L Street, NW, Suite 570 Washington, DC 200364201"  '  ""IVD15 Terry Hughes Manager, Environmental Engineering & Regulatory Affairs The Mearl Corporation 1057 Lower South Street Peekskill, NY 10566 "EIVD20 Robert P. Strieter Director, Environmental Affairs The Aluminum Association, Inc. 900 19th Street, NW Washington, DC 20006'  b!>2@LKK!K{AK{a@ 52 h AFTd\* X " "  aFTd8 X " "" h "'   IA A Ib""Docket A9216 Entryx Commenter name and address">2"BDocket A92D16 EntryS^!Commenter name and address " IA A I  ""IVD21 Mary E. Ward CounselResearch and Development RJReynolds Tobacco Company WinstonSalem, NC 27102y">2y"EIVD26y Walter Quanstrom Amoco Corporation 200 E Randolph Drive P.O. Box 87703 Chicago, IL 606800197"    ""IVD22| Donald J. Patterson, Jr. Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. 1350 I Street, NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 200053311q">2q"EIVD27q Robin K. Wiener Assistant Counsel/Director of Environmental Compliance Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. 1325 G Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 200053104"    y""IVD23i Paul Gerbec, Supervisor Air Toxics Unit Air Quality Division aKMinnesota Pollution Control aKAgency aK520 Lafayette Road, N St. Paul, MN 551554194S">2S"EIVD28S Gail M. Graban Manager Environmental Affairs Ravenswood Aluminum aKCorporation aKP.O. Box 98 aKRavenswood, WV 26164"  F  f ""IVD24V Milton Feldstein Air Pollution Control Officer Bay Area Air Quality Management District 939 Ellis Street San Francisco, CA 94109">2"EIVD29 J. Wayne Powell Burroughs Wellcome Co. P.O. Box 1887 Greenville, NC 278351887"F    S""IVD25 Lawrence L. Bunn Engineering Services Division Department of Health and Envir. Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201">2"EIVD30 M. L. Mullins Vice PresidentRegulatory Affairs Chemical Manufacturers Association 2501 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037  >20LKKK{a0 52(m>*2-ؐ h aFTd8 X " ""  FTTQ* X " " h "    A A II""Docket A9216 Entry  Commenter name and address   "BDocket A92D16 Entry S^!Commenter name and address "  A IIe""IVD31+ Brenda L. Tollett The Valvoline Company A Division of Ashland Oil, Inc. P.O. Box 14000 Lexington, KY 40512 "EIVD36 Michael M. Hertel, Chairman Utility Solid Waste Activities Group c/o Edison Electric Institute 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 eu    "IVD32 Lawrence W. Bierlein General Counsel The Association of Container Reconditioners 8401 Corporate Drive, Suite 140 Landover, MD 207852224   "EIVD37  Paul C. Bailey, Jr. American Petroleum Institute 1220 L. Street, NW Washington, DC 20005"u    n""IVD33 Andi S. Kenney and Kurt B. Thaus KWMX Technologies, Inc. KGovernment Affairs K1155 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 "EIVD38 Norbert Dee, Ph.D. National Petroleum Refiners KAssociation K1899 L Street, NW, Suite 1000 KWashington, DC 20036 "  u   ""IVD341 Robert H. Colby, ALAPCO Donald F. Theiler, STAPPA STAPPA/ALAPCO 444 N Capitol St, NW Washington, DC 20001 "EIVD39 Deborah W. Gates Vice President Ashland Petroleum Company Division of Ashland Oil, Inc. P.O. Box 391 Ashland, KY 41114"u      ""IVD35 Michael Ray Smith and Catherine R. M. Ehlhardt Eli Lilly and Company Lilly Corporate Center Indiana, IN 46285R R"EIVD40R Edgar J. Marston III Executive Vice President Southdown, Inc. 1200 Smith Street, Suite 2400 Houston, TX 77002   t ^>20RLKKK{0 52(im*2-ؐ h FTTQ* X " "  FTTQ* X " " h "     A AIIt""Docket A9216 Entry V Commenter name and address    "BDocket A92D16 Entry S^!Commenter name and address "  AIe""IVD41+ Les A. Darling Director, Environmental Affairs Cyprus Amax Minerals Company    "EIVD46  Billie S. Flaherty Manager, Environmental and Administration Beazer East, Inc. 436 Seventh Avenue Pittsburgh, PA 15219"eu  ""IVD42 Elizabeth C. Smith Manager, Air Quality Corporate Envir. Quality Reynolds Metals Company P.O. Box 27003 Richmond, VA 232617003   "EIVD47  Norman L. Morrow Exxon Chemical Americas Safety and Environmental Affairs Department P.O. Box 3272 Houston, TX 772533272"u  n""IVD43 William J. Doyle, Ph.D. Manager, HES Policy & Analysis KMarathon Oil Company K539 South Main Street KFindlay, OH 458403295 "EIVD48 Authur Lee Texaco, Inc. KP.O. Box 509 KBeacon, NY 12508"   ""IVD44 J. C. Hovious, Assistant Director Environmental Affairs Union Carbide Corporation Health, Safety & Environment 39 Old Ridgebury Road Danbury, CT 068170001 "EIVD49 Ann Johnston Molten Metal Technology, Inc. 51 Sawyer Road Waltham, MA 02154"     ""IVD45 Robert LaBoube, Director Regulatory Affairs and Special Projects Chemical Waste Management, Inc. 3001 Butterfield Road Oak Brook, IL 60521R R"EIVD50R Joseph L. Woolbert, P.E. Engineering Associate Eastman Chemical Company P.O. Box 7444 Longview, TX 756077444   !