WPC "E w昳2LE䫅qT@N7dCW>)ΰH@r-d&1j}i~sǮAb.nfs<- 5ft#qaPvh k>hs Ao \2c)@0RơxnSs7F0qHЉy?DBZ>);&zCh)UӚ #"p,p{ !GOLkYWwRfoFRPi fKJɫ}eӐc",( : D=w(3ibe+4v*Ο *ԥx:I"N Щ]Bޟ¤٤NC&ܴlx.f'ŒRb؊ t\^dYNBAeYhgݭqƐNF4_|G\ 0 0 0P 0 0 0 0 0= 0 0t 0v 0vm 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0) 0< 0N 0aW! 0" 0#U$ 0$U8&EP&UR& 0Jj&U' 0Y' 0%) 07*U&+ 0>+UP, 0Lh, 0- 0>. 09F/ 00M1 0X1 0 (3 04 0b5 0 q6U}7 0_7 08b;e; 0; 0w= 03> 0/P? 0Y A 1cB 1B 1C VD 0<eDDnD BbM#!M %N 1N 0f-OUTONO^ Ow@O45PIP mKPNbP&Q CQ 1uQ 0ceR 1RULOS 0 ST 0T D+dUU 0EUV AYVnVNWfW 0CW 0 W A QhXnXja 0jbfncapcfcacNc Bc D3c B c 0w d BdNdNdNda\d ASeNUefWeaYeNmefoeNqea\sea\eU:+f Befa\fffa\fNga\@gfga\gfgNgfg ikh D3khfhNhfhfha\hbi i jNjjIknIlfttuNvfvvwN>xN@xfBxDxDyfyayyNzfzz{{f;|=|=}=}=} B*} 0A~ 0TG~ 0h~ af0n2Vds9aIf]a_ns$$a•UF֕a\dsxaaaN'a)f=a?U :SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSbfal= g:Technical[5]Technical Document Style..   2(1)3  Ԁ. l= :Technical[6]Technical Document Style..   2(a)3  Ԁ. l:%:Technical[2]Technical Document Style   2A.3  Ԁ   .. l7!:Technical[3]Technical Document Style   21.3  Ԁ   .. l6! ):Technical[4]Technical Document Style   2a.3  Ԁ   .. lE0 D:Technical[1]Technical Document Style    2I.3  Ԁ     .. l<a~:Technical[7]Technical Document Style..   2i)3  Ԁ. l<a:Technical[8]Technical Document Style..   2a)3  Ԁ. V1 8Document[8]Document Style0..8` ..`   V$8Document[4]Document Style..   . V 8Document[6]Document Style8..  V 8Document[5]Document Style0..  V:8Document[2]Document Style   2A.3  Ԁ   V1 8Document[7]Document Style0..0` ..`   z` :Right Par[1]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..  2I.3  Ԁ..0..zs B:Right Par[2]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..  2A.3  Ԁ..0` ..` VJ8Document[3]Document Style..   21.3  Ԁ   z :Right Par[3]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  ..P   21.3  Ԁ` ..` 0 .. z &:Right Par[4]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..   2a.3  Ԁ .. 0..z {j:Right Par[5]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..  2(1)3  Ԁ..0h..hz Ĵ:Right Par[6]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h..  2(a)3  Ԁh..h0..z :Right Par[7]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....  2i)3  Ԁ..0..z :Right Par[8]Right-Aligned Paragraph Numbers..` ..`  .. ..h..h....p..  2a)3  Ԁ..0p..pVc08Document[1]Document Style  @..^    2I.3  Ԁ     Ԉ d.ReportEHPA-Pechan formal reports  &&&- `-A7 (08@A `a :Tab/Fig/RefsEHPA-Formats Tables & Figs & Refs headings   -%2`-     6C' xd6    &&&-+`- %2`+`nQ2ContentsEHPA-Formats Contents heading     - 22-6C' xd6&&&- `-  22_F:Table Title EHPA-Suppresses headers/footers & changes font  XXX- 22- 1 1  XXX- 22-v2FootnoteFootnote for reports (schoolbook)VL (08@HPX!"V-+`-LYF .Run-InRun-In Heading..-$"Du-.-$"Du-"DuII :Helv. Bold 1EHPA-Changes font to Helv. Bold 12XXX-&02`- XXX-&02`- 02`~f"F:2nd tier (1)EHPA-Heading for 2nd-tier sectionXXX- 22-..   ..XXX- 22-`* .BulletEHPA-Bullet (Schoolbook)0.."0..|FF6Table TextEHPA-Formats text in Pechan tables-&02`-&&&- `-~S"F:1st tier (A)EHPA-Heading for 1st-tier sectionXXX- 22-   ..XXX- 22-^`F.SourceEHPA-Sources for tables-&02`-SOURCE:0..-&02`- C2007~Uncontrolled~NO_x~=~[2007~NO_x~emissions]~*~1over{(1~~0.1)}~F:4th tier (i)EHPA-Heading for 4th-tier sectionXXX- 22-.... .. ..XXX- 22-^HQ8ChapterheadEHPA-Chapter title      6C' xd6   - 22-   6C' xd6     - 22-l* 8Bullet ListEHPA-Indented Bullet List0..0..j_F,NotesEHPA-Formats notes below table-&02`-NOTES:0..-&02`-.ResumeEHPA-Pechan staff resume format 09/03/91   -2'\ `-;1P 0 pP0;  '\ `~y"F:3rd tier (a)EHPA-Heading for 3rd-tier sectionXXX- 22-....   ..XXX- 22-jN.LetterEHPA-Pechan letterhead letter#d#   5      A7X`hp x  pA&&&- `-      ..h..h..p ..p  .. x ..x  .. ...... .. ..p..p  "US ,  6 !  Page EQ:Appendix CovEHPA-Formats text for appendix cover sheet  6C' xd6   - 22-   6C' xd6     - 22-l^F *NoteEHPA-For single note below table-%2`-NOTE:0..-%2`-dI 0SourcesEHPA-Formats references at bottom of table-%2`- SOURCES:0 .. -%2`- _F8Table TitleEHPA-Formats table titles in Pechan reports  XXX- 22- 1 1  XXX- 22-dQ 6ReferencesEHPA-Pechan references  &&&- `-0....&  ..'    &&&- `-   A_ekqwDocumentDocument StyleI.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a) CRight ParRight-Aligned Paragraph NumbersI.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a) Cu{TechnicalTechnical Document StyleI.A.1.a.(1)(a)i)a)@1($0 #|x `&&U PyQ&P%2`  v2PkQ P+`&o P'C&P22 2p}wC 22X:x2p}wCX+`e P['CP"DuPDupQ02`X:s2PkCXP02``2PkCP02`|M2PkCP%2`J2PkQP'\ ` a\  PC P%2`;2PkQP dHP LaserJet 5MP,,,,,,0H%(5hCEKQW]cioAutoList11.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.(>8$HX?XXXH&W%X X?.)Z<Century Schoolbook RegularS )  DDDDEK(z U RICEs NSCR SCR LEC SCCs EGU tpd FIPSHibbardOAQPSregionwiderulemakingVatavuk CRFDivitaLyckan E.H.NeufferCogeneration JWAguilar d##37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)(;3$2#  0  .3  0   EhCEKQW]cioAutoList21.1.1.1.1.1.1.1.