WPCr2 drCqn{n͊uٓ-{Kd0(/hL[)B1t!v0nD}19`􄐏'E> iþ{2ǽd`ʾ^.by?,I'/ #Na2[_ (F+#8rb:)ȋ%=Dc"Nw{4&蝹z?$ː99A,PV=`G6 Mʍ6KW\B#2vPtKuvuKxhQTۆH"ϪQ nErU.$,e`}p!U|'ɦ!j!$e ]?=0L&YY3PJ@h9'6j6JPt u(H \juwB#+`Ry]msGž}-b湀MKE5 >7pJD\[9`6/ _H#!T U5Nu % 0( U.B U@3 UNs UH w@ 4I ] l mn ^ N R UN@";oP]p]kU 43N;L= 0w 0tnX|  N   0TNL:BNJ6L 0LN\LdENx<NDxFnXN&(LL  0_VnX N L c Lk   D+   0C! 0J! AM=""" C"N"t"nX*#$ B $N$$LO%% 0g% 1u &L& 0& 0J' 0' 0( 0D) 0#* 0+ 1),,^ ,",f,a,f,a,f-a-f(-a*-n>-NA/ D3C/ B*v/ D3/ B*/ D3/ B700 B7g0 D30 B0 D50 D-#1 0DP1 11b1 1 1Q1 2 22Q!2HP LaserJet 5P,,,,,,0(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX($\  `*Times New RomanTT< `(CG TimesScalable(9 Z 6Times New Roman Regular+_ 0CG TimesBoldScalable CDDEFDGHIJDKLWuK'fnlo3|xLU1<( DishakjianSeitzMobleyLamasonSegallGaribaySCAQMDBallay DEPBivins VOCMcAlisterSchakenbachGrimleyFostonRascher ECOSWestlin MACT NSRContdECEnglert ADI CAAA CARB CFR COMS CPMS CTM DQO EMAD EMC EMMC ESDFESOP FID FTIRFVGFAASGMACT GPRA HAPs HClNESHAP ICPLIDAR MDL MEK CAS MRRTRecordkeepingNAAQSNCASI NDONELAC NOx NSPSNTTAAOAQPS OECA OPG OSW PAHsPolyaromatic PBMS PCDD PCDF4pentachlorodibenzodioxin2pentachlorodibenzofuran PQLQuantitation PTEQA SESSOCMISTAPPAALAPCO TTE TTNUATMPToxics VOCsSubmittals AOP AOV BACT BTS GFC HWCcombustor HWI LAERMMBtu MSEnonattainmentNELAP NRDC"polychlorinatedbiphenyl PEMS POMsPolycyclic ppb ppm ppmC PSEUSSCAP TOC TPY VEO WFI CEMS SIPstoxicsrecordkeepingwebsitereproposedisocyanatesimpinger dscmfuransfurancommentersreproposalacetonitrile PCBscondensablereproposeSubparts GGa GGb NERL SOPsPeeleCandaceattenuatorsubpartsalkenesspeciationTedlarimpingersorganicsNJDEP CEMGG DNPHketonesrosanalineUSEPAisokineticpitotcemspg.htmlducting"recertificationPMfinecondensablesspeciatedexhausterCalTechdenudersteflon"gravimetricallydenuderimpactorspresurveyunspikeddesorbedEMTICTNRCC RACTDD SOxcommenterRATAsreinventionexceedancesMegagigs PEM RAsCoGentriboelectrictricorders FMCgrandfatheredCasternovaArkleyShigahara QAdOakridge isokinetically GGGadsorbers TSSAdsorberlinearityplatersprecontrolAleyska RTP(hH  Z 6Times New Roman RegularAIRGLOBE.PCXWPC_Kl l 519l ,, Jt}ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[Z~$@5ZZ[(?-~( .~(1~#> .~#A @."0~"7~$.~#?'~#@'~#'~# &~# @(~"  &~" @)~" 8&~! 2~  0~ `@ '~  L-~( &~! (~  @`$~! %~'?% <$~#~x$~ @ $~" @ @$~  @A@$~ 0%~`  &Á!~@x! ~!`0~ @? 8??? x?~??~#<!??~0xA ~?~<y#883#c  C~   A@~0 p x~    ~0 z7 ~8 8>~8 ~p@<@ p  <~   ~ 0@~x @~A     ~  ~  88 !~  ~ @ 0 ~ &@ ? ~ "`~ ~   ~+@0~  ~ " ~  ~ @@~- 0~ @@~ ~*    @   ~ @ ~   ?  ~ @ ~  @  ~  ~  A@  `~ @0,  ~ @  ~@H  ~ 0 ` ~ @ ~ 0   ~@~  @@~   ~ @  ~   ( ~0B G7 @ ~ ` ` @ @@  ~0   ~     ~  @   ~  @0@~          ~ A@~ @     > ~ @ >8@ @@ ~  ~  ~ Fp  ~ @8@  ~   1@   ???  ~ 0@   ~  @@~  p -~ @ ~4~ @ ~@   ~  @,~   ~  A ~   .~ @@-~ @@ ~ 00-~  -~   ~  ~`@  ~  ?~@ 8  ? ~   @@~ p < @@x    ~  |  p~ `x  ?   ~`?  ~ 08  ~`   ?    ~ ph`x   ~x ~Xpqx ? ~$ x @0~f  ~  ` ~   d@ ~ @   @ @ ~@>,@~x  10~   p0 ~ ~ f0 @0<~  ~>~xd@~ 2@>$@ @ ~p   D ~ @@@p~  8~ p>@`~@g    @~  ~ `$`!@ ~   0@ ~  V x@|D~` 1x8@~ `@ ~ p@@ ~   @ ~<!~  h  ~ `H@~ ~8~s'@@@ ~  @D~ ~  ~7080x@d@P ~p@HHx 0@`@ Ϗ? ~xH@ 30@~`033@<  ~ @@?xx|? ~    ǁ ~0@@@   ~x8@~@H @ ? ~@~ ) ~08  ~ H@  ? ~@h  8 ~ `H ~`<@?~<8$`@  ~  `  ~Fpp @@@ ~ ``~ 8 <@`@~ P>@0 @~ ' 8  ` ` @  ~ 0`~ @@@@ @ $ ~  @@~p  0@  D~0 `~@@@@B"~!p@ P ~'@LCD~   @~@0d~   `@$  ~ @@  DA~ @8~   0  ~ @  D~   `~! `@@~x8   0~@@DC A~@?Dp  ~  8  ~   Ã@@~@ @D b ~ @D@` ~ @    ~   8< ~ p'p@@@D$@~x  D<"~@,88~@H 0 f|x|~88?0?~  D@D@3DD@P0 ~@ @H@@@ @@~ c @<8~@  9x8x8@Dd @`D"ǀ?~>@DGDF H!  0 ~ 8x 9@p0p2  ~!0cp @1@~x@H `? ?~ @x08 & p???8x??x|~?~` p@@~A @B@~ `~?~` p8d H D? ǀ?~8$ 1 ||x<~Fq~!@@~~ @<~~  #  $@0 A~ 0h8P @ ~ @ @@ (8= |?~9;@D~@D@ 8x  ~ ǁ?~ <0D@@ `~  x`|`@@D@DA!?  ?>|?~1;@~ @'FB D@  ?|ǁÃ ?  ~|??~0Á@ƁFDF@?8<8<>~  !~?À?~  ~ @ ~<  g   ~ $?'À ~ `!8?a!  ?߁!?p? !?? ~!~@ =@!? ? ?"? ?0"???0#~@$~@> 0#~   $~@ #~ $~b 0$~$&~<)&~8@'~(|'?<)~ 0@)~ < (~)~p(~(~@)<--~-#-$-%-&.Z[ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ'Ac&quire Image...&Select Image Source...F&ile...Ob&ject...&Insert$ _  /X!_ &LeftCtrl+L&Line&Polygon&RectangleRou&nded RectangleC&ircle&EllipseElliptical &ArcCur&ve$ _ 0_ ???0????0????x|?WPWin 6.0/OLE 1.0 Prefix Information MarkerWPDraw30.Drawing|ࡱ> ,  !"#$%&'()*+./0123456789:;<Root Entry`.@pæOle 7WPG20PCompObjj'F! WP 7 [0] `.@pWP Draw 3.0 Drawing Embed SourceWPDraw30.Drawing9q&^&PWPC_Kl l 519l ,, Jt}ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ[Z~$@5ZZ[(?-~( .~(1~#> .~#A @."0~"7~$.~#?'~#@'~#'~# &~# @(~"  &~" @)~" 8&~! 2~  0~ `@ '~  L-~( &~! (~  @`$~! %~'?% <$~#~x$~ @ $~" @ @$~  @A@$~ 0%~`  &Á!~@x! ~!`0~ @? 8??? x?~??~#<!??~0xA ~?~<y#883#c  C~   A@~0 p x~    ~0 z7 ~8 8>~8 ~p@<@ p  <~   ~ 0@~x @~A     ~  ~  88 !~  ~ @ 0 ~ &@ ? ~ "`~ ~   ~+@0~  ~ " ~  ~ @@~- 0~ @@~ ~*    @   ~ @ ~   ?  ~ @ ~  @  ~  ~  A@  `~ @0,  ~ @  ~@H  ~ 0 ` ~ @ ~ 0   ~@~  @@~   ~ @  ~   ( ~0B G7 @ ~ ` ` @ @@  ~0   ~     ~  @   ~  @0@~          ~ A@~ @     > ~ @ >8@ @@ ~  ~  ~ Fp  ~ @8@  ~   1@   ???  ~ 0@   ~  @@~  p -~ @ ~4~ @ ~@   ~  @,~   ~  A ~   .~ @@-~ @@ ~ 00-~  -~   ~  ~`@  ~  ?~@ 8  ? ~   @@~ p < @@x    ~  |  p~ `x  ?   ~`?  ~ 08  ~`   ?    ~ ph`x   ~x ~Xpqx ? ~$ x @0~f  ~  ` ~   d@ ~ @   @ @ ~@>,@~x  10~   p0 ~ ~ f0 @0<~  ~>~xd@~ 2@>$@ @ ~p   D ~ @@@p~  8~ p>@`~@g    @~  ~ `$`!@ ~   0@ ~  V x@|D~` 1x8@~ `@ ~ p@@ ~   @ ~<!~  h  ~ `H@~ ~8~s'@@@ ~  @D~ ~  ~7080x@d@P ~p@HHx 0@`@ Ϗ? ~xH@ 30@~`033@<  ~ @@?xx|? ~    ǁ ~0@@@   ~x8@~@H @ ? ~@~ ) ~08  ~ H@  ? ~@h  8 ~ `H ~`<@?~<8$`@  ~  `  ~Fpp @@@ ~ ``~ 8 <@`@~ P>@0 @~ ' 8  ` ` @  ~ 0`~ @@@@ @ $ ~  @@~p  0@  D~0 `~@@@@B"~!p@ P ~'@LCD~   @~@0d~   `@$  ~ @@  DA~ @8~   0  ~ @  D~   `~! `@@~x8   0~@@DC A~@?Dp  ~  8  ~   Ã@@~@ @D b ~ @D@` ~ @    ~   8< ~ p'p@@@D$@~x  D<"~@,88~@H 0 f|x|~88?0?~  D@D@3DD@P0 ~@ @H@@@ @@~ c @<8~@  9x8x8@Dd @`D"ǀ?~>@DGDF H!  0 ~ 8x 9@p0p2  ~!0cp @1@~x@H `? ?~ @x08 & p???8x??x|~?~` p@@~A @B@~ `~?~` p8d H D? ǀ?~8$ 1 ||x<~Fq~!@@~~ @<~~  #  $@0 A~ 0h8P @ ~ @ @@ (8= |?~9;@D~@D@ 8x  ~ ǁ?~ <0D@@ `~  x`|`@@D@DA!?  ?>|?~1;@~ @'FB D@  ?|ǁÃ ?  ~|??~0Á@ƁFDF@?8<8<>~  !~?À?~  ~ @ ~<  g   ~ $?'À ~ `!8?a!  ?߁!?p? !?? ~!~@ =@!? ? ?"? ?0"???0#~@$~@> 0#~   $~@ #~ $~b 0$~$&~<)&~8@'~(|'?<)~ 0@)~ < (~)~p(~(~@)<--~-#-$-%-&.Z[ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ'Ac&quire Image...&Select Image Source...F&ile...Ob&ject...&Insert$ _  /X!_ &LeftCtrl+L&Line&Polygon&RectangleRou&nded RectangleC&ircle&EllipseElliptical &ArcCur&ve$ _ 0_ ???0????0????x|?BOlePartOlePres000-4/     /3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f3333f3333333333f3333333f3f33ff3f3f3f3333f3333333f3̙333333f333ff3ffffff3f33f3ff3f3f3ffff3fffffffffff3fffffff3fff̙ffff3fffff???__ߟ߿3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff̙̙3̙f̙̙̙3f̙3f3f3333f333ff3fffff3f3f̙3f45    C (@   ??????ݎdጜs79'?<=#??0r?Ao?~qo?JZ?o?_?1?|~9.>yS0ӏg?'hl?C~'3'g> H87?#B_'í3>?<9?~@xxO|~/x?'07?0+x=?xO9=<yS0ӏg?'hl?C~'3'g> H87?#B_'í3>?<9?~@xxO|~/x?'07?0+x=?xO9=<c$"Small Circle"0  BivinsUSEPANELACNELAP MSE EMCwebsite SOPsC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT SchakenbachGrimleypitotcemspg.htmlducting SchakenbachGrimleypitotcemspg.htmlducting\  `*Times New RomanTTC\  P6QP\  `*Times New RomanTTXXP\  P6QXP DishakjianQA EMMCspeciated VOCspresurveyimpingerC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPTC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPTH4Body TextBody Text  XXXW\  `*Times New RomanTTW        W\  `*Times New RomanTTWԫ\  `*Times New RomanTTC\  P6QP\  `*Times New RomanTTXXP\  P6QXPC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPTC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT'dxd Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(2C$ !  ("$ Figure    HIJGA<< c d Westlin NRDC PSEUprecontrolQA TTN CFR\  `*Times New RomanTTC\  P6QP\  `*Times New RomanTTXXP\  P6QXP d  CEMsBivinsOakridge HAPsexceedance isokineticallycondensiblesC:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT(?J$2#  0  .3  0@ ##37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)C:\OFFICE\WPWIN\TEMPLATE\STANDARD.WPT(WO$0 20,  a  .3  0` (#(#(n$0 0` (#(#20,   .3  0 ` (#` (#($0 0` (#(#0 ` ` (#` (#20,(  0  )3  0  (# (#($0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#2#(  a  )3  0h(#(#(h$0 0` (#(#0 ` ` (#` (#0  (# (#0h(#(#20,(   )3  0%h(#h(#($0 0` (#(#0 ` ` (#` (#0  (# (#0h(#(#0h#h(#h(#20,  0  )3  0`*(#(#(e?$0 0` (#(#0 ` ` (#` (#0  (# (#0h(#(#0h#h(#h(#0((#(#20,  a  )3  0p/(#(#X[\]^_`aG_cgkosw{Bullet ListBullet ListO'    TABLE ATABLE ATABLE BTABLE A<6X9`(CourierXx6X@KX@'\  `TimesRomanXo\  PCXP'\  `TimesRoman&f\  PC&Pqqqq'dxd&p d Pdssss'dxd&p Pd duvuv'dxd3+0 d d d3+0 d d dxxxx'dxd dSSSSS'dxdS'dxd(3$ !   8 A- ȿH G {)  _"US //ȿؿ G {)  _"US // !  _XDsXXX( B=% | =B `     h      p      x  `     h   @@bb" Proceedingsofthe1999   SourceTestingintheNewRegulatoryWorld  WorkshopII  @EPAContractNumber68D98046    @' Preparedfor:    @"#XDsXXXDs+#XXXXDsRimaCHowellCDDishakjianDHE%  EH(MD19) f    SourceMeasurementTechnologyGroup#XDsXXX#XDsXXXDs  ~V Emissions,Monitoring,andAnalysisDivisionOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyResearchTrianglePark,NorthCarolina27711  2  C@' Preparedby:   #XDsXXXDs#XXXXDs  EC/RIncorporated ! 2327EnglertDrive,Suite100Durham,NC27713#XDsXXX#XDsXXXDs #  and  %^ %@zz _TRC_ԀEnvironmentalCorporation ^'6 @vv6340QuadrangleDrive,Suite200@TTChapelHill,NorthCarolina27514 #XDsXXXDs#XXXXDs  #XDsXXX# % XDsXXXDs#XDsXXXDsn#XDsXXXDs @==%January_J19JK28KL%  L,_Ԁ2000  -"% _( $8DsXXdXXd8E1X` hp x (#XE  @" TABLEOFCONTENTS   INTRODUCTION""H(#. iii ` LISTOFACRONYMS""I(#.  iv 8  AGENDAT"T"H(#.vii  ` DAY1""J(#.1  8  DAY2`"`"I(#.((24   DAY3`"`"I(#.((55   APPENDIXA:FINALPARTICIPANTLIST   `     h      #l! @$ Introduction     ThesecondSourceTestingintheNewRegulatoryWorldWorkshopwasheldinRaleigh, ` NorthCarolina,onNovember2throughNovember4,1999.Theworkshop,sponsoredbytheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA),providedaforumforopendiscussionamongtheEPAsEmissionMeasurementCenter,theEPAregionaloffices,andStateandlocalagenciesregardingsourcetestingissuesandconcerns.  Alistofacronymsandanagendafromtheworkshopareprovidedfollowingthisintroduction.AfinalparticipantlistisprovidedinAppendixA.  $  @" LISTOFACRONYMS   H.,N hp x (#XXHADI N ApplicabilityDeterminationIndex  AIM N Architectural/IndustrialManufacturers t AMS N AdvancedMonitoringSystems ` AOP0 N angleofprojectionL N (#N (# AOV0 N angleofview8 N (#N (# ASTM N AmericanSocietyforTestingandMaterials $ t #XDsXXXDs#BACT0 N BestAvailableControlTechnologyXDsXXXDs `N (#N (# BOD0 N BiologicalOxygenDemand L N (#N (# BTS0 N BureauofTechnicalServices 8 N (#N (# CAA N CleanAirAct $  CAAA N CleanAirActAmendmentsof1990   CAM N ComplianceAssuranceMonitoring   CARB N CaliforniaAirResourcesBoard   cfm0 N cubicfeetperminute N (#N (# CO2 N carbondioxide p CO N carbonmonoxide \ CE N CaptureEfficiency H CEMS N ContinuousEmissionMonitoringSystem 4 CFR N CodeofFederalRegulations  p CMS N ContinuousMonitoringSystem  \ COMS N ContinuousOpacityMonitoringSystem H CPMS N ContinuousParameterMonitoringSystem 4 CTM N ConditionalTestMethod   CY0 N calendaryear N (#N (# DQO N DataQualityObjectives  DOE0 N DepartmentofEnergyN (#N (# EMAD N Emissions,Monitoring,andAnalysisDivision  EMC N EmissionMeasurementCenter l EMMC N EnvironmentalMonitoringManagementCouncil X  EPA N EnvironmentalProtectionAgency D! ESD N EmissionStandardsDivision 0"  ETV N EnvironmentalTechnologyVerification #l! FESOP N FederallyEnforceableStateOperatingPermit $X" FID N FlameIonizationDetector $D # FR N FederalRegister %0!$ FTIR N FourierTransformInfrared &"% FV N facevelocity '#& FY0 N fiscalyear(#'N (#N (# GC0 N GasChromatography#XDsXXXDs#XDsXXXDs)$(N (#N (# GC/MS N GasChromatography/MassSpectroscope |*%) GFAAS N GraphiteFurnaceAtomicAbsorptionSpectrometry h+&* GFC0 N gasfiltercorrelationT,'+N (#N (# GMACT N GenericMaximumAchievableControlTechnology @-(, GPRA N GovernmentPerformanceandResultsAct  HAPs N HazardousAirPollutants  HCl N HydrogenChloride  HF N HydrogenFluoride t HON N hazardousorganicNESHAP ` ICP N InductivelyCoupledPlasmaEmissionSpectrometry L  IP0 N InternationalPaper8 N (#N (# HWC0 N hazardouswastecombustor$ tN (#N (# HWI0 N hazardouswasteincinerator `N (#N (# #XDsXXXDs#LAER0 N LowestachievableemissionrateXDsXXXDs L N (#N (# LCL N LowerConfidenceLevel  8  LIDAR N LightDetectingandRanging $  MACT N MaximumAchievableControlTechnology   MDL N MethodDetectionLimits   MeCl2 N methylenechloride   MEK N methylethylketone;CAS78933   MMBtu/hr0 N #XDsXXXDs#Xj XXXDsmillionBritishthermalunits#XDsX XXj#XDsXXXDspN (#N (# MRRT N Monitoring,Reporting,RecordkeepingandTesting ` MSE0 N MeasurementofSourceEmissionLN (#N (# NA0 N nonattainment8N (#N (# NAAQS N NationalAmbientAirQualityStandard $t NAS0 N NationalAcademyofScience`N (#N (# NCASI N NationalCouncilforAirandStreamImprovement L NDO N NaturalDraftOpenings 8 NELAC0 N NationalEnvironmentalLaboratoryAccreditationCouncil$N (#N (# NELAP0 N NationalEnvironmentalLaboratoryAccreditationProgramN (#N (# NESHAP0 N NationalEmissionStandardforHazardousAirPollutantsN (#N (# NH3 N ammonia  NO N nitricoxide  NO2 N nitrogendioxide p NOx N nitrogenoxides \  NRDC0 N #XDsXXXDse#X XXXDsNaturalResourcesDefenseCouncil#XDsX XX ##XDsXXXDsH!N (#N (# NSPS N NewSourcePerformanceStandards H"  NSR N NewSourceReview 4#! NTTAA N NationalTechnologyTransferandAdvancementAct  $p" OAQPS N OfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandards  %\ # OECA N OfficeofEnforcementandComplianceAssurance %H!$ O&M N OperationandMaintenance &4"% OPG N OperatingPermitsGroup ' #& ORD N OfficeofResearchandDevelopment ( $' OSB0 N OrientedStrandBoard)$(N (#N (# OSW N OfficeofSolidWaste *%) O2 N oxygen +&* PAHs N Polyaromatichydrocarbons l,'+ PBMS N PerformanceBasedMeasurementSystem X-(, PCB0 N #XDsXXXDs@$#polychlorinatedbiphenylcompoundsXDsXXXDsN (#N (# PCDD/PCDF N pentachlorodibenzodioxin/pentachlorodibenzofuran  PEMS0 N PredictiveEmissionMonitoringSystemsN (#N (# PM N Particulatematter t PMfine0 N Fineparticulatematter`N (#N (# POMs0 N #XDsXXXDs:(#PolycyclicorganicmatterXDsXXXDsL N (#N (# ppb0 N #XDsXXXDs)#Partsperbillion(volume).XDsXXXDs8 N (#N (# ppm0 N partspermillion(volume)$ tN (#N (# ppmC0 N partspermillionconcentration `N (#N (# PQL N PracticalQuantitationLimit  L  PS N PerformanceSpecification  8  PSEU0 N #XDsXXXDs*#X XXXDsPollutantSpecificEmissionUnit#XDsX XX ,#XDsXXXDs$ N (#N (# PST0 N PerformanceSpecification#XDsXXXDsi,#XDsXXXDsԀTest$ N (#N (# PTE N PermanentTotalEnclosure   QA/QC N QualityAssurance/QualityControl   RA0 N RelativeAccuracy N (#N (# RACT0 N ReasonablyAvailableControlTechnologyN (#N (# RATA N RelativeAccuracyTestAudit p R&D0 N ResearchandDevelopment\N (#N (# SCAQMD0 N SouthCoastAirQualityManagementDistrictHN (#N (# SES N SourceEvaluationSociety 4 SIP N StateImplementationPlan  p SOCMI0 N SyntheticOrganicChemicalManufacturingIndustry \N (#N (# SO2 N sulfurdioxide H SO3 N sulfurtrioxide 4 SOP0 N StandardOperatingProcedure N (#N (# SSCAP0 N #XDsXXXDs,#X XXXDsStationarySourceComplianceAuditProgram#XDsX XX 0#XDsXXXDs N (#N (# STAPPA/ALAPCO0 N StateandTerritorialAirPollutionProgramAdministrators/Association   ofLocalAirPollutionControlOfficials N (#N (# THC N TotalHydrocarbons  #XDsXXXDsf1#X XXXDsTOC0 N TotalOrganicCompounds#XDsX XX 2#XDsXXXDs N (#N (# TPY0 N TonsPerYearp!N (#N (# TTE N TemporaryTotalEnclosure \"  TTN N TechnologyTransferNetwork H#! UATMP N UrbanAirToxicsMonitoringProgram 4$" UV N ultraviolet  %p # VEO0 N VisibleEmissionObservation &\!$N (#N (# VOCs N VolatileOrganicCompounds &H"% WFI0 N wastefuelincinerator'4#&N (#N (# WPN2 N WhitePaperNumber2 ( $'   ) %( #XDsXXXDs3#X XXXDs$8 X XdXXd8Kk[Wz|!`l @@F e@ H@Ee P (#P (#(#(#   SOURCETESTINGINTHE  NEWREGULATORYWORLDWORKSHOPII  0   Q XX #Q5# X   CONFERENCEAGENDA   @  (#(#P (#P (#  ?S0' VxdE x?  0 f#X X X j7##XDsX XX 7#X XXXDs Day1November2,1999(Tuesday)     ~^X` hpx (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?A,N X~#XDsX XX 8#8:30am0  Welcome0 (#(#0 (# (#0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#RimaDishakjianH (#(# 8:40am0  IntroductoryRemarks0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#HenryThomas,@ (#(#      `     h      p     BillLamason9:30am0  TestMethodsUpdate0h(#(#0h(#h(#0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#GeneRileyl (#(# 10:15am0  BREAKd(#(# 10:45am0  StationarySourceComplianceAuditProgram0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#GaryMcAlister (#(# 11:30am0  ModificationstoPerformanceSpecification10p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#SolomonRicksd(#(# 12:00pm0  LUNCH \(#(# 1:30pm0  PerformanceBasedMeasurementSystemUpdate0(#(#0(#(#RobinSegall(#(# 2:15pm0  LowConcentrationAlternativetoMethod25 p 0(#(#0(#(#MikeGaribay,SCAQMD\(#(# 3:00pm0  BREAKT(#(# 3:30pm0  EmissionTestingProblemsEncounteredintheField0(#(#0(#(#FredBallay/MikeKlein,   NewJerseyDEP (#(# 4:30pm0  Questions/DiscussionT!"(#(# 5:00pm0  ADJOURN"L$(#(#  Day2November3,1999(Wednesday)  L&!( 8:30am0  NationalEnvironmentalLaboratoryAccreditation'D#*(#(#     ConferenceandFieldActivitiesStandards0 p 0p(#p(#0(#(#DanBivins($+(#(# 9:15am0  RecentMethod301ValidationSubmittals0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#GaryMcAlisterp*%-(#(# 10:00am0  BREAK,h'/(#(# 10:30am0  AcidRainandFlowMeasurementIssuesPanel0(#(#0(#(#JohnSchakenbach,-)1(#(#      `     h      p     BillGrimley,TomLogan  .)2 X XXXDs   SOURCETESTINGINTHE  NEWREGULATORYWORLDWORKSHOPII      X XX # X D# X   CONFERENCEAGENDA(Continued)  d    ?S0' xdE: x?#X X X sE##XDsX XX E#X XXXDs ;  aX` hpPx (#%'0*,.8135@8:<H?AX` XxX#XDsX XX F#11:30am0  LUNCH l(#(# 1:00pm0  WhatsAlltheFussAboutPMFine?0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#TomLogan,RonMyers  (#(# 2:00pm0  Method18Modifications0(#(#0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#RimaDishakjianl (#(# 2:30pm0  BREAKd (#(# 2:45pm0  PredictiveEmissionsMonitoringSystems (#(#     PerformanceSpecification160  0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#FostonCurtis (#(#     InternationalPaperXLProject0  0(#(# p 0(#(#0(#(#ChrisRascher,Region1d(#(# 4:00pm0  Methods203A,BandCSomedaySoon?0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#PeterWestlin \(#(# 4:30pm0  Questions/Discussion(#(# 5:00pm0  ADJOURN\(#(#  Day3November4,1999(Thursday)   8:30am0  ContinuousMonitoringSession0(#(#0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#T(#(#     PMContinuousEmissionMonitoring0  0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#DanBivinsL (#(#     MACTMonitoringGuidance0  0(#(#0p(#(#0p(#p(#0(#(#BarrettParker !(#(#     ComplianceAssuranceandTitleVMonitoring0    PeterWestlin "(#(# 10:00am0  BREAKL"$(#(# 10:30am0  ContinuousMonitoringSessionContd#D&(#(# 11:30am  ConferenceWrapUpSession % ( 12:00pm0  ADJOURND'"*(#(#   (h#+ fX   `NOVEMBER2,1999`   $Q  Welcome/OpeningRemarks  RimaDishakjian,WorkshopModerator,EmissionMeasurementCenterHenryThomas,AssociateDirectorofOperations,OfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsBillLamason,GroupLeader,EmissionMeasurementCenter  4  vQ    RimaDishakjianwelcomedparticipantstothesecondSourceTestingintheNewRegulatory  H  WorldWorkshop.Sheprovidedanoverviewofthemakeupoftheaudienceattendingtheworkshop  4  andindicatedthatonlyregulatorypersonnelfromEPAheadquarters,EPARegionalOfficesandStateandlocalairagencieswereinattendance.Shehopedthatthiswouldofferacomfortableatmosphereconducivetoopenandfrankdiscussionsaboutstacktesting,monitoringissues,andproblemsencounteredinthefield.Shenextintroducedthekeynotespeaker,Mr.HenryThomas,theAssociateDirectorofOperationsatOAQPS.  Mr.Thomasemphasizedtheimportanceoftheseconferences.HestatedthatpoliciesdevelopedbyOAQPSmustbebasedonsoundtechnicalinformationandthatmuchofthisinformationcomesfromtheworkperformedbytheEPARegionsandStateandlocalagencies.TheseconferencesareveryimportantinallowingOAQPStoperformtheirjobbyensuringthatcriticalinformationiscommunicatedtothekeypeopleatOAQPS.  Next,Mr.ThomasidentifiedOAQPSsmissionassettingnationalstandardssuchastheNAAQS,NSPSandMACT.CentraltothismissionisdevelopingguidanceforSIPsandnationalemissionstandards.EPAandStateandlocalagenciesneedtoworkcloselytoensurethatthisguidancemakessenseandaccomplishesthestatedobjectives.AnotherareacentraltoOAQPSsmissionisthecollectionandanalysisofairpollutioninformationsuchasambientairqualitydataandemissionsdata.OAQPSisheavilydependentuponStateandlocalagencyactivitiestocollectthisdata.Finally,OAQPSisrequiredtoreporttoCongressandthepublicontheAgencysprogressinachievingitsobjectivesandgoals.ThisreportislargelybasedondatacollectedbytheStateandlocalairagencies.Inshort,therelationshipbetweenStateandlocalagenciesandEPAiscriticaltothemissionofOAQPS.  Mr.ThomasoutlinedOAQPSsprioritiesforthecomingyear.HeprefacedhisremarksbynotingthatrecentCourtdecisionsandthebudgetcutsthatCongresshasbeenimposingmakeitmoredifficulttodevelopstrategiesandpriorities.Nevertheless,OAQPSdoeshaveadirectionandpriorities,althoughtheseprioritieswillbeshapedbytheavailablebudgetandapplicablecourtdecisions.ThesixareasofhighpriorityforOAQPSforthenext25yearsinclude:(1)developrevisedOzone/PMNAAQS(includinganappealtotheSupremeCourt);(2)requireregionalNOx (#' controlstomeettheozonestandardsintheNortheastthroughtheNOxSIPcallandtheSection126 )$( petitions;(3)implementtheRegionalHazerule;(4)publishaNSRreformrule;(5)issueallTitleVpermitsbytheendofCY2000;and(6)continueairtoxicsreductionthroughimplementationofexistingMACTstandards,developmentofadditionalMACTstandards,andimplementationoftheurbanairtoxicsstrategy.Mr.ThomasindicatedthatprogressontheseprioritiesdependsontheworkperformedbyStateandlocalairagenciesandthattestingissuesareaskeyindevelopingMACT (.x)- standardsasaremonitoring,recordkeepingandreportingindevelopingTitleVpermits.Mr.ThomasstatedthatthedevelopmentoftestmethodsforaPMfinestandardisalsocriticaltosuccessofOAQPSsmission.  Next,Mr.BillLamasonwelcomedallparticipantsandhopedthatitwouldbeavaluableworkshopforallinattendance.HestatedthatthemeetingisavaluableopportunityforafacetofacedialoguetodiscussissuesandproblemswithStateandlocalagencycounterpartsinallareasofemissionstesting.Mr.LamasonprovidedanoverviewofEMCbyoutliningEMCsorganizationandtheresponsibilitiesandfunctionsofbothGroupsthatcompriseEMC.HealsointroducedeachindividualwithinEMCandidentifiedtheprogramsforwhicheachindividualisresponsible.Mr.LamasonindicatedthattheEMCwebsiteandtheworkshopnotebookcontainsthislistingofEMCpersonnelandtheirresponsibilities.  