>20RLKKK{0 52(p* 2-ؐ h FTTQ* X " "  FTTQ*  X " " h "    A AII""Docket A9216 Entry  Commenter name and address   "BDocket A92D16 Entry S^!Commenter name and address "  AI""IVD51+ Catherine McCord SafetyKleen 1000 N Randall Road Elgin, IL 601237857   "EIVD56  David Copeland Occidental Chemical Corporation 360 Rainbow Blvd S Niagara Falls, NY 143020728"  ""IVD52R J. E. Cooper Director Environmental Quality AlliedSignal, Inc. P.O. Box 1139 Morristown, NJ 079621139 "EIVD57 D. Sean White Industrial Service Corporation P.O. Box 3249 Shawnee, KS 66203"   ""IVD53 Walter R. Quanstrom Amoco Corporation 200 E Randolph Drive Chicago, IL 606800703   "EIVD58  D. W. Gustafson and Toby A. Threet The Dow Chemical Company 2030 Dow Center Midland, MI 48674"  ""KIVD54 KScott Kuhn KCorp. Compliance Communications Manager Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. Post Office Box 210799 Columbia, SC 29221  "KEIVD59 KP. T. Cavanaugh KThe Chevron Companies 1401 Eye Street, NW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20005"     ""IVD55 Charles D. Malloch Monsanto Company 800 N Lindergh Boulevard St. Louis, MO 63167  "EIVD60 Jonathan Greenberg BrowningFerris Industries 1350 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 1101 Washington, DC 20036   ^>20 LKKK{ 0 52(im|*!2-ؐ h FTTQ*  X " "  FTTQ*! X " " h "    A AII""Docket A9216 Entry  Commenter name and address   "BDocket A92D16 Entry S^!Commenter name and address "  AIe""IVD61+ Linda J. Liszewski Manager, Environmental Issues Eastman Kodak Company Rochester, NY 146526263   "EIVD66  Thomas E. Moore Manager, Regulatory Affairs Systech Environmental Corporation 245 N Valley Road Xenia, OH 453859354"e  ""IVD62 J. W. Vinzant Kaiser Aluminum 5555 Hilton Avenue, Suite 205 Baton Rouge, LA 708082597   "EIVD67  Craig S. Campbell Cement Kiln Recycling Coalition 1212 New York Ave, NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20005" u n""IVD63n Christopher Goebel National Association of Chemical Recyclers K1200 G Street, NW, Suite 800 KWashington, DC 20005   "EIVD68  Robert H. Colby, ALAPCO Donald F. Theiler, STAPPA STAPPA/ALAPCO K444 N Capitol St, NW KWashington, DC 20001 K"u u < ""IVD64 Lori Wrotenbery, Director Environmental Services Railroad Commission of Texas Oil and Gas Division 1701 N. Congress Austin, TX 787112967& &"EIVD69& Deleted from Docket on Jan. 19, 1994, Comment intended for another Docket"u     ""IVD65h Eli D. Eilbott Environmental Technology Council 915 15th Street, NW 5th Floor Washington, DC 20005 "EIVD70 John A. Dege DuPont SHE Excellence Center 1007 Market Street Wilmington, DE 19898  & >20!LKKK{!0 52(p*"2-ؐ h FTTQ*! X " "  FTTQ*" X " " h "    A AII&""Docket A9216 Entry V Commenter name and address    "BDocket A92D16 Entry S^!Commenter name and address "  AI""IVD71+ Donald Theiler State of Wisconsin/Department of Natural Resources 101 South Webster Street Madison, WI 53707 "EIVD76 Thomas M. Allen, P.E. New York State Dept. of Envir. Conservation 50 Wolf Road Albany, New York 122333254"  ""IVD72 Thomas A. Kovacic, P.E. Dow Corning Corporation Midland, MI 486860995  "EIVD77 Rasma I. Zvaners Chemical Manufacturers Association 2501 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037" u ""IVD73 Richard Moskowitz Institute of Chemical Waste Management 4301 Connecticut Avenue, NW, KSuite 300 KWashington, DC 20008   "EIVD78  Joanna L. Johnson Harris & Johnson Attorneys 1439 West Babcock Bozeman, MT 59714"u u  ""IVD74< Barry Russell Independent Petroleum Association of Amer. 1101 Sixteenth Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 "EIVD79 Eli D. Eilbott Environmental Technology Council 915 Fifteenth Street, NW 5th Floor Washington, DC 20005"u     ""IVD75 Thomas P. Lynch National Tank Truck Carriers, Inc. 2200 Mill Road Alexandria, VA 223144677] ]"EIVD80] Edmund J. Skernolis WMX Technologies, Inc. 1155 Connecticut Ave, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036   ^>20]"LKKK{"0 52!(imP *#2-ؐ h FTTQ*" X " "  !FTTQ%# X " h "   A A II"Docket A9216 BEntry Commenter name and address>:BDocket A92D16 EntryS^!Commenter name and address " A II"IVD81 Scott Kuhn Laidlaw Environmental Services, Inc. 220 Outlet Pointe Blvd. Columbia, SC 29210d d"EIVD86d William J. Doyle Marathon Oil Company 539 South Main Street Findlay, OH 458403295    IVD82 Christopher Goebel National Association of Chemical Recyclers 1200 G. Street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20005-  - "EIVD87-  Jonathan Greenberg BrowningFerris Industries 1350 Connecticut Avenue NW, Suite 1101 Washington, DC 20036"    d"IVD83Z Authur Lee and Greg W. Bolner Texaco Environment Health & Safety !KP.O. Box 509 !KBeacon, NY 12508   "EIVD88  Robert Trunek ARCO 515 South Flower Street !KLos Angeles, CA 90071"  p  - "IVD84# Edward C. Graves, P.E. Ashland Chemical Company P.O. Box 2219 Columbus, OH 43216 "EIVD89 Christopher Harris and Joanna L. Johnson National Oil Recyclers Association 1439 West Babcock Bozeman, MT 59715"p  R    "IVD85 Paul Bailey American Petroleum Institute 1220 L. Street, NW Washington, DC 20005 "EIVD90 Raymond F. Pelletier Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585R   f>2X` hp x (#%'0*,.8135@8:\+)) requirements regarding general design criteria (e.g., no visible holes or gaps) and operating requirements (e.g., the cover remains in place except at those times access to the tank is required for the conditions specified in the rule). 