+`4New Century Schoolbook(Y26c$ G8!H%u%%H%H&u%%H%u  ݃ Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5(Z3$ G8!H%u%%H%H&u%%H%u  'dxd Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5($ (    ) ZX[YM << deUU+`4New Century Schoolbook&o P['C&P($     (Y26c$ G8!H%u%%H%H&u%%H%u  WaX`YC<< c+`4New Century Schoolbook&o P['C&P%2`Century Schoolbook  v2PkQ P22AArialBoldTToolbook 2p}wC 22AArialBoldTToolbookX:x2p}wCX+`lBoldTToolbooke P['CP"DulBoldTToolbookPDupQ02`lBoldTToolbookX:s2PkCXP02`lBoldTToolbook`2PkCP02A`ArialTT Schoolbook|M2PkCP%2`lTT SchoolbookJ2PkQP'\ `lTTTToolbook a\  PC P%2A`ArialTTTToolbook;2PkQP%2`lTTTToolbook;2PkQP V6c(H%+%%H%H&+%%H%+  _bWGCz|X   p  @ H@EX   X  rII$1EHPA-Changes type to Helv. Bold 10 pt.-%2`- -%2`- Table_ATABLE A dkkkk'dxdd@ (Ou$0  2#  a  .3  0` ..( (d\Table_A!PRINT_AREA '<PRINT RANGE> XM -, dcTable_A\Table_A!PRINT_AREA '<PRINT RANGE> \Table_A!PRINT_AREA '<PRINT RANGE> -FAZ"Arial Regular  d\Table_A!PRINT_AREA'<PRINT RANGE>\Table_A!PRINT_AREA '<PRINT RANGE> \Table_A!PRINT_AREA '<PRINT RANGE> \Table_A!PRINT_AREA '<PRINT RANGE>  CCCCU ReportAb8  Q CCCC'dxd\Table_A!PRINT_AREA '<PRINT RANGE> A-  V6c(H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _bWGCz|X   p  @ H@EX   X   a6c"H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _@| | | A  3   a6c"H%+%%H%H&+%%H%+  _@   15   V6c(H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _bWGCz|X   p  @ H@EX   X  ߫+`4New Century Schoolbook&o P['C&P%2`Century Schoolbook  v2PkQ P22AArialBoldTToolbook 2p}wC 22AArialBoldTToolbookX:x2p}wCX+`lBoldTToolbooke P['CP"DulBoldTToolbookPDupQ02`lBoldTToolbookX:s2PkCXP02`lBoldTToolbook`2PkCP02A`ArialTT Schoolbook|M2PkCP%2`lTT SchoolbookJ2PkQP'\ `lTTTToolbook a\  PC P%2A`ArialTTTToolbook;2PkQP%2`lTTTToolbook;2PkQP V6c(H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _bWGCz|X   p  @ H@EX   X   a6c"H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _@| | | A  4   V6c(H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _bWGCz|X   p  @ H@EX   X   a6c"H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _@| | | A  5   V6c(H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _bWGCz|X   p  @ H@EX   X   a6c"H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _@| | | A  6  Table_A a6c"H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _@| | | A  2   V6c(H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _bWGCz|X   p  @ H@EX   X   a6c"H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _@| | | A  7   V6c(H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _bWGCz|X   p  @ H@EX   X   a6c"H%^%%H%H&^%%H%^  _@| | | A  8  &0 d d(Vm$0   (,z$0  0` ..  (@$0  0` ..0 ` .` . `  Table_A+`4New Century Schoolbook&o P['C&P%2`Century Schoolbook  v2PkQ P22AArialBoldTToolbook 2p}wC 22AArialBoldTToolbookX:x2p}wCX+`lBoldTToolbooke P['CP"DulBoldTToolbookPDupQ02`lBoldTToolbookX:s2PkCXP02`lBoldTToolbook`2PkCP02A`ArialTT Schoolbook|M2PkCP%2`lTT SchoolbookJ2PkQP'\ `lTTTToolbook a\  PC P%2A`ArialTTTToolbook;2PkQP%2`lTTTToolbook;2PkQP V6c(H%+%%H%H&+%%H%+  _bWGCz|X   p @ H@EX   X   L2007~PostControl~NO_x~=~[2007~Uncontrolled~NO_x]~*~(1~~control~efficiency)!"%%i2007%%iPost%%fi%%iControl%%iNOnn0x%%Yi%% i[%%U i2007%%= i Uncontrolled%%iNOnn0x%%Fi]%%i%%i(%%i1%%i%%Dicontrol%%i efficiency%%i) a6c"H%+%%H%H&+%%H%+  _@   8  TABLE CkTABLE B+`4New Century Schoolbook&o P['C&P%2`Century Schoolbook  v2PkQ P22AArialBoldTToolbook 2p}wC 22AArialBoldTToolbookX:x2p}wCX+`lBoldTToolbooke P['CP"DulBoldTToolbookPDupQ02`lBoldTToolbookX:s2PkCXP02`lBoldTToolbook`2PkCP02A`ArialTT Schoolbook|M2PkCP%2`lTT SchoolbookJ2PkQP'\ `lTTTToolbook a\  PC P%2A`ArialTTTToolbook;2PkQP%2`lTTTToolbook;2PkQP V6c(H%+%%H%H&+%%H%+  _bWGCz|X   p @ H@EX   X   a6c"H%+%%H%H&+%%H%+  _@   13  Table_A/ Z.Benguiat Bk BT Book\Table_A!PRINT_AREA$ '<PRINT RANGE>$ !"%%2007%% Uncontrolled%%NOnnx%%]%% [%%Y 2007%%A NOnnl x%% emissions%%.]%%k% %%C1%%>(%%>1%%>%%N>0%%>.%%>1%%N>)Table_ATable_ATable_ATable_ATable_A,  AZ"Arial RegularB- tcTABLE D G8!H%+%%H%H&+%%H%+  _June7,2000Mr.LarrySorrelsMD15U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyResearchTrianglePark,NC27711SUBJECT:0 ` EPAContractNo.68D98052,WA232F ` (#` (#    ` FinalReportDearLarry:Afinalreportisenclosedwiththeresultsoftheanalysisofreciprocatinginternalcombustionenginecosts.Thisisinpartialfulfillmentoftherequirementsofthesubjectworkassignment.Pleasecallmeatextension164withanyquestionsaboutthisanalysis.Sincerely,FrankDivitaFD/dawEnclosurecc:0  NancyRiley(MD15),"|"(#(#   W._Newby_Ԁ(MD33)  P.Crump  $ % X_   H&+%%H&+&Q%%H&+K7 (08@XK    (< T$T$(33   &Q%%&QU&+%%&QK7 (08@K  UO%U&+ (UOE.H.Pechan&Associates,Inc.    5528BHempsteadWaySpringfield,VA221517038136700telephone7038136729facsimile3622LyckanParkwaySuite2002Durham,NC277079194933144telephone9194933182facsimileP.O.Box1575ShingleSprings,CA956825306720441telephone&facsimile "'r") #&g %(4#/  %&g NOxEmissionsControl V+ CostsforStationaryReciprocatingInternalCombustionEnginesintheNOxSIPCallStates  / RevisedFinalReport   2 HM: /#H&+%HM: #HO%H&+Preparedfor: Q: InnovativeStrategiesandEconomicsGroupOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandardsU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyResearchTrianglePark,NC27711Preparedby:ThePechanAvantiGroupaunitofE.H.Pechan&Associates,Inc.5528BHempsteadWaySpringfield,VA22151August11,2000EPAContractNo.68D98052WorkAssignment232PechanRpt.No.00.08.001/9004.232#H&+%HOL# +&O (< (  {,'O #&g %%H&+ #H&+% %&g33   8+&%d&&d8  H !