Mr.Lamasonthensharedsomeobservationsfromlastyearsworkshop,includingthoseactivitiesthatEMCprovidesthatareinvaluabletoStateandlocalagenciesperformingtheirfunctions.Someoftheseincludetechnicalsupportandassistanceactivities,theEMCwebsite,theauditprogram,andtheCAMworkshops.Inaddition,hesummarizedthoseareaswherelastyearsattendeesindicatedEMCneededtoimprovetobetterservetheStateandlocalprograms.Theseincludetheneedforelectroniccommunication(EMChassinceestablishedanemailgroup),testingrequirementsinMACTstandards,andcompilingdatabasesfortheauditprogramthatcanbeaccessedontheweb.HeindicatedthatthechallengesthatlieaheadforEMCincludeprovidingmoreassistanceonTitleVandMACTimplementationissuesandcontinuingthedialogueandoutreacheffortsthroughsuchitemsasnewsletters,cheatsheets,etc.̀  X     `PRESENTATION1`   g  TestMethodsUpdate  GeneRiley,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenterMg   Mr.Rileyspresentationprovidedanupdateonrecentmethoddevelopmentactivitiesandsummarizedthemethodsrevisionpackageandtheissuesassociatedwithit.HealsohighlightedseveralcurrentregulatorydevelopmentactivitiesthatarebeingundertakenwithinEMC.HebeganhispresentationbysummarizingthenumberingsystemthatisusedtopublishtestmethodsintheCFR.  Mr.RileynextexplainedthatEMCisintheprocessofupdatingandreformattingallmethodsbyfollowingtheEMMCstandardformat.TheserevisionswereproposedonAugust27,1997,andareexpectedtobepromulgatedinearlyFY2000.Themostsignificantchangesincetheproposalisthattheinstrumentalmethodswillberemovedfromthepackage.  Mr.RileyexplainedthepurposeofthePBMSandpresentedthestatusoftheprogram.HeindicatedthattheprogramwillonlyapplytoanalyticalmethodsandthatimplementationoftheprogramwilloccurthroughpublicationofaFederalRegisternoticescheduledforproposalinFY 0 2000.  EPAisawaitingcompletionofPS1beforedecidingifMethod203willbereproposedorfinalized.  TherevisionstoMethods203A,BandCfordeterminingopacityvaluesinotherthan6minuteperiodsisscheduledforpromulgationinFY2000.  Method207formeasuringisocyanatesusinganimpingercollectionfollowedbyGCanalysiswasproposedDecember8,1997,andisanticipatedtobefinalizedinFY2000.ThemethodwillbeusedforSIPlimitsinsourcecategoriessuchasflexiblefoammanufacturing,paintspraybooths,andpressedboardmanufacturing.  Methods2F,2G,and2HforvelocityandflowratemeasurementweredevelopedinresponsetoconcernsbytheelectricutilityindustrywithpotentialbiasesofMethod2andtheimpactontheacidrainprogram.ThesevoluntarymethodscanbeusedinplaceofMethod2.  Method5iwasdevelopedtomeasurelowlevelparticulatelevelsforcalibrationofPMCEMS.Itconsistsofanoutofstack,heatedfilterandiseffectiveforloadingslessthan50mg/dscm.ItwaspromulgatedthisyearwiththeHazardousWasteIncineratorMACTrule.  RevisionstoMethod23fordioxinandfuranswereproposedonMay31,1995.Thatnoticeproposedtodeletethemethylenechloriderinseforthedioxin/furananalysis;however,commentersrequestedthemethylenechloriderinsebemadeoptionalwhenusingcombinationtrainsforsplitorganicsamples.Themethodisbeingrevisedtoaddressthecomments.PromulgationistargetedforFY2000. (.x)- Ї  Mr.Rileynextsummarizedthecurrentstatusoftheperformancespecifications.EPAsproposaltorevisePS1in1994promptedASTMtodevelopMethod6216andledtoasupplementalproposal.EPAexpectstofinalizetherevisionsinFY2000.PS11forthecertificationofPMCEMSwasproposedinApril1996withtheHWCMACTstandard.AsaresultofsignificantchangespromptedbytheHWCstandards,PS11isexpectedtobereproposedinFY2000.PS15forthecertificationofFTIRCEMSforHAPsthatareabsorbedbyinfraredwasproposedonAugust7,1997.ItallowsforseveralcertificationoptionsandisanticipatedtobepromulgatedinearlyFY2000.AppendixFProcedure2isaQAproceduretoaccompanyPS11.ItwasproposedonDecember30,1997,andisscheduledforreproposalinFY2000.  RevisionsandcorrectionstoMethod301areanticipatedtoconsumeasignificantamountofEMCstimeoverthenextyear.Theserevisionswilladdressanumberoftechnicalareas,withpromulgationexpectedinFY2000.  RevisionstoMethods306,306A,and306BforchromiumelectroplatingwereproposedonAugust7,1997,andareexpectedtobefinalizedinFY2000.TheserevisionsclarifythesamplingandanalyticalproceduresandreformatthemethodtocomplywiththeEMMCcriteria.  Method316formeasuringformaldehydeemissionswasdevelopedforthemineralwoolindustryandwaspromulgatedwiththeMACTregulationinMay1999.  Method318(FTIRforphenol,formaldehyde,CO,carbonylsulfideandmethanolemissionsfromprocessesusingphenolicresins)isdesignedforuseinthemineralwoolandfiberglassindustriesandwasalsopromulgatedwiththeMACTstandardinMay1999.  Method320,ageneric,selfvalidating,extractivesamplingprocedureusingFTIR,wasproposedonMarch24,1998.Thismethodcanbeusedforanycompoundabsorbedintheinfraredrangeonanysource,providedtheQA/QCcriteriaaremet.ThefinalmethodwaspromulgatedwiththePortlandCementMACTstandardinMay1999.  Method321isanFTIRbasedmethodspecificforHClemissionsfromPortlandCementplants.ThefinalmethodwaspromulgatedwiththePortlandCementMACTstandardinMay1999.  Method322isanothermethod(usesGFCwithinfraredspectroscopy)fordeterminingHClemissionsfromPortlandCementplants.ThedraftmethodwasproposedonMarch24,1998,alongwiththePortlandCementMACTrule.However,promulgationofthemethodisbeingpostponeduntilitcanbedeterminedwhypairedGFC/IRandFTIRmeasurementsproduceddifferentresultsatseverallimekilns.  Mr.RileynextdescribedthefiveguidancecategoriesthatEMCusesinpostingtestmethodsontheEMCwebsite.Theyarebasedonvalidationandpublicationstatusofeachmethod.  Mr.Rileythendescribedanumberofdrafttestmethods.Theseincludedamethodforacetonitrile(bothgaseousandparticulate)thathasbeenvalidatedataHWI;amethodforhydrogencyanideinthegasphasethathasbeenvalidatedinthelaboratory;amethodforphenolandcresolemissions(formerlyknownasMethod317)thathasbeenvalidatedatafiberglassmanufacturing ,.|)- plant;amethodforcoplanarPCBs(definedaschlorinatedPCBsthatproducedioxinlikehealtheffects)thathasnotbeenfullyvalidated;andanewmethodforcharacterizingfilterableandcondensableparticulatematter.    Lastly,Mr.RileyaddressedEMCseffortsinreviewingalternativetestmethods.HefirstoutlinedtheproceduresthatEMCfollowsinreviewingalternativetestmethodsandthenidentifiedsomespecificrequeststhatEMChasrecentlyreviewed.TheseincludedtwoinstrumentalproceduresasanalternativetothemanualPMMethods5and17.AlsoreviewedwasadirectinterfaceGC/MSasanalternativetoMethods18,25and25A.ThisalternativemethodwasinitiallyapprovedasCTM28andlaterasalternativemethod(ALT017)forspecificapplicationsofMethod18.BecauseEMClackedthenecessaryexpertise,apeerreviewprocesswasemployedtoreviewarequestforanalternativemethodusingaNOxultravioletanalyzer.Nofinaldecisionhasbeenmadeonthis $  alternativemethod.EMCalsoreviewedarequesttousearoofflowmonitorasanalternativemethodtoMethod14and14A.ApeerreviewprocesswasusedandthemethodwasapprovedasALT016,withconditions,inAugust1998.  Inclosing,Mr.RileyreviewedseveralmethodimprovementsmadeasaresultofaletterreceivedfromtheSESregardingimprovedQA/QCintestmethods.Healsoprovidedinformationonthewebsiteaddresswheremuchofthisinformationcanbelocated.Question:0  Whyhavethechangestotheinstrumentmethodsinpart60beenpulled? p(#(# Answer:0  ItwasbasedonthenegativecommentsreceivedfromtheEPAsAcidRainprogram. H IndustryalsoprovidednegativecommentsandarguedthatEPAshouldrepropose.EPAplanstoreproposetheinstrumentmethods(3A,6C,7E,10and20)andintendstomakethemethodsconsistent. (#(# Question:0  IsEMClookingattheproblemsassociatedwithdecreasingNOxlimitsbeingimposed  ongasturbines?Theproblemisthattheexistingtestmethodscannotmeasureconcentrationsaslowasthosebeingincludedinpermits.Ifanenforcementcaseislitigated,thereisnobasistodemonstratethattherewasaviolationbecausethedetectionmethodishigherthanthepermitlimit.Specifically,isEPAconsideringcreatingnewSubparts(forexample,GGaandGGb)toaddresstheissue? (#(# Answer:0  EPAunderstandstheissueandislookingatit,butcurrentlydoesnothavetheresources $X" requiredtofullyaddressit.Withadequateresources,EMCcouldexaminethetechnologiesthatareavailabletomeasurelowNOxconcentrationsandalsoexaminethe %0!$ changestotheQA/QCproceduresformeasuringlowNOxconcentrations.&"%(#(# Question:0  AStaterepresentativeindicatedthatduringanobservation,thetestingfirmidentified (#' thatchangestothetestmethodhadbeenmade.CanEPAincludeadatewhenthetestmethodwasamendedintheCFR? (#(# Answer:0  Goodpoint.Thisisagoodsuggestionthatshouldbedone. T,'+(#(#     &    XDsXXXDsX XXXDs         X X XX `PRESENTATION2`#X X XX 2#  StationarySourceComplianceAuditProgram  GaryMcAlister,EPA,EmissionsMeasurementCenter u  Mr.McAlisterdiscussedtheSSCAP.Heprovidedabackgroundoftheauditprogramand P  thestatusofthecurrentprogram. "    X X XX XDsX XX '  TheauditprogramwasoriginallyadministeredbyORD.Inlate @  1996,NERLandEMCassumedtheprogramandjointlyoperateditforaperiodofoneyear.ThatperiodendedinJanuary1998.  In1998,EMCformedaworkgrouptoimprovetheSSCAPprogram.AtelephonehotlinesystemcalledTheSource[(919)5410200]wasdevelopedtoassistusersinobtainingaudit @  samples.Currently,auditsamplescanalsoberequestedonlineatthefollowingaddress:http://www/epa.gov/ttn/emc.Mr.McAlisterrequestedthatusersprovideampletimetofulfillrequests.Ingeneral,EMCcanfillliquidsamplerequestswithin24hours(excludingweekends)andcylinderrequestswithin23days.  HestatedanotherimprovementEMCisworkingonistheneedforSOP.Atpresent,therearenoproceduresoutlininghowtheauditsamplesshouldbehandled,whathappenstothesamplesafteratestiscompete,andhowresultsshouldbereported.EMCiscurrentlyintheprocessofdevelopingSOPstoaddresstheseissues.  Toexpediteasamplerequestprocedure,thefollowinginformationmustbeincludedontheauditsamplerequestform:name,agency,address,telephonenumber,emailaddress,whatsamplesarebeingrequestedandforwhatmethods,targetconcentration(VERYIMPORTANT),datesampleisneededandwhatdaytestingwilltakeplace,shippinglocation,testsitelocation(fortrackingpurposes),andanyspecialinstructions.  Mr.McAlisterthenprovidedabriefdescriptionofthemethodsforwhichauditsareavailable.Theseincludethefollowing.*c  *c"0    Method6/8liquidsample*c݌`" (#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    Method7liquidsample*c݌L#!(#(# Ќ  *c  *c-"0    Method13Aliquidsample*c-H݌8$"(#(# Ќ  *c  *cӗ"0    Method13Bliquidsample*cӗ݌$%t #(#(# Ќ  *c  *cy"0    Method18cylindersample*cy݌&`!$(#(# Ќ  *c  *c "0    Method23solidadsorbentinglasscontainer*c ;݌&L"%(#(# Ќ  *c  *cڙ"0    Method24(solventbasedpaints)liquidsample(paint)*cڙ݌'8#&(#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    Method25cylindersample*c݌($$'(#(# Ќ  *c  *cE"0    Method26liquidsample*cE`݌)%((#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    Method29filterandliquidsolution*c݌*%)(#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    Method101filterandliquidsolution*c݌+&*(#(# Ќ  *c  *cN"0    Method101Afilterandliquidsolution*cNi݌,'+(#(#   *c  *c "0    Method101Bfilterandliquidsolution*c '݌p-(,(#(# Ќ    Inadditiontothesampleslistedabove,severalsamplesarecurrentlyunderdevelopment. TheseincludeaprojectfordevelopinganinksampleforMethod24,andasampleforMethod315(procedureusedtomeasureindicatorofPOMs).  Mr.McAlisterreportedthatEMCisattemptingtotracktheauditsampleselectronicallytostreamlinetheprogramandtoprovidebettersecurity.ThiselectronictrackingsystemshouldbeoperationalinJanuary2000andwillincludesamplerequestsandreportingofauditsamples,allconductedelectronically.TheEMCQATeamMemberslistedbelowcanbecontactedtorequestauditsamplesortoobtainadditionalinformationregardingthisprogram:*c  *c"0    TerryHarrison0(#(#9195415233*c݌ 8 (#(# Ќ  *c  *cO"0    GaryMcAlister0(#(#9195411062*cOj݌$ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c "0    WadePeele0 (#(#0 (# (#9195414945*c $݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *cӣ"0    GeneRiley0 (#(#0 (# (#9195415239*cӣ݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    CandaceSorrell0(#(#9195411064*c݌ (#(# Ќ  Question:0  Whopaysfortheshippingtoandfromthesupplier?p(#(# Answer:0  EMCpaystosendsamplesoutandtheclientortesterpaystoshipthemback.H(#(# Question:0  Forcylinderaudits,isitnecessarytohavesomeonewatchtheanalysisoftheaudit  p sample?Isthisstillarequirement? (#(# Answer:0  Yes,EMCwouldliketocontinuethisprocessifpossible.Itprotectstheintegrityofthe 4 audit. (#(# Question:0  Aretheregoingtobeauditsamplesfor6C,7E,etc.?(#(# Answer:0  Thesemethodsarealreadysetupwithnumerousperformancerequirements,soitmay  notbenecessarytoauditthem.Itisnotasimportanttoauditthesemethodsasitistoauditmanyoftheothermethods.Itwouldbeeasytodevelopauditsamplesforthesemethods,butEPAcurrentlydoesnthavefundsforthat. (#(# Question:0  IfaMethod25auditsamplewassenttoatestingcompanyinsteadofgoingdirectlyto #l! thetestsite,wouldyoustillconsiderthatavalidaudit? (#(# Answer:0  Ifyoudonthaveanyreasontodoubttheintegrityofthetestingcompany,thenits %0!$ probablyokay. (#(# Question:0  Canauditsamplesbeshippedtothetestingsitedirectlyordotheyhavetogotothe (#' agencyfirst? (#(# Answer:0  Samplescanbeshippedtoeitherplace.Ifitssenttothesite,itmustbeunderstoodthat h+&* theagencyneedstobreaktheseal. (#(#   @-(, Question:0  Samplesareoftenorderedthroughthefaxand,thenafewdaysbeforethetest,many   timesthesampleisnotthere.Thisisaproblembecauseitisoftenhardtogetalivepersononthetelephonetocheckonthestatus.Ifthishappens,cansamplesbereused? (#(# X XXXDsAnswer:0  Samplescanbereusedformorethanoneaudit.Ifaregulatorwasattached,youcould ` checkthepressureandseehowmuchsampleisstillavailable.Thispracticeisnotencouraged.Thecanistersshouldbemailedbackaftereachuse.Also,youmaycontactCandaceSorrellat(919)5411064tocheckthestatusofasample. (#(# Comment:0  Itwassuggestedthatinstructionsshouldbeincludedwitheachsample.Inaddition,it  `  wasstatedthatsampleresultsshouldneverbeincludedwithsamplesthataresentout.ItwasalsomentionedthatEMCshouldconsidermakingauditsamplesmandatory,especiallyforMethod25. (#(# Answer:0  Itisagreedthatsamplesneedbetteroperatinginstructions.Inaddition,pleasenotethat   anyonewhowouldliketobepartofamonthlyconferencecalliswelcome.EPAneedstohearcommentsfromoutsideindividuals. (#(# Comment:0  Itwouldbegoodideatoincluderesealingtapewitheachsample.Thetestercouldre  sealthesampleafteruse,beforeshippingitbacktotheagency. (#(# Question:0  WhatisintheMethod18cylinder?P(#(# Answer:0  Thesamplesarecustommade.Theycanputupto4compoundsineachcanister.You 0 canaskforanycompoundthatislistedonthewebpageunderMethod18.Youcangetauditsamplesforallcompounds,butthiswillrequiremultiplecylindersbecauseamaximumof4compoundscanbeplacedinonecylinder. (#(# Question:0  CantheMethod25auditsamplebeusedfor25A,B,orC?0(#(# Answer:0  ItisnotappropriatetouseMethod25auditsfor25Aor25B.EMChasonrare   occasionsallowedittobeusedforMethod25C,butthisisnotanidealsituation.#XDsX XX ٭#X XXXDs!(#(#   $"    `PRESENTATION3`       ModificationstoPerformanceSpecification1  SolomonRicks,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenter      Mr.RicksspresentationfocusedonthechangesmadetoPS1overthepastfewyears.EPAproposedrevisionstoPS1onNovember25,1994.Basedoncommentsreceivedinresponsetothatproposal,EPAheldastakeholdermeetingin1996.OneoutcomeofthisstakeholdermeetingwasthatASTMformedasubcommitteetodevelopperformancespecificationsforopacitymonitors(D6216).EPAdecidedtoincorporatetheD6216proceduresbyreferenceintoPS1andpublishedasupplementalproposalonSeptember23,1998.Promulgationisscheduledforearly2000.  Mr.RicksnextoutlinedthereasonsthatEPAproposedrevisionstoPS1.TheseincludedupdatingtheCOMSdesignandperformancerequirementsandclarifyingtheowner/operatorandmonitorvendorobligations.Thesechangesincludethefollowing."0  Requiringthattheopticalalignmentdeviceclearlyshowmisalignmentat2percentopacity.(#(# "0  Requiringthatthealignmentcheckbeperformedattheinstallationpathlengthinsteadofthe  8metersthatiscurrentlyrequiredinPS1. (#(# "0  ReducingthespecificationsfortheAOVandAOPfrom5degreesto4degrees.p(#(# "0  Requiringacalibrationdriftcheckingsystemconsistingofazerosimulationdeviceandan ` upscalecalibrationdevice. (#(# "0  Requiringalarmsandwarningstoindicateafaultyconditionintheopacitymonitoring @ system. (#(# "0  Requiring,withrespecttozerocompensation,theopacitymonitortohaveanautomated  p meanstoassessandrecordtheaccumulatedautomaticzerocompensationona24hourbasis.Thepurposeofthisrequirementistoachieveacorrectresponsetothezerosimulateddevice. (#(# "0  Includinga4percentopacitycompensationallowancefordirtaccumulation.Foropacity @ monitorsthatdonotdistinguishbetweendirtandzerocompensation,theaccumulatedzerocompensationmaybedesignatedasthedirtcompensation. (#(#   AnotherrequirementinPS1addressesthedesignandaccesstotheexternalauditfilters.Specifically,thefiltersmustbeusedinconjunctionwithazeroconditionbasedonthesameenergylevelandtheentirebeamreceivedbythedetectormustpassthroughtheattenuator.Alsotheattenuatorinsertionpointmustnotinterferewithreflectedlight.Withrespecttothepathlengthcorrectionfactor,theopacitymonitormustautomaticallycorrecttheopacityemissionsmeasuredattheinstallationpointofthemonitortotheemissionsoutletpathlength.Thepathlengthcorrectionfactorcannotbechangedbytheuserorrecordedduringeachcalibrationcheckcycleandwillsetoffanalarmwhenitisbeingchangedfromacertifiedvalue.  Mr.RicksaddressedthePS1changesregardingresponsibilityfordemonstratingthedesignofamonitor.ThePS1revisionsrequirethatthemanufacturerconductthedesignspecification testing.Thetestingneedstobeperformedforeachrepresentativemonitor.Therepresentative -P(+ monitorcanbeselectedfromeithereachmonthsproductionlotorfromalotof20,whicheveristhesmallerlot.   TheproceduresfordesignspecificationtestingareoutlinedinASTMD621698.D6216includesproceduresforthedesignrequirements,aswellasadditionalprocedurestodeterminetheinsensitivityoftheopacitymonitortosupplyvoltagevariationsandambientlightandalsotodeterminethethermalstabilityofthemonitor.̀  ThePS1revisionsrequirethatopacitymonitormanufacturersconductperformancetestingofeachinstrumentpriortoshippingtheinstrumentandthateachsourceowner/operatorusinganopacitymonitorconductperformancetestingafterinstallationofthemonitor.TheproceduresforthemanufacturersperformancetestingarecontainedinASTMD621698andtheproceduresforthesourceowner/operatorsarecontainedinPS1.Theperformancetestingincludes:anopticalalignmentassessmenttodetermineiftheinstrumentiscapableofdetectingmisalignment;acalibrationerrorchecktodemonstratethattheinstrumentisproperlycalibratedandcanprovideaccurateandprecisemeasurements;andasystemresponsetimecheck(referredtoastheinstrumentresponsetimecheckintheD6216proceduresforthemanufacturers)fordemonstratingthattheinstantaneousoutputoftheopacitymonitoriscapableoftrackingquickchangesinopacity.  OtherchangestoPS1includesimplifyingtheselectionofthecalibrationattenuatorbyusingabsolutevaluesinsteadofapercentageoftheapplicablelimit.TheconditioningperiodhasbeeneliminatedbecauseEPAfeltthatitwasnotnecessarytorequireanadditional7daytestperiod.Finally,inresponsetoanumberofcommentsreceived,theoperationaltestperiodhasbeendefinedtostipulatethatthetestperiodmustincludeonefullcycleforbatchoperationsandthatforcontinuousprocesses,thesourcemustoperateforatleast50percentofthe168hourtestperiod.Finally,Mr.RicksindicatedthatPS1isnowintheEMMCformataswellasinplainEnglish.̀Question:0  OneStaterepresentativeindictedthattheyhaveanumberofoldopacitymonitorsthat P wouldnotbesubjecttotherevisedPS1procedures.Theseoldmonitorssendthedatatoacentraldatahandlingsystemandallofthecalculationsareperformedatthecentralsystem.Ifthecentraldatabasesystemisupgraded,willtheynowberequiredtoperformthecalculationintheopacitymonitorinsteadofthecentraldatahandlingsystem? (#(# Answer:0  Alarmsandsystemsareincludedforthesetypesofchecksandiftheyareincludedthat $" maytakecareofthisconcern.However,EPAhasnotfullyaddressedthisissueandmorediscussionisappropriate. (#(# Question:0  AnotherStaterepresentativeindicatedthattheycurrentlyrequest,butwillsoonrequire, P(#& thatsourcesconductquarterlyCOMaudits.TheyplantorefertoanEPA450seriesguidancedocument(EPA450/492010,PerformanceAuditProceduresforOpacity 0*%( Monitors)intheregulation.Isthisdocumentgoingtobeupdated? +p&)(#(# Answer:0  Therearenocurrentplanstoupdatethatdocument.Moreover,itisnotrecommended -P(+ thatthedocumentbereferencedinarulebecausemanymonitorsreferencedinthe -@), documentarenolongermanufactured.However,itwouldbeacceptabletoreferenceonlythegeneralauditproceduresintheintroductoryportionofthedocument. (#(# ЀQuestion:0  Sometimesitisnecessaryforasourceowner/operatortochangeaflangeandthismay  shortenorlengthenthepathlength.Howwillthisbehandledsincetherevisedproceduresstipulatethatanalarmmustgooffifthepathlengthischanged? (#(# Answer:0  Thepathlengthcanbechangedprovideditisrecorded.Inaddition,manufacturerscan @  provideinstructionsonhowtochangethepathlengthifthissituationoccurs. (#(# Question:0  WhenwillMethod203beissuedandwillitrequirequarterlyaudits?` (#(# Answer:0  EPAwillbeginworkingon203assoonastherevisionstoPS1arefinalized. @  However,thereisnodefinitetimeframeforcompletingit. (#(# Question:0  ArethereanyplanstoreviseAppendixFof40CFRpart60toincorporateanopacity  monitorauditprocedure? (#(# Answer:0  TherearenoplanstoreviseAppendixF.Method203willaddresstheopacitymonitor  auditprocedure. (#(# Comment:0  But203isanoptionalmethodforStateandlocalagenciesandAppendixFisrequired ` forcompliancedemonstrations. (#(# Response:0  EPAmaylookatrenumberingMethod203andincludingitinAppendixF.Inaddition, 0 thereisnoreasonwhyEPAcantreferenceMethod203inaMACTregulation.EPAhasabitofflexibilityinthisareaandwillensurethatMethod203proceduresarerequiredwhereitisappropriate. (#(# Comment:0  JohnBoschwithEMCstatedthat,foravarietyofreasons,EPAisbeingpressuredto 0 acceptandadoptmethodsandprocedures,includingPS1,developedbyvoluntaryconsensusstandardorganizationssuchasASTM.ThesegroupsareheavilystaffedbytheregulatedcommunityandmorebalanceisneededwithstafffromtheStateandlocalairagencies.Johnencouragedallparticipantstojoin($65/year)andtoparticipateinthesediscussions. (#(#   % #    `PRESENTATION4`    edOрPerformanceBasedMeasurementSystemUpdate  RobinSegall,EPA,EmissionsMeasurementCenter     Ms.SegallbeganbydefiningPBMS.ShethendiscussedthebackgroundofPBMSandtheproposedgoalsoftheprogram,includingOARsPBMSimplementationplanandregulatoryevaluation.ShealsooutlinedhowPBMSwillbeimplementedforstationarysources.  PBMSisdefinedas Asetofprocesseswhereinthedataqualityneeds,mandatesorlimitationsofaprogramorprojectarespecifiedandserveascriteriaforselectingappropriatemethodstomeetthoseneedsinacosteffectivemanner.ShestatedPBMSwillshifttheagencysapproachtomeasurementrequirementsfromastepbystepmethodtospecifyingperformancecriteriaandlettingtheregulatedcommunityselectanysuitablemeasurementmethodbasedontheperformancecriteria.Thegoalistoallowtheregulatedcommunitytouseanymeasurementmethodthatwillmeettheestablishedperformancecriteria.  