44Also, the final rule allows a tank using Tank Level 1 controls to be equipped with a conservation vent#Xx6X@X@# or similar type of pressure relief device which vents to the atmosphere during normal tank operations for the purpose of maintaining the tank internal pressure in accordance with the tank design specifications. Examples of normal operating conditions that may require these devices to open are during those times when the container internal pressure exceeds the internal pressure operating range for the tank as a result of loading operations or diurnal ambient temperature fluctuations.#Xx6X@X@# #x6X@X@#44Two revisions have been made to the rule regarding tanks used for waste stabilization processes to address comments. First, waste stabilization tanks (as well as any other affected waste management unit) are exempted from the air emission control requirements of the rule if hazardous waste is placed in the tank and this waste meets the applicable numerical concentration limits specified in 40 CFR part 268 Land Disposal Restrictions under both of the following tables: Table Treatment Standards for Hazardous Waste in 40 CFR 268.40; and Table UTS Universal Treatment Standards in 40CFR 268.48. Second, for those waste stabilization tanks that are required to use air emission controls under the rule, the final OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP allows a waste stabilization tank to be controlled by locating the tank inside an enclosure vented to an enclosed combustion control device (e.g., vapor incinerator, boiler, process heater). With these revisions to the final rule, the EPA believes that#Xx6X@X@# requirements of the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations are not only technically feasible but appropriate for waste stabilization tanks used to treat offsite materials and required to use air emission controls under the rule#Xx6X@X@#.#x6X@X@# 44The EPA believes that the Tank Level 1 air emission)?\+)) control requirements as specified in the final rule (i.e., a cover with no visible hole or gaps)#x6X@X@# can be readily applied to those tanks that manage bulk solids and qualify to use Tank Level 1 controls. For those tanks required to use Tank Level 2 controls, the EPA has revised the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP to address the specific situation raised by commenters regarding the technical feasibility of applying air emission controls to a tank used for bulk feed of offsite material to a waste incinerator. The EPA added to the final rule an air emission control alternative to the Tank Level 2 air emission control requirements for existing incinerator bulk feed tanks. For these tanks, the tank is exempted from the Tank Level 2 air emission control requirements if all of the following conditions are met: (1)the tank is located inside an enclosure vented to a control device that is designed and operated in accordance with #Xx6X@X@#all applicable requirements specified under 40 CFR 61 subpart FF National Emission Standards for Benzene Waste Operations for a facility at which the total annual benzene quantity from the facility waste is equal to or greater than 10megagrams per year; #x6X@X@#(2) these controls were installed and began operation prior to #Xx6X@X@#the rule promulgation date#x6X@X@#;#Xx6X@X@# and#x6X@X@# (3)the enclosure is designed and operated in accordance with the criteria for a permanent total enclosure as specified in "Procedure T Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary Total Enclosure" under 40CFR52.741, AppendixB. #Xx6X@X@#44Finally, at proposal the EPA assumed that if an oilwater or organicwater separator was subject to using air emission controls under the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP it would be considered a type of tank. As such, this separator would have been required to meet the air emission control requirements specific in the rule for tanks. In actual practice, application of these controls to a separator in strict accordance with the requirements specified in the proposed rule may not be practical given special design and operating characteristics for separators. Therefore, the EPA)@\+)) concluded that it is