%H&+  !!H   CONTENTSj G  ?C' xdE3x? 4    &%! H&+%% &      Page  c       TABLES""I(#.iv  o CHAPTERI INTRODUCTION""J(#. 1   CHAPTERII UNIVERSEOFUNITS""J(#. 3 S  CHAPTERIII CONTROLCOSTMODELINGMETHODS""J(#.'5 = CHAPTERIV RESULTS\"\"I(#.**11  CHAPTERV CAVEATSANDUNCERTAINTIES\"\"I(#.#23 !q REFERENCES\"\"I(#. 25 - APPENDIXA DETAILEDCONTROLCOSTWORKSHEETS""H(#.FF*A1 w APPENDIXB SOURCECLASSIFICATIONCODESAFFECTEDBYTHENOxSIPCALL""H(#.BB1 a     ? H !%H&+ ,!!H       TABLESvG   ?C' xdE3x? 4     &C%! ,H&+%%&C     Page      ?   II10  Summaryof2007MajorRICEEngineEmissionsbyState#""J(#.D(#(##4   III10  ImplicitPriceDeflators#""J(#.ff((#(##6 a  III20  LowEmissionCombustionCostComponentsforLeanBurnRICEs#""J(#.K(#(##8 ?   III30  EmploymentCostIndices#""J(#.'(#(##9 m  III40  UnitCostsforRICEAnalysis#\"\"I(#.^^,(#(##10 K  IV10  ReciprocatingICEngineCostAnalysisSummary#\"\"I(#.=(#(##13 )  IV20  MainAnalysisandScenarioDescription#\"\"I(#.6(#(##14   IV30  ControlMeasureSummaryMainAnalysisandScenarioResults#\"\"I(#.TTL(#(##15   IV40  StateSummaryScearnionarioAMainAnalysis񀄀ScenarioA#\"\"I(#.:(#(##16 s  IV50  StateSummaryScenarioBControlEfficiency=82%#\"\"I(#.E(#(##17 Q IV60  StateSummaryScenarioCControlEfficiency=91%#\"\"I(#.E(#(##18 / IV70  StateSummaryScenarioDUncontrolledNOx=13.7g/bhphr#\"\"I(#.M(#(##19  ] IV80  StateSummaryScenarioE ; ControlLevel=1.2g/bhphr#\"\"I(#.I(#(##20 ; IV90  StateSummaryScenarioF񀄀  AnnualHours=6,500#\"\"I(#.A(#(##21  IV100  StateSummaryScenarioG񀄀  PreviousCapitalCostValues#\"\"I(#.I(#(##22   2   .      ?C' xdEx?  H !%H&+  !!H     CHAPTERI  INTRODUCTION.cG *?C' xdEb x? c     &%! H&+%% &    OnSeptember24,1998,theU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(EPA)  F Administratorsignedthefinaloxidesofnitrogen(NOx)StateImplementationPlan(SIP)  $  Call,arulethatcalledforNOxemissionreductionsfrompointsourcesin22EasternStates    andtheDistrictofColumbia(DC)(theSIPCallregion).Amongthetypeofsourcespotentiallycoveredbythisrulearestationaryreciprocatinginternalcombustionengines(RICE),whicharealargecontributorofNOxemissionsintheSIPCallregion.OnMay24, L  1999,theDCCircuitCourtofAppealsissuedastayonfurtherimplementationoftheNOx *z  SIPCall,andagreedtohearmotionsfromvariouspartiesopposedtoimplementationoftheNOxSIPCall.OnMarch3,2000,athreejudgepanelupheldmostoftheSIPCall 6 provisions.Thispanelruled,however,thatEPAdidnotprovideadequatenoticeofthefinalcontrollevelforRICEsourcesthatEPAdeemedhighlycosteffective.Inresponsetothisruling,theEPAwillreproposethepartoftheNOxSIPCallparticulartoRICE  sourcesintheaffectedStatesinordertoprovideadequatenoticetothepublic.  ThedataandresultsprovidedinthisreportupdateapreviousreportofthesamenameanddatedJune97,2000.TheupdatesincludeincorporatingRICEfromVirginiaandWestVirginia,andmodifyingathefuelpenaltyestimateforleanburnengines.  Theanalysisincludedinthisreportcontainscontrolcostestimatesassociatedwiththeprovisionsofthereproposal.ThisanalysisshowsthatNOxemissionreductionsforthe p large,affectedRICEsundertheNOxSIPCallareexpectedtocost$532perton,onaverage. N NOxemissionswithinthecontrolregionareexpectedtobereducedbyabout53,000tons ,| per5monthozoneseasonin2007fromwhattheywouldotherwisebewithoutthisprogram.ExpectedtotalannualcostsforRICENOxcontrolsundertheNOxSIPCallare 8 $28million.  ThisreportprovidesinformationabouttheuniverseofpotentiallyaffectedstationaryRICEs,controlcostmodelingmethods,scenarioanalyses,andcaveatsanduncertaintiesassociatedwiththisanalysis.ChapterIIdescribestheuniverseofpotentiallyaffectedRICEs.ControlcostmodelingmethodsaredescribedinChapterIII.AnalysisresultsforthebaselineanalysisandsensitivityanalysesarepresentedinChapterIV.ChapterVdescribessomeoftheimportantcaveatsanduncertaintiesinthisanalysis.  AllcostresultspresentedinChapterIVofthisreportareexpressedin1990dollars.Wherecontrolcostequationslistedinthisreportareexpressedinyeardollarsotherthan1990,thatisnotedintheapplicabletable.A7percentdiscountratewasusedtoexpresscapitalcostsasannualequivalents.Thechoiceofthe7percentdiscountrateisbasedonguidancefromtheOfficeofManagementandBudget(OMB).  ,:(.A . i       ?C' xdEx?  H !%H&+  !!H     CHAPTERII  UNIVERSEOFUNITS.)G )?C' xdEb x? c     &%! H&+%% &    StationaryRICEsgenerateelectricpower,pumpgasorotherfluids,orcompressairfor  F machinery.Theprimarynonutilityapplicationofinternalcombustion(IC)enginesisinthenaturalgasindustrytopowercompressorsusedforpipelinetransportation,fieldgathering(collectinggasfromwells),undergroundstoragetanks,andingasprocessingplants.RICEsareseparatedintothreedesignclasses:2cycle(stroke)leanburn,4strokeleanburn,and4strokerichburn.Eachofthesehavedesigndifferencesthataffectbothbaselineemissionsaswellasthepotentialforemissionscontrol.  