Jump to main content.


5.0 Intro

"Economic impact analysis" is not a precise term in economics but an evolving term that describes the various analyses performed to gauge the economic consequences of EPA regulations. Over time, conducting EIAs has become an integral part of ISEG's role in EPA's regulatory development process. Based on legislative and administrative directives, the EIA's purpose for ISEG is primarily to describe and quantify the reallocation of society's resources in response to a proposed regulatory action. Under some circumstances, the EIA also provides the social cost estimate to be compared with social benefits in the benefit-cost analysis required in a full EA, as described in Section 2.

Generally, ISEG needs estimates of the following types of variables without and with the regulation for the time period of the analysis:

  • facility- and industry-level impacts, which may include compliance cost burden; revenue, cost, and profit changes; changes in capacity utilization; facility and process closures; and employment changes;
  • market-level impacts, which may include changes in market prices, domestic production and consumption, and foreign trade;
  • company-level impacts, which may include compliance cost burden and its impact on financial viability and/or failure;
  • community-level impacts, which may include changes in employment, facility closures, and changes in emissions;
  • governmental impacts, which may include the costs of administrative, monitoring, and enforcement actions and changes in receipts from taxes or fees; and
  • social costs and benefits.

By quantifying and evaluating these impacts in the EIA, the ISEG analyst is able to provide valuable inputs to policymakers in the regulatory development process and, if applicable, improve the benefit-cost analysis.

The section continues with a description of the methodological approach for performing EIAs in OAQPS. Section 5.1 provides a discussion of alternative approaches for performing EIAs and the rationale for the partial equilibrium, intermediate-run market model approach used in many ISEG analyses. Section 5.2 provides a conceptual overview of the market modeling approach for estimating economic impacts. Section 5.3 moves beyond the conceptual framework for market models to practical issues involved in developing an economic model, when information on the economic phenomena of interest is often sketchy and practical compromises must be made. Section 5.4 summarizes the analytical approach and concludes with the recommended structure for organizing and reporting analytical results.

__________________
1 For a more comprehensive review of the basic economic concepts of social cost, the reader may refer to the document Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses prepared by EPA’s Office of Policy ( EPA, 1998d). As of July 1998, that document was in draft form.
 

5 EIA Framework

 5.0 Intro

 5.1 Alternative
   Approaches
   for Economic
   Impact Analysis

 5.2 PEIS Modeling
   Approach:
   Conceptual
   Framework

 5.3 PEIS Modeling
   Approach:
   Operational
   Issues

 5.4 Economic
   Impact Results

Local Navigation


Jump to main content.