appropriate to add individual air emission control requirements for oilwater separators and organicwater separators #Xx6X@X@#that will provide a level of air emission control comparable to the control level established for tanks yet address the special design and operating features of separators. #Xx6X@X@#44Comment: Several comments stated that air emission controls that would be required by the proposed rule for containers are commercially unavailable or impractical to implement. Comments stated by individual commenters include: (1) allow use of vaporreducing foam and a tarp on containers (especially rolloff boxes); (2) container requirements under the rule should be consistent with the container requirements under the RCRA subpart CC standards. 44Response: Since proposal, the EPA has obtained more information on the practices and equipment currently used to manage waste and used solvents in containers. Based on consideration of this information, the EPA decided to revise the air emission control requirements for containers to better reflect the container organic HAP emission potential, the various container types, and the common container management practices used for offsite waste and recovery operations. These revisions are described in detail in Section 1.1.7 of this document. 44 The EPA believes that the revised requirements are technically feasible and practical to implement on all types of containers that the Agency expects to be subject to the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. #Xx6X@X@#The air emission control requirements for either Container Level 1 or Container Level 2 controls allow an owner or operator to use a container that meets the relevant U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) regulations on packaging hazardous materials for transportation under 49CFR parts173, 178, 179, and 180#Xx6X@X@#. Containers that meet these DOT regulations are readily available from many suppliers. The requirements allow)A\+)) the use of allow use of vaporreducing foam and a tarp on containers required to use Container Level 1 controls. 44The EPA is addressing consistency between the air emission control requirements for containers (as well as the other affected offsite material management units) in the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP and the RCRA rules by amending the RCRA rules to include an exemption for those affected units using organic emission controls in accordance with the requirements of the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP or any other applicable NESHAP. 44Comment: Several commenters interpret the proposed requirements in OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP for treatment of wastes prior to being placed in land disposal units to be land disposal restrictions. Specific comments stated by individual commenters include: (1) proposed requirements are inconsistent with RCRA land disposal restrictions; and (2) any solid waste land disposal restrictions should be promulgated by the EPA's Office of Solid Waste (OSW). 44Response: The EPA proposed that prior to being placed in land disposal units owners and operators treat regulated materials having a VOHAP concentration equal to or greater than 100 ppmw to remove or destroy organic HAP. Based on the Agency's decisions regarding the rule applicability and considering the existing requirements under RCRA land disposal restrictions, the EPA concluded that the proposed requirement is not need for the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. The final rule places no restrictions on the disposal of wastes in land disposal units. 44Comment: Several commenters stated that, as proposed, the leak detection and repair (LDAR) standards are duplicative or inconsistent with other EPA LDAR standards that also may be applicable to a unit subject to the rule. Specific comments stated by individual commenters include: (1) rule should be)B\+)) consistent with HON equipment leak standards (40 CFR 63 subpart H); (2)proposed definition of "ancillary equipment" is inconsistent with the RCRA subpart BB definition and proposed definition of "conveyance systems" includes RCRA ancillary equipment; and (3)"product accumulator vessel" in the definition of "ancillary equipment" is inappropriate. 