TableII1presentsinformationabouttheprojected2007largeRICEpopulationintheNOxSIPCallcontrolregion.ThelistofICenginesandNOxestimatesusedinthisanalysis  weresuppliedtoThePechanAvantiGroup(PechanAvanti)byEPAintwoLotusspreadsheetsnamedlrge200b.123onMay19,2000,andice32vawv.xlsonAugust2,2000.TheselistsincludethelargeRICEsintheentireStatesofIllinois,Indiana,Kentucky,Maryland,Massachusetts,NewYork,NorthCarolina,Ohio,Pennsylvania,SouthCarolina,Tennessee,Alabama,Georgia,Michigan,Missouri,Virginia,andWestVirginia.Itshouldbenotedthat4ofthe201enginesincludedintheanalysisareinthecoarsegrid.Forthisanalysis,alargeRICEwasdefinedashavingemissionsgreaterthanorequalto1tonperday(tpd)in1995(thebaseyearoftheanalysis).  TableII1liststhenumberoflargeRICEs(units)ineachState,andtheirrespectiveNOxemissionsexpressedindailyand5monthozoneseasonterms.Theaveragelarge N RICEemitsabout2tpd,andthisvaluedoesnotvarymuchfromStatetoState.AlabamaistheonlyStateinthecontrolregionwithmorethan10,000tonsofNOxfromlargeRICEs  Z inthe5monthozoneseason.ThirteenStateshaveozoneseasonNOxemissionsfromRICE 8 enginesintherangebetween1,000and10,000tons.StatesinthecontrolregionwithnoaffectedenginesareConnecticut,NewJersey,RhodeIsland,DC,andWisconsin.Combined,theseRICEsareestimatedtocontributetomorethan60,000tonsofNOx "" emissionsduringthe20075monthozoneseason.  Thereare67establishments(facilitiesorplants)withlargeaffectedRICEsinthecontrolregion,asnotedinTableII1.NoStatehasmorethan9establishments.  &("' :  HXX%H&+ X&XXHX 1?  TableII1  Summaryof2007MajorRICEEngineEmissionsbyState:35G 1?5   &%X X&H&+%% &  )H%H&+&H  *Cddd Xdd Xdd X(#(#,(,x,SU,SU,S5,S(U+  <CC+ ^ ,<_FIPs_State LCC;' n"CC LState LCC;' n CC L#ofEstablishments LCC;' n "CC L#ofRICE LCC;' n"CC LOzone  SeasonNOx T  (tons/5months) LCC;' n"CC LOzoneSeason  DailyNOx T  (tpd) ]S2 n" , CC ,]01 E;' d" EAlabama dZ' d  @4@d_4_Ԉ zF dU  @4 @  @@32@@_32_Ԉ G dU  @@32 @@ vq d@ 11977.1254Pvq d@_11,977_Ԉ O dUP vq d@ 11977.1254 vq d@  S@78.2818 S@_78.3_ xW dU  S@78.2818 ,  S@ ,13 E;' Z" EGeorgia dZ' Z  @2@d_2_Ԉ zF ZU  @2 @  &@11&@_11_Ԉ G Z U  &@11 &@  $(~ѱ@ 4561.1113P $(~ѱ@_4,561_Ԉ N Z!UP  $(~ѱ@ 4561.1113  $(~ѱ@ >W[=@29.8113>W[=@_29.8_ xW Z"U >W[=@29.8113 , >W[=@ ,17 E;' P#" EIllinois dZ' P$  "@9"@d_9_Ԉ zF P%U  "@9 "@  <@28<@_28_Ԉ G P&U  <@28 <@ 47@ 6647.0321P47@_6,647_Ԉ N P'UP 47@ 6647.0321 47@ {E@43.4449{E@_43.4_ xW P(U {E@43.4449 , {E@ ,18 E;' F )" EIndiana dZ' F *  @6@d_6_Ԉ zF F +U  @6 @  1@171@_17_Ԉ G F ,U  1@17 1@ 2ıN@ 5198.9324P2ıN@_5,199_Ԉ N F -UP 2ıN@ 5198.9324 2ıN@ Af@@33.9797Af@@_34.0_ xW F .U Af@@33.9797 , Af@@ ,21 E;'< /" EKentucky dZ'< 0  @6@d_6_Ԉ zF< 1U  @6 @  $@10$@_10_Ԉ G< 2U  $@10 $@ U}@ 3082.5053PU}@_3,083_Ԉ N< 3UP U}@ 3082.5053 U}@ gDio%4@20.1482gDio%4@_20.1_ xW< 4U gDio%4@20.1482 , gDio%4@ ,24 E;'2 5" EMaryland dZ'2 6  @2@d_2_Ԉ yF2 7U  @2 @  @3@_3_Ԉ F2 8U  @3 @ x&1 @609.399Px&1 @_609_Ԉ L2 9UP x&1 @609.399 x&1 @ w/@3.983w/@_4.0_ vU2 :U w/@3.983 , w/@ ,25 E;'( ;" EMassachusetts dZ'( <  ?1?d_1_Ԉ yF( =U  ?1 ?  @4@_4_Ԉ F( >U  @4 @ 7A`%@932.737P7A`%@_933_Ԉ L( ?UP 7A`%@932.737 7A`%@ Pkwb@6.0963Pkwb@_6.1_ wV( @U Pkwb@6.0963 , Pkwb@ ,26 E;' A" EMichigan dZ' B  @3@d_3_Ԉ yF CU  @3 @  @6@_6_Ԉ F DU  @6 @ -/@ 1601.0465P-/@_1,601_Ԉ N EUP -/@ 1601.0465 -/@ =U$@10.4642=U$@_10.5_ xW FU =U$@10.4642 , =U$@ ,29 E;'G" EMissouri dZ'H  @4@d_4_Ԉ yFIU  @4 @  @5@_5_Ԉ FJU  @5 @ ~{@ 1400.8706P~{@_1,401_Ԉ NKUP ~{@ 1400.8706 ~{@ Zd;O"@9.156Zd;O"@_9.2_ vULU Zd;O"@9.156 , Zd;O"@ ,36 E;' M" ENewYork dZ' N  @2@d_2_Ԉ yF OU  @2 @  @2@_2_Ԉ F PU  @2 @ V-z@417.231PV-z@_417_Ԉ L QUP V-z@417.231 V-z@ 8A`@2.7278A`@_2.7_ vU RU 8A`@2.727 , 8A`@ ,37 E;'S" ENorthCarolina dZ'T  @3@d_3_Ԉ zFUU  @3 @  (@12(@_12_Ԉ GVU  (@12 (@ b4o@ 3274.7172Pb4o@_3,275_Ԉ NWUP b4o@ 3274.7172 b4o@ Kg5@21.4035Kg5@_21.4_ xWXU Kg5@21.4035 , Kg5@ ,39 E;'Y" EOhio dZ'Z  @5@d_5_Ԉ zF[U  @5 @  (@12(@_12_Ԉ G\U  (@12 (@ Pn@3328.911PPn@_3,329_Ԉ M]UP Pn@3328.911 Pn@ R5@21.7575R5@_21.8_ xW^U R5@21.7575 , R5@ ,42 E;'_" EPennsylvania dZ'`  @6@d_6_Ԉ zFaU  @6 @  .@15.@_15_Ԉ GbU  .@15 .@ ܵ@ 4093.3057Pܵ@_4,093_Ԉ NcUP ܵ@ 4093.3057 ܵ@ {:@26.7537{:@_26.8_ xWdU {:@26.7537 , {:@ ,45 E;'e" ESouthCarolina dZ'f  ?1?d_1_Ԉ zFgU  ?1 ?  (@12(@_12_Ԉ GhU  (@12 (@ ٬@ 4890.5507P٬@_4,891_Ԉ NiUP ٬@ 4890.5507 ٬@ ͪ?@31.9642ͪ?@_32.0_ xWjU ͪ?@31.9642 , ͪ?@ ,47 E;'k" ETennessee dZ'l  @5@d_5_Ԉ yFmU  @5 @   @8 @_8_Ԉ FnU   @8  @ xF@ 3012.6385PxF@_3,013_Ԉ NoUP xF@ 3012.6385 xF@ ( 3@19.6904( 3@_19.7_ xWpU ( 3@19.6904 , ( 3@ ,51 E;'~q" EVirginia dZ'~r  @4@d_4_Ԉ zF~sU  @4 @  1@171@_17_Ԉ G~tU  1@17 1@ Stٯ@ 4076.8837PStٯ@_4,077_Ԉ N~uUP Stٯ@ 4076.8837 Stٯ@ gs:@26.6463gs:@_26.6_ xW~vU gs:@26.6463 , gs:@ ,54 E;'tw" EWestVirginia dZ'tx  @4@d_4_Ԉ yFtyU  @4 @  @7@_7_Ԉ FtzU  @7 @ Y8E2@ 1100.5682PY8E2@_1,101_Ԉ Nt{UP Y8E2@ 1100.5682 Y8E2@ gDio@7.1933gDio@_7.2_ CCqVt|U gDio@7.1933 , gDio@ , FCC5!j}"CC FTotal lCC['j~CC  P@67P@l_67_Ԉ CC|GjU  P@67 P@CC  i@201 i@_201_Ԉ CCHjU  i@201  i@CC +ee@ 60205.5656P+ee@_60,206_Ԉ CCOjUP +ee@ 60205.5656 +ee@CC &Sx@393.5013&Sx@_393.5_h^\jU &Sx@393.5013 ,  &Sx@CC h)6&&C%&H&+%%&&C   4 .      ?C' xdEx?  H !%H&+  !!H     CHAPTERIII  CONTROLCOSTMODELINGMETHODS.xG Yy?C' xdEb x? c     &%! H&+%% &    NOxcontrolsappliedtoRICEsinthisanalysiswerelowemissioncombustion(LEC)  F appliedtoleanburngasfiredengines,nonselectivecatalyticreduction(NSCR)appliedtorichburngasfiredengines,andselectivecatalyticreduction(SCR)appliedtooilfiredengines.Thebaselinecontrolassumptionsforeachtechnologyare87percentNOx   reductionforLEC,90percentforNSCR,and90percentforSCR.  Eachcontrolcostreferencedocumentreportscontrolcostsinspecificyeardollars.TheEPAAlternativeControlTechniques(ACT)documentforRICEsreportscostsin1993dollars.ThecapitalcostestimatesforLECthatwereusedinthisanalysisforcontrollingNOxfromleanburngasfiredenginesarereportedin1999dollars.Allcostswere  convertedto1990dollarsusingNationalIncomeandProductAccountsgrossdomesticproductimplicitpricedeflatorindexfromtheSourceofCurrentBusiness(DOC,1999),asshowninTableIII1.EachEPAACTdocumentcontainsinformationaboutinterestratesandtheexpectedlifetimeofeachcontroltechnique.Inestimatingcontrolcostsforthisanalysis,thelifetimefromtheACTdocumentwasused,anda7percentdiscountrate.TheestimatedequipmentlifetimeforICenginecontrolsis15years.  IntheSeptember1998analysis(PechanAvanti,1998),itwasassumedthatallgasfiredengineswereleanburn(becausetheSourceClassificationCodes[SCCs]didnotdistinguishleanandrichburn).Thisanalysisassumestwothirdsofgasfiredenginesareleanburn,whileonethirdarerichburn.ThisprovidesamoreaccurateassessmentofexpectedcontrolcostsforRICEsthanintheSeptember1998NOxSIPCallcostreport ,| (PechanAvanti,1998),whereallgasfiredengineswereassumedtobeleanburn.AsmoreStatessubmitpointsourcedatausingSCCsthatdistinguishleanfromrichburnengines,moresophisticatedanalysescanbeperformed.  Controlcostsareestimatedinthisanalysisusinganozoneseasoncostperton.Forcontrolsthatoperateyearround,likeLEC,theozoneseasoncostpertonisthetotalannualizedcost(with100percentofbothcapitalandoperatingcost)dividedbytheozoneseason(5month)tonsreduced.ForSCRandNSCR,onlyfivemonthsoftheoperatingcostiscountedincomputingthetotalannualizedcost.  Theestimatesof1995and2007NOxemissionsforthe(large)ICenginesaffectedby '#( theNOxSIPCallwerereceivedinanEPAdatabase.Mostoftheunitsinthisdatabase (#) hadazeroforNOxcontrolefficiency.NoneofthenonzeroNOxcontrolefficiencieswere r)$* morethan15percent.Therefore,itwasdeterminedthatanyoftheexistingcontrolsinplacewouldnotaffecttheperformanceofthecontroloptionsneededtomeettheNOxSIP .+~&, Callrequirements.Therefore,whenSCR,atan80percentcontrollevel,wasappliedtoanoilfiredICengine,andthatenginehada10percentefficientcontrolin1995,theNOx ,:(. emissionsandemissionreductionswerecomputedas:  -)/A :  HXX%H&+ X&XXHX 1?  TableIII1  ImplicitPriceDeflators:G 1?߇   &%X X&H&+%% &  )H%H&+H  *hCi dd(xxSUSSUSS5SS(USC(#(#,dd ,dd, dd +  )CC ^ )Year @CC/!CC @  GrossDomesticProduct @CC/! CC @Conversionto1990Dollars RH!"CC @1990@R1990 uk: p @1990 @ W@92.00W@u92.00 uD p U W@92.00 W@ ?1.000?1.000 ukD p " ?1.000 ? @1991@u1991 uk:~   @1991 @ zGX@96.27zGX@u96.27 uD~  U zGX@96.27 zGX@ (\?0.955(\?0.955 ukD~  " (\?0.955 (\?  @1992 @u1992 uk: ,  @1992  @ QX@99.13QX@u99.13 uD ,U QX@99.13 QX@ V-?0.928V-?0.928 ukD ," V-?0.928 V-? $@1993$@u1993 vl::  $@1993 $@ (\uY@101.84(\uY@v101.84 vE: U (\uY@101.84 (\uY@ L7A`?0.903L7A`?0.903 ukD: " L7A`?0.903 L7A`? (@1994(@u1994 vl:  (@1994 (@ QZ@104.13QZ@v104.13 vE U QZ@104.13 QZ@ }?5^I?0.884}?5^I?0.884 ukD " }?5^I?0.884 }?5^I? ,@1995,@u1995 vl:F  ,@1995 ,@ Z@106.75Z@v106.75 vEF U Z@106.75 Z@ /$?0.862/$?0.862 ukDF " /$?0.862 /$? 0@19960@u1996 vl:T  0@1996 0@  ףp=:[@108.91 ףp=:[@v108.91 vET U  ףp=:[@108.91  ףp=:[@  ףp= ?0.845 ףp= ?0.845 ukDT "  ףp= ?0.845  ףp= ? 4@19974@u1997 vl: 4@1997 4@ [@111.00[@v111.00 vEU [@111.00 [@ I +?0.829I +?0.829 ukD" I +?0.829 I +? 8@19988@u1998 vl:`  8@1998 8@ Gz\@112.32Gz\@v112.32 vE`!U Gz\@112.32 Gz\@ h|?5?0.819h|?5?0.819 |CkD`"" h|?5?0.819 h|?5? <@1999<@|1999 }Cl:n# <@1999 <@C zGa\@113.52zGa\@}113.52 CvEn$U zGa\@113.52 zGa\@C Q?0.810Q?0.810 WMDn%" Q?0.810 Q?C W+ع ع  عSOURCE:0   DOC,1999.+'G ع  5+)`( ! !   5)G&C%H&+%%&C   0( \,_OKz| <x p @Xdddddddd@Exb@M (#(#   (#(#0  0(#(#Then,2007postcontrolNOxwasestimatedas:J(#(# \_OKz| lx p @Xdddddddd@ExU?U0@ (#(#   (#(#  ThismethodchangestheStatelevelNOxemissionestimatesslightly,inStateswith   existingcontrols,butallowsconsistentapplicationofdifferentcontrolefficienciesinthesensitivityanalyses.  ThiscostanalysisusesrevisedestimatesofthecostsofinstallingandoperatingLECNOxcontrolsonleanburnnaturalgasfiredRICEs.TableIII2summarizestherevised h  controlcostinformationforthiscontroltechnique.Notethatallofthecostsinthistablearepresentedin1993dollars(asweretheNOxACTdocumentcosts).Capitalcostswere $  convertedfrom1999dollarsto1993dollarsusingthegrossdomesticproductimplicitpricedeflators.Themaintenancelaborratewasconvertedto1993dollarsusingtheBureauofLaborStatistics(BLS)EmploymentCostIndexHistoricalListing(BLS,2000).TheBLSindicesareshowninTableIII3.  