|
The benefits of an environmental regulation generally consist of the effects that an improvement in
environmental quality has on human welfare. Individuals derive satisfaction (abstractly known as
utility) from the services provided by the natural environment. To the extent that improvements in the
quality of the natural environment improve the service flows provided to humans, individuals
experience a utility gain. Conversely, any damage to the physical environment that decreases the
quantity or quality of these service flows results in a utility loss. In this context, the atmosphere can
be viewed as a natural asset, the services of which include (but are not limited to) such things as life
support for humans and other living things, as well as visual amenities. Changes in air quality that
result from pollution hinder the atmosphere's ability to provide such service flows to humans.
To understand the effect that an environmental regulation has on the
service flows provided by the natural environment, one must consider
three functional relationships ( Freeman, 1993). The first relationship
describes the effect of human activities on environmental quality. This
relationship estimates ambient concentrations of pollutants in environmental
media as a function of air emissions. Fate and transport models are
used to characterize this relationship. The second functional relationship
is that between environmental quality and the service flows provided
by the natural environment. This relationship characterizes such service
flows as a function of ambient pollution concentrations, usually in
the form of concentration-response or dose-response function. The third,
and final, relationship translates environmental service flows into
human welfare. The use of these functional relationships in estimating
the benefits of a regulation is presented in Figure 7-1.
Recall from the discussion above that the benefits of OAQPS regulations
result from changes in emissions to the atmosphere. Therefore,
the first functional relationship presented in Figure 7-1 relates these
changes in emissions to changes in ambient concentrations of pollutants
in environmental media through fate and transport models. The boxes
at the top of Figure 7-1 represent emissions under two different states
of the worldthe baseline and the control. The baseline corresponds
to the state of the world in the absence of the regulation. In contrast,
the control corresponds to the level of emissions in a world with the
regulation. The difference between these emissions levels is the primary
result of the regulation. |
|
|