44Response: As discussed in section 3.1, the EPA recognizes that the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP could be applicable to owners and operators of facilities now (or sometime in the future) subject to other CAA or RCRA air standards. It is the EPA's intention that leak detection and repair (LDAR) standards specified under the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP not require an owner or operator to perform duplicative activities or inconsistent activities in those cases when standards are applicable to equipment for which the owner or operator is already conducting a LDAR program to comply with another EPA rule. 44The EPA proposed that the equipment leak standards under the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations would not apply to equipment for which the owner or operator is already complying with the HON equipment leak standards (40 CFR 63 subpart H). This provision remains in the final rule. Thus, in the case when equipment at a synthetic organic chemical manufacturing facility that is subject to a LDAR program under both the Offsite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP and the HON, by implementing a LDAR program in accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 63 subpart H the facility owner or operator is in compliance with OffSite Waste and Recovery NESHAP. 44The EPA reviewed the definitions of "ancillary equipment" proposed for the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. Considering the EPA's intention to have consistent requirements for facilities subject to implementing equipment leak standards under more than one rule and the potential for confusion with terminology used for other existing rules, the)C\+)) EPA decided not to include a definition for "ancillary equipment" in the final Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. Instead, the specific equipment types subject to equipment leak standards under the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP are listed directly under the rule applicability. 3.5 RULE IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS 44Comment: A number of commenters stated that proposed requirements for determining the average VOHAP concentration of a waste or recovered material either use inappropriate test methods or are impractical and too costly to implement at many facilities potentially subject to the rule. Specific comments stated by individual commenters include: (1) analytical costs for testing wastes will be too high, and will discourage reclamation; (2) requirements are difficult to implement at commercial landfill facilities because of the nature of the facility operations (e.g., wastes received from many sources); (3)requirements for testing wastes in containers are excessive and rule should provide for less frequent testing requirements or exemptions should be provided; (4) rule should provide a criteria for identifying wastes which need to be tested (e.g., use data from material safety data sheets (MODS) or provide exemptions for certain types of waste material, such as glass, paper, cardboard, etc.); (5) Method 305 is not validated and does not directly relate to potential to emit; (6) allow use of Method 25D results or TOC measurements; (7)allow use of results for testing required by the RCRA LDR; and (8) process knowledge should not need measurement validation by Method 301. 44Response: #Xx6X@X@#Under the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP, air emission controls are not required for those offsite material management units located in the affected source when the unit manages offsite material having a VOHAP concentration less than the action level. As part of the procedure for determining the VOHAP concentration of the)D\+)) offsite material, the EPA proposed that an owner or operator could use either: (1)direct measurement using Method 305 of samples of the material collected in accordance with the procedures specified in the rule; or (2)the owner's or operator's knowledge of the VOHAP concentration in material based on information, as specified in the rule. 44For the final Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP, the EPA decided to add other appropriate test methods that an owner or operator can choose to use for direct measurement of the VOHAP concentration of an offsite material. In addition, the EPA has made certain other changes to facilitate the use of organic concentration data obtained using other alternative test methods not specifically listed in the rule. The EPA believes that the changes incorporated into waste determination requirements in conjunction with changes to the applicability and action level for the final OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP provide a range of options for determining the VOHAP concentration of an offsite material such that every owner and operator of facilities subject to the final rule has available practical and inexpensive waste determination alternatives. 44The EPA developed Method 305 to provide a relative measure of the potential for specific volatile organic compounds to be emitted from waste materials. In developing Method 305, the EPA solicited public comments on a proposed version of the method and addressed these comments in the final version of the method (59 FR 19402). Method 305 has been validated and the EPA considers Method 305 to be an appropriate method for determining the VOHAP concentration of offsite materials subject to the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. 