TheLECcapitalcostestimatesfor2,000,4,000,and8,000horsepower(hp)engineswereprovidedbyCooperEnergy(Hibbard,1999a;1999b)anduseddirectlyinthisanalysis.MaintenanceandoverheadcostswereestimatedusingrecommendedmethodsfromtheEPAOfficeofAirQualityPlanningandStandards(OAQPS)ControlCostManual(Vatavuk,1999).Themaintenancecostisthemaintenancelaborratetimesthenumberofexpectedadditionalmaintenancehoursperyear(500).Theoverheadcostis60percentofthemaintenancelaborvalue.Thefuelpenaltyisbasedonanestimatedonepercentdecreaseinnaturalgasuse.Taxes,insurance,andadministrativecostsareestimatedtobe4percentofthecapitalcost.Thecompliancetestcostis$2,440,whichisthesamevaluethatwasestimatedintheEPAACTdocument(EPA,1993).  TableIII4summarizestheozoneseasonNOxcosteffectivenessvaluesforeachofthe  threeenginetypecontroloptioncombinationsthatwereevaluatedinthisanalysis.MoredetailedinformationonthecontrolcostequationdevelopmentforthisanalysisispresentedinAppendixA.   #Z#  \ TRO'3X3' Letter'3 Letter Landscape3'T:  HXX%H&+ X&XXHX 1?  _Table_ԀIII2 V LowEmissionCombustionCostComponentsforLeanBurnRICEs:1  1?b   &%X X&H&+%% &  }&1%%H&+}W21%}&*fCgd  ddd dd dd hCi..,9(P,P,,F,,P,P,P,e(+  <CC+   ,P<Size(hp) LCC;' "PCC PLAnnual 0  Hours LCC;' "PCC LCapital 0   Cost* LCC;'  "CC LMaintenance 0   Cost LCC;'  "CC LOverhead 0   Cost LCC;' "CC PLFuel 0  Penalty LCC;' "PCC PLTaxes,Insurance 0  Admin. FCC5' "PCC FCompliance 0  Test FCC5! "CC FO&MCost zp2 " , CC @@2000,P@@z2,000 I "P @@2000 @@ @@8000P@@_8,000_ g]I "P @@8000 @@ Pg$337,493 E;' "P PE$13,113 E;' "P PE$7,868 E;' "P PE$1,643 E;' "P PE$13,500 ?5' "P ?$2,440 ?5! " P?$35,277 zp- "P ,  @@4000,P@@z_4,000_ I x "P @@4000 @@ @@8000P@@_8,000_ g]I x!"P @@8000 @@ Pg$552,620 E;' x""P PE$13,113 E;' x#"P PE$7,868 E;' x$"P PE$2,987 E;' x%"P PE$22,105 ?5' x&"P ?$2,440 ?5! x'" P?$42,539 Cu2 x("P ,  @@8000,P@@_8,000_ CI f)"P @@8000 @@C @@8000P@@_8,000_ nC]I f*"P @@8000 @@C Pn$594,784 LC;' f+"PC PL$13,113 LC;' f,"PC PL$7,868 LC;' f-"PC PL$5,867 LC;' f."PC PL$23,791 FC5' f/"PC F$2,440 FC5! f0"C PF$41,345 \R2 f1"P , C , P\  8}{z42}Wع 4}{zNOTE:0    *Costsareexpressedin1993dollars.8ɹ  ع}W2  > 4-- +}{z42}W&54}{zSOURCE:0    Hibbard,1999a;1999b.+ٺ8&5&}W2&  J@>J 6--P ,    JH2}WH&+%H  P 6 TRX3' LetterO'33' Letter'3 Letter LandscapeT:  HXX%H&+ X&XXHX 1?  TableIII3  EmploymentCostIndices:ƽ" 1?    &%X X&H&+%% &  )H%H&+&H  *_Cd d9(P9PFFPPPe(efCg(#(#,dd , dd +  )CC J )Year @CC/!CC @Index(June1989=100) RH!"CC @1991@R1991 uk: \ @1991 @ Z@107.4Z@u107.4 ukD \" Z@107.4 Z@  @1992 @u1992 uk:j    @1992  @ [@111.5[@u111.5 ukDj  " [@111.5 [@ $@1993$@u1993 uk:   $@1993 $@ ̬\@114.7̬\@u114.7 ukD  " ̬\@114.7 ̬\@ (@1994(@u1994 uk:&v  (@1994 (@ ]@118.0]@u118.0 ukD&v " ]@118.0 ]@ ,@1995,@u1995 uk:  ,@1995 ,@ y^@121.9y^@u121.9 ukD " y^@121.9 y^@ 0@19960@u1996 uk:2  0@1996 0@ Y_@125.4Y_@u125.4 ukD2 " Y_@125.4 Y_@ 4@19974@u1997 uk:@  4@1997 4@ 33333#`@129.133333#`@u129.1 ukD@ " 33333#`@129.1 33333#`@ 8@19988@u1998 uk: 8@1998 8@ fffff`@133.7fffff`@u133.7 |CkD" fffff`@133.7 fffff`@ <@1999<@|1999 |Ck:L <@1999 <@C   5)"&&C%&H&+%%&&C    :  HXX%H&+ X&XXHX 1?  TableIII4  UnitCostsforRICEAnalysis:a 1?   &%X X&H&+%% &  )H%H&+&H  *xvCwd ddd  dd _C(#(#x,r(,, ,,rP+  8CC' ^ 08EngineType LCC;'" rCC LFuel LCC;'" r CC LControlOption LCC;'" r CC LPercentageReduction LCC;'" r"CC LOzoneSeason  CostEffectiveness($/ton) YO2" r" 00 CC 0YICEngineLeanBurn E;'L  ENaturalGas E;'L  ELowEmissionCombustion E;'L  E87% f\'L " `z@422P`z@f_422_Ԉ zpSL UP `z@422 00 `z@ 0zICEngineRichBurn E;'v  ENaturalGas E;'v  ENonselectiveCatalyticReduction E;'v  E90% f\'v " `u@342P`u@f_342_Ԉ CpSv UP `u@342 00 `u@ 0ICEngineAll LC;' C LOil LC;' C LSelectiveCatalyticReduction LC;'  C L90% nC]' !"C @1066P@n1,066dZX "UP @1066 00  @C d)&&C%&H&+%%&&C    " .      ?C' xdEx?  H !%H&+  !!H     CHAPTERIV  RESULTS.lea |?C' xdEb x? c     &%! H&+%% &    ThischapterdescribestheanalysisofthecostimpactsforRICEs.Thisanalysis  F estimatescontrolcostsandNOxemissionreductionsforlargeRICEsaffectedunderthe  $  NOxSIPCallreproposal.      TableIV1summarizestheanalysisresultsatthedomainlevelforthemainanalysisandsixsensitivitycontrolscenariosexamined.TableIV2describesthekeyassumptionsinthebaselineanalysisaswellashoweachofthealternativecontrolscenarios(i.e.,sensitivityanalyses)differsfromthebaseline.TableIV3providesallofthesameinformationasTableIV1,butwithmoreinformationreported.TableIV3reportsresultsforeachofthethreeenginetypes,andshowsallofthebeforeandaftercontrolNOx  emissionvalues(annualtons,5monthozoneseasontons,andozoneseasondailytons).TheremainingtablesinChapterIV,TablesIV4throughIV10,provideStatelevelresultsforeachscenario.  