TheEMMCPolicyCouncilendorsedAgencywideadoptionofPBMSin1996andinMay1997,allEPAprogramswereencouragedtoimplementPBMS.Atthattime,theagencymadethedecisiontolimitPBMStoanalyticalmeasurementsonly.ShortlyaftertheDeputyAdministratorchargedEPAprogramstoimplementPBMS,LauraAutrywasappointedtoleadOARsefforttodevelopaplanforimplementingPBMS.OARs#XDsX XX #X XXXDsfinalPBMSimplementationplanwascompleted P inMay,1998.Theplanispostedonthewebatthefollowingaddress:www.epa.gov/oar/oario.html.  Ms.SegallreportedthepushforimplementationofPBMScamefromoutsidetheagency,primarilyfromcommerciallaboratoriesandinstrumentvendors.ThelaboratoriesfelttheydidnothaveenoughflexibilityinmodifyingEPAmethods.Theinstrumentvendorsfeltthattheagencysapproachtomeasurementrequirementsisabarriertoinnovationofnewinstrumenttechnologies.  TheagencyplanstoaccomplishthefollowinggoalsbyimplementingPBMS.*c  *c"0    Toprovideasimple,straightforwardwayfortheregulatedcommunitytorespondtospecific "  measurementneedswithreliable,costeffectivemethods.*c݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    Toemphasizeprojectspecificmethodperformanceneedsratherthanspecifictechnologies $" toavoidcostlymeasurementoverkill.*c݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    Toencourageuseofprofessionaljudgementinmodifyingordevelopingalternativesto p&!$ establishedagencymethods.*c/݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    Toprovideaconsistentwaytoexpressmethodperformancecriteriaindependentofthetype P(#& ofmethodortechnology.*c8݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c("0    Tofosternewtechnologydevelopmentandcontinuousimprovementinmeasurement 0*%( methodology.*c(C݌ (#(#        `     h    ,`'* edO eX e    Ms.SegallstatedthattheAmbientMonitoringProgram,AcidRainProgram,andtheEnginesandVehiclesCertificationProgramwillnotmovefullytoPBMS,becausetheywillcontinuetorequireupfrontapprovalprocessesformodificationstotheirmeasurementrequirements.   SheexplainedthattheremainingfourprogramsinOARwillplanregulatoryrevisionstomeettheperformancebasedruleformat.*c  *c"0    FuelsProgram*c݌@ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c/"0    RadiationProgram*c/J݌0 (#(# Ќ  *c  *c"0    StationarySourceProgram*c݌ p (#(# Ќ  *c  *cq"0    IndoorAirProgram*cq݌` (#(# Ќ    TheRadiationProgramhascontroloverMethods111,114,and115inpart61andplanstomakethesemethodsperformancebased.Thetimingisuncertain,butproposaliscurrentlyscheduledforMay2000.  IntheStationarySourceProgram,atotalof83regulatorysubpartsandalltestmethodswerereviewed.AdecisionwasmadenottoopensubpartsinParts60,61and63torewriteregulations.Instead,performancecriteriawillbespecifiedforeachofthe30testmethodsamenabletoPBMSsothattheregulatedcommunitycanuseanalternativemethodwhichmeetstheperformancecriteria.B,XX X X` XPxXB  TheproposedformatofthedraftPBMSrulewillrequirethefollowingfivesteps.*c  ? ,X4` X,XX X?*c"0    Step10` (#(#TheaffectedsourcemustincludeastatementofintenttousePBMSinasitespecific @ testplanornotificationofperformancetesting.*cx݌ ` (#` (# Ќ  *c  *c"0    Step20` (#(#Conducttheperformancetest.*c݌ p` (#` (# Ќ  *c  *c\"0    Step30` (#(#PerformlaboratoryanalysisofsamplesusingPBMSapproach.*c\w݌`` (#` (# Ќ  *c  *c@"0    Step40` (#(#Submitatestreportincludingdocumentationofthemethodperformanceand P certificationstatement.*c@[݌ ` (#` (# Ќ  *c  *cV"0    Step50` (#(#Theresponsibleagency(State,region,etc.)reviewsthedocumentationanddecides 0 ifitisacceptablebasedondocumentationofdataregardingmethodperformance.*cVq݌ ` (#` (# Ќ  B,XX4` X,X4` XB  Ms.SegallconcludedthatitisestimatedtheproposedrulefortheStationarySourceProgramwillbefinalizedinlate2000.  % #    `PRESENTATION5`       LowConcentrationAlternativetoMethod25      MikeGaribay,SCAQMDSourceTesting   <    MikeGaribaybeganhispresentationbynotingthattheozonelevelsintheSCAQMDhavebeendecreasingandthattherewerenoStage1alertsthisyear.Onereasonforthesereducedozoneconcentrationsisthemorestringentlimitsthatarebeingimposedonsources.Thesestringentemissionslimits(forexample,ontheorderof1pound/houror5ppm)ledtoaneedforacompliancetestfortheselowconcentrationandmassloadinglimits.Inresponse,theSCAQMDdevelopedamethodthatiscurrentlywidelyused.Theagencyalsodecidedthatavalidationmethodwasneeded.ThemethodmeasurestotalVOCatlowconcentrationsusingatankandtrapapproach,andisintendedforcombustionsourcesburningcleanfuels.Thenewmethod,labeledasMethod25.3,isintendedtofillthevoidintheexistingVOCtestmethods.  Mr.GaribaynextoutlinedSCAQMDsinterpretationoftheapplicabilityoftheexistingmethods.First,EPAMethod25islesspreciseatlowconcentrations,particularlyatcombustionsourceswithlargecarbonmonoxideandwatervaporemissions.EPAMethods25Aand25Bareforalkanes,alkenesandaromaticsonly.EPAMethod18isaspeciationmethodandisnotfortotalVOC.SCAQMDMethod25.1issimilartoEPAMethod25,exceptitissimplertooperateinthefieldandisprimarilyusedinlocaldistrictsinCalifornia.SCAQMDformerdraftMethod25.2wasremovedfromconsiderationbecauseitdidnotwork.ItwasatemporarysolutiontothelowconcentrationissueusingTedlarbagsandsufferedfromcondensationoftheVOCandpoorreproducibility.SCAQMDdraftMethod25.3isforlowconcentrationsonlyandwasdevelopedbymodifyingSCAQMDMethod25.1.  Mr.GaribayexplainedSCAQMDMethod25.3isforcombustionexhaustslessthan50ppmCandusesatankandtrapapproachwithsmallwaterimpingers.Ifthecontrolefficiencyofthecontroldeviceisbeingdetermined,Method25.1shouldcontinuetobeusedontheinletstreamsorwhenexhaustconcentrationsexceed50ppmC.Method25.3hasaprovisionfordeletingthetrapwhennoelevatedmoistureispresentandusingacanistertoanalyzefortotalVOC.ThenewSCAQMDMethod25.2replacestheformerdraftSCAQMDMethod25.2.  Indesigningtheprocedure,SCAQMDwantedtoaddressthecomplexityofEPAMethod25bydevelopingafoolproofmethod.Theirdesignedmethodisasimpleselfcontainedsamplerthatrequiresnopower,heatersoradjustments.Sinceallanalysisiscompletedoffsite,nocalibrationgasesareneeded.AsinSCAQMDMethod25.1,thereisduplicatesamplingwithprobesbeingplacedflushwiththeportentrance.  Next,Mr.GaribayshowedadiagramofthesetupoftheSCAQMDMethod25.3andpicturesoftheduplicatesamplers,thetrapassemblyandthecondensatetrap.HeindicatedthattheconnectorlinefromtheprobetothecondensatetrapismadeofTeflonbuttheyhavenothadanyproblemswith ,`'* thetubemelting.Healsoindicatedthattheflowcontrollerinthetrapassemblyactsasacriticalorifice.Thecylindercanbefilledtwothirdsfullandsamplingcanbestoppedat10"pressure.Thecondensatetrapuseswaterbecausewaterisformedinthelinesanyway.Aftersampling,theTeflonlineshouldbedisconnectedandflushedwithwatertocollectallcondensate.The4milscrewcapbottlecanbestoredandusedformultiplesamplingruns.  AnalysisofsamplescollectedbythecanisterisbyMethod25.1modifiedforlowconcentrations.TheinstrumentisaGC/Oxidation/Reduction/FIDwithalowerdetectionlimitof1ppmC.Thecondensatesampleisanalyzedbyinfraredorganiccarbonanalyzerwithalowerdetectionlimitof1ppmC.Mr.Garibaypresentedanexamplechromatogramreadoutthatshowsacleardelineationforcarbonmonoxide,methane,carbondioxide,ethyleneandethane.Hecommentedthatinthepast,theCO2peakwouldhaverunintothetotalorganics. P    Indevelopingthemethod,SCAQMDmadevariousimprovementstoamethodprovidedbyacontractorafteraninitial$300,000investment.Thesemodificationsincludedtrapvolumereduction,connectorlinerecovery,trappurgeforCO2,andcleaningandhandling.Theimproved  methodwentthrough3setsofMethod301validationandeventuallymetallthespecificationsinMethod301.Theyobtained92percentspikerecoveryand20percentcoefficientofvarianceandconcludedthata1.086biascorrectionfactorbeused.ThishasmetwithEPAsapprovalandisconsidered301validated.  Someimplementationissuessurroundingthenewmethodincludeddistributingthedraftmethodforcommentsundertheprotocolreviewprocessofpermits.SCAQMDhasbeenallowinguseofthedraftmethodsubjecttoprotocolreviewandhasrequiredadeterminationformolecularweight/carbonratio(guidelinesforsuchadeterminationareincludedinthedraftmethod).  Inconcluding,Mr.GaribaystatedthatSCAQMDbelievesthemethodhassuperioraccuracyandprecisionthantheexistingmethods.ThenextphaseistocomparethemethodtoMethod25A.Industryandsourcetestingfirmshavesupportedthenewmethod,principallybecauseitiseasytorunandeasiertousethatMethod25A.Finally,hestatedMethod25.3isnotaccurateabove50ppmand,atthoseconcentrations,thedirectionofthebiasislow.Question:0 4 Areduplicateprobesrequired?" 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Yes.$"4(#4(# Question:0 4 Howmanycanistersareneededforacompletetest?p&!$4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Forabasictest,justone(thatis,onesetofduplicates)isneeded.Ifthetestisconducted P(#& forotherreasons(forexample,developingemissionfactors),multiplerunsarerequired,specifically,threerunsoftwo. 4(#4(# Comment:0 4 PleasereviewtheissueregardingmoisturecontentinSummacanisters.,`'*4(#4(# ЇAnswer:0 4 Mr.Garibaysuggestedthatanarticleonthisissueberead.Thereisanideal  concentrationforrecoveryofVOCoutofacanister(generallyabout1percent).Thislevelishighenoughsothereisnocondensation,buthighenoughthatVOCcanfillthecanister. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 IsthissatisfactorytoEPAsinceEPAsaysnottouseSummacanisters?` 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 EPAallowsuseofcanistersinsomeapplications,suchasinMethod.25.However,EPA @  doesnotallowtheuseofcanistersinMethod18. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Isthisanapprovedalternativemethod?` 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 IthasbeenvalidatedunderMethod301,butMethod301requiresasourcecategoryby @  sourcecategoryvalidationandSCAQMDvalidateditforaparticularsourcecategoryforwhichthereisnoNSPS.However,SCAQMDwasinterestedinusingitforthelocalsourcesintheSCAQMD,soEPAagreedthatitmettheMethod301criteria.Itwouldhavebeenapprovedasanalternative,butnotforanysourceforwhichanapprovedmethodhadbeenestablished. 4(#4(# Ѐ0  04(#(#TheSCAQMDmethodwillbepostedontheEMCwebsiteasaconditionaltestmethodassoonastheytaketheworddraftoffthetitle. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Whatisthesamplingtime?P4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Therecommendedsamplingtimeisonehour,simplybecausemostpermitlimitsinthe 0 SouthCoastareintermsofpoundsperhour.Themethoddoesallowforothersamplingtimesandcanbeadjustedbyusingdifferentdiameterandlengths. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 IsSCAQMDlookingatotherlowconcentrationmethods(forexample,NOx)?@4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Yes,theyare,principallybecausetheseemissionlimitscontinuetobesetatlowerand   lowerlevels. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 HowfaralongisSCAQMDindevelopingthislowconcentrationNOxmethod?#!4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Theyhaveacoupleofconceptsandhaverunasinglecomparisontestforoneofthese % # concepts. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Whydoyouseeaproblemwithconcentrationsabove50ppmC?P(#&4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Thewaterimpingertocollectthecondensableportionofthesamplecanonly 0*%(  homogeneouslyretainacertainamountofVOC,particularlywhenyouaretalkingabout  +p&) insolubleVOCs.Acertainamountwillplateonthewallsofthetubeandbecomeunrecoverable. 4(#4(#  Question:0 4 Canyougetaroundthatbyusingalargervial?4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Youmaybeabletodothisconceptually,especiallyathigherconcentrationswhereyou `  arerecoveringwatersolubles. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 ItseemsliketheonlydifferencebetweenthismethodandMethod25istheuseofanice 0  waterbathinsteadofadryicebath.HowdoyougetthedetectionlimittobesomuchlowerthanwithMethod25? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Thereisactuallyaverylargedifferenceintheapproach.Method25collectsindryice, @  butduringtheanalysisyouareactuallycombustingthecontentsinsidethetrapatelevatedtemperatures.OneproblemwithMethod25istheCO2problem.Whenyou   sample,youcondenseboththeCO2andwateratdryicetempandthecrystallizinglocks  theCO2inthetrap.Whenthisisburnedoff,alltheCO2iscountedashydrocarbon.  AnotherproblemisthattheMethodisfamousforishighblankvaluesonagoodday15ppmisaboutaslowasyoucangetonaMethod25blank. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 HowdoyoukeepyourcanistercleanwhenyoucouldnotinaMethod25sampling p system? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 ThemajorityofthecontaminationinMethod25isinthetrap.@4(#4(# Question:0 4 Isthereanypotentialcarryoverofhighmolecularweightorganicsbecausetheyhavent  p beencooledintheicewatertrap? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Ifyoustaybelow50ppm,theamountthatdoescarryoverintothecanistershouldbeat @ asufficientlylowconcentrationthatitshouldnotdropoutinthecanister. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 HowdoesCaliforniadetermineiftheexpectedconcentrationinadvanceoftestingisless ! than50ppm? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 SCAQMDrecommendsthatthesourceuseEPAMethod25orSCAQMDMethod25.1 $" incaseconcentrationsareinexcessof50ppm.MosttestingcontractorsrunMethod25.3attheoutletandMethod25attheinlet. 4(#4(#   `'"%    `PRESENTATION6`  ~&  EmissionTestingProblemsEncounteredintheField  FredBallayandMichaelKlein,NJDEPBureauofTechnicalServices(BTS)         FredBallayandMichaelKleinbegantheirpresentationbygivingabriefoverviewoftheNewJerseyBureauofTechnicalServices(BTS).TheBTShastwomainprogramsfortestingactivities.TheyarethestacktestprogramandtheCEMcertificationprogram.  Thestacktestprogramreviewsallprotocols,observes8090percentofallstacktestsperformedtoensurequalitydata,andreviewsallstacktestreportssubmittedforDepartmentreview.Thelateststatisticsindicatethatapproximately200stacktestsareobservedeachyear.  TheCEMcertificationprogramconductsequipmentprotocolreviews,PSTprotocolreviews,andPSTreportreviews.Approximately30CEMcertificationsareperformedeachyear.Unfortunately,duetolimitedstaffresources,thetestingpartoftheprogramisnotobserved.  Protocolsarerequiredtominimizeproblemsencounteredinthefield,toidentifyrequiredsamplingtraincomponentsandprocedures,andtoensurethemethodisproperlytunedforthesourcebeingtested.Thepurposeofobservingstacktestsistoensuremethodsandprotocolsarefollowed.Aninternalauditperformedin1994indicatedthat47percentoftestobservationsresultedinsignificantcorrectionsbyBTS.  Themostcommonproblemsidentifiedinthefieldareasfollows.*c  *c,"0    Presitesurveyerrorssuchasunacceptablesamplelocations,equipmentandelectrical ` needs/limitations*c,-݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c-"0    Samplerecoveryandhandlingerrorsincludingunacceptablerecoverylocations,improper @ reagentsandequipment,inadequateprocedures,shippingerrors*c-.݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c#/"0    Equipmenterrors(operatingranges/calibrationgases,poorconditionornotcalibrated,   incorrecttraincomponents,impropermethods)*c#/>/݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *c@0"0    Proceduralerrorssuchasnotperformingcyclonicfloworleakchecks,notfollowing "  temperatureoricedownprocedures*c@0[0݌ (#(# Ќ  *c  *cO1"0    Errorscausedbyinexperiencedand/orfrustratedtesters(mainlyendofdaysyndrome)*cO1j1݌$"(#(# Ќ    Thepresentationincludedseveralexamplesofthemorecommonerrorsnotedinthefieldandprovidedseveralsolutionstomitigatethereoccurrenceofidentifiederrors.Possiblesolutionsincludedthefollowing.*c  *c3"0    Requiringcertificationofindividualtestersandconsultantcompanies*c3/3݌0*%((#(# Ќ  *c  *c3"0    Promotingfacilityawarenessandcommunication*c34݌ +p&)(#(# Ќ  *c  *c4"0    Providingadequateregulatoryoversight*c44݌,`'*(#(# Ќ    Itwasnotedthatrequiringindividualcertificationwouldnotsolvetheproblem.Instead,thecompanyshouldbecertified.EachStateorregulatoryagencyneedstoestablisha hammertocrackdownontestersorfirmsthatcontinuetoviolateproperprocedures.Companiesneedingatestingconsultantwouldthenhavetheflexibilitytorequireaminimallevelofexpertiseontheirjobandintheirbid.  Mr.Ballaystressedtheimportanceofpromotingfacilityawarenessandcommunication.Facilitiescouldreporttheirexperiencestoa system,whichcouldaidinthefutureselectionofaqualifiedconsultant.Facilitiesshouldalsopayattentiontodelaysintestingprogramsandtheircauses.Billingofdowntimecanthenbeeasilyquantifiedandconfirmed.Inaddition,trainingoffacilitypersonnelinstacktestingissuescanbebeneficial.Facilitiesshouldhavesomeonsiteknowledgetodetectproblems.  Adequateregulatoryoversightisnecessarytoensureanacceptancepercentoferrors.Itwasnotedthatduringobservations,BTSstillseesabout50percenterrors,evenwhenthetesterknowsBTSwillbeonsiteforobservation.Ofthe8090percentofthetestprogramsobserved,approximately510percenthaveunobservederrors,whicharefoundinthetestreportreviews.  Mr.Ballaysummeduphisadvicebysaying, Thetruthisupthere.Ifyourenotobserving,youwontseetheproblems.Question:0 4 Whatareyoudoingintheshorttermtoalleviatetheproblem?Howareyouweedingout P companies?Doyouhaveregulatorymechanismthatwouldallowyoutoweedoutcompanies? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Over15yearsagotheDepartmentcaughtanindividualfalsifyingdata.Nooneinthe ` Departmentwantedtogetcaughtupinthelegalissues.Todate,NewJerseyhasnotprosecutedanyone.Thisisprimarilywhyweneedtogetintothecertificationprogram.Ifthereisnota hammer,thejobwontgetdone.Thereneedstobealegalmechanismtopenalizecompaniesthattakeshortcuts. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Doyouthinkthe hammeralreadyexistsinthecompetitivebusinessworld?" 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Idontbelieveitdoes.Testsareawardedbasedsolelyonthelowestbid.Companiesare $" nottalkingtoeachothertocomparetesters. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Doyouthinktheeconomicincentivesandthecompetitivenessofthetestingbusiness `'"% makesindividualsfalsifytestdatatomakesureaclientpasses? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Thatsalwaysaconcern.Itsimpossibletowatchthedatafromcradletograve.People 0*%( aregoingtobeabletofalsifydataiftheyreallywantto. 4(#4(#  ,`'* Comment:0 4 RonMyersnotedthatanemissionfactorsgroupwenttoover30Statescollectingover  4,000testreports.TheynoticedadefinitechangeinthequalityofthetestreportswhentheytouredNewJersey.MosttestreportsinotherStateswerepoorquality.Beingatthesiteandobservingtestsmakesabigdifferenceinthequalityofthefinalproduct. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Doyouthinkfieldworkismoreinerrorthanlaboratorywork?` 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Wedogothroughtheanalysisinthereportandoftenfindproblemsintheanalytical @  data. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Areyoumoreapttoapprovedatawithapositivebias?` 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Dependsoncomplianceimplications.Ifitaffectscompliancedataonewayoranother, @  thedatawouldnotbeaccepted. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Howdoyoucapturedataonthenumberoferrorsfoundintests?4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Observationformsareusedwhentestsareobserved.Theobserverisrequiredto  documentallactionsobserved(innarrativeform)duringthetest.Thesedocumentsarethenusedtodevelopstatisticaldata. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 Whatcriteriaisusedforrejectingruns?`4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Ourcriteriaforrejectingrunsaredeterminedcasebycase.@4(#4(# Question:0 4 Whenmethodisperformedproperly,howdoyoudetermineifdataisincompliance?  p Whatisthegrayzoneinwhichacompliancedeterminationmustbemade? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 BTSdoesnotsetthiszone.BTSlooksatthedataanddeterminesifitisdefensibleor @ not.Thenthedataissenttotheenforcementgroupwitharecommendation.Theenforcementgroupisthenresponsiblefortakingfurtheractionifnecessary. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 IsEPAworkingondeterminationoftheerrorinthereferencemethods?" 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Mostofstandardsarewrittentooneortwosignificantdigits.Mostagencieswouldnot $" enforcetestresultswithin10percentoftheallowablerateforthestandard. 4(#4(# Comment:0 4 Region7recentlyfinedautility$250,000forfalsifyingdata.Theyheldthefacility,not `'"% thetestingcompany,responsibleforfalsifyingdatabecausetheywantedtosendastrongmessage.Region7founditwasusefultoholdthecompanyresponsibleratherthanthetester.Todate,thetesteronthejobreferencedabovehasnotbeenseenintheRegion forseveralyears. +p&)4(#4(# Comment:0 4 Ifeelthisisamanagementproblemandnotatechnicalproblem.Wedefinitelyneeda   hammertoenforcerules,inadditiontotheabilitytochargecompaniesfortheagencytobeonsitetoobservetests. 4(#4(#   p    `QUESTIONANDANSWER/DISCUSSIONSESSION`   M  DayOneTopics  Moderator:RimaDishakjianN Question:0 4 Withrespecttowaterbasedcoatings,whatisthestatusofthenewmethodthatwasbeing P  developedinthemid1990s? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Thiswasamethodusingcharcoaladsorptiontubes,whichwasdroppedduetothefact  p  thattheprecisionisnobetterthanMethod25.EMCiscurrentlyworkingonanewdraftmethod(Method24)usingtotalevaporationwithadsorbentanalyzedwithanFID.Theroundrobintestinghasbeencompletedanditlookspromising. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 WithrespecttolowNOx,howlowcanwegoandarethereanyplanstoupdatesubpart   GG? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 EPAisreluctanttoreopensubpartGGpartlybecausethelimitswouldneedtobeset  verylowasaresultofrecentBACT/LAERdeterminations.FTIRwitha100meterpathlengthcangodowntothelowppbrange,however,accuracyatthoselevelsisanotherissue.Chemiluminescencecangototheppmlevels,buttherealissueiswhetherthespecificationsaresufficientatthoselevels.EPAisstartingataskgrouptoaddressthisissueandanyoneinterestedinparticipatingshouldcontactTerryHarrison. 4(#4(# 0  04(#(#IntheSouthCoasttheyaregettingintothelowppmlevelsusingachemiluminescencedetector.However,theyarepayingspecialattentiontothecalibrationstandards. 4(#4(# 0  04(#(#PeterWestlinremarkedthatthereisanotherQCissuewithCaliforniainthattheydonotallowanymeasurementsbelow12ppmtobereported. 4(#4(# 0  04(#(#TheissuethattheStateofNewJerseyisaddressingrelativetolowNOxisnotwiththe   analyzer,butwiththeincreasingproportionofNO2relativetoNO.Themethodassumes ! about90percentNOandtheNO2seemstobemoredifficulttogetintothesampler,so "  themoreNO2,themoreuncertaintywiththeresults.#!4(#4(# Question:0 4 ArepresentativefromtheStateofPennsylvaniaindicatedthattheyhaveconducted % # testingforformaldehydeonasmallwoodfiredboilerandusingtheSolidWaste0011method,foundaconsiderableamountofformaldehydeinthelastimpinger.WhentheyaddedmoreDNPH(twicetheamount),theyfoundthatitallshowedupinthefrontoftheimpingertrain.Consequently,theyhavealwaysbeenalittlecautiousoftheresultsfromthismethod.Also,NCASIhasreceivedapprovaltousetheirmethodinlieuofthe0011,whichtheyclaimgivesnumbersthatarebiasedhigh.TheNCASImethodwasusedrecentlyonapressboardfacilityatanumberofemissionpointsandPennsylvania ,`'* disapprovedthetestprogrambecausetheyrequirethatthelastimpingerbeanalyzedseparately.Theyweregettinganywherefrom2560percentbreakthroughinthelastimpinger.Hasanyoneelsenoticedbreakthroughinthetrainsoneitherthe0011ortheNCASImethod?Also,didEPAlookedatthisbreakthroughissuewhenthereferencemethodwaspromulgated? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 EPAhasused0011inthepastfornotonlyformaldehyde,butotheraldehydesand P  ketonesandhavefoundthesameproblem.Asaresult,EPAisusingFTIRforformaldehyde.Theonlyotheroptionistheindustryvalidatedpararosanilinemethodforformaldehyde(Method316)thatwasdevelopedforthemineralwoolandwoolfiberglassindustry.Inaddition,theHONrequirestheuseofMethod18,whichisnotgoodformeasuringformaldehyde.Therefore,EPAhasallowedHONfacilitiestousethepararosanilinemethodforformaldehyde.SoEPAhasshiftedawayfromusingtheDNPHmethod. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 IsEPAlookingatothersamplingtechniques?4(#4(# Answer:0 4 EPAhasvalidatedFTIRforformaldehydeandusedMethod301tovalidatethepara  rosanilinemethodonthewoolfiberglassandmineralwoolindustries.So,intheory,thepararosanalinemethodshouldbevalidatedforothersources.However,therewasnochoicewiththeHONindustriesbecauseMethod18didnotwork. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 WhenmoreDNPHwasadded,thetestingresultswereabout1,000timeshigherthanthe P emissionfactorforformaldehydeforwoodfiredboilers.Whatsourcecategorieswerethebasisforthewoodfiredboileremissionfactor? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Newdraftemissionnumberswerejustreleasedthatwerebasedonnumeroustests ` conductedatparticleboardmanufacturingfacilities,plywoodmanufacturingfacilitiesandwoodfurnituremanufacturingfacilities. 4(#4(# Question:0 4 WhatisEPAsstanceontheuseofalternativeflowmethodssuchashotwire   anemometersorvaneanemometers? 4(#4(# Answer:0 4 Itdependsontheapplication.EMChasrecommendedtocertainStatesthatitis #! acceptabletouseahotwireorvaneanemometeratlowflowratesincertainnoncomplianceapplications.ThereisaguidancedocumentontheEMCwebsitethataddressestheuseofalternativemethods. 4(#4(#    @)$'    `NOVEMBER3,1999`   4d   `PRESENTATION7`  d  ӀNationalEnvironmentalLaboratoryAccreditationConference p andFieldActivitiesStandards `  DanBivins,FieldActivitiesCommittee,EPA,EmissionsMeasurementCenter    Mr.BivinsdiscussedNELACandtheproposedfieldactivitystandards.Thisconference  p  washeldtoestablishaconsensus,toencourageuniformity,andtofostercooperationamongStatesbyadoptinguniformstandards.HestatedNELACismadeupoftheStates,EPA,otherfederaloffices,andcontributorsandwasformedtodevelopconsensusstandards.AdoptionofthestandardsbytheStatesandfederalofficesisvoluntary.EPAmaintainsoversightoftheaccreditingauthoritiestoensureuniformityamongtheStates.Mr.BivinsstressedthattheStateandfederalagenciesgrantaccreditationtolaboratoriesundertheirauthorityandreciprocityisautomaticamongparticipatingStateagencies.  MrBivinsstatedNELACparticipantsincludeaBoardofDirectors,VotingMembers(EPAoffices,federaloffices,Stateoffices),andContributors,whichincludethegeneralpublic,laboratories,regulatedindustry,environmentalgroups,etc.NELACoversightisprovidedbyUSEPAsNELAP,whichhasauthorityovertheStateandfederalregulatorsandtheenvironmentallaboratories.99em X,XX4` X9 r Mr.Bivinsnextdescribedthestandardsettingprocess.Thisprocessconsistsofthefollowing:(1)thestandingcommitteeproposesstandards;(2)theproposedstandardsarepublishedanddiscussedatinterim/annualmeetings;(3)thehouseofrepresentativesandhouseofdelegatesvoteonthestandards;and(4)ifapproved,thestandardsarepublishedandadoptedbytheStatesthatparticipateinNELAP. r Mr.BivinsexplainedthataccreditedStatesmustcomplywithNELAPbydoingthefollowing.*c  *cwl"0    Acceptingreciprocity*cwll݌" (#(# Ќ  *c  *c&m"0    ApplyingallNELAPstandardstolaboratories*c&mAm݌#!(#(# Ќ  *c  *cm"0    Refrainingfromaddingsupplementalrequirements*cmm݌$"(#(# Ќ   r In1998,twentyapplicationswerereceivedforNELACrecognition.AsofJuly1999,thefollowingStateswererecognizedasaccreditingauthorities:California,Colorado,Florida,Illinois,Kansas,Louisiana,NewHampshire,NewJersey,NewYork,Pennsylvania,andUtah. r Mr.BivinsstatedthatthoseinterestedinobtainingmoreinformationonNELACcanaccessitonthefollowingtwowebsites:www.epa.gov/ttn/emcorwww.epa.gov/ttn/nelac. ,`'*  r Next,MrBivinsprovidedinformationofthedraftMSEstandard.ThisstandardwasadaptedfromcurrentNELACstandardsandincludesproficiencytesting,onsiteassessmentandqualitysystems.Inaddition,MSErequiresqualificationofsourcetestersbyverifyingthetestersexperience,training,andeducation.AdraftoftheemissionstandardispublishedontheEMCwebsite.ThefinalversionwillbevotedonattheNELACannualmeetinginJune2000.Question:0 ` WhydoesFloridaincludestandardsforairtesting?@ ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Itisstrictlyavoluntaryprocess.Floridachosetoincludeascopeforair. p ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Wouldthecompanybeaccreditedforallmethodsoncetheboardgivesaccreditation?P ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thereareelevengroupsandaccreditationisbygroup.Youneedtobeaccreditedfor 0  groups15asaprerequisitefortheothergroups. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WhatdoyouthinkaboutMSErequiringNELACaccreditationforeachState?` (#` (# Comment1:0 ` Itwillrequiremorework.` (#` (# Comment2:0 ` Notagoodidea.p` (#` (# Question:0 ` Theproblemsareinthefieldbecausepeopleliketotakeshortcuts.Howwill P accreditationrelieveshortcuts? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Individualsonsitewillhavetobetrained(qualified)andwillberequiredtofollow  p SOPs.Weenvisionsettingupacomplaintprocesswherepeoplecanreportbadtesters.Reportingatestertothishotlinecouldresultinthelossofhis/heraccreditation. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` Itwillcostmoneyforindividualfirmstogetaccredited.Newcompanieswillhave   ahardtimegettingstarted. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,itisamoneyissuebutwecannotaffordpoorqualitydata.#!` (#` (# Comment:0 ` NewHampshireviewseachtestthattakesplace.Testerswillstilltakeshortcutsif % # observersarenotpresent.Itwillnothelptojustrequireaccreditation. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Itisagreedthatthecombinationofaccreditationandobserversareneeded.Itisalso P(#& understoodthatobserversneedappropriatetraining.Weneedtoestablishalevelofresponsibilityandahammertoenforceit. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WhathashappenedinEurope?,`'*` (#` (# ЇAnswer:0 ` AccreditationisinplaceintheUK.InGermanyitsrequiredforindividualtesters  andcompanies.Itsaworldwideprogram. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` HowfrequentlywillStatesrequirereaccreditation?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Everytwoyearsafterinitialaccreditation.Everythreeyearseachcompanymust `  submitcompanystatustoensurethatthecompanyisstillinthesamebusiness,etc. ` (#` (#   @     `PRESENTATION8`       RecentMethod301ValidationSubmittals      GaryMcAlister,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenter   }   r GaryMcAlisterbeganbystatingthatMethod301waspromulgatedin1991andthatthepurposeofthispresentationwastoreviewsomevalidationrequeststhathavebeensubmittedoverthepastthreeyears.Foreachrequest,hedescribedthemethod,listedthetargetpollutants,andidentifiedthesourcestowhichthemethodisapplicable. r ThefirstrequesttobeaddressedwasfromGeorgiaPacificformeasuringformaldehydeemissionsfromthewoodproductsindustry.Themethodusestwowaterfilledimpingerswithisokineticsampling.TheanalysisisperformedbyaddingacetylacetonetothesampleandmeasuringthecolorintensitybyUV/visiblespectrophotometer.Thecolorintensityisrelatedtotheformaldehydeconcentrationinthesample.Garynotedthatthereisapublishedformaldehydemethodthatisvalidatedforhazardouswasteincinerators.EPAhasreceivedcommentsthatitdoesntworkwellforotherindustries,probablybecauseitusesastrongacidicsolutionandcouldbeformingformaldehydethroughreactions;however,EPAhasnotbeenabletoconfirmthis.Nevertheless,GeorgiaPacificconcludedthatacetylacetonewasabetterprocedure.ThetargetpollutantfortheGeorgiaPacificprocedureisformaldehydeandtheapplicablesourceisresinplantsthatproduceformaldehyde.ThismethodwasapprovedinMarch1997withacorrectionfactorof0.95. r ThesecondrequestaddressedaNCASIchilledimpingermethodthatusesonewaterfilledimpingerandtwosilicagelfilledadsorbenttubeswithnonisokineticsampling.AnalysisofthewaterimpingerisdonewithdirectinjectionintoGC/FIDorbyaddingacetylacetonefollowedbyspectrophotometer.ThesilicagelisanalyzedbyextractingwithpropanolandtheninjectingtheextractintoaGC/FID.Therequestproposedusingthemethodforanumberoftargetcompoundsincludingmethanol,acetone,acetaldehyde,methylethylketone,andformaldehyde.Themethodwasvalidatedformostofthesepollutants,butnotall.Forexample,themethodwasvalidatedformethanolatallsourcesexamined,butnotvalidatedformethylethylketoneatthebrownstockwasherhood.Themethodwasapplicabletothefollowingsourcesatkraftpulpmills:brownstockwasherhood,bleachplantscrubber,smeltdissolvingtank,andtherecoveryfurnace.ThevalidationrequestwasdesignedtovalidateamethodforusewiththePulpandPaperMACTregulation.ThisrequestwasapprovedinAugust1997foruseonMACTsources.ItisverysimilartoMethod308thatwaspublishedwiththeMACTstandardand,consequently,sourcescanuseeithermethodfordemonstratingcompliance. r Mr.McAlisternextdiscussedavalidationrequestforaNCASImethodformethanolinprocessliquids.ThesampleiscollectedbytakingliquidsamplesinaglasscontainerdirectlyfromprocesslinesandanalyzedbydirectinjectionintoaGC/FID.Thetargetpollutantismethanolandtheapplicablesourcesarekraftpulpmillsandsulfitemills.Mr.McAlisterspeculatedthatthetargetcompoundwaslimitedtomethanolbecausethevalidationrequestwassubmittedaftertheMACT ,`'* standardwaspromulgatedandNCASIrecognizedthattheMACTstandardallowstheoptionofmeasuringmethanolasasurrogateforallHAPs.ThisrequestwasapprovedinFebruary1998foruseinallliquidstreams.Nocorrectionfactorwasrequired. r ThenextvalidationrequestpresentedwasalsosubmittedbyNCASIandwasverysimilartothepreviouschilledimpingermethoddiscussed.Themaindifferenceisthesourcestowhichthemethodisapplicable.Thesampleiscollectedintwowaterfilledimpingersandsamplingisnotisokinetic.SampleanalysisisbydirectinjectionintoaGC/FIDorbyaddingacetylacetone,followedbymeasurementwithaspectrophotometerforformaldehyde.Thetargetpollutantsaremethanol,phenolandformaldehyde.Theapplicablesourcesarewoodproductmills.TherequestwasapprovedforGeorgiaPacificmillswithacorrectionfactorthatvariesfrom0.98to1.03.TheapprovalwasissuedinMay1998beforetheMACTstandardwaspromulgated.Consequently,itwasnotapprovedasanalternativetoanyexistingmethod.Itwill,however,likelybeusedasthetestmethodinthestandard. r AveryrecentvalidationrequesthasbeenreceivedfromCarolinaEastmanforaPolymersandResinsplantasanalternativetothetestmethodspecifiedinthePolymersandResinMACTstandard.Thealternativecollectsthesampleusingacondenserandthreesilicagelfilledtubeswithnonisokineticsampling.TheanalysisofthecondensateisperformedwithdirectinjectionofthecondensatematerialintoaGC/FID.ThesilicagelisanalyzedbyextractingwithisopropanolandinjectingtheextractintoaGC/FID.ThemethodisverysimilartotheNCASIchilledimpingermethodforkraftpulpmills.Thetargetpollutantsareethyleneglycol,aceticacid,andoctanol,whichareallrawmaterialsandbyproductsofpolymerandresinplants.ThesourcestowhichthemethodisapplicablearepolymerandresinplantsthataresubjecttothePolymerandResins(GroupIV)MACTstandard.Approvalofthemethodispending. r Inclosing,Mr.McAlisternotedthatthese301validationstudiesareveryexpensiveandthatonlygroupsthatarewellorganizedandanticipatealotofregulatoryactionsaffectingthemwillconsidersponsoringsuchstudies.Question:0 ` WhatisthecostofaMethod301validation? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Itvaries,butoneofthefirstonesconductedbyNCASIforgaseouspollutantsatfive "  processescostinthe$600700,000range.Theonesthathavebeenapprovedgenerallyaverageinthe$100,000range. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Withrespecttotheformaldehydemethods,itseemsliketheNCASImethodwasfirst p&!$ isokineticandnowitisnonisokinetic.Doesthishavetodowiththeassumptionregardingformaldehydeabsorption? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thisdependsonwhetherwaterispresentornot.Theproblemwiththemethodis 0*%( thatiftheflowrateishighenoughtoallowisokineticsampling,thentheformaldehydecollectionefficiencydropsoffverydramatically.Method301_requires ,`'* testingforbias,butdependingonhowthespikingisperformed,maynotrevealproblemswithnonisokineticsampling. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` PennsylvaniahasfoundthatwiththesecondNCASImethod,therewasasignificant  problemusingtwoimpingers.Theydiscoveredapproximately30percentbreakthroughinthesecondimpinger.HasEPAlookedintothecollectionefficiencyissue? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` EPAdidlookatthisissueanddidnotseeaproblem.Ifthesamplingisdoneatthe 0  rightflowrateandtheimpingersareproperlychilled,thecollectionefficiencyshouldbefine.Inaddition,thesilicageltubeprovidesabackupthatcanbeanalyzedseparatelyforformaldehyde.ThereisaproblemwiththeNCASImethod;itdoesntworkwellforotheraldehydesandketones. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WhatisEPAspositionontheNCASImethoddoesitstripformaldehydeoutof   wood? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wearenotreallysure,butyoudogetdifferentnumbersbetweenDNPHandacetyl  acetone;butthereisnocorrelationasfaraswecantell. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Method301statesthatavalidationtestshouldbecomparedtoareferencemethod, p butitseemsthatalloneneedstodoisspikeasampletrainandgetrecoveryintherightrange. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Ifthereisavalidatedtestmethod,thenMethod301requiresyoutovalidateagainst 0 thatmethod.Inthiscase,therewasnoreferencemethod. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Havemethodsbeenvalidatedfordifferenttypesofresins?P` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thereisapotentialforgettinginterferences,butitishardtopredictwhatwillhappen 0 withdifferentchemicalmixtures. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` HasEPAlookedatFTIRforthewoodproductsindustry?" ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` EPAhasuseditatsomeplantsandsomesources(forexample,dryer)anditseemed $" toworkwell.Therealproblemisthecostofthesystem. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` ArethereanysamplingproblemswithFTIRversuswetchemicalmethods?`'"%` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Iftherightmethodsareusedandsamplingisattherightlocation,thereshouldbeno @)$' problems.However,moisturecontentisarealissuewithFTIRmeasurements. ` (#` (#    +p&) Question:0 ` Part63,subpartH,theHON,requirestheuseofMethod18forTOC.However,   Method18cantdetectHAPsandifyouuseanothermethoditmustbevalidatedagainstthereferencemethod.SoifMethod18doesntwork,whatwouldyouvalidatethealternativemethodagainst? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Forformaldehyde,EPAallowedtheuseofMethod316thatwasvalidatedatanother `  facility.Itisreallyacasebycasecalltodeterminetheappropriatevalidationmethodforeachalternative.AnexampleisafacilityinIndianathatemitsmethanolandtheywererequiredtodoaMethod18.TheconsultantstatedthatitwouldbedifficulttodowithMethod18(althoughtheycouldhavedoneadirectGCinterface).TheconsultantrecommendedusingMethod308,whichwascheaper.I_IThe_ԀtestingwasperformedandthesourcelikedtheresultsandsubmittedthemtoEPA.EPAsconcernwasallowingtheuseofMethod308becauseitwasntvalidatedforthissource.EPAdecidedthatthetestusingMethod308couldqualifyasamodifiedMethod18,butthesourcehadnotfollowedalltheMethod18QAcriteria.EPAaskedthefacilitytogobackanddotheQArequiredunderMethod18.ThefacilitydidthisandEPAacceptedthedata.ThebottomlineisthatEPAneedstobeconfidentthattheyaregettinggooddata. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` TheGeneralProvisionsat63.7(f)allowtheuseofalternativetestmethodswhen  approvedbyEPA.TheGeneralProvisionsalsoallowEPAtowaiveperformancetests.Insomecases,sourcesaskforapprovalaftertheyhaveconductedaperformancetestusinganalternativemethod.WhatareEMCsfeelingsaboutwaivingtheperformancetestandcantheRegionalOfficeswaivetherequirementtodoaperformancetest? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Waivingtheperformancetestisnotagoodideabecausetherearenoassurancesthat ` thealternativemethodwillworkandprovidegooddata. ` (#` (# ̀    _   `PRESENTATION9`    ӀAcidRainandFlowMeasurementIssuesPanel  JohnSchakenbach,EPA,AcidRainProgram,BillGrimleyandTomLogan,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenter   r Mr.Schakenbachpresentedabriefoverviewofmethods2F,2Gand2H.Inaddition,he @  introducedtoolsusefulforpeopleusingorreviewingthesemethods. r HestatedthatbecauseMethod2oftenoverestimatesflow,twonewmethods(methods2Fand2G)weredevelopedforestimatingvolumetricflow.Hestressedthatthesenewmethodsareoptional,asMethod2isstillavalidmeansofmeasuringvolumetricflow.Method2Fmeasuresboththeyawandpitchanglesbyusing3Dprobesorfiveholeprobes.Asphericalprobeisalsoapprovedforusewiththismethod.Method2GjustmeasurestheyawcomponentusingatypeSprobeora3Dprobewithoutthepitchdetermination. r Mr.Schakenbachlistedtheequipmentusedwiththeseprocedures,whichincludesthefollowing.*c  *cf"0 r   TypeSprobes,sphericalprobes,automatedtypeSprobe,etc.*cf݌pr(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c/"0 r   Pressuremeasurementdevices(mechanicalgauge,etc.)*c/J݌`r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Yawanglemeasurementdevices*c ݌Pr(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Windtunneltocalibratetheprobe*c݌@r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *cG"0 r   Probesupportsandstabilizationdevices*cGb݌0r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Temperaturegauge*c݌ pr(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Gasdensityandmoistureequipment*c݌`r(#r(# Ќ   r Next,hedescribedthemajorstepsinvolvedinperformingMethods2Fand2G.*c  *c"0 r   Qualifyingthewindtunnelbyusingvelocitypressurecrosscheck(toensurethesamevelocity   isatthestandardpitotpositionasatthetestprobeposition)oraxialflowverification(toensureastraightflowinthetunnel)*c݌ r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Preparetocalibratetheprobebyputtingascribelineonit,checktomakesuretheprobeisnot #! bent,zeroandcalibrateallpressuredevices,calibrateandalignyawanglemeasurementdevice,andleakcheckthesystem*c8݌ r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Performingyawanglecalibrationtoestablishtheyawnullpositionoftheprobe*c݌p&!$r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *cn"0 r   Performingavelocityandpitchcalibration*cn݌`'"%r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c%"0 r   Preparingforthefieldtest(thatis,inspectprobe,zeroandcalibratepressuredevices,etc.)*c%@݌P(#&r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Performingthefieldtest*c,݌@)$'r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Preparingthecalculations*cѺ݌0*%(r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c\"0 r   Submittingthefieldtestreport*c\w݌ +p&)r(#r(# Ќ   ,`'*  r Mr.SchakenbachaddedthatMethod2HcanbeusedasanaddontoMethod2,2For2Gfordeterminingwalleffects,butitcanonlybeusedincircularstacksthatarenolessthan3.3feetindiameter.TherearebasicallytwowaystoperformMethod2H.Thefirstmethodisacalculationapproachandthesecondmethodisadefaultapproach.ThemajorstepsforperformingMethod2Hincludethefollowing.*c  *c"0 r   Locatingwalleffectstraversepoints*cܽ݌P r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *cr"0 r   Determiningsamplingorder*cr݌@ r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Takingmeasurements*c3݌0 r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Recordingdata*cҿ݌ p r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *cQ"0 r   Tabulatingvelocityvalues*cQl݌` r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Performingwalleffectscalculations*c݌P r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Submittingthefieldtestreport*c݌@ r(#r(# Ќ   r Hereportedthatseveraltoolshavebeendevelopedtoassistinperformingthesemethods.ThisdocumentationcanbereviewedbyloggingontotheAcidRainWebsiteat:www.epa.gov/acidrain/cems/cemspg.html.Inaddition,acomprehensiveobserverschecklistforallthreemethodshasbeendeveloped.Workiscurrentlyunderwaytodevelopcalculationspreadsheetsthatwillbeusefulforverifyingcalculations.Thesespreadsheetswillbeavailablesometimethisfiscalyear.Question:0 ` Howdoallthemethodsforflowmeasurementcomparetoeachother?`` (#` (# Answer:0 ` AlowerflowmeasurementisgeneratedwiththenewmethodsthanwithMethod2.@` (#` (# Question:0 ` Werethewindtunneltestsdoneonsquareorroundducting? p` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Threewindtunnelswerestudied.Onewasanellipse,onewasrectangularandone P wascircular. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whydidyouselectvelocityrangesof60and90? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Itseemedtoencompasstherangeofvelocitiesthatonewouldfindinthefield." ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Doesthemethodallowyoutoselectlowervelocities?$"` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes.Themethodrequirestwo,butyoucanselectothervelocitiesaslongasthey p&!$ brackettheexpectedaveragefieldvelocity. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Areallsourceswithstacksthatmeettherequirementseligibletousethesemethods? @)$' Whatisthedefaultwalladjustmentfactor?Canasourcegobackretroactivelyandlookatthevelocitynumbersanddecreasethembyonehalfpercent? ` (#` (#  ,`'* Answer:0 ` Itisnotaretroactiveapplication.Asourcecannotgobackandcorrectretroactively.` (#` (# Question: ` AreMethods2FandGapplicabletosourcesthatarenotacidrainsources?  Answer: ` Yes.Thelasttwopagesinpresentation9containamemorandumthataddressesthis p  r  ` question.Thismemostatesthattheyareapprovedforoptionaluseinplaceof0 r 0` r(#r(#Method2orasasupplementtoMethod2inanyspecificsubpart(part60,61,63,etc.)whereMethod2isnowthespecifiedflowratemeasurementmethod.Insummary,theyareacceptableforanysourcecategorywhereMethod2isspecified. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` IfyouwanttouseMethod2andthentakethedefaultofonehalfpercent,thatis `  permitted. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` IfasourceisusingMethod2FinconjunctionwithMethod2Handthatresultsinan 0  adjustmenttothepolynomial,dotheyneedtosubmitarecertificationapplication? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes.` (#` (# Question:0 ` Doesthemethodrequirecheckingclosetowallpoints?