44Method 305 uses the same waste sample collection procedures and sample recovery conditions established by Method 25D (40 CFR part 60, AppendixA). When using Method 25D, the waste sample is analyzed to determine the total concentration, by weight, of all organics recovered from the)E\+)) waste sample. When using Method 305, the waste sample is analyzed to determine the purged concentration, by weight, of only those specific hazardous air pollutants in the waste sample which are listed in Table 1 in the rule (i.e., the VOHAP concentration). Any hazardous air pollutant or organic constituent that may be contained in the sample but is not listed in Table 1 in the rule is not counted in the VOHAP concentration determination. For the offsite materials typically managed in the operations subject to the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP, the EPA concluded that using Method25D is a reasonable alternative to using Method305 for the purpose of this rulemaking. Therefore, the final Off-Site Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP includes use of Method25D as one of the test methods an owner or operator may choose among for direct measurement of the VOHAP concentration of an offsite material. 44Other test methods have been developed by the EPA for use in rulemakings under the Clean Water Act that measure the concentration of organic pollutants in municipal and industrial wastewaters (see Appendix A to 40 CFR part 136). Commenters suggested that certain of these test methods are applicable to EPA air rulemakings affecting wastewater management units. After extensive review, the EPA decided that as alternatives to using Method 305 or Method 25D for direct measurement of VOHAP concentration in an offsite material for the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP it is appropriate to add Methods 624, 1624, and 1625 (all contained in 40 CFR 136, Appendix A) when used under certain specified conditions. Because these methods measure the total concentration of the HAP constituents listed in Table 1 of the rule, owners and operators may choose to "correct" these measured values to equate to the values that would be measured using Method 305. This is accomplished by multiplying the total concentration measured values times the appropriate  C' "fmĠfactor" presented in Table 1 of the rule to obtain the'F\+)) Method 305 VOHAP concentration. 44Sufficient recovery study results are available for Methods 1624 and 1625 to correct for possible bias, and therefore, these methods are considered adequate by the EPA to characterize the concentration of a offsite material sample. In addition, Method 624 is appropriate provided the initial calibration of the analytical system is performed with the target compounds to be measured. However, none of these methods specifies a sample collection and handling procedure that is considered by the EPA adequate to minimize the volatilization of organics from the sample prior to analysis. Therefore, to ensure that an adequately representative sample of an offsite material is analyzed by the method, an owner or operator that chooses to use either Method624, 1624, or 1625 for the OffSite waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP is required to develop and follow a written sampling plan. This plan describes a stepbystep procedure for collecting representative samples of the offsite materials such that material integrity is maintained and minimal loss of organics from the sample occurs throughout the collection and analysis process. An example of an acceptable sampling plan is one that incorporates sample collection and sample handing procedures similar to those specified in Method 25D. The sampling plan is to be maintained onsite in the facility records. 44The EPA proposed use of knowledgeofthewaste, allowing a facility owner or operator to use test data obtained using a test method other than Method 305 provided that the method was validated in accordance with Method 301 (40 CFR part 63, Appendix A). Under this application of Method 301, the owner or operator would be validating the alternative test method results as compared to test results obtained using Method 305. Since proposal, the EPA decided to allow organic concentration data test that are validated in accordance specifically with Sections5.1 and 5.3 of Method301 to be used as direct measurement data. This makes validation of the alternative)G\+)) test method a selfcheck of the method being validated. Also, if appropriate,#Xx6X@X@# owners and operators may choose to "correct" values measured by the alternative test method to equate to the values that would be measured using Method 305 by multiplying the measured values times the appropriate  C "fmĠfactor" presented for each hazardous air pollutant listed in Table 1 of the rule.