WPC 2 BPZ Courier 12cpi#|PAd6X@8;@HP LaserJet 3SIHP3SI.PRSd6X@8;,\,K@2<L Za #|PCourierCourier BoldHP LaserJet 5LHPLAS5L.PRS5x  @\\j"eaX@2 Z[UO|DPE&?xxx,Q#x6X@`7X@&},6X@`7@},C `7&^,l6X@`7@^, `7&[*PPP,IMP6X@`7@X@&},6X@`header4 =4 <D! #\  PCP#footer!oC! !#x\  PCXP#21F`heading 2* #\  PCP#  } #6X@`7@#= DRAFT#6X@`7l@# ă | 3PHASE II MANAGEMENT PLAN n 2OZONE, PM AND REGIONAL HAZE 4IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMS  ? #x6X@`7Q#X@# 2Date Revised: April 7, 19970*0*0* T ddx !ddx X T "; CONTENTS ?@ H page@@ I. Introduction 1@@H II. Major Regulatory Outputs 2@@ III. Other Deliverables 3@@ IV.H Phase II Issue Paper Status SummaryH 4@@ V. Phase II Issue Paper Work Group Liaisons 7@H VI. Summary of Critical Implementation Issues and Their Resolution  8@  VII. Schedule of FY 1997 FACA Subcommittee Meetings 16@@  VIII. Schedule of FacetoFace Work Group Meetings 20@  IX.P Schedule of NAAQS Implementation Public Meetings 21 XX\\ O !ddx X Addx4D O  Attachment A1  Major NAAQS/Haze Implementation Milestones Through 7/99 Attachment A2  General Air Quality Management and Issue Paper Flow Chart Attachment A3  Issue Paper Principles and Development Process@ Attachment A4  Staffing Summary Ad Hoc Groups and Caucuses@@ Attachment A5 @ Subcommittee Membership List@ Attachment A6  Membership List Coordination and Work Groups@H0*0*0*   @page @  I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this management plan is to identify the critical components of the process that EPA is using to develop ozone, PM and regional haze implementation program rules/guidance. These rules/guidance will be used by States, Tribes and local agencies to develop plans which implement new or revised NAAQS for ozone and PM and which also achieve mandated regional haze objectives. This management plan focuses upon those activities that need to be completed in 1997 and will be used by EPA to assure that a comprehensive and effective implementation strategy is developed in a timely manner. Major elements of the plan include the following: ` ` critical implementation outputs to be developed such as the interim implementation policy and the integrated implementation strategy,(#` ` ` schedules for development of issue papers and other outputs that will support the integrated strategy,(#` ` ` a summary of critical implementation issues and their resolution, and(#` ` ` schedules of Subcommittee and other meetings scheduled for 1997.(#` 0*(( O Addx4D  addx  O @ II. MAJOR REGULATORY OUTPUTS @ AREA OUTPUT DATE@P NAAQS Ozone and PM NAAQS Proposal( 12/13/96P@  NAAQS Final Actionh 7/19/97@P( Part 53/58 PM Monitoring Requirementst Proposal 12/13/96P@h  Final Action 7/19/97@P Part 58 Ozone Monitoring Requirements ProposalH 7/19/97P@  T Final Action 7/19/98@PH  Interim Implementation Policy Proposed Policy 12/13/96P@   Final Policy 7/19/97@P  Integrated Implementation Strategy O3/PM/Regional Haze (1) ANPRh 12/13/96P@  Phase I Proposal 7/19/97@@h ; Phase I Final Action 2/28/98@@ { Phase II Proposal( 7/19/98@@  Phase II Final Actionh 7/19/99@(  ?0  (1)XRegional haze components are contained in both the Phase I and the Phase II strategy.(#0*((  3'3'Standard3'3'StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  |D #x6X@`7Q#X@# Y addx   ddx Y @ ( III. OTHER DELIVERABLES   DELIVERABLE  DUE DATE DATE COMPLETE  COMMENTSp Preliminary Phase I Report to CAAAC 12/5/96 12/5/96 Preliminary overview of Phase I major accomplishments, discussions and recommendations to date.p Interim Implementation Policy (IIP) Principles  12/96  12/30/96  Memo transmitting IIP principles from the Subcommittee to the CAAAC.H  Contentrelated issue paper principles 12/96 1/97 See Attachment A3, Section B.  Conceptual Model Vol 1 2/97 2/20/97  Initial Report to CAAAC on Subcommittee Discussions 4/97   Report on Phase I issues, accomplishments, etc. Summary of Available Air Quality Management Tools8 6/978 8  RIA for the Phase I Implementation Strategy 7/97  8 Conceptual Model Vol 20 8/970 0 p Preliminary Phase II Report to CAAAC! 12/97! ! Preliminary overview of Phase II major accomplishments, discussions and recommendations to date.p0 Final Phase II Report to CAAAC$ 3/98$ $ Full report on Phase II issues, accomplishments, etc. "%0*(( 3'3'StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  '3'3StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  PE  ddx ddx35ffffv     IV. PHASE II ISSUE PAPER STATUS SUMMARY #MP6X@`7I@# R   ISSUE PAPER [1]  EPA STAFF CONTACT  WORK GRP(s) [2]  EXTERNAL LEAD [3] DATE TO CG PLAN DATE TO CG ACTUAL DATE TO SC PLAN DATE TO SC ACTUAL DATE SC DISCUSS. COMPL.  CATE GORY [4]   COMMENTSR   AOI's, CONTROL REGNS Pace/Meyer NRS Theiler 9/97  10/97         AREA AND MOBILE SOURCE INCENTIVES Rodriguez NRS Brownstein 5/97  6/97          AREAS AT RISK Woodard BP Chastain 5/97  6/97          AREA OF VIOLATION BOUNDARIES  Baldridge (N