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,youmustcheckthenearwallpointsateachport.Youhavetobecarefulto p shieldtheportoryouwillgetaircominginorblowingout.Thiscouldaffectthemeasurements. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` AguidancedocumentisneededtoaddresshowStatesaretousethenew 0 amendmentstopart75forpart60sources. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Arethepart75RATAproceduresapplicabletopart60sources?P` (#` (# Answer:0 ` No,theyareapplicabletopart75sourcesonly.0` (#` (# Question:0 ` Haveyoulookedatapplyingmethodsfornonaxialflowforisokineticsamplingwith ! Method5?Also,haveyoulookedintohowtousethesemethodsforcorrectingforcyclonicflow? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thisisprobablyworthconsidering,butithasnotbeenaddressedtodate.InMethod % # 2G,aprovisionisincludedthatallowstheuseofMethod5.ThisprocedureincludestheuseofasamplingprobetogetherwithatypeStoperformayawnullprocedurefordeterminingtheyawangle.Inthiscase,theywouldhavetodemonstrateinawindtunnel,withthesamplingprobeactuallysampling,thatitdoesnotadverselyaffecttheabilitytodetermineayawangle. ` (#` (#    +p&) Question:0 ` YoustatedthattheAcidRainProgramusedavalueof$200/tonforSO2emissions.   Howdidyougetthisnumber?Wasitquantifiedinanyway,orwasitbasedonincreasingthecertaintyofthemeasurementbyusing2FinsteadofMethod2? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` UsingwalleffectsandMethod2F,wehavecomeupwithatotalof5075million p dollarsnationwide. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` ThebiggestproblemwithMethod2isitssloppyprocedure.Multiplyingthenumber @  ofmeasuringpointswiththealternatemethodwillonlyincreasethepotentialuncertaintyoftheresultsgiventhesamelevelofsloppinessonallpointsbeingmeasured. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Wehavetriedtobuildinenoughproceduresinthenewmethodstomakesuretesters @  holdtheirprobeslevel,waittheappropriateresponsetime,andusethepropercalibrationcoefficienttoreduceanyuncertainty. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` AtrainingvideoisavailablethatshowstheproperprocedureforperformingMethod  2F.Thisvideoisavailableuponrequest. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` IfyouwanttouseMethod2andthentakethedefaultofonehalfpercent,thatis  permitted. ` (#` (#   @    `PRESENTATION10`       WhatsAlltheFussAboutPMFine?      RonMyersandTomLogan,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenter      r RonMyersbeganthepresentationbyexplainingthathewilladdressthreemainareas:(1)thereasonswhythereisaneedforanewparticulatetestmethod;(2)theparticulatetestmethodsthatareavailablenow;and(3)commentsonthemethodthatEPAmaydevelopformeasuringPMfine. 0  #XDsX XX *# r  `     h      p      x  r Mr.MyersexplainedthereasonforanewPMtestmethodbeganin1997whenEPApromulgatednewNAAQSforPMfine.Thisrequiredthedevelopmentofnewemissioninventories H  tocharacterizethetotalloadingofPMfinetotheatmosphere.Thesenewemissioninventoriesthen 4  requiredmorecomprehensiveemissionfactors,whichinturnnecessitatedmorecomprehensivetestmethodstocollecttheappropriatedatatodevelopanewemissionfactor.X XXXDsԀThisdatawillalsobeused   indispersionmodelsandreceptormodelstocalculatethedownwindambientconcentrationsandthesourcecontributiontoambientconcentrations,respectively. r Mr.Myersprovidedmoredetailineachoftheseareas.HefirstexplainedthatEPArealizedthatalargenumberofareaswillpotentiallyexceedthenewPMfineNAAQS.Also,sincethenew | standardnotonlyestablishesadifferentnumericalvalueforthelevelofthestandard,butalsoisacompletelydifferentform(thatis,measuresacertainparticlesize)ofstandard,anewPMmonitoringnetworkisrequiredtoproperlycharacterizetheambientairintheseareas.AnewPMfinemonitoring L networkwasinstalledin1998andthisnetworkhasbeguntogeneratedata.Inaddition,theNASstatedthatmeasuringtotalmassofPMwasnotadequateandthatspeciationisrequiredtofullycharacterizethePM.Consequently,fullchemicalspeciationbeganinOctober1999at300sitesnationwide.Thespeciationwillidentifytheelementsaluminumthroughlead,majorions(sulfate,nitrate,ammonium,sodium,andpotassium),andtotalmassandcarboncontent(elemental,organic,andcarbonate).̀ r Ontheemissioninventoryside,Mr.MyersindicatedthatEPArecentlyissuedarequirementfornewemissioninventoriestobedevelopedforPM10andPM+ hX 2.5#X X+##XDsX XX &#X XXXDs.Theseinventoriesmustinclude !  condensableparticulateaswellasprecursorcompoundssuchasammonia,sulfurdioxide,andnitrogenoxidesthatmaybeproducedasaresultofreactionsintheambientairasopposedtogeneratingfromanemissionsource.Inordertodevelopbetteremissioninventories,improvedemissionfactorsareneededforalargepartoftheinventory.ThisincludesfactorsforPM10,PM+ hX 2.5#X X,+4##XDsX hX Z#X XhXDs, |% # condensables,significantprecursors.Ifavailable,speciatedfactorswouldbeuseful.Inordertodevelopimprovedemissionfactors,amorecomprehensivetestmethodisrequiredtodevelopdatainalloftheseareas. r Thesenewemissionsdatawillallowanexpandeduseofdispersionmodelstopredictambientairconcentrations.Thisincludesincorporatingphotochemicalreactionsoccurringintheambientairandmodelingchemicalspeciesindependently.Theresultsofthesemodelingeffortscanbeused  ,\'* tovalidatetheemissioninventoriesandtodevelopanattainmentplan.Thesenewemissiondatawillalsoallowtheuseofreceptormodelstobeexpandedtousechemicalmassbalancemodelsmoreoftenandtovalidateboththeemissionsinventoryandtheemissionsourcescontributingtotheairqualityvalues. r Mr.Myersnextpresentedthetestmethodsthatarenowavailable.Specifically,heidentifiedEPAreferencemethodsin40CFRparts51and60,EPAmobilesourcemethods,certainStatemethodsandNASrecommendedresearchmethods.EPAsexistingtestmethodsforPMincludeMethods5,17,201and201Aand202.Methods5and17measureonlytotalPManddonotdistinguishbetweendifferentsizeparticlesormeasurecondensablesorspeciatedcompounds.Mr.MyersstatedthatneitherofthesemethodsareconsistentwiththeNASrecommendations.Methods201and201AaresimilartoMethod17inthattheymeasuretotalmassinthestack,buthaveacyclonethatmeasuresthePM10fraction.However,theydonotmeasurecondensablesorspeciated @  compounds.Method202wasdevelopedwithStateassistancetoaddresstheissueofcondensablePMandcanbeusedwithMethod17,aswellaswithMethod5and201A.ThismethodisusedwithafilterablePMmethodandisdesignedtomeasurecondensablePM.Itrequirespostsampleconditioninginthefieldusingdrynitrogenbubblingandpostsampleseparationusingmethylenechloride.Method202alsorequirespostsampleadjustmentsinthelaboratoryforammoniaandothercompoundsthatareformedintheimpingers.Finally,itprovideslimitedspeciationdata. r Mr.MyersexplainedthatmobilesourcemethodsusedilutionsamplingtomeasurefilterablePMandemploya400cfmexhausterthatsendsalloftheexhaustgasfromtheenginetothesampler.Heexplainedthatidlingcreatesalotofdilutionair,whilemaximumaccelerationcreatesessentiallynodilution.ThismethodalsomeasurescondensablePM.However,somerecentresearchindicatesthatthefiltermaybeheatedduringtheaccelerationphaseofthefederaltestprotocolanddriveoffsomeorganicsonthefilter,thuscreatingalowbiasforPM.Thismethodisnotportableinthatthesource(thatis,theautomobile)isdriventothetestmethod,asopposedtothestationarysourceprogramwherethemethodmustbetakentothesource. r Mr.Myersnextdiscussedtheapproximatelysixdifferentbasicdesignsusedforresearchmethods.Allincludeinitialparticlesizingandallusedilutionsampling.Althoughthedilutionratiosvaryfrommethodtomethod,theyaregenerallyinthe6:1rangeforminimumdilutionand55:1formaximumdilution.Allofthesemethodshavearesidencetimerangingfromaminimumof5secondstoamaximumof4minutes.Noneofthesemethodsarecurrentlyportableforuseinthefield,althoughthemethoddeveloperswillsaythattheyare.TheCalTechsamplerisagoodexample.Theunitis7feethigh,weighs300poundsandcomesinthreepieces.Thedeveloperssaythisisportable,butthatisdebatable. r IndevelopingthePMfinereferencemethod,EPAistryingtousethesametechniquesthatthe P(#& researchmethodsareusing,thusfollowingtheNASrecommendations.Specifically,EPAisusingtheexistingparticlesizemethodologyatboththe10micronand2.5micronsizefractionstodevelopafederalreferencemethod.UnofficiallybeingcalledMethod201,thisdesignationisverytentative.AlthoughsimilartoMethod201B,itaddsanothercyclonethatcutsat2.5microns.Proposalis ,`'* scheduledforearly2000.Themethodwillusedilutionsamplingtoavoidcondensedwater,andwillbedesignedtobeportableandsimpletooperate.Becauseofthevolumerequiredforlongresidencetimes,itmayhaveashortresidencetimetomakeitportable.EPAwouldliketoallowformultipleconcurrentsamples(totalmass,organiccarbon,elementalcarbon,elements,ions),speciation,andforprecursormeasurement;however,Method201Bdoesnotallowforprecursormeasurement.Otherexistingmethodscanbeusedtomeasuretheseprecursorcompounds. r Thisnewmethodusesaninstackparticlesizingdevicefollowedbyaventuritomeasuretheflowrate.Mr.Myersnotedthatthismethodhaspassedtheconceptualphaseandthattheequipmentexistsandaprototypedevicehasbeenconstructed.Theventuriisfollowedbyamixingchamberformixingprecooled,filteredanddryair.Themajorityofthisairmixtureisexhaustedat2030cfm;however,a210litersampleistappedoffintoalabmodulethatwillbeanalyzedbyalaboratory.Thismoduleincludeshoneycombdenudersandafilterpack.Subsequenttothelaboratorymoduleistheimpingerbox.Thefilterpackconsistsoffourfiltersincludingaquartzfiberfilter,ateflonfilter,andanylonfilterfollowedbyanotherquartzfiberfilter.Thefirstquartzfiltercanbeanalyzedfororganiccarbonandelementalcarbon.Theteflonfiltercanbeanalyzedbyxrayfluorescencefortotalmassand34traceelements.Thenylonfilter,whichwillbetreatedsoitretainsthenitrates,canbeanalyzedforsulfates,nitrates,ammonium,sodiumandpotassiumions.Thelastquartzfiberfiltercanbereservedfororganiccompoundidentification.̀ r Mr.MyersnextreviewedthePMfinesampleanalysisthatisbeingconductedforambientair p samples.EPAintendstousethesamelaboratoriesthatareusedtoanalyzeambientairsamplestoanalyzestacksamples,principallybecausestrictQA/QCrequirementsforsuchanalysishavebeensetup.Thequartzfilterwillbeanalyzedgravimetricallyfortotalmassandelementalcarbon,organiccarbon,andcarbonatecarbonwillbedeterminedusingthermalopticalanalysis.Theteflonfilterwillbeanalyzedgravimetricallyfortotalmassandxrayfluorescence(anondestructionmethod)formetals.Thenylonfilterwillbeanalyzedusingfilterextractionfollowedbyionchromatography. r TomLogancontinuedthePMfinediscussionbycommentingthatthisanongoingR&Dproject. 0 HebeganbyshowingexamplesofsomeofthecomponentsofthenewPMmethod,whichincludedthecyclones(bothPM10andPM2.5),andtheannulardenuderwiththehoneycombdesigncoatedwith ! achemicaltoabsorbtheSO2,NOx,orammoniasoonlythePMgoestothefilterinthebottomof "  thedenuder.Henextdescribedtheuseoftheventuritometerflow(2030cfm)intothesamplingdeviceandthroughthedilutionpart.HeshowedagraphoftheSO2concentrationsinvarioustest $" runs.Testruns3through7or8showedsignificantconcentrationsontheseconddenuderindicatingthatbreakthroughofthefirstdenuderhadoccurred.Insubsequenttests,theconcentrationwasreducedtolessthan400ppmandverylittleSO2wasfoundontheseconddenuder.Mr.Logan `'"% concludedthattheyarestillevaluatingthedesignandhowtocontroltheflowrateswiththeventuriflowmetersbeforedecidingtoproceedwiththemethod.  0*%( Question:0 ` Whatwasthedifferencebetweentestruns3and24onyourgraph?The  concentrationmeasuredbythefirstdenuderwasaboutthesame,buttherewerelargedifferencesinwhatwascaughtontheseconddenuder. ` (#` (#  Answer:0 ` Theppmbeingfedintothesamplewaslowerwiththelatterruns.p` (#` (# Question:0 ` Areyoutraversingwiththismethod?P ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` No,EPAhasnotyetconductedthismethodatasource.EPAistryingtodecidehow 0  toobtainacorrectflowratebeforedeployingittothefield. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Method201Aallowsforcascadeimpactors.Haveyoulookedatmultistage P  impactorsforPMfine?@ ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Theyhavelookedatitandhaveseenparticlebounce(thatis,carryover)whenover   samplinghasoccurred. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WillEPAallowtheuseofcascadeimpactors?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` EPAisfarfromdecidingthis,butisleaningawayfromallowingit.Itmaybeokay  forfilterableparticulate,butnotforcondensables.Itisatrickyproceduretouseandcyclonesgiveyoutheopportunitytosamplebetter. ` (#` (#   P   &    X X XX X X XX          #XDsX XX #X XXXDs`PRESENTATION11`#XDsX XX v #X XXXDs  Method18Modifications C        X X XX X X XX '   RimaDishakjian,EPA,EmissionsMeasurementCenter     r Ms.DishakjiangaveabriefdiscussionofMethod18anditsrecentrevisions.Themodificationsincludefinetuningtheprocedures,addingsomeQA/QC,andputtingthemethodinEMMCformat. r Ms.DishakjiandescribedMethod18asagenericGCmethodtobeusedforspeciatedVOCsandwherethepollutantsbeingemittedfromthesourceareknown.Itisconsideredawideopenmethodbecausethetesterhastheoptionofusingallowedsampling,GCcolumnordetectorchoices.Anycombinationcanbeusedaslongastherecoverycriteriaaremet.Inaddition,ifasourceisvisitedyearafteryearandthematrixdoesnotchange,thenonlyonerecoverystudyisrequiredforthatparticularsamplingandanalyticalscheme. r Ms.Dishakjiannotedthatpresurveysamplingisanoptionforcharacterizingemissionsincaseswheresourcesareunsureofthetargetcompounds.However,sourcesthatarecertainofthetargetcompoundsarenotrequiredtoconductpresurveysampling.Thepresurveycomponentwasmovedtothebackofthemethodbecausethepresurveylanguageisoftenconfusedasanothersamplingoption(thatis,Summacanisters).Shestatedthepresurveycomponentisjustgrabsamplesinto ` canisterswithqualitativeanalysisperformedtogetageneralideaofwhatconcentrationstoexpect. r Ms.DishakjianindicatedacommonquestionaskediswhatsamplingtechniqueshouldbeusedforMethod18ataspecificsource.Shestatedthefollowingthreeoptionsareavailable.*c  *cR"0 r   DirectInterface/DilutionInterface:Itallowstheleastamountofsamplereactionorlossofany P othersamplingcomponent.DirectInterfacecollectsthegassampledirectlyfromthestack.DilutionInterfacedoesthesame,butisusedincaseswithextremelyhighconcentrationsofthetargetcompounds.*cRm݌ r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   AbsorptionTube:TheoldMethod18listedcharcoalastheapprovedabsorbentandimplied "  itwastheonlyonethatcouldbeused.Nowanyabsorbentonthemarketcanbeused.Thistechniqueshouldbeusedforsubppmlevels.*c8݌ r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   BagSampling:ThisisacheaptechniquethatdoesnotrequireaGCunitonsite.Inaddition, p&!$ thelargebagallowsmultipleanalysis.Ifthereisariskofexplosioninthesamplingarea,thistechniqueshouldbeused.*c݌ r(#r(# Ќ   r Ms.DishakjiannextdiscussedthechangesmadetoMethod18whenusingdirectordilutioninterface.Thedefinitionofarunhasbeenchangedfordirectinterface;previouslyarunrequiredtwoconsecutiveinjectionsintotheGCthatmatchedtowithin5percent.Thiscriteriawasdifficult ,`'* tomeetforprocessesthatarevariable.Thecalibrationgasrequirementsnowspecifythreeinjectionswiththreeconcentrationsofeachtargetcompound.Thenewrequirementrequirestheuseofacalibrationgascertifiedbythemanufactureto2percent.Method205isallowedasthegasdilutionverificationproceduresotesterswillnotbecaughtinthefieldwiththewrongcalibrationgas. r Shethendescribedtherecoverystudyfordirectinterfaceasbasicallyaleakcheckwitha70130percentrecovery.BasicallytheGCiscalibratedandthenthecalibrationgasisrunthroughtheprobetocheckforthesameresponseontheinstrument.Shementionedthattherequirementstatingtwoconsecutivesampleshavetobewithin5percenthasbeendeleted.Acompleterunnowconsistsoffiveconsecutivesamples.Fifteensamples(3setsof5consecutivesamples)areconsideredthethreerunsneededforthecompliancetest.Theposttestcalibrationcheckconsistsofinjectionofonelevelofcalibrationgas.Ifthereisgreaterthan5percentdifferencebetweentheinitialandfinalcalibration,thenanothercalibrationcurveisrequired.Inthiscase,theaverageofthepreandposttestcalibrationsisusedtogetthefinalnumber. r Ms.Dishakjianstatedthatforabsorptiontubesampling,anycommerciallyavailableabsorbentisallowed.Thesourcecanalsouseawaterknockoutimpingerbeforetheabsorbentbut,inthiscase,theimpingerandtheabsorbentintherecoverycheckmustbespiked.Inaddition,dualtrainsmustbeusedonespikedwiththetargetpollutantsandtheotherunspiked.Thetrainsmustbesampledsimultaneouslyandusedinallthreeruns.Inorderforthetesttobevalidforthatsource,thespikerecoveryofonetrainmustbewithin70130percentoftheother.Theresultsofthetestneedtobecorrectedbasedontherecoverystudy.Forexample,iftherecoveryis70percent,theresultsofthetestwouldbeincreasedby30percent.Ifthetestdoesnotachievethe70130percentrecovery,thenanotheranalyticaltechniquemustbeused.Desorptionoftheabsorptiontubeisperformedinthelabandcanbeeithersolventorthermal.Basicallywithsolventdesorption,thesolventgoesthroughtheabsorbentandreleasesthetargetcompounds.Thedesorbedliquidallowsmultipleinjectionstobeperformed.Withthermaldesorption,eachsamplecanonlybeanalyzedonce. r Ms.Dishakjianstatedthattheevacuatedcontaineristhemostcommonbagsamplingtechnique.Inaddition,othersamplingmethodsallowedincludeadirectpumpsamplingmethodwhereateflonpumpisrunbetweenthebagandthestack;anexplosionriskprocedure,whichusestwoevacuatedcontainersinaseries;andaheatedcontaineroption,whichisusedifwatercondensationisexpectedinthebagduringsampling.The70130percentrecoveryratealsomustbeachievedwiththistechnique. r Ms.DishakjianconcludedthattheMethod18revisionsallowflexibilityinchoosingsampling/analyticalmethodologyaslongastherecoverycriteriaof70130percentismet.However,EMCencouragestheDirect/DilutionInterfacetechniquebecauseoftherealtimedataandlesschanceofsamplinglosses.Inaddition,anydetectormaybeused,includingmassspectrometer.#XDsX XX #X XXXDs P(#& Anyabsorbentisallowedaslongastherecoverycriteriaismet.ShenoteditisimportanttorememberthattherecoveryprocedureisdoneonlyoncepersourceaslongasthematrixdoesnotchangeandSummacanistersareonlyallowedduringpresurveysampling.  +p&)  ,`'* Question:0 ` Ifyouhad130percentrecovery,doesthatmeanyouwouldadjusttheresultsdown  by30percent? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,thatiscorrect.Itworksthesameasifyoushowed70percentrecovery.Inthis  case,youwouldadjustalltheresultsupby30percent. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Isthecertifiedgasusedfordirectinterfacerecoveryorcalibrationcurve?P ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Youmustusecertifiedgas(thatis,2percent)foranysamplingprocedure.0 ` (#` (# Question:0 ` IsthefactthatMethod18islistedinthelatestCFRasMethod17anoversight?` ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,itislistedasMethod18,buttheheadingsintheCFRidentifyitasMethod17.@ ` (#` (#   0     `PRESENTATION12`   -  PredictiveEmissionMonitoringSystems  PerformanceSpecification16    FostonCurtis,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenter  p u.   r FostonCurtiswasscheduledtospeakaboutPS16,whichisthenextperformancespecificationforPEMS.However,becauselittleprogresshasbeenmadeondevelopingthisPS,Mr.CurtisaddressedtheprecursortoPS16"thedraftPSdevelopedinthemid1990sundertheoldenhanced 0  monitoringrule.ThisdraftPSispostedontheEMTICwebsiteandacopyisincludedintheworkshopnotebook.Mr.CurtisindicatedthatthesedraftspecificationsshouldbeusedtovalidatePEMS.APEMSsystemisapredictivesystem,whichpredictsanemissionratebasedoninputparametersofaprocess,asopposedtodirectmeasurementofemissionsusinganinstrumentsuchasaCEM.EMCsplanistopromulgatethisdraftPSandpublishitintheCFR. r Mr.Curtisnextprovidedahistoricalreviewofthedevelopmentofmonitoringtools.Intheearly1970s,whenEPAfirstpromulgatedemissionstandards,referencemethodswerereliedupontodeterminecompliancewiththeemissionstandards.Instrumentalmethodswerethendevelopedasameansofdeterminingcompliance.Advantagesofinstrumentalmethodsoverthepreviousmethodswerethattheyprovidedrealtimeandcontinuousdata.Initially,instrumentalmethodswereusedfordeterminingtheoperationandmaintenanceparametersofcontroldevices,suchasduringperiodsofexcessemissions.Asthesesystemsprovedtobereliable,theywereultimatelyusedtodeterminecompliancewiththeemissionstandards.EPAisnowatanothercrossroadswiththedevelopmentofthePEMS.Thesearecheapertoinstallandcheapertooperate. r ItisanticipatedthattheapplicationofPS16willbeasanalternativetocurrentCEMmonitoringrequirements.Theprovisionsinparts60,61and63currentlyallowtheuseofalternativemethods.EPAisalsoevaluatingPEMSasanalternativetoCEMSintheMACTregulationsthatarecurrentlyunderdevelopment.ThepharmaceuticalMACTstandardthathasbeenpromulgatedcontainsaPEMSformonitoringorganicsfromcondensers.PEMScanalsobeusedinapplicationsunderStateandlocalrules.Mr.CurtismentionedTexas,SouthCoast,Arkansas,OklahomaandPennsylvaniaasexamplesofStatesthathaveadoptedtheirownPEMSpoliciesorprocedures.Mr.CurtisstatedthatPEMSareproceedingasaviablemonitoringtool.HeexpectstoeventuallyreceiveanumberofpetitionstousePEMSinsteadofCEMS. r Mr.CurtisoutlinedthetwogeneraltypesofPEMS.Thefirsttypeusesequationsbasedonphysicalprinciplessuchasthermodynamics,idealgaslaw,etc.Thesecondtypeisbasedonregressionanalysiswithhistoricaldata,whichinvolvestrainingthecomputermodeltodevelopthepersonalityoftheprocess.Thefirsttypeisquitereliable,althoughsomeerrorsoccurasaresultoftheassumptionsthatarerequiredtosolvethecomplexequations.Thesecondtypeisaccurateoverthelongrunaslongasthesensorsoperateatthesamerangeasreflectedinthehistoricaldata.   +p&)  r IndevelopingPS16,EPAintendstousedatathatiscurrentlyavailable,including:(1)data collectedaspartoftheacidrainprogram(40CFR75,subpartE);(2)TNRCCspecificationsforPEMSallowedundertheNOxRACTrules;(3)priorPEMScertifications(forexample,thesubpart  DDboilerPEMSinRegion10);(4)theRegion1InternationalPaperstudy;and(5)futureacidrainstudies. r ThedraftprotocolonthewebsiteisalmostacopyofPS2.Theinitialperformancerequirementswillrequire20percentrelativeaccuracyandaminimumdailysensorcheckforfailedsensors.ItwillalsoincludeatesttodeterminethePEMSabilitytousesubstitutiondata.ThegeneralmeasurementlocationspecificationsforPEMSareverysimilartothoseforNOxandSOx  p  inPS2.ThesensorsmustbeinaccessiblelocationsandthereferencemethodsandtheRATAmustfollowthesamecriteriaasPS2.TherelativeaccuracytestisessentiallythesameasthatinPS2.Itrequiresaminimumofninecomparisonrunsatthreeparameterlevels(thatis,high,mediumandlowconcentrationrange).ParticulatePEMSwillrequireaminimumof15comparisonruns.TherangeofoperationofthesensorsduringtherelativeaccuracytestsdefinestheoperationenvelopeofthePEMS.TherelativeaccuracycalculationremainsthesameasPS2.ThesecondtestthatPS16requiresisthedailysensorchecktoidentifyfailedsensors.Thistestmustbedoneat75100percentoftheemissionstandardandmustidentifythesensors,orcombinationofsensors,whichcausethemodeltoproduceanemissionratethatisofftheemissionstandardby20percentormore.Thisdailysensorcheckcouldbeanychecktoensurethatthesensorsareworkingproperly.Examplesofsuchchecksincludeavisualcheckoftheoutputs,asensorsetpointtest,ortheuseofadiskettecontainingsensorvaluestoevaluateifthemodelcangeneratethecorrectemissionsdata.ThethirdtestinvolvesanevaluationofthePEMSabilitytousesubstitutiondatathatiswithin20percentofthecorrectdata. r Mr.CurtisnextsummarizedsomeconcernsassociatedwiththedraftPS16.Theseincludewhethermorerelativeaccuracydatapointsareneeded;whetherthePEMSowneroroperatorshouldsubmitmappingdatausedtodevelopthePEMS;andwhetherFtests,ttestsandcorrelationtestsofrelativeaccuracytestdatashouldberequired.AcomparisonoftheinitialcertificationrequirementsforPEMSinPS16,theacidrainprogramandtheTexasprogramwasalsopresented.ThemostcriticalissueishowwellthePEMSwilloperateovertime.EPAintendstodevelopaQAprocedurethatprovidesguidanceonperiodictestingofthePEMStoensurecontinuedreliabledata.Inaddition,EPAisexaminingthefrequencyatwhichauditsshouldbeconducted,developingprovisionstoallowalesserfrequencyforsuperiorperformance,andusingreconcileddata. r Mr.CurtisindicatedthetentativeschedulehasproposalbyJune2000,andpromulgationbyMarch2001.Question:0 ` TheAcidRainCEMSgenerallyhaverelativeaccuraciesinthesingledigitrange,so P(#& whyshouldweaccept20percentRAforPEMS? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` PEMSisanewtechnologyandwhenCEMSwerefirstregulatedwithPS2,theRA  +p&) levelwassetat20percent.Also,AcidRainisforadifferentpurpose.Inarecent ,`'* evaluationtheRegion10PEMScertificationachieveda89percentRAlevel,butitisnotreasonabletoimposethisonallPEMSapplications.However,thiswillcontinuetobeexaminedandcanberevisedifthetechnologyimprovestowhereitcanconsistentlymeetamorestringentRA. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` DoesEPAallowreplacingCEMSnowusedforNSPScompliance?Forexample, `  subpartDbrequirescontinuouscomplianceforsourcesgreaterthan250MMBtu/hr. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` PEMSarenotapplicabletoallsituations,butifyoucanmeettheperformance 0  specificationsandtheQArequirements,itshouldbeacceptable.However,replacementofaCEMusedforcompliancerequiresOAQPSapproval. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whymustwedoa30dayRATAcomparisontestonaPEMSintheacidrain @  programwhenitisnotnecessary?Doestheincreasedaccuracyofthelongtestjustifythecost? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` ThesubpartErequirementismeanttocovermorethanPEMS.The720hour  demonstrationisadequatefromastatisticalpointofview.Theacidrainprogramisamarketbasedsystemandneedstobeasaccurateaspossible. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Weareencouragingnewtechnologiesbutnotholdingthemtothesamelevelofthe p currenttechnologythatisreflectedintheAcidRainRATArequirements.ThecommenteralsonotedthatAppendixEforpeakingunitsundertheacidrainprogramissortofaPEMS.AnotherconcernistheinabilitytochallengePEMSresultswithanindependentmeasure.ItcanonlybechallengedwithaRATA.ShouldRATAsbedonemorefrequently(thatis,quarterlyinsteadofannually)? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thisisaverygoodpointthatneedsconsideration.Texasandtheacidrainprograms P requirerepeatedRATAsafter6months.IntheIPstudy,IPisleavingtheCEMSonfor6monthswhileoperatingthePEMS.Thisshouldgivesomevaluableinformationonhowthesethingstrackwithtime. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Howwillyouhandlestartup,shutdownandmalfunction?" ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thiswillvaryfromruletorule,butnormallytheseactivitiesareexempt.$"` (#` (# Question:0 ` Theideathatstartup,shutdownandmalfunctionisexemptisdisturbing.Thereare p&!$ manyreasonsthatstartups,shutdowns,andmalfunctionsoccur.Thesourceshouldnotbeexemptfrommeetingemissionlimitsduringstartup,shutdown,andmalfunctioninallcases.Thereisaneedtospecifywhatisacceptable. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thesecriteriaarespelledoutintheregulationsandnotintheperformance  +p&) specifications.,`'*` (#` (# ЇQuestion:0 ` SomeoftheNSPSrequireCEMSwherestartup,shutdownandmalfunctionis  includedintheaveragingtime. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thatiscorrect.` (#` (#       PredictiveEmissionsMonitoringSystems  InternationalPaperXLProject  ChrisRascher,EPARegion1   U r Mr.ChrisRascherstatedthathewouldaddressthefollowingtopicsinhispresentation:(1)theXLprogramandtheassociatedprocess;(2)theIPXLproject;(3)theresultsofthepilotprojectonthelimekiln;and(4)thefinalstepsoftheIPXLproject. r ProjectXL,whichstandsforexcellenceinleadership,isanationalregulatoryreinventionprogram.UnderXL,aregulatedentity(thatis,company)sponsorsaprojectthatresultsinanenforceablecommitmenttoachievebetterenvironmentalresultsthanwouldbeattainedthroughexistingregulations.Itgenerallyinvolveslesscompliancecostsandoffersmoreregulatoryflexibilitythantraditionalregulations.XLisanexperimentproposedbyaregulatedentityandwillnotdirectlyleadtoachangeinregulationsorpolicy.Assuch,theprojectwillnotestablishaprecedentforotherfacilities.ThemajorcomponentsofProjectXLincludethefollowing.̀"0 r Aproposalsubmittedbyacompanythatcontainsaconceptualdescriptionoftheproject.r(#r(# Ѐ"0 r Afinalprojectagreementorworkplanthatcontainsadetaileddescriptionoftheproject  includingEPAandstakeholderinput,FederalRegisternotices,andsitespecificrules.Allpartiesmustagreewithandsignthefinalagreement. r(#r(# Ѐ"0 r Implementationoftheproject.Ofthe50orsoXLprojectsinthepipeline,onlyabout10of ` themhavestarted. r(#r(# Ѐ"0 r Reviewofthecompletedproject.Theseprojectscanlastanywherefrom3to10years.@r(#r(# Ѐ"0 r TheXLprojectmay,insomecases,leadtoanewruleorachangeinanexistingrule.0r(#r(#  r IndecidingifaproposedXLprojectwillbeselected,theenvironmentalresults,stakeholdersupport,costsavingstothecompany,andpaperworkreductionarethemostimportantfactorsconsidered.Otherfactorsconsideredincludeinnovation,multimediaapplicability,transferability,feasibility,monitoringreportingandevaluation,andshiftingofriskburden. r Mr.RaschernextexplainedIPsproposalforanXLproject.IPproposedtodevelopaPEMSforthewastewoodfuelincineratorattheirintegratedpulpandpapermilllocatedinJay,Maine.Intheproductionofpaper,thefacilitygenerateswastebarkthatisusedintheWFI,alongwithwastepaperandotherwastematerial,togeneratesteamforthefacility.TheWFIisratedat480MMBtu/hrandemits210tonsPMperyear.Thefacilityemploys1200employeesandhasfivepermittedstacks.ThePEMSisprimarilyforPM,butwouldalsoincludeSO2,NOxandsteaming p&!$ rate.Theconceptistocorrelatesteamingratetoemissionlevels.Iftheprojectissuccessful,itwouldreducerequirementsforPMstacktesting,whichiscurrentlyrequiredonceevery2years.OnebenefitofthePEMSwouldbethattheemissionswouldbeknownforeverydayofoperationcomparedtothecurrentapproachofquantifyingemissionsonceevery2years.ThefacilitywouldalsoliketoremovetheSO2andNOxCEMSiftheprojectprovessuccessful.IPsproposalalso  +p&) containedaconditionthatwouldseekEPAapprovalforconditionalcalibrationallowancesduring ,`'* thedevelopmentandtestingphases.TheStateofMainesupportedthisconceptalthoughEPArequiredthatnoNAAQScouldbeexceededduringthedevelopmentalandtestingphases. r TheIPXLprojectwoulddemonstratethecapabilitiesofaPEMStoprovidecontinuousinformationonemissionsandprocessinformation.ItwouldalsoprovideincreasedinformationonPMemissionsandthereducedrisksassociatedwiththoseemissions.ThegoaloftheprojectistoreducePMemissionsby10percent.ThebenefitforSO2andNOxisnotaswelldefinedasitisfor P  PM;however,itmustberememberedthattheprojectisdesignedforPM. r IPsmainreasonsforproposingthisXLprojectaretogetmoreinformationonPMemissionsandobtainsignificantoperationaldata(thatis,steamingrate).Mr.RaschernotedthattheXLprojectmaybethebestfederalmechanismfordevelopingthePEMS.Theprojectwouldimprovethecurrentmonitoring.Monitoringlimitationsincludethefactthatstacktestsareperformedonceperyearandthatfrequentstacktestingiscostprohibitive.ThemoistureinthestacksmakesopacitymonitorshighlyinaccurateandPMCEMSprovideemissionsdata,butwillnotprovidefeedbackontheoperationalparametersimpactingemissionrates.Furthermore,thefacilityusesanumberofdifferenttypesoffuels,whichimpactstheoperationoftheCEM. r ThePEMSmodelbeingconsideredisanadvancedneuralnetworktopredictemissionsfromprocessoperatingdata.Thisisopposedtoamodelthatusesregressionanalysis.Todate,noPMPEMShasbeendevelopedforsuchacomplexsource;theyhave,however,beendevelopedforsimpler,lesscomplexsources.Themodelisdesignedtoresultinanaccuratepredictionofpollutantemissionsonacontinuousbasis.Itwillalsoidentifyoptimaloperatingconditionsandcontainalarmstonotifypotentialexceedancesimmediately. r ThepilotprojectthatwasconductedaspartoftheXLprojectwasperformedon2limekilns.SixhundredmodifiedMethod5samples,takenevery15minutes,wereconductedtocollectPMdata.CEMSwereusedfortheotheremissions(TRS,SO2,NOx,COandCO2).Operationaldata, P suchaskilntemperatureandairflow,wascollectedfromIPsoperatingcomputers.IPalsomeasureddatamanually,includinglimemudchemicalanalysis,wetscrubberflowdata,meteorologicaldataandfuelanalysis.Inall,54operatingparameterswereidentifiedand580datasetsweresampled.Datawascollectedfor14hoursperdayforaperiodof25days.Over250Megagigsofrawdatawerecollectedandfedintothemodel.Aseriesofthreesetsofrelativeaccuracytestswerethenperformed.ThefirsttestwasaquickvalidationforPMtoseeifthemodelcomesclosetopredictingtheactuallevels.Theresultsshowedthatthemodelcameclosetopredictingthecorrectvalues,butitdidnotpass.Aftersomeadjustments,alargevalidationeffortwasconductedfor50samplesandthemodelfailedmiserably.Asaresult,IPlookedatallthedatathathadbeencollectedanddiscoveredthattheprobeformeasuringpHwasatthewronglocation.TheyrelocatedthepHmonitortoabetterlocationandreranthemodelbasedonthenewdata.Thevalidationofthenewmodeldidpass;however,thereweresomequestionsabouttheappropriatenessofdoingthis.Consequently,anotherrelativeaccuracytestwasconductedandshowedastrongcorrelationbetweenthemodeledandmeasuredresults(8.3percentRA).WiththePEMSoperating,IPcanlookatlimeavailability(anindicatorofthequalityoftheproduct)andPMemissionsand ,`'* adjustcontrolstooptimizeboth.Thefacilitypreviouslyemitted17poundsPMperhourandisnowat8poundsPMperhour.Thefuelfiringratehasalsobeenreduced. r Anumberofissuesremaintoberesolved.TheseincludehowoftenRAshouldbeconductedinordertoevaluatetheaccuracyofthePEMovertime.Annual,semiannualandquarterlyRAsarebeingconsidered,aswellasusingCEMStoperiodicallycheckonthePEMS.OtheroptionsbeingconsideredaretotemporarilyinstallCEMSorinstallingCEMSforaperiodofafewyearstocheckonthePEMS.Mr.Rascheralsomentionedtheconceptofa GoldDiskforusebyinspectorstoconfirmaccuracyofthePEM.Thesensorvalidationsystemanditsaccuracyisanotherissue. r Mr.RascherconcludedbyoutliningthefinalstepsoftheIPXLproject.Theseincludedevelopingafinalprojectagreement,whichhasbeenunderdevelopmentforanumberofyearsandrequiresinvolvementofallstakeholders;developingasamplingandvalidationplan;andidentifyingandpreparinglegalmechanisms.Oncetheagreementiscompleted,testingwillbeperformedtocollectdataforthemodel.Next,themodelwillneedtobevalidated(RATAtests)andifvalidationissuccessful,theexistingstacktestingandCEMrequirementswouldbereduced,mostlikely,throughaSIPrevision.Question:0 ` WhydidyouuseMethod5?ItmeasuresPM,notPM10.` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Method201Acantbeusedinawetstack.Inawetstack,Method5willgiveyou p thePM10measurement.`` (#` (# Question:0 ` Couldyouhavepickedaneasiersource?@` (#` (# Answer:0 ` TherearetwopowerboilersonsitethatwouldhavebeeneasiertodevelopPEMS  p for.However,thefacilityisbuildinganaturalgasfiredCoGenfacilityandtheboilerswillbeshutdown.ThegoalofthePEMSistoincludeallfactorsthatmaysignificantlyimpactemissionsundernormalconditions.Itisacomplexsourcewithmultiplevariables. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Aretheymonitoringoxygenatthecoldendofthekiln?!` (#` (# Answer:0 ` No,onlyairisbeingmeasured.#!` (#` (# Question:0 ` Isthewastefuelincineratorthesameasawastebarkburner?% #` (#` (# Answer:0 ` No,itisalsocalledahogboiler.`'"%` (#` (# ̀  0*%(    `PRESENTATION13`         MethodsforMeasuringOpacity203A,B,CNoworEver?  PeterWestlin,EPA,OfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandards   }&    X X XX X X XX       Z~     X X XX X X XX '` j~    ?  X X XX X X XX          r Mr.Westlindiscussedabriefhistoryofthemethod,theproposedchanges,andthepossibility P  ofaddingadditionalmethodstothelist.Hestatedthemethodwasoriginallyproposedin1986becausemanyStateandlocalstandardsforopacitylimitsweredifferentthanthemeasurementsdescribedinMethod9.Themaindifferencesincludeddifferentaveragingtimes,timeexceptionlimits,ornoaveragingtimesatall.ThesedifferencesledtoaproposalforaddingAppendixF1totheCFRpart52.ThepurposeofproposingAppendixF1wastoprovideproceduresandtomakethemrequirementsinpart52.Forexample,ifaStatestandarddidnothaveamethodformeasuringandreportingvisibleemissionsobservationsforthestandardthatwasdifferentfromMethod9,thenonehadtousetheproceduresinAppendixF1. r Themethodwasreproposedin1993andputinpart51insteadofpart52.Inaddition,AppendixF1wasdividedintothefollowingthreetestmethods:203,A,B,andC.Method203requirescontinuousopacitymonitoringsystemsandA,BandCrelyonvisibleemissionobservers.Inaddition,proceduresformeasuringvisibleemissionsoffugitivedustwereadded.Theaccuracydiscussionthatcameoutofthe1986studieswasalsoincluded.Inordertogetagreaternumberofdatapointsforashorttermaverage,5secondreadingswererecordedtoseeiftheaccuracywasaffected.Theresultsindicatedthat5secondreadingswerepossible.Theaccuracyshowedthesameresultsaswereobtainedwith15secondreadings. r Method203Aincludeslanguagerequiredforcertification.Itaddressesfugitivedustprocedures,includingwheretopositionyourself,wheretolookintheplume,etc.Avisibleemissiondatacollectionformisalsoincludedtoassistwithdatacollection.Languageisincludeddocumentingvisibleemissionsobservationprocedures,whichincludeanadditionalpartofvisibleemissionsobservationcertificationthatfocusesonhowtodofugitiveemissiontests. r Method203Bincludescalculationproceduresfortimeexceptionstandards.Thismethodrequires15secondreadingsovera1hourperiodwithanaggregatelessthanthestandard.Method203Cconsistsofinstantaneousopacitymeasurements.Instantaneousopacityisdefinedas aoneminuteaverage.Theproposalincludesanoptiontouse4,15secondconsecutivereadingstocalculatea1minuteaverageor5secondreadings. r Mr.WestlinnextdiscussedwhattheMethodwilllooklikewhenitispromulgated.ThemethodwillbeputinplainEnglishanditwillbeinEMMCformat.Inaddition,hestatedtherequirementallowing4,15secondreadingsforinstantaneouslimitsinMethod203Cwillbedeleted.Healsostatedthatlanguagewillbeincludedinregardtotrainingforthefugitivedustobservationrequirement. ,`'*  r Mr.Westlinendedhisdiscussionbyintroducingotherusefultoolsforobservingvisibleemissions.PMCEMSareusefulinsituationswherestackemissionsareextremelylow.Otherusefultoolsincludetriboelectricdetectors,fencelineCOMSandCEMS,andtricorders.Question:0 ` Mr.WestlinaskedwhetherEPAneedstodevelopanothervisibleemissionsmethod p thatwouldbeusedwhentherewasacontinuousopacitylimit(forexample,lessthan10percent)orarequirementthattherebenovisibleemissions.Themethodwouldbe203D. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` TheonlyapplicationRegion10hasbeeninvolvedwithalongthislineistherecent  p  federalimplementationplanwrittenforFMCinIdaho.Therearenumerousvisibleemissionrequirements.Becausetherewasnomethod,Region10usedterminologytoemphasizethatitisnotMethod9oranothersimilarmethod.InthepastRegion10citedrelevantsectionsofMethod22.Region10statedthattherewouldbesomevalueindevelopinga203Dtocoverscenariosdescribedabove. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` MissourienforcementsectiondoesnotrecommendplacingMethod22inoperating  permits.Instead,Method9observationsareinitiatedifaplumeisvisible.Theowner/operatormustconductMethod9observationsonaprescribedscheduleuntiltheplumedisappears.Forexample,theowner/operatormustconductMethod9observationsevery24hoursuntiltheplumedisappears.Aftertheplumedisappears,theMethod9observationsmustbeconductedevery24hoursforatwoweekperiod. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` Method203Dwouldbehelpful.0` (#` (#    p    `QUESTIONANDANSWER/DISCUSSIONSESSION`     DayTwoTopics  Moderator:RimaDishakjian  Question:0 ` AStaterepresentativeaskedifanyStatesinattendancerequirethatcondensablePM P  bemeasuredforanyreason. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` TheStateofMontanarequiresthatthebackhalfofthetraininMethod5beusedto  p  demonstratecompliancewiththeirprocessweightregulation.ThecontactisPatDriscoll[(406)4440284]. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofNewJerseyrequiresMethod202forPM10sourcesafterthedateofpromulgationofthemethod(thatis,February17,1991).Sourcespermittedbeforethenareconsideredgrandfathered.ItisNewJerseysinterpretationthatpart51definesPM10toincludecondensablesandEPARegion2supportsthisinterpretation. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#Region9statedthatCaliforniaincludescondensablesintheirmethod(CARB5).CindyCasternovaisthecontact. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofMissouriaddressesthisinthesamemannerastheStateofNewJerseydoes.AnytimethereisacompliancetestthatinvolvesPM10,thetestautomaticallyincludesthecondensables.ThisrequirementiscitedinmanyrecentconstructionpermitsissuedwithintheState.RandyRaymondisthecontact. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofPennsylvaniarequirescondensablePM10wherethereisanoutofstackPM10requirementorformodeling.Theyalsostatedthat,inpractice,theyarenotsurethatthisisbeingdone. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofIowahasthesamerequirementsasMissouridoes.MarkStoneisthecontact. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofMinnesotarequiresanalysisofthebackhalfofthetrainfororganicsonindustrialprocesses.StuartArkleyisthecontact.[(651)2967774] ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofKentuckyrequiresthatanysourcenotunderanNSPSandthatimpactsanonattainmentareamusttestforcondensables(basicallyRogerShigaharasoldincineratormethod). ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WhoistheEMCcontactformercurytestingatelectricutilities? +p&)` (#` (#  ,`'* Answer:0 ` BillGrimleyisthecontactforreviewingtestplansandLaraAutryisthecontactfor  thereviewoftheQAplans. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WilltestingbeQAdbytheStatesorRegions?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` ThetestscheduleispostedontheInternetatwww.utility@rti.org.Interested `  individualsshouldrefertothewebsite. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WillthedatabeavailabletoStateandlocalagencies?0 ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,itwillbepostedonthewebsite.` ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WillthisprogramleadtomercuryCEMS?@ ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` ItprobablywillifEPAmakesapositivedeterminationthatmercuryemissionsfrom   electricutilityplantsshouldberegulated. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Giventheproblemsidentifiedwithfieldsampling,isthereanyprovisionforsite  observationoraccreditationfordatageneratedthatwillbeusedasthebasisfordevelopingMACTregulations?Inotherwords,arethereanyplansforrequiringaccreditationofthepeoplethatobservethesetests? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Probablynot,principallybecausethedatausedtosupportMACTdevelopment P comesfrommanysources. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Twowastewatertreatmentplantswererecentlypermittedandwererequiredto  p identifyalltheHAPcompoundsinthewastewater.AremethodsavailabletoidentifyallHAPsandwherecanonefindalistingofsuchmethods? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,seethereportScreeningMethodsfortheDevelopmentofAirToxicsEmission 0 Factors(EPA450\491012). ` (#` (# Question:0 ` ItisdifficulttorunMethod201A." ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Itisdifficult,however,wearetryingtobreakmethodsintomoreuseableversionson $" thewebsite. ` (#` (#  r Question:0 ` HaveotherStatesseenthisproblemwithhowthetestperformedusingMethod `'"% 201A? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` TheMethod201Avalidationdatalooksacceptable,soEPAdoesnothaveaproblem 0*%( withit. ` (#` (#  ,`'* Question:0 ` IfsourcetestingfirmsarerequiredtobecertifiedbyNELAC,willtheStateandlocal  agencystaffwhowillreviewandapprovecompliancetestprotocolsalsoberequiredtobeNELACcertified? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` NotasNELACiscurrentlywritten,butitunderconsiderationandEMCwould p welcomeinputonthisissue.Region7statedthattheirstaffwillbecertifiedsothattheirtestimonyinlegalchallengescanbeupheld. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Withthereportingofbadpracticesbyaccreditedtestingfirms,howwilltheactual 0  penaltyapplyforcompaniesthatareaccreditedoutofState? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thisisanationalaccreditationprogram.Chapter4oftheNELACstandardsdeals P  withdenials,revocationandsuspensionofaccreditation.TheStateagencyobservingthebadpracticewouldberequiredtoprepareacorrectiveactionreportand,ifNELACisnotsatisfiedwiththetestingfirmsresponsetothecorrectiveactionplan,theycanrevoketheaccreditationanditwouldapplyinallStates,notjusttheStateinwhichthefirmwasaccredited. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Whatsortoftrackingmechanismisforeseen?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` EachStatewillneedtodecideonthis.Checklistsandsurpriseinspectionsaresome p ofthetechniquesthatcouldbeused.However,NELACwouldhavetheresponsibilityoftracking,documentingandreportingthefindings. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WouldthelistofdiscreditedtestingfirmsbeavailabletoStates?0` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,therewillbeanationaldatabasewiththedatafromallaccreditedtestingfirms.`` (#` (# Question:0 ` Fivetosevenyearsagotherewasapushforobserversbeingcertified.Itrequired @ thatobservershavetestingexperienceinthepast.However,requiringNELACcertificationwouldseverelylimitthenumberofobserversthatwouldbeavailable. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` However,ontheotherhand,therearemanyobserverswhoasktestingfirmstodotoo #! manystupidthingsandthereisneedtoimprovethequalityofthesetypesofobservers. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` Thetrainingaspectisveryimportantbecausemanyofthestaffhavenoexperience. `'"% TheStateofNewJerseytrainsnewobserversandpairsthemwithanexperiencedobserverforthefirstyearorso. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` TheStateofFloridaspent$75,000foracontractortoprovidespecializedtraining.  +p&) Inaddition,everyoneinthetestinggroupgoestotheEPA450courseandreceives ,`'* adequatesafetytraining.WebelievethisapproachispreferabletoNELACaccreditation. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Isthereafieldobservationmanualavailable?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` KirkFoster,whowasonthestaffoftheNCAirQualityDivisionformanyyears, `  wroteamanualonconductingopacityobservations.However,ithasnotbeenupdatedforabout10years. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` TheStateofMontanastatedthattheydonothavetheresourcestodothe  p  certification. ` (#` (# Comment:0 ` TheStateofVirginiadevelopedcheckoffsheetsthataretakentothefield.Theseare @  selfguidingandausefultooltothosewithextensivetestingexperience.Inaddition,EPAswebsite(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/uatw/hon/honpg.html#XDsX XX (#X XXXDs)hasinformationfor   inspectorchecklists.CanEPAdevelopinspectioncheckoffsheetswithemphasisonthecriticalaspectsofatest? ` (#` (# Question:0 ` IsEPAdevelopinggascompressorportablemonitorprotocol?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` No,however,EPAisacceptingcommentsonaportablegasanalyzerproposal p developedbyanindustrygroup.ThisproposalcanbefoundontheEMCwebsiteunderconditionaltestmethods(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/ctm.htm). ` (#` (#   0  #XDsX XX #X XXXDs  `NOVEMBER4,1999` #XDsX XX C#X XXXDs   #XDsX XX #X XXXDs`PRESENTATION14`#XDsX XX #X XXXDs   b   ContinuousMonitoringSession  p     U.S.EPAsEvaluationandApplicabilityDeterminationProcessforPMCEMS `  DanBivins,U.S.EPAOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandards  P     r Mr.BivinsexplainedEPAsevaluationofPMCEMS,includinghowdatacanbeusedinthefuture,andwhatisexpectedforPMCEMSinfutureregulations.PMCEMSareexpectedtoreplaceMethod5formeasuringPM2.5.Theymayalsobeusedinthefutureinlieuofopacitylimitsandas P  asurrogatemeasureforHAPmetalcompounds.?|     X X XX X X XX   CurrentEPAworkisdesignedtoaddress @  performancespecificationissues.Atpresent,EPAhascompletedproofofconceptandgatheredinformationfromothertests.Mr.BivinsalsoexplainedGermanysevaluationandapplicabilitydeterminationprocess.InGermany,organizationsevaluateinstrumentsinthelab,makeajudgmentcallonitsapplicabilitytothattypeofsourceandthendeemitusableatthattypeofsourceonly.Thentheorganizationtakesittothefacilityandtestsitforaccuracy,placesasealonitandstatestheinstrumentisapprovedforuseonthissourceatthissite.Incontrast,theU.S.usesperformancespecifications,givingflexibilityofinstrumentstouse. r Mr.BivinsreportedthatEPAcurrentlyhasthreePMCEMSinstalledonacoalfiredboileratapowerplant.PresentresultsindicateasuccessfulcorrelationtestofthethreePMCEMS,butafinalauditisscheduledforDecember.Hestatedadraftreportwillbeavailableinthespring.Inaddition,theDOEisevaluatingatestatanincineratoratOakridgeLaboratories.EliLily&Companyalsoperformedatestlastyearonawetincinerator.Theresultsofthistestindicatedthattheinstrumentsperformedaccordingtotheperformancespecifications. r Mr.BivinscitedthefollowingreasonswhyPMCEMSwouldbeofvaluetoindustry.*c  *cM"0 r   Greatcommunicationtool*cMh݌" r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Alternativetomoreoneroustesting*c ݌#!r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   PEMSdevelopmentsavings*c݌$"r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *cD"0 r   Moreefficientcontroldevicemaintenance*cD_݌% #r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Processoptimizationandresourceconservation*c݌p&!$r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Learnhowtobecomecompliantwithmorestringentairpollutionstandards*c݌`'"%r(#r(# Ќ   r Insummary,Mr.BivinsstatedthecostsforPMCEMSrangefrom$100,000to$200,000.Historically,CEMShaveonlybeenrequiredatlargeindustrialfacilities.PMCEMSareusefultoEPAforcomplianceassurance,asasurrogatemonitorformetalHAPs,andforanalternativetoopacitymonitoring. ,`'* ЇQuestion:0 ` HowmanyStatesrequiretheuseofPMCEMS?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Noneatpresent.` (#` (# Question:0 ` CouldyoutalkmoreabouttheEuropeanexperience?DonttheytreatresultsofPM p CEMSverydifferentlythanwedoforenforcementpurposes? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,theregulatoryagencyhasamorecooperativerelationshipwithindustry.Itis @  notasconfrontationalinEurope.Ifacompanyhasanexceedance,theregulatoryagencymeetswiththemtodeterminewhathappenedandwhyithappenedinsteadofcomingdownhardwithanenforcementaction. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#AnotherdifferencebetweentheEuropeannationsandtheUnitedStatesisthattheyhavecorrectiveactionobligations,reportingobligations,andtestingobligations,butdonthaveautomaticviolationsituations.Theregulatoryagencywilltakecorrectiveactiononlyifcontinuousviolationsarenoted.Inaddition,theytakeamoreactiveapproachtolettingthepublicknowhowthefacilityisoperating.Somecompanieshavelargedisplayboardsoutsidethefacilityshowingcurrentemissions. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` CanPMCEMSbeusedonwetstacks?` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Twotypesofmonitoringequipmentcanbeused.Oneisabetagauge.Itextractsthe ` sampleisokinetically,heatsitup,andplacesthePMonpapertape.RaysarethenshotthroughthetapeforPMdetermination.ThesecondtypeisaSwissinstrumentthatextractsPM,condensesthewateroutandthensucksthegasintoacell.AlightbeamisthenshotatthecellandthereflectedlightbackisanindicationofPM. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Alotofdatathathasbeencollectedindicatethatemissionsarereallycondensables P andnotfilterable.HowwouldthatbeaccommodatedinPMCEMS? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Thatisdefinitelyaconcernatcementkilns.Wewillhavetoseeifthatsaproblem   inthefuture.ThereisstillalottolearnaboutPMCEMS ` (#` (# Question:0 ` HaveyoulookedintoinstallingPMCEMSatInternationalPaper?#!` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Therearealotofvariablestoconsideratawastefuelincinerator.TheIPwastefuel % # incineratorhasmultiplefuelsourceswithasaturatedstack.ItisunderstoodthatchangeinfueltypescanaffectPMCEMSreadings.IPhasactivelylookedforPMCEMS.Theyhavemetwithvendorsbutnoequipmenthaspresentlybeenidentified.IPwouldlovetohaveaPMCEM,butthetechnologyisjustnotthere. @)$'` (#` (#    NewMACTMonitoring  BarrettParker,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenter    r BarrettParkerindicatedthatEPAdevelopedapolicyonFebruary6,1998,toaddressmonitoringrequirementslistedintheMACTrules.EPAfelttheneedtostandardizeorcategorizethewaymonitoringisapproachedintheMACTrules.Inaddition,EPAwishedtostrengthenMACTmonitoringtoassurecontinuouscomplianceinaccordancewiththeCAAA,andtoalsoassistOECAintheircomplianceandassuranceactivities. r Underthenewapproach,dataareusedtodetermine,notindicate,compliancewiththeemissionsoroperatinglimits.Thestandardsmustspecifytheaveragingperiodsandthecalculationprocedures,aswellasQA/QCrequirements,eitherindividuallywithineachstandardorinanappendixoraperformancespecification.QA/QCisparticularlycriticalforCMSandcanbeusedtoidentifytheprocessoperatingconditionsthatshouldoccureitherduringnormaloperationofthefacilityorduringperformancetesting. r Mr.Parkerdiscussedthefourtiersinthetopdownmonitoringselectionprocess,withTierIasthehigheststandard.Thetiersarecharacterizedbythemeansusedinthemeasurementandthetypeofstandardsthetierincludes.TheMACTrulewriterscanconsiderbothtechnicalandeconomicfactors.Forexample,ifthecostsassociatedwithaTierImonitoringapproachistooexpensive,therulecanbewrittentorequireaTierIImonitoringapproach.TierImonitoringisusedinrulesthatcontainanemissionlimitandstatethatCEMSaretobeusedtodetermineongoingcompliance.ArulecontainingTierImonitoringshouldequateanexceedanceoftheemissionlimitasaviolationofthatlimit,althoughexcusedexcursionscanbeidentifiedintherule.TierIImonitoringshouldbeusedforrulesthatcontainanemissionlimitandstatesthatCEMS(orsurrogates)orCPMSaretobeusedfordeterminingongoingcompliance.ArulecontainingTierIImonitoringshouldequateasurrogatepollutantexceedanceordeviationfromanestablishedparameterlevelasanemissionlimitviolation.ExcusedexcursionsarealsoidentifiedinaTierIIrule.TierIIImonitoringshouldbeusedinrulesthatcontainemissionoroperatinglimitsandstatethatCEMSforsurrogateparametersorCPMSareusedtodeterminecompliance.ArulecontainingTierIIImonitoringshouldequateasurrogatepollutantexceedanceordeviationfromanestablishedparameterlevelasaviolationofanoperatinglimit,notanemissionslimit.ExcusedexcursionsarealsoidentifiedinaTierIIIrule.TierIVmonitoringshouldbeusedinrulesthatcontainoperatinglimitsandstatesthatmonitoringisameansforinitiatingcorrectiveaction.ArulecontainingTierIVmonitoringshouldequateafailuretoconductmonitoringortakeactionasaviolationofanoperatinglimit,notanemissionslimit.AllMACTrulesissuedafterFebruary1998aretocontainthesemonitoringrequirements. r Next,Mr.ParkerexaminedthePharmaceuticalMACTstandardwiththetieredmonitoringapproach.ThePharmaceuticalMACTstandardiscodifiedatsubpartGGGof40CFRpart63.ItwaspromulgatedonSeptember21,1998,withthecompliancedatethreeyearsafterpromulgation. ,`'* Theruleaffectsapproximately101facilities,mostlylocatedintheStatesofNewJersey,California,NewYorkandPuertoRico.TheruleisestimatedtoreduceHAPemissionsby24,000TPYwiththemajorityofthereductioncomingfrommethylenechloride,methanolandtoluene.Thestandardsapplytostoragetanks,processvents,equipmentleaksandwastewateroperationsatpharmaceuticalmanufacturingfacilities.Therulecontainsanalternativestandard,whichreliesonCPMS,andthepreamblestatesthatcomplianceisshownthroughcontinuousdirectorparametricmonitoring.Mr.ParkerthenidentifiedthosecontroltechnologiesthatcouldbeusedatpharmaceuticalfacilitiestocomplywiththesubpartGGGregulation.Mr.ParkerstressedthatmanyportionsofthePharmaceuticalMACTarederivedfrompreviouslypromulgatedregulationsaffectingotherindustries.ManyoftheserulespredatedtheFebruary1998policyand,therefore,maynotcomplywiththetieredmonitoringapproach.Mr.Parkerexplainedthatthemonitoringtechniqueswillvaryfromcontroldevicetocontroldeviceandcanincludeconductinginspectionsormeasuringparameterssuchastemperature,pressure,flowrate,flamepresence,BOD,etc. r Mr.ParkerevaluatedthepharmaceuticalMACTwiththerequiredrulecomponentstodeterminewhichmonitoringtiershouldbeintheregulation.TherulecontainsanexplicitcompliancedeterminationstatementandQA/QCrequirementsforinitialcomplianceandforthosemonitorssubjecttopromulgatedperformancespecifications.Thereare,however,noQA/QCrequirementsforflaresandcarbonadsorbers.Theruledoesnotdefinetheprocessoperationforcontinuousoperation,butdoesdefineitforbatchprocessing(thatis,itmustbedoneathypotheticalorworstcaseconditions).Theruledoesdefinetheinitialandongoingaveragingtimesandcontainscompletecalculationsandequations.Therulealsoidentifiesexcusedperiodsforcertainstoragetanksandequipmentleakconditions. r Next,Mr.Parkerexaminedhowwelltheruleimplementedthemonitoringtieringpolicyinitsprovisionsforprocessvents,storagetanks,equipmentleaksandwastewater.Thesecomparisonsareshowninthefollowingtables.  PROCESSVENTS  0 r*fSgddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,$$ ,$$ ,%$$ ,~$$ ,^$$"+  2N   x2&% XX Control AN,!H!"N APollutant/Parameter AN,!H! "N AMonitoringDevice AN,!H!!"N AExceedance/Excursion H!" violationof AN,!$"t#"N ATier ;1'H!$" x N x;#X X%&#+ XX Noncondenser,Non x#% CEMS,Nonalternative  B$& Flowrate,pressuredrop,pH,andtemperatureflamepresence   %\ ) Continuousflowrate,pressuredrop,temperature,andpHmonitors  %&!- Operatinglimit  x#. III #x#/ x x#Condenser  'h"0 Outlettemperature  'h"1 Continuoustemperature  'h"2 Emissionlimit  'h"3 II #'h"4 x x#CEMS  Z(#5 OutletHAP  Z(#6 CEMS  Z(#7 Emissionlimit  Z(#8 I#X X+#&% XX  #Z(#9 x x#AlternativeMethod  )$: OutletTOC,Outlethydrogenhalidesandhalogens  T+&= CEMS  )$> Emissionlimit  )$? II#X X%&#)$@ x    0,'@    STORAGETANKS   *hSidd$$ $$ %$$ %~$$ ~^$$"^fSg(#(#,$$ ,$$ ,$$ ,~$$ ,`$$"+  2N  H2&% XX Control AN,!8"N APollutant/Parameter AN,!8"N AMonitoringDevice AN,!8"N AExceedance/Excursion 8 violationof AN,!"N ATier ;1'8" H N H;#X X%&#+ XX Noncondenser,Non 8 CEMS,Nonalternative    Flowrate,pressuredrop,pH,andtemperatureflamepresence  |   Continuousflowrate,pressuredrop,temperature,andpHmonitors  F  Operatinglimit  8 III #8 H H#Condenser  X  Outlettemperature  X  Continuoustemperature  X  Emissionlimit  X  II #X  H H#CEMS  j  OutletHAP  j  CEMS  j  Emissionlimit  j  I #j  H H#AlternativeMETHOD  |  OutletTOC,Outlethydrogenhalidesandhalogens  `  CEMS  | ! Emissionlimit  | " II #| # H H#Floatingandnonfloatingroof  < % Undefined  "r & Undefined  "r ' Undefined  "r ( NC"r ) H  #X X+|#Kx9 XX #X Xx9k#+ XX #X X+#K  EQUIPMENTLEAKS   * [*jSkdd$$ $$ $$ ~$$ ~`$$"`hSi(#(#,$$ ,$$ ,$$ ,~$$ ,^$$"+  2N + H2+ XX Control AN,!.,"N APollutant/Parameter AN,!.-"N AMonitoringDevice AN,!.."N AExceedance/Excursionviolationof AN,!0"N ATier 7-'.1" H N H7  ӄ  2  VOC   3 Periodicinspectionswithvisual,audibleorolfactorychecksanddetectioninstruments  h7 Undefined   8 NC 9 H0  #X X+#Kx9 XX #X Xx9#K&% XX  r #X X%&/#  Ӏ WASTEWATER  R: ~*lSmdd$$ $$ $$ ~$$ ~^$$"^jSk(#(#,$$ ,$$ ,$$ ,~$$ ,^$$"+  7N" B; H7&% XX Control AN,!:<"N APollutant/Parameter AN,!:="N AMonitoringDevice AN,!:>"N AExceedance/Excursion :? violationof AN,!f@"N ATier @6,:A" H  N H@#X X%&9#+ XX Tanks,Surface :B Improvement,Containers,Individualdrainsystems,andoil/waterseparators  b F Sealintegrity  :G PeriodicVisualInspectionorMeasurementChecks  J Undefined  :K NC #:L H H#BiologicalTreatmentUnit  >"N TSS,BOD,Biomassconcentration  >"P Undefined  t!Q Undefined  t!R NC #t!S H H#EnclosedCombustionDevice  $jU Undefined  P#V Undefined  P#W Undefined  P#X NC #P#Y H H#VaporRecoverySystem  %F![ Undefined  ,%| \ Undefined  ,%| ] Undefined  ,%| ^ NC #,%| _ H H#Incinerator,Boiler,ProcessHeater,CarbonAdsorber,Flare,Scrubber  f)$c Є 'X"d" Undefined  'X"e OperatingLimit  'X"f III #'X"g H H#Condenser  x*%h Є x*%i" Undefined  x*%j OperatingLimit  x*%k IIx*%l H  #X X+$#x9 XX NC=Notclassifiable#X Xx9E# B+&l  +2'm  r Mr.ParkerconcludedthatthepharmaceuticalMACTshouldbegradedasfollowsforitsadherencetotheMACTmonitoringguidanceissuedinFebruary1998.Theprocessventprovisionsreceivean A,storagetanksreceivea C,andequipmentleaksandwastewaterreceiveanincomplete.EMCintendstoplayamoreactiveroleindevelopingmonitoringprovisionsfortheMACTstandardsthatarestillunderdevelopment.Question:0 ` CanyouexplaintheperformancespecificationtoolsinAppendixFandhowthese P  relatetotheseCEMS? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` ManyhaveviewedAppendixFastheendall/beallforCMS.However,notallthe  p  CMSinusetodayareincludedinAppendixF.OneofthetaskscurrentlybeingundertakenbyEMCistowriteaPSforthoseCPMS.TheywillalsoincludeQA/QCforCPMS. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` HaveyougradedthepulpandpaperMACTclusterrule?Noncombustionsources   coveredbythisruleneedtobeexamined. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` No,wehavenotdonethis.` (#` (# Question:0 ` HaveyouthoughtaboutrevisingAppendixFtorequirelinearityongasmonitors  ratherthanjustshootingacoupleofgases?Thenitwouldbeconsistentwiththepart75linearityrequirements. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` EMChasnotconsideredthis,butcould.However,thepart75programisatrading @ programthatrequiresaccuracyacrosstherangeofmeasurementandparts60and63areanemissionsstandardprogramwhereweareconcernedaboutcompliancewithanumber. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` WhendevelopinganewPSforCPMS,areyougoingtotakeintoaccountthehigh @ priorityviolatorpolicy?Forexample,forchromeplaters,thevarianceis5percentoverthetargetrangeforameshpadeliminator.However,thisequatestoa1.0inchpressuredropversusa1.05inchpressuredrop.Thisisaverytightrange,butitisaviolation. ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Yes,theyplantodothis.$"` (#` (#   `'"%    ComplianceAssuranceandTitleVMonitoring  PeterWestlin,EmissionsMeasurementCenter    r PeterWestlindiscussedtheCAMRule,whichwaspromulgatedacoupleofyearsagoin40CFRpart64.Inaddition,hespokeaboutTitleVmonitoringprinciplesandtheguidanceinformationthatisavailable. r Mr.WestlinfirstaddressedtherecentcourtrulingregardingCAM.TheCAMrulewaspromulgatedinOctober1997.ItwasimmediatelylitigatedbytheNaturalResourcesDefenseCouncilandindustry.TheCourtarrivedatitsdecisiononOctober29th,1999.Thefollowingthreeissueswereinvolvedinthelitigation.L bX[\]^_`ai#YL XJ   XJ23  0 r   NRDCclaimedtheCAMruledidnotaddressenhancedmonitoringrequirementsthatappear 0  inthe1990CleanAirAct.XJ݌ r(#r(# Ќ  0 r CourtRuling:0 r(#r(#DisagreedwithNRDC.TheCAMruledoessatisfytherequirementsofthe  Act.  (# (# *c  *c"0 r   ThecompliancecertificationlanguagewasnotsufficienttoaddressthepartoftheActthat  statestheownerandoperatorhastocertifyastowhetherannualcomplianceiscontinuousorintermit.*c݌ r(#r(# Ќ  0 r CourtRuling:0 r(#r(#TheCourtagreedthatthecompliancecertificationlanguagedidnotmeet @ specificlanguageoftheAct.Part70certificationlanguagewillberevisedtosaythatthesourcemustcertifywhethercomplianceiscontinuousorintermittentoverthecourseoftheyear.  (# (# *c  *cB"0 r   Industry,primarilytheutilityindustry,raisedthecredibleevidenceissue.Thecompliance @ certificationlanguageraisesstringencyissuesandmakesregulationsmorestringentthantheywerewhentheywerepromulgated.*cB]݌ r(#r(# Ќ  0 r CourtRuling:0 r(#r(#TheCourtdisagreed.IndustrycantproveanyincidentwhereEPAhas "  raisedthestringencyonanystandard.  (# (#  r Mr.WestlinstatedthemonitoringprinciplesforTitleVandCAMareidentical.Bothweredevelopedprimarilytoraisethelevelofmonitoringforexistingsourcesandtoraisetheattentionpaidtocontroldevices.Itisameanstoensuretheowner/operatorpaysthesamelevelofattentiontothecontroldeviceoperationastheydototheproductionline. r APSEUissubjecttoCAMifitmeetseachofthefollowingapplicabilitycriteria.*c  *cX"0 r   LocatedatamajorsourcesubjecttoTitleV*cXs݌,`'*r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Subjecttoanemissionlimitationandhasacontroldevicetomeetthatlimit*c+݌r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c"0 r   Hasprecontrolemissionsgreaterthanthemajorsourcesizethreshold.*c݌r(#r(# Ќ   r Mr.Westlinexplainedexemptionsarebyruletype,notfacilitytype.ThefollowingruleswereexemptedunderCAMbecausemonitoringundertheserulesissufficienttodemonstratecompliancewithCAM.*c  *c"0 r   Monitoringforacidrainrules*c݌@ r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c= "0 r   Post1990EPArules*c= X ݌0 r(#r(# Ќ  *c  *c "0 r   Ruleswithcontinuouscompliancedeterminationmethods*c  ݌ p r(#r(# Ќ   r TheCAMruledoeshaveoneexemptionforspecificsourcetypesorcontroltypes,whichisformunicipallyownedutilities. r Mr.WestlinthenexplainedtheCAMrequirements.Theowner/operatorcanbuildoncurrentrequirementsandpracticestomeetCAMrequirements.Foreachaddoncontroldevice,thesourceowner/operatorselectsparametersthatarerelatedtothecorrectoperationofthatdevice,(forexample,fireboxtemperatureforanincinerator).Next,indicatorrangesmustbeestablishedforeachoperatingparameter.Testdatashouldthenbeusedtoverifythatindicatorrangesdoprovidereasonableassuranceofcompliancewithaspecifiedemissionlimit. r Mr.Westlinnextdiscussedperiodicmonitoring.HedefinedperiodicmonitoringundertheActasmonitoringthatgeneratesreliabledatarepresentativeofcompliancefortherelevanttimeperiod.PeriodicmonitoringmustbeconductedforeachemissionpointatatitleVmajorsourcethatissubjecttoafederalapplicablerequirement.Federalapplicablerequirementsincludethoseinfederalairregulations,SIPrequirements,andpermittermsresultingfromSIPapprovedprograms.Insomecases,themonitoringintheapplicablerequirementwillsatisfyperiodicmonitoringrequirements;inothers,itmaynotbeadequate.Ifinadequate,thesourcecanbuildonitscurrentmonitoringpracticestomeetperiodicmonitoringrequirements.TheAgencyhasdevelopedguidancetodefineperiodicmonitoringrequirements. r Mr.WestlinstressedthatCAMandperiodicmonitoringrequirementsaremetthroughthetitleVpermit.Theowner/operatormustproposetheCAMandperiodicmonitoringprovisionsthatwillbeincludedinthetitleVpermit.Thisinformationincludesadescriptionofthemonitoring(whatismeasuredandhow),adefinitionofexcursionsfromthemonitoredparameters,andadelineationoftheQA/QCprocedures.Inrarecases,suchasforsomeinsignificantemissionunits,itmaybeappropriatetoproposenoadditionalmonitoring. r Aftertheowner/operatorhassubmittedthepermitapplicationcontainingtheproposedmonitoring,thepermittingauthoritymustdetermineiftheCAMandperiodicmonitoringrequirementsaremet.Thisprocessincludesdecidingwhethertherequirementsofeachapplicable regulationaremet,reviewingrequirementsforunitswithanaddoncontroldevicethatarenot  +p&) subjecttoCAM,determiningiftheproposedmonitoringwillprovideareasonableassuranceofcompliance,anddecidingwhetheranyunitsmaybeexemptfrommonitoring.  r EPAhascompletedaCAMguidancedocumentdescribingtheprocessofhowdevelopingmonitoringconditionsshouldwork.Thedocumentincludesadescriptionoftheruleimplementationprocessandseveralcasestudies.Thesecasestudiesareusefulnotonlytoassistinselectingwhatparametersareimportantforaparticularcontroldevice,butalsotogiveanideaofwhatkindofdatacollectionandanalysisarenecessarytojustifyacertainmonitoringapproach.TheCAMTechnical @  GuidanceDocumentiscurrentlyavailableontheTTNforreviewandcomment.Inaddition,EPA 0  ispreparingaperiodicmonitoringtechnicalreferencedocument.Mr.WestlinstatedthatacompletedocumentwillbepostedonthewebbytheendofNovemberforreviewandcomment.AllcommentsshouldbesentdirectlytoPeterWestlinatWestlin.Peter@epa.gov. r TheStateagencymustmakeitclearthattheyexpectindustrytooperateincompliancewithapplicablerequirementsbymaintainingcontroldeviceoperationswithindesignatedparameterrangesandbyrespondingtoallexcursionswithappropriatecorrectiveaction.HestressedthatitmustbeclearthatallexcursionsmustbereportedtothepermittingauthorityandEPA.Industrymustreportthedurationandnatureofcorrectiveactioninasemiannualreport.Mr.WestlinstatedthateachStateshoulddevelopastandardformatforthesemiannualreportandthecompliancecertificationreport.AstandardformatwillmaketheStatesjobeasierandwillhelptheindustryknowexactlywhattheyneedtoreport.Forcomparisonpurposes,herecommendslookingatthestandardformatEPApreparedforpart71. r Mr.WestlinconcludedhispresentationbydiscussingtheCredibleEvidenceRule.ThisruleisarevisiontofoursectionsoftheCFR(parts51,52,60,and61)thatallowsthesourceoragencytouseinformationotherthancompliancetestmethodstoshowcomplianceorviolationsofapplicablerequirements.Thesesectionswerepromulgatedin1997. r Therewerenoquestionsfollowingthispresentation.  !    `PANELDISCUSSION`   4  ConferenceWrapUpSession  Moderator:FredThompsonPanel:PeterWestlin,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenterDavidMobley,DivisionDirector,EPA,EMAD4  FredBallay,NewJerseyDEP  P   PaulBoys,EPARegion10 @  RobinSegall,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenterBillLamason,EPA,EmissionMeasurementCenter5 Question:0 ` AretherePMtestingormonitoringissuesthatyoufeelEMCshouldaddressthatare P  notbeingaddressed? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` PaulBoysstatedthattheinformationavailablefromthecombinationoflastyears   andthisyearsworkshopwasverythorough.However,theNewJerseypresentationraisedanissuethatneedstobeaddressed.Specifically,resourcesareneededforstacktestobserversandEMCshouldconsolidatematerialsforusebyallStates.Also,EMCcanactasaclearinghouseforstudiesandtestprogramsconductedbyStates(forexample,Method25.3inSCAQMD).EMCshouldassesstheseprogramsandlistthemonthewebsite. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#RobinSegallrespondedthatEMCistryingtopostmethoddevelopmentinformationonthewebsiteandhasdevelopedaschemeforsuchmethods.TheyhaveestablishedcategoriesfromAthroughEandreserveeachcategoryforaspecifictypeofmethod.Forexample,CategoryBisforalternativemethods.CategoriesC,DandEarefortestmethodsforwhichEPAhasvaryinglevelsofconfidence.Forexample,CategoryCisformethodsthatEPAisfairlyconfidentabout,butarenotpromulgatedasEPAmethods. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#FredBallayidentifiedtwoissuesofconcern.ThefirstistoprovidemoreinformationonthevalidityofPEMSdatawhenitisoutsideofthenormalrange.Thesecondissuedealtwithrequeststhattheyreceiveforqualityassuranceofpart60andpart75monitoringsystems.TheycanhandlethisforStateregulations,buttheyneedguidanceforaddressingthisforthefederalregulations. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#DavidMobleystatedthatammoniafromlagoonsatanimalfarmshasbeenabigissuebetweenEPAsOfficeofResearchandDevelopmentandtheStates.Thereisaneedforameasurementmethodtorespondtothechangesinemissions.Also,PM2.5 P(#& fugitiveemissions,especiallyfromagriculturalandconstructionsources,areabigconcern. ` (#` (#    +p&) 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofPennsylvaniaaskedEMCtoissueaguidancedocumentaddressing whenatestcanberejectedinthefieldforMethods15.Theguidancedocumentshouldidentifybothminorandmajorinfractionsandprovideguidanceonhowmanyminorinfractionscanoccurbeforethetestisrejected. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofConnecticutstatedthereshouldbeasessiononQA/QCtechnologiesforCEMS.TheStateofMontanastatedthattheywouldlikethesamethingfororganicsinMethod18;specifically,guidancerecommendingapproachesfordifferentsourcesandtypesofcompounds. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(# ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofNewJerseyrespondedbysayingthataprogramwasavailableontheoldEMCwebsite.Theprogramallowedtheusertoenterdataandreceivearecommendedcollectionandanalyticaltechnique. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#InresponsetothequestionregardingMethod18guidance,RimaDishakjianstatedthatifEMCissuesguidanceitwouldbetoostrictlyinterpretedandwouldactuallyrestricttesters.ShenotedthatStateshaveabetterideaofwhatworksinthefield,butEMCdoesntusuallyhearaboutthesesuccessstories. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#GaryMcAlisterstatedthatEMCiscontinuingtoworkonMethod18issues.OneexampleistheworkbeingconductedbytheNewJerseyInstituteofTechnologythatisdevelopingacontinuousanalyzerforVOCbasedonMethod18principles.Themethodlookspromisingandhasalowdetectablelimitandbetteraccuracy. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#WithrespecttototalVOCsampling,theStateofPennsylvanianotedthattherearecurrentlythreemethodsavailable(25,25Aand25.3),butthateachoftheseisonlyapplicableincertainranges.TheyfeltitwouldbeusefulifMethod25couldbeextendedtoalowerrangeorMethod25.3extendedtoahigherrange.RimaDishakjianrespondedthatshewouldbeinterestedinhearinganyideasonamethodthatwoulddothat.EMChasexaminedthisinthepastandhasnotbeensuccessful. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofNewJerseycommentedthatthetestmethodshouldbeselectedbasedonthepermitlimit.HehasrarelyseenacoatingoperationthatdoesntuseMethod25,however,industryisraisingthedestructionefficiencytogetbelow50ppmsoMethod25A,whichgivesbetterresults,canbeused. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` ArethereproblemsolvingactivitiesforwhichEMCassistancewouldbehelpful?p&!$` (#` (# Answer:0 ` Region10respondedtherearenoissuesatthemoment,butprovidedanexampleof P(#& EMCassistanceinthepast.TheexampleinvolvedanissuewithasubpartYtestattheAleyskaoilterminalinAlaska,whichEMChelpedresolve.PaulBoyssuggestedthatthistypeofassistanceshouldbeincludedintheEMCsstaffperformancestandardsfortheirannualreview.,`'*` (#` (# Ї0 r 0` r(#r(#DavidMobleystatedthattechnicalassistanceisalreadyapartoftheEMCstaffsperformancestandards. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#BillLamasonstatedthistypeoffeedbackishelpfulinassistingwiththeperformancereviews. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofNewJerseyreallyvaluesEMCassistanceandnotedthatEMChasprovidedvaluableassistanceinthepast.HeencouragedalltotrytoworktheproblemfirstandthencallEMCwhenyouhaveexhaustedallotheroptions.NewJerseyalsonotedthattheprotocolreviewaspectoftheprogramcouldbemoreefficientandsomeguidancethatsummarizeseachmethodwouldbehelpful. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#RobinSegallrespondedtothetestprotocolreviewcommentbystatingthataguidancedocumentisavailableontheEMCwebsite.Shesolicitedfeedbackonthisdocumentandwhetherornotitisadequate. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#TheStateofFloridavaluestheassistanceprovidedbyalloftheEMCstaff,specifically,thewebsite,technicalassistanceondifficultproblemsandevaluatingtheeffectivenessofnewtechnologies.ArecentissuethatneedstobeaddressedistherelationshipofPS1tonewopacitymonitoringsystems. ` (#` (# Question:0 ` Arethereanyothermeanstoshareinformationotherthanthroughthewebsiteand ` conferences? ` (#` (# Answer:0 ` PaulBoysofRegion10statedconferencecallsscheduledonaregularbasisanda 0 listingofsuchcallsonthewebsitewouldbeuseful. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#Region9feltthatsatellitebroadcastsarehelpfulandaskedifthiscouldbedoneforotherconferencestoprovideameanstothosewhocouldnotattendtheconferencetohearandseetheproceedings. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#BillLamasonnotedthatemailgroupswhereestablishedafterlastyearsconferenceandaskedifthisshouldbecontinued. ` (#` (# 0 r 0` r(#r(#DavidMobleyclosedtheconferencebyannouncingthatFredThompsonhasbeennamedastheActingGroupLeaderinEMCforthenextyear. ` (#` (# #XDsX XX d#  ,`'* XDsXXDs    @  % APPENDIXA  @ FINALPARTICIPANTLIST  0 #XDsXXXDswU#    h8D8 X XdX Xd8}OJ~@( ( d SourceTestingintheNewRegulatoryWorld 8 @ZZ$dEPAWorkshopII@ dFinalParticipantList@dAlphabeticalbyLastName   &i%XXDs#XDsX%&iW#XXDs.UUUUUU@%%.LaraAutry  U.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-14RTP,NC27711(919)541-5544(919)541-1903 fax   b  autry.lara@epa.govDaveBakerPADEPP.O.Box8468,RCSOBHarrisburg,PA17105-8468(717)772-3936(717)772-2303 fax   baker.dave@dep.state.pa.usFredBallayNJDEPPOBox437,BureauTechServTrenton,NJ08625-0437(609)530-5314(609)530-4504 fax   fballay@dep.state.nj.usYenBaoVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2195(757)518-2123 fax  0" ytbao@deq.state.va.usKirkBatselVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2107(757)518-2123 fax  b%*!* kabatsel@deq.state.va.usChristopherBednarVADEQ4949-ACoxRoadGlenAllen,VA23060(804)507-5046(804)507-5106 fax  +\'2 cabednar@deq.state.va.us t/<+7 MortBenjaminFLDEP7825BaymeadowsWay,Ste200BJacksonville,FL32256-7590(904)448-4510(904)448-4363 fax   b< morton_benjamin@dep.state.fl.usW.QuentinBestMecklenburgCountyGovernment700NorthTryonStreetCharlotte,NC28202(704)3365500(704)3364391 fax  D bestqu@co.mecklenburg.nc.usDanBivinsU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5244(919)541-1039 fax  L bivins.dan@epa.govRobertBivinsNCDAQ910NorthMainStreetMooresville,NC28115(704)663-1699(704)663-7579 fax  0T robert_bivins@mro.enr.state.nc.usJohnBoschU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5583(919)541-1039 fax  b%*!\ bosch.john@epa.govPaulBoysU.S.EPA-RegionXOEA-095,12006thAvenueSeattle,WA98101(206)553-1567(206)553-0119 fax  +\'d boys.paul@epa.gov t/<+i BernardBradyWADeptofEcologyP.O.Box47600Olympia,WA98504-7600(360)407-6803(360)407-6802 fax   bn bbra461@eoy.wa.gov.usPaulBrandlFLDEP2600BlairStoneRd,MS-5510Tallahassee,FL32399-2400(850)921-9510(850)922-6979 fax  v paul.brandl@dep.state.fl.usTroyBreathwaiteVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2006(757)518-2123 fax  ~ tdbreathwa@deq.state.va.usJeromeBrooksVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2174(757)518-2003 fax  0 jabrooks@deq.state.va.usEricBrownSt.LouisAPC1415N13thStreetSt.Louis,MO63110(314)613-7306(314)613-7275 fax  b%*! browne@stlouiscity.comToddBrownOhioEPA122SFrontStLazarusGovCtrColumbus,OH43215(614)644-4839(614)644-3681 fax  +\' todd.brown@epa.state.oh.us -) }OJM }88 }  TedBurnsRIDEM235PromenadeStreetProvidence,RI029085767(401)222-2808(401)222-2017 fax   eburns@dem.state.ri.usHowardCaineU.S.EPA-RegionV77WestJacksonBlvd(AE-17J)Chicago,IL60604(312)353-9685(312)353-8289 fax  H  caine.howard@epa.govAmitChakrabortiNYSDEC50WolfRoadAlbany,NY12233-3254(518)457-7689(518)485-8427 fax  zB axchakra@gw.dec.state.ny.usMikeCiolekU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-4921(919)541-1039 fax  t ciolek.michael@epa.govKarenClavinMTDEQP.O.Box200901Helena,MT59620(406)444-0282(406)444-1499 fax   % kclavin@state.mt.usDaveClineIDEM100N.SenateAve,POBox6015Indianapolis,IN46206(317)233-5668(317)233-6865 fax  '"- dcline@dem.state.in.usWayneCoeADEM1400ColiseumBlvdMontgomery,AL36110(334)271-7861(334)279-3044 fax  B- )5 wec@dem.state.al.us /^+8 TimConnoleADEM2204PerimeterRoadMobile,AL36615(334)450-3400(334)479-2593 fax  = tnc@adem.state.al.usLauraCorlVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2178(757)518-2123 fax  H E ldcorl@deq.state.va.usJamesCourvilleLDEQ7290BluebonnetP.O.Box82135BatonRouge,LA70884(225)765-0168(225)765-0222 fax  @N james_c@deq.state.la.usFostonCurtisU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-1063(919)541-1039 fax  r:V LH%  HLcurtisLH%qjHL.foston@epamail.epa.govDaleDavidsonRAPCA451WestThirdStreetDayton,OH45422(937)225-4435(937)225-3486 fax  !l^ davidsdl@rapca.orgJohnDeGirolamoCTDEP79ElmStreetHartford,CT06106-5127(860)424-3957(860)424-4179 fax  '#f jdegirolamo@dep.state.ct.usCurtisDeMuthVADEQ4949ACoxRoadGlenAllen,VA23060(804)527-5147(804)527-5106 fax  .)n cldemuth@deq.state.va.us /^+p TomDriscollU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-12RTP,NC27711(919)541-5135(919)541-5509 fax  u driscoll.tom@epa.govRimaDishakjianU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-0443(919)541-1039 fax  H } dishakjian.rima@epamail.epa.govDougElleyMODNRP.O.Box176JeffersonCity,MO65102-0176(573)751-4817(573)751-2706 fax  zB nrelled@mail.dnr.state.mo.usJayEvansNCDAQ1641MailServiceCtrRaleigh,NC27699-1641(919)715-7711(919)733-1812 fax  t jay_evans@ncair.netJeanFloydARDEQPOBox1644ElDorado,AR71730-1644(870)862-5941(870)862-3509 fax    floydj@adeq.state.ar.usTomFranklinMTDEQP.O.Box200901Helena,MT59620(406)444-5265(406)444-1499 fax  '" tfranklin@state.mt.usSteveFriendIDEM100N.SenateAvenueIndianapolis,IN46206(317)233-3438(317)233-6865 fax  B- ) sfriend@opn.dem.state.in.us /^+ VickiFuentesNCDAQ3800BarrettDriveRaleigh,NC27611(919)571-4700(919)571-4718 fax   vicki_fuentes@rro.enr.state.nc.usDavidGahrNVDEP555E.Washington,Ste4300LasVegas,NV89101(702)486-2870(702)486-2863 fax  H  MikeGaribaySouthCoastAQMD21865E.CopleyDriveDiamondBar,CA91765(909)396-2249(909)396-2099 fax  | mgaribay@aqmd.govBillGrimleyU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-1065(919)541-1039 fax   grimley.bill@epa.govDanielGrinnellVADEQP.O.Box10009Richmond,VA23240-0009(804)698-4115(804)648-4510 fax   $ dtgrinnell@deq.state.va.usLeeGruberHamiltonCoDOES250WilliamHowardTaftCincinnati,OH45219(513)796-7716(512)796-7778 fax  J&", leroy.gruber@does.hamilton-co.orgStephenHackneyVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2124(757)518-2123 fax  |,D(4 sahackney@deq.state.va.us /^+8 BarryHalcrowVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2184(757)518-2123 fax  = bwhalcrow@deq.state.va.usMikeHarleyFLDEP2600BlairStoneRd,MS-5510Tallahassee,FL32399-2400(850)921-9509(850)922-6979 fax  H E mike.harley@dep.state.fl.usTerryHarrisonU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5233(919)541-1039 fax  zBM harrison.terry@epa.govBobHartleyMEDEP17StateHouseStation,BAQAugusta,ME04333-0017(207)287-2437(207)287-7641 fax  tU robert.w.hartley@state.me.usJeffHegeCityofIndpls-ERMD2700S.BelmontAvenueIndianapolis,IN46221(317)327-2234(317)327-2274 fax   ] jhege@indygov.orgYolandaHernandezMNPCA520LafayetteRoadNSt.Paul,MN551554194(651)282-9886(651)297-8683 fax  '"e yolanda.hernandez@pca.state.mn.usJasonHobbsSCDHEC2600BullStreetColumbia,SC29201(803)898-3844(803)898-4117 fax  B- )m hobbsjd@columb31.dhec.state.sc.us /^+p DavidHughesNCDAQ1641MailServiceCtrRaleigh,NC27699-1641(919)715-2966(919)733-1812 fax  u david_hughes@ncair.netRoyHuntleyU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-14RTP,NC27711(919)541-1060(919)541-1034 fax  H } huntley.roy@epa.govBobJacobsNYSDEC6274EastAvin-LimaRoadAvon,NY14414(716)226-5310(716)226-2909 fax  zB rxjacobs@gw.dec.state.ny.usJohnJayneKYDNR&EPMabryBuildingKentucky32,SouthMorehead,KY40531(606)7846634KarenKajiya-MillsMIDEQ106WAllegan,POBox30260Lansing,MI48909(517)338-4874(517)241-7440 fax    millskd@state.mi.usAnthonyKeelerSCDHEC2600BullStreetColumbia,SC29201(803)898-4303(803)898-4117 fax  H&" keelerav@columb31.dhec.state.sc.usRickKelleyMaricopaCoESD1001NCentralAve,Ste300Phoenix,AZ85004(602)506-6904(602)506-6862 fax  z,B( tkelley@mail.maricopa.gov /\+ RobertKettigNJDEPPOBox437,BureauTechServTrenton,NJ08625-0437(609)530-4041(609)530-4504 fax   rkettig@dep.state.nj.usKevinKiharaHIDoHP.O.Box3378Honolulu,HI96801-3378(808)586-4200(808)586-4359 fax  H  kkihara@eha.health.state.hi.usSusanKilmerMIDEQ106WAllegan,POBox30260Lansing,MI48909(517)373-1874(517)241-7440 fax  zB Kilmers@state.mi.usMichaelKleinNJDEPPOBox437Trenton,NJ08625-0437(609)530-4041(609)530-4504 fax  t mklein@dep.state.nj.usFredKramerAkronRegionalAQMD146S.HighStreet,Ste904Akron,OH44308(330)375-2480(330)375-2402 fax   % frederick_kramer@epa.ohio.govRobertLacailladeVTDEC103SouthMainSt,Bldg3SWaterbury,VT05670-0402(802)241-3852(802)241-2590 fax  '"- robertl@dec.anr.state.vt.usBillLamasonU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5374(919)541-1039 fax  B- )5 lamason.bill@epa.gov /^+8 MaryLeeKnoxCoDAQM400MainStreet,Suite339Knoxville,TN37902(423)215-3239(423)215-4242 fax  = mylee@esper.comJohnLesterVADEQ3019PetersCreekRoadRoanoke,VA24019(540)562-6700(540)562-6725 fax  H E jflester@deq.state.va.usLindaLightfootVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2005(757)518-2123 fax  zBM lklightfoo@deq.state.va.usJohnnieLittleOKDEQ707N.Robinson,P.O.Box1677OklahomaCity,OK73101-1677(405)702-4106(405)702-4101 fax  tU johnnie.little@deqmail.state.ok.usThomasLoganU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-2580(919)541-1039 fax   ] logan.thomas@epa.govThomasLovellCoDPHE4300CherryCreekDriveSDenver,CO80246(303)692-3204(303)782-0278 fax  '"e thomas.lovell@state.co.usGeorgeMarusakU.S.EPA-RegionVI1445RossAvenue,Ste1200Dallas,TX75202-2733(214)665-8366(214)665-7446 fax  B- )m marusak.george@epa.gov /^+p FrankMatulaNJDEPPOBox437,BureauTechServTrenton,NJ08625-0437(609)530-4041(609)530-4504 fax  u fmatula@dep.state.nj.usGaryMcAlisterU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-106F3FG2G(919)541-1039 fax  H } mcalister.gary@epa.govDavidMcNealU.S.EPA-RegionIV61ForsythStSW,SamNunnCtrAtlanta,GA30340(404)562-9102(404)562-9095 fax  zB mcneal.dave@epa.govMargieMearesNCDAQ59WoodfinPlaceAsheville,NC28801(828)251-6208(828)251-6452 fax  t margie.meares@ncmail.netSyedMehdiNYSDEC50WolfRoadAlbany,NY12233-3254(518)457-7689(518)485-8427 fax    smmehdi@gw.dec.state.ny.usDanMeyerU.S.EPA-RegionX1200SixthAvenue,OAQ-107Seattle,WA98101(206)553-4150(206)553-0110 fax  '" meyer.dan@epa.govDavidMobleyU.S.EPAOAQPSMD14RTP,NC27711(919)5414676(919)5412357 fax  B- ) mobley.david@epa.gov /^+ RonMyersU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5407(919)541-1039 fax   myers.ron@epa.govJeffreyNafzigerAZDEQ3033NorthCentralAvenuePhoenix,AZ85012(602)2074493(602)2072366 fax  H  jnafziger@deq.state.az.usAnh-tuanNguyenCityofIndpls-ERMD2700S.BelmontAvenueIndianapolis,IN46221(317)327-2234(317)327-2274 fax  zB tnguyen@indygov.orgCraigNicolVADEQ7705TimberlakeRoadLynchburg,VA24502(804)582-5120(804)582-5125 fax  t crnicol@deq.state.va.usNeilNissimNJDEPPOBox437,BureauTechServTrenton,NJ08625-0437(609)530-4041(609)530-4504 fax   % nnissim@dep.state.nj.usGreggO'NealNCDAQ1641MailServiceCtrRaleigh,NC27699-1641(919)715-0251(919)733-1812 fax  '"- gregg_o'neal@ncair.netCoreyOhmeADEM1400ColiseumBlvdMontgomery,AL36110(384)270-5664(384)279-3044 fax  B- )5 cdo@adem.state.al.us /^+8 ConnieOldhamU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-14RTP,NC27711(919)541-7774(919)541-1903 fax  = oldham.commiesue@epa.govWilliamOsbahrU.S.EPARegionI60WestviewStreetLexington,MA02421(781)8604389(781)8604397 fax  H E osbahr.william@epa.govSamirParekhNCDAQ1641MailServiceCtrRaleigh,NC27699-1641(919)715-0751(919)733-1812 fax  zBM samir_parekh@ncair.netBarrettParkerU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5635(919)541-1039 fax  tU parker.barrett@epa.govMonaPedersenVADEQ7705TimberlakeRoadLynchburg,VA24502(804)582-5120(804)582-5125 fax   ] rnpedersen@deq.state.va.usWadePeeleU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-4945(919)541-1039 fax  '"e peele.wade@epa.govKennethPinzelVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2191(757)518-2123 fax  B- )m kjpinzel@deq.state.va.us /^+p MichaelPjetrajNCDAQ1641MailServiceCtrRaleigh,NC27699-1641(919)733-1469(919)733-1812 fax  u michael_pjetraj@ncair.netDarrellPoffJeffersonCoAPCD850BarrettAvenueLouisville,KY40204(502)574-6009(502)574-5306 fax  H } dpoff@co.jefferson.ky.usN.ScottPostmaU.S.EPA-RegionVII901North5thStreetKansasCity,KS66101(913)551-7048(913)551-8752 fax  zB postma.scott@epa.govPaulRaderWVDEP1558WashingtonStreet,EastCharleston,WV25311(304)558-2472(304)558-3287 fax  t prader@mail.dep.state.wv.usChrisRascherU.S.EPA-RegionIOneCongressSt,Suite1100Boston,MA02203(617)918-1834rascher.chris@epa.govSolomonRicksU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5242(919)541-1039 fax  H&" ricks.solomon@epa.govGeneRileyU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5239(919)541-1039 fax  z,B( riley.gene@epa.gov /\+ DaveRobinettVADEQ4949-ACoxRoadGlenAllen,VA23060(804)527-5098(804)527-5106 fax   dcrobinett@deq.state.va.usRobRussForsythCoEnvAffairs537N.SpruceStreetWinston-Salem,NC27101-1362(336)727-8060(336)727-2777 fax  H  russro@co.forsyth.nc.usGarySaundersNCDAQ1641MailServiceCtrRaleigh,NC27699-1641(919)733-1497(919)733-1812 fax  zB gary_saunders@ncair.netRobertSaundersVADEQ3019PetersCreekRoadRoanoke,VA24019(540)562-6773(540)562-6725 fax  t JohnSchakenbachU.S.EPA401MStreetSWWashington,DC20460(202)564-9158(202)565-2140 fax   $ schakenbach.john@epa.govRobinSegallU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-0893(919)541-1039 fax  J&", segall.robin@epa.govDavidSellersVADEQ5636SouthernBlvdVirginiaBeach,VA23462(757)518-2108(757)518-2123 fax  |,D(4 dnsellers@deq.state.va.us /^+8 GeraldSlucherKYDAQ803SchenkelLaneFrankfort,KY(502)5733382(502)5733787 fax  = jerry.slucher@state.ky.usCandaceSorrellU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-1064(919)541-1039 fax  H E sorrell.candace@epa.govClintSperryU.S.EPA-RegionVII901North5thStreetKansasCity,KS66101(913)551-7057(913)551-8752 fax  zBM sperry.clint@epa.govToddStarnerPADEPP.O.Box8468Harrisburg,PA17105-8468(717)783-9725(717)772-2303 fax  tU starner.todd@dep.state.pa.usJ.J.StrepelisVADEQ4949-ACoxRoadGlenAllen,VA23060(804)527-5020(804)527-5106 fax   ] jjstrepelis@deq.state.va.usDanielStrochakNJDEPPOBox437,BureauTechServTrenton,NJ08625-0437(609)530-4041(609)530-4504 fax  '"e dstrocha@dep.state.nj.usMitchelStrohARDEQ8001NationalDr,POBox8913LittleRock,AR72219-8913(501)682-0769(501)682-0753 fax  B- )m stroh@adeq.state.ar.us /^+p DennisSullivanNYSDEC50WolfRoadAlbany,NY12233-3254(518)457-7689(518)485-8427 fax  u dbsullivan@gw.dec.state.ny.usMikeSundbergNYSDEC232HudsonStreetWarrensburg,NY12885(518)623-3671(518)623-4193 fax  H } mrsundbe@gw.dec.state.ny.usBillSwaffordARDEQ8001NationalDr,POBox8913LittleRock,AR72219-8913(501)682-0746(501)682-0059 fax  zB swafford@adeq.state.ar.usRickSzekeresPADEP400MarketSt(12thFl,RCSOB)Harrisburg,PA17105-8468(717)772-3938(717)772-2303 fax  t szekeres.richard@dep.state.pa.usRichardTaylorGADNR4244Internat'lPkwy,Ste120Atlanta,GA30354(404)363-7128(404)363-7100 fax    ЀHenryThomasU.S.EPAOAQPSMD10RTP,NC27711(919)5415642(919)5412464 fax  J&" thomas.henry@epa.govFredThompsonU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5474(919)541-1039 fax  |,D( thompson.fred@epa.govEEEE /^+ MichaelToneyU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-5247(919)541-1039 fax   toney.michael@epa.govKeithTongORDEQ201WMain,Suite2DMedord,OR97501(541)776-6010(541)776-6262 fax  H  tong.keith@deq.state.or.usStanleyTongU.S.EPA-RegionIX75HawthorneSt(AIR-4)SanFrancisco,CA94116(415)744-1191(415)744-1076 fax  zB tong.stanley@epa.govShannonVogelNCDAQ1641MailServiceCtrRaleigh,NC27699-1641(919)733-1472(919)733-1812 fax  t shannon_vogel@ncair.netMargaretWagnerVADEQ7705TimberlakeRoadLynchburg,VA24502(804)582-5120(804)582-5125 fax   % mowagner@deq.state.va.usRayWaltersNHDESPOBox95,6HazenDriveConcord,NH03302-0095(603)271-6288(603)271-1381 fax  '"- r_walters@des.state.nh.usLarryWebberGADNR4244Internat'lPkwy,Ste120Atlanta,GA30354(404)363-7120(404)363-7100 fax  B- )5 larrywebber@mail.dnr.state.ga.us /^+8 PeterWestlinU.S.EPA-OAQPSMD-19RTP,NC27711(919)541-1058(919)541-1039 fax  = westlin.peter@epamail.epa.govMichaelWheelerNYSDEC6274EAvon-LimaRoadAvon,NY14414(716)226-5318(716)226-2909 fax  H E mswheeler@gw.dec.state.ny.usJeffWinterRESD-AWQD117W.DuvalSt,Suite225Jacksonville,FL32202(904)630-3484(904)630-3638 fax  zBM winter.coj.netHankWrightARDEQP.O.Box428Malvern,AR72104(501)337-0776(501)337-7613 fax  tU ЀPeterYronwodeMODNRP.O.Box176JeffersonCity,MO65102-0176(573)751-4817(573)751-2706 fax   \ nryronp@mail.dnr.state.mo.usYuanZengNYSDEC6274EAvon-LimaRoadAvon,NY14414(716)226-2466(716)226-2909 fax  J&"d yxzeng@gw.dec.state.ny.usGaryZimmermanNYSDECBldg40,SUNYEB%  BEStonyBrook,NY11790-2356(516)444-0205(516)444-0209 fax  |,D(l Ѐ#XDsXX#