#Xx6X@X@# 44Finally, the EPA is promulgated a less rigorous validation procedure, "Alternative Validation Procedure for EPA Waste Methods," in Appendix to 40 CFR part 63 as an alternative to Method 301 for the validation of a test method established by the EPA Office of Water (OW) or the EPA Office of Solid Waste (OSW) when this test method is used for air emission standards. The EPA decided it is appropriate to allow organic concentration data test that are validated in accordance with this method to be used as direct measurement data. 44In summary, procedures for determining the VOHAP concentration of a waste or recovered for the purpose of implementing OffSite Waste and recovery Operations NESHAP have been revised. Under the final rule, air emission controls are not required for those affected units that manage offsite materials having a VOHAP concentration less than 500ppmw on a mass-weighted average basis as directly measured using any one of the following methods: Method 305 in 40 CFR part 63, AppendixA: Method 25D in 40 CFR part 63, Appendix A; or Method 624, Method 1624, or Method 1625 in 40CFR part 136, Appendix A (when used in accordance with the procedure specified in the rule). In addition, an owner or operator may used any other alternative method that has been validated in accordance with the procedures specified in Sections 5.1 and 5.3 of Method 301 or specified in "Alternative Validation Procedure for EPA Waste Methods." 44Comment: A number of commenters stated that the'H\+)) recordkeeping and reporting requirements of the proposed rule are excessive and inconsistent with other EPA air standards that also may be applicable to a unit subject to the proposed rule. One commenter requests additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements be included in the final rule. Specific comments stated by individual commenters include: (1) use the HON reporting and recordkeeping requirements; (2)add compliance recordkeeping and reporting requirements for air emission control devices and documentation of operator education; (3)recordkeeping and reporting requirements of the Part 63 general provision are not appropriate for containers; (4) the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are excessive for facilities or units exempted under the rule provisions; (5)schedule for initial notification should be increases to 120 days (rather than 90 days as proposed), and schedule for notification of compliance should be increased to 150 days (rather than 60 days as proposed); and (6) summary report should be submitted semiannually (not quarterly as proposed). 44Response: Under CAA section 114(a), the EPA may require any owner or operator of a source subject to a NESHAP to establish and maintain records as well as prepare and submit notifications and reports to the EPA or authorized State. Review by EPA and State officials of appropriate information that is maintained in facility records and is submitted in facility prepared reports provides one means for checking the compliance status of the facility with the NESHAP technical requirements. However, the EPA also recognizes that excessive and duplicative recordkeeping and reporting requirements can create a burden to facility owners and operators complying with a NESHAP as well as to the EPA and State officials responsible for assuring compliance with the NESHAP. Thus, it is the EPA's intention to limit the amount of recordkeeping and reporting required for a particular NESHAP to reasonable requirements which will provide the appropriate information needed by EPA and State officials to enforce the rule. 44For the OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP,)I\+)) the EPA proposed adopting the recordkeeping and reporting requirements as specified in the Part 63 general provisions. Since proposal, as discussed previously in this chapter, the EPA has revised the applicability and technical requirements for the final OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP. The EPA reviewed the recordkeeping and reporting needed for the final rule considering the revisions made since proposal. Based on this review, the EPA decided that certain changes from the recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in the Part 63 general provisions which will effectively reduce recordkeeping and reporting requirements for the final OffSite Waste and Recovery Operations NESHAP can be made without compromising the enforceability of the rule.