Theaveragecostperton(ozoneseason)forthemainanalysisis$532perton.Thisozoneseasoncostpertonisaffectedmostlybythegasfiredenginecontrolcosts.Oilfiredenginesareabout3percentofthepopulationoflargeRICEs.Whileoilfiredenginecostsarejustabove$1,000perton,theyhaveanegligibleinfluenceonregionwidecosts.OfthefiveoilfiredRICEs,fourareinMassachusettsandoneisinMissouri.MassachusettshasthehighestcontrolcostspertonbecauseallofitsaffectedRICEsareoilfired.  InScenarioB,thecontrolefficiencyforLECappliedtoleanburngasfiredenginesisreducedto82percent.Thisincreasestheaveragecostpertonbyabout$20perton.(Thetotalannualcostchangesslightlyfromthemainanalysis.Thischangeisanartifactofthe 8 waythetotalannualcostisestimated,though.ExpectedannualcostswouldbethesameinScenariosBandCastheyareinthemainanalysis.)TheRICENOxreductiondropsby !! almost2,000ozoneseasontonsinScenarioB.  ScenarioCincreasestheNOxcontrolefficiencyforleanburnenginesto90percent. D$$ Thisadditionalemissionreductionreducestheaveragecostpertontoabout$520perton,whichisabout$12pertonlessthaninthemainanalysis.  ScenarioDchangestheuncontrolledNOxemissionlevelforleanburngasfiredengines ' #( to13.7gramsperbrakehorsepowerhour(g/bhphr)from16.8g/bhphr.WithfewerNOx (#) tonsbeingreduced,thisraisesthecostpertontoabout$603perton.  Acontrollevelof1.2g/bhphrinScenarioEproducesthelowestaveragecostpertonof$513(andthelargestemissionreduction).  ,@(.   ScenarioFreducesannualoperatinghoursto6,500.Thischangesboththeemissionreductionsandthecosts.Comparedwithotherscenarios,thereareloweremissionreductionsandcosts,andwithacostperton$49higherthanthatinthemainanalysis.   ScenarioGretainsthecapitalcostestimatesthatwereusedintheSeptember1998NonElectricityGeneratingUnit(EGU)costanalysisfortheNOxSIPCall.Thecapital  V costsusedforthisanalysisweretakenfromtheACTdocument.Thescenariohasthesameemissionreductionsasthemainanalysis,butwith$334pertonhigherestimatedcosts.  ~    / TRO'3X3' Letter'3 Letter Landscape3' LetterT:  HXX%H&+ X&XXHX 1?  TableIV1 V ReciprocatingICEngineCostAnalysisSummary:!G 1?{   &%X X&H&+%% &  )H%H&+H  *Cddr(r  rPrvCw..,dd , dd ,wdd ,dd ,2dd ,dd0,dd +  -CC   -Scenario CCC2$ CC COzoneSeason h  NOxEmissions 2   5MonthTons @CC/!  "CC @OzoneSeasonNOx h   5MonthTonReduction @CC/!  "CC @AnnualCost($1000) @CC/! "CC @AverageCostPerTon @CC/! "CC @PercentageReduction 0&! "CC 0A 'Z  'MainAnalysis SIZ  e@60206e@S60,206 uDZ " e@60206 e@ @53006@_53,006_ \RDZ " @53006 @ \$28,222 9/!Z " 9$532 9/!Z " 987.8% 0&!Z " 0B 'b 'ControlEfficiency=82% 0&b 0 \R!b " @@51002@@\_51,002_ \RDb!" @@51002 @@ \$28,007 9/!b"" 9$549 9/!b#" 984.5% 0&!b$" 0C ' % 'ControlEfficiency=91% 0& & 0 \R! '" `@54539`@\_54,539_ \RD (" `@54539 `@ \$28,387 9/! )" 9$520 9/! *" 990.4% 0&! +" 0D 't , 'UncontrolledNOx=13.7g/bhphr 0&t - 0 \R!t ." z@52181z@\_52,181_ \RDt /" z@52181 z@ \$31,464 9/!t 0" 9$603 9/!t 1" 984.9% 0&!t 2" 0E '| 3 'ControlLevel=1.2g/bhphr 0&| 4 0 \R!| 5"  @55305 @\_55,305_ \RD| 6"  @55305  @ \$28,390 9/!| 7" 9$513 9/!| 8" 992.4% 0&!| 9" 0F '0 : 'AnnualHours=6,500 SI0 ; @@49154@@S_49,154_ uD0 <" @@49154 @@  "@43281 "@_43,281_ \RD0 ="  "@43281  "@ \$25,134 9/!0 >" 9$581 9/!0 ?" 971.7% 7C&!0 @" 7G .C8AC .PreviousCapitalCostValues 7C&8BC 7 cCR!8C"C @53006@c_53,006_ cCRD8D" @53006 @C c$45,899 @C/!8E"C @$866 @C/!8F"C @87.8% 4*!8G"C 4Costsareexpressedin1990dollars.+!*J   +)fG&C%H&+%%&C   z$J TRX3' LetterO'33' Letter'3 Letter LandscapeT:  HXX%H&+ X&XXHX 1?  TableIV2  MainAnalysisandScenarioDescription: 1?6   &%X X&H&+%% &  )H%H&+&H  *yCd ddd  dd wdd wdd 2dd 2dd0dd C(#(#, (,+  <CC+ J ,<SourceCategory LCC;'vCC PLDescription ]S2vP , CC ,]MainAnalysisScenarioA E;'6  PEForleanburngasfiredengines,theuncontrolledNOxemission l   levelis16.8g/bhphr,thecontrolledNOxlevel(withLEC)is2.0 6   g/bhphr,theannualhoursofoperationare8,000,andLECcostsareestimatedasdescribedinChapterIII. WM2  P ,  ,W 9/!   9 WM,  ,  ,WScenarioB E;'   PEControllevelof3g/bhp-hrforgas-firedleanburnengines WM2  P ,  ,W 9/!  9 WM,  ,  ,WScenarioC E;'  PEControllevelof1.5g/bhp-hrforgas-firedleanburnengines WM2 P ,  ,W 9/!  9 WM,  ,  ,WScenarioD E;'  PEUncontrolledlevelof13.7g/bhp-hrforgasfiredleanburnengines WM2 P ,  ,W 9/!  9 WM,  ,  ,WScenarioE E;'z PEControllevelof1.2g/bhp-hrforgasfiredleanburnengines WM2zP ,  ,W 9/!p 9 WM,p ,  ,WScenarioF E;'f PEAnnualoperatinghoursreducedto6,500hours/yearforgasfiredleanburnengines WM20!P ,  ,W 9/!&v" 9 ^CM,&v# ,  ,^ScenarioG LC;'l$C PLUsesthesameLECcostsappliedtoleanburnenginesthatwereusedintheSeptember1998NOxSIPcallanalysisB866&P , C B)&&C%&H&+%%&&C   & 8  TRP$'3 Letter LandscapeX3' Letter'3 Letter Landscape3' LetterTd:  HXX%H&+ X&XXHX 1?  TableIV3 V ControlMeasureSummaryMainAnalysisandScenarioResults:P ( 1?   &%X X&H&+%% &  }&1%%H&+}^M_1%}&*xCdd ( yCX/X/x,H (,,%,%,%,v%,%, %,%,h%,~%,v%,,%+  7CC&   7SourceCategory LCC;'  CC LControlOption LCC;' "CC PL#ofSources LCC;' "PCC PLAnnualBaseline(tons/year) LCC;' "PCC PLAnnualAfterControl(tons/year) LCC;' "PCC PLAnnualReduction(tons) LCC;' #"PCC PLOzoneSeasonBaseline(tons/5mo) LCC;' ("PCC PLOzoneSeasonAfterControl(tons/5mo) LCC;' -"PCC PLOzoneSeasonReduction(tons/5mo.) LCC;' 2"PCC QLOzone  3 SeasonDailyBaseline(tons/day) LCC;' 7"QCC QLOzone  8 SeasonDailyAfterControl(tons/day) LCC;' <"QCC QLOzone  = SeasonDailyReduction(tons) LCC;' A"QCC PLTotalAnnualCost($1000) LCC;' F"PCC PLCostperOzoneSeasonTon($) SI- K"P CC SMainAnalysisScenarioA ?5' ^L ? 