The Air Benefit and Cost Group (ABCG) develops
benefits analyses to quantify the value of improving human health
and reducing environmental impacts of air pollution regulations.
Benefits analyses include both quantitative and qualitative estimates
of reducing exposure of humands and the environment to ambient concentrations
of air pollution. Further details about benefits analyses completed
by ABCG can be found in Chapter
7 of the OAQPS
Economic Analysis Resource Document.
Below is a listing of benefits analyses that have been completed
by ABCG. To download a report, click on the appropriate link.
|
Benefits Analyses |
Date |
|
Chemical Manufacturing - SIC 28; NAICS 325 |
|
|
Industrial Boilers and Process
Heaters |
02-03 |
|
|
|
|
Mercury |
|
|
Technical Support Document: Methodology Used to Generate Deposition, Fish Tissue
Methylmercury Concentrations, and Exposure for Determining Effectiveness of Utility
Emission Controls |
03-05 |
|
Mercury Exposure Peer Review Summary |
03-05 |
|
Mercury Neurotoxicity Workshop Notes (November 2002) |
07-04 |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Influence Analysis in Support of
Characterizing Uncertainty in Human Health Benefits Analysis |
12-09 |
|
Analysis of Ecosystem Benefits for Reductions of
NOx and SOx Methodology Report |
12-09 |
|
Peer Review of Expert Elicitation:
This memo synthesizes responses provided by experts selected to review and comment on
Expanded Expert Judgment Assessment of the Concentration-Response Relationship between
PM2.5 Exposure and Mortality. (Prepared by Industrial Economics, Incorporated [IEc] for the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], Research Triangle Park, NC, August 25, 20 |
12-06 |
|
Expanded Expert Judgment Assessment of the Concentration-Response Relationship Between PM2.5 Exposure and Mortality:
This expert elicitation report was prepared in support of the characterization of uncertainty in EPA's benefits analyses associated with reductions in exposure to particulate matter pollution. As recommended by the National Academy of Sciences, EPA is using expert judgment as part of an effort to better describe the uncertanties inherent in any benefits analysis. This report and its findings are intended solely for this purpose. |
09-06 |
|
Expanded Expert Judgment Assessment of the Concentration-Response Relationship Between PM2.5 Exposure and Mortality - Appendix A: Elicitation Protocol |
09-06 |
|
Response to Peer Review of An Expert Judgment Assessment of the Concentration-Response Relationship between PM2.5 Exposure and Mortality |
02-05 |
|
Peer Review of An Expert Judgment Assessment of the Concentration-Response Relationship Between PM2.5
Exposure and Mortality |
09-04 |
|
OTAQ/Nonroad Diesel Rule for the Final
Regulatory Analysis: Control of Emissions from Nonroad Diesel Engines,
Chapter 9: Cost-Benefit Analysis |
09-04 |
|
An Expert Judgement Assessment of the
Concentration-Response Relationship
Between PM2.5 Exposure and Mortality |
05-04 |
|
An Expert Judgement Assessment of the
Concentration-Response Relationship
Between PM2.5 Exposure and Mortality - Appendix |
05-04 |
|
Impacts
of Southern Appalachain Mountains Initiative (SAMI)I: An Independent
Analysis of Benefits and Economic Impacts, Summary |
05-02 |
|
Benefit Analyses
of Alternative SAMI Strategies: Selected Health and Welfare
Methods and Results |
05-02 |
|
Benefit Analysis
of Final Tier 2 Vehicle/Gasoline Sulfur Standards |
04-00 |
|
2018 Milestone Benefits Assessment
of BART Reductions in 9 Western States |
08-00 |
|
2018 Milestone Benefits Assessment
of BART Reductions in 9 Western States, Accompanying Excel Table |
08-00 |
|
Technical Support Document
for the Heavy Duty Engine/Diesel Fuel Rule |
12-00 |
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}