9/! ^M 9 9/! ^N3 9 9/! ^O3 9 9/! ^P3 9 9/! ^Q3 9 9/! ^R3 9 9/! ^S3 9 9/! ^T3 9 9/! ^U3 9 9/! ^V3 9 9/! ^W3 9 9/! ^X3 9 MC' ^Y3  MICEngine-Gas_leanburn_ E;'HZ ELEC pf'H[ UUUUUU`@ 130.666666667 PUUUUUU`@p_131_ RH\3P UUUUUU`@ 130.666666667 UUUUUU`@  ףp%@94306.34P ףp%@_94,306_ MH]3P  ףp%@94306.34  ףp%@ /b@ 11316.7733333 P/b@_11,317_ RH^3P /b@ 11316.7733333 /b@ fB@ 82989.5566PfB@_82,990_ OH_3P fB@ 82989.5566 fB@ vO/@ 39294.3152PvO/@_39,294_ OH`3P vO/@ 39294.3152 vO/@ x&Qk@4715.317Px&Qk@_4,715_ MHa3P x&Qk@4715.317 x&Qk@ \@34578.9P\@_34,579_ LHb3P \@34578.9 \@ H}8 p@256.8262QH}8 p@_256.8_ MHc3Q H}8 p@256.8262 H}8 p@ u>@30.8188Qu>@_30.8_ LHd3Q u>@30.8188 u>@ هϰ+@l@ 226.005333333 Qهϰ+@l@_226.0_ RHe3Q هϰ+@l@ 226.005333333 هϰ+@l@ V-@ 18174.714PV-@_18,175_ NHf3P V-@ 18174.714 V-@ `z@422P`z@_422___ tjNHg3P `z@422 `z@ tICEngine-Gasrichburn E;'h ENSCR pf'i UUUUUUP@ 65.3333333333 PUUUUUUP@p_65_ Rj3P UUUUUUP@ 65.3333333333 UUUUUUP@  ףp%@47153.17P ףp%@_47,153_ Mk3P  ףp%@47153.17  ףp%@ /b@ 5658.38666667 P/b@_5,658_ Rl3P /b@ 5658.38666667 /b@ fB@ 41494.7783PfB@_41,495_ Om3P fB@ 41494.7783 fB@ vO/@ 19647.1576PvO/@_19,647_ On3P vO/@ 19647.1576 vO/@ x&Qk@ 2357.6585Px&Qk@_2,358_ No3P x&Qk@ 2357.6585 x&Qk@ \@17289.45P\@_17,289_ Mp3P \@17289.45 \@ H}8 `@128.4131QH}8 `@_128.4_ Mq3Q H}8 `@128.4131 H}8 `@ u.@15.4094Qu.@_15.4_ Lr3Q u.@15.4094 u.@ هϰ+@\@ 113.002666667 Qهϰ+@\@_113.0_ Rs3Q هϰ+@\@ 113.002666667 هϰ+@\@ V-@9087.357PV-@_9,087_ Mt3P V-@9087.357 V-@ `u@342P`u@_342___ tjNu3P `u@342 `u@ tICEngine-Oil E;'p v ESCR dZ'p w  @5P@d_5_ Fp x3P  @5 @ \@3033.83P\@_3,034_ Lp y3P \@3033.83 \@ @1896.15P@_1,896_ Lp z3P @1896.15 @ {Ƒ@ 1137.6728P{Ƒ@_1,138_ Np {3P {Ƒ@ 1137.6728 {Ƒ@ F_@ 1264.0928PF_@_1,264_ Np |3P F_@ 1264.0928 F_@ .1_@126.4093P.1_@_126_ Mp }3P .1_@126.4093 .1_@ QƑ@1137.68PQƑ@_1,138_ Lp ~3P QƑ@1137.68 QƑ@ /$ @8.262Q/$ @_8.3_ Jp 3Q /$ @8.262 /$ @ 8gDio?0.8261Q8gDio?_0.8_ Kp 3Q 8gDio?0.8261 8gDio?  cZB@7.4358Q cZB@_7.4_ Kp 3Q  cZB@7.4358  cZB@ V-@960.202PV-@_960_ Lp 3P V-@960.202 V-@ @1066P@_1,066___ |CkOp 3P @1066 @ |Total FC5' 3C F dCS! C  0P i@d_201_ CwE 3P  0  i@C  0PQjA_144,493_ CwE 3P  0 QjAC  0Pq= m@_18,871_ CwE 3P  0 q= m@C  0P `@_125,622_ CwE 3P  0  `@C  0P+ee@_60,206_ CwE 3P  0 +ee@C  0P@b@_7,199_ CwE 3P  0 @b@C  0P[@_53,006_ CwE 3P  0 [@C  0P&Sx@_394_ CwE 3P  0 &Sx@C  0PjMG@_47_ CwE 3P  0 jMG@C  0Pp_u@_346_ CwE 3P  0 p_u@C  0Px@_28,222_ CE 3P  0 x@C #@@@1000@#P%M*{@_532___ w[ 3P #@@@1000@# %M*{@C ScenarioBControlEfficiency=82% ?5'B  ? 9/!B  9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 9/!B 3 9 MC'B 3  MICEngine-Gas_leanburn_ E;',  ELEC pf',  UUUUUU`@ 130.666666667 PUUUUUU`@p_131_ R, 3P UUUUUU`@ 130.666666667 UUUUUU`@  ףp%@94306.34P ףp%@_94,306_ M, 3P  ףp%@94306.34  ףp%@ 贁N]@ 14523.2133333 P贁N]@_14,523_ R, 3P 贁N]@ 14523.2133333 贁N]@ +qz@ 79783.1166P+qz@_79,783_ O, 3P +qz@ 79783.1166 +qz@ vO/@ 39294.3152PvO/@_39,294_ O, 3P vO/@ 39294.3152 vO/@ Y?S@ 6051.32446667 PY?S@_6,051_ R, 3P Y?S@ 6051.32446667 Y?S@ ,Œ_;@ 33242.9866667 P,Œ_;@_33,243_ R, 3P ,Œ_;@ 33242.9866667 ,Œ_;@ H}8 p@256.8262QH}8 p@_256.8_ M, 3Q H}8 p@256.8262 H}8 p@ C@ 39.5515333333 QC@_39.6_ R, 3Q C@ 39.5515333333 C@ T㥛(k@217.274QT㥛(k@_217.3_ L, 3Q T㥛(k@217.274 T㥛(k@ (\@18030.99P(\@_18,031_ M, 3P (\@18030.99 (\@ |@448P|@_448___ tjN, 3P |@448 |@ tICEngine-Gasrichburn E;'j  ENSCR pf'j  UUUUUUP@ 65.3333333333 PUUUUUUP@p_65_ Rj 3P UUUUUUP@ 65.3333333333 UUUUUUP@  ףp%@47153.17P ףp%@_47,153_ Mj 3P  ףp%@47153.17  ףp%@ 贁N]@ 7261.60666667 P贁N]@_7,262_ Rj 3P 贁N]@ 7261.60666667 贁N]@ +qz@ 39891.5583P+qz@_39,892_ Oj 3P +qz@ 39891.5583 +qz@ vO/@ 19647.1576PvO/@_19,647_ Oj 3P vO/@ 19647.1576 vO/@ Y?S@ 3025.66223333 PY?S@_3,026_ Rj 3P Y?S@ 3025.66223333 Y?S@ ,Œ_;@ 16621.4933333 P,Œ_;@_16,621_ Rj 3P ,Œ_;@ 16621.4933333 ,Œ_;@ H}8 `@128.4131QH}8 `@_128.4_ Mj 3Q H}8 `@128.4131 H}8 `@ 3@ 19.7757666667 Q3@_19.8_ Rj 3Q 3@ 19.7757666667 3@ T㥛([@108.637QT㥛([@_108.6_ Lj 3Q T㥛([@108.637 T㥛([@ (\@9015.495P(\@_9,015_ Mj 3P (\@9015.495 (\@ `u@342P`u@_342___ tjNj 3P `u@342 `u@ tICEngine-Oil E;'T  ESCR dZ'T   @5P@d_5_ FT 3P  @5 @ \@3033.83P\@_3,034_ LT 3P \@3033.83 \@ @1896.15P@_1,896_ LT 3P @1896.15 @ {Ƒ@ 1137.6728P{Ƒ@_1,138_ NT 3P {Ƒ@ 1137.6728 {Ƒ@ F_@ 1264.0928PF_@_1,264_ NT 3P F_@ 1264.0928 F_@ .1_@126.4093P.1_@_126_ MT 3P .1_@126.4093 .1_@ QƑ@1137.68PQƑ@_1,138_ LT 3P QƑ@1137.68 QƑ@ /$ @8.262Q/$ @_8.3_ JT 3Q /$ @8.262 /$ @ 8gDio?0.8261Q8gDio?_0.8_ KT 3Q 8gDio?0.8261 8gDio?  cZB@7.4358Q cZB@_7.4_ KT 3Q  cZB@7.4358  cZB@ V-@960.202PV-@_960_ LT 3P V-@960.202 V-@ @1066P@_1,066___ |CkOT 3P @1066 @ |Total FC5' 3C F dCS! C  0P i@d_201_ CwE 3P  0  i@C  0PQjA_144,493_ CwE 3P  0 QjAC  0PHz> @_23,681_ CwE 3P  0 Hz> @C  0P -~@_120,812_ CwE 3P  0  -~@C  0P+ee@_60,206_ CwE 3P  0 +ee@C  0P @_9,203_ CwE 3P  0  @C  0PQE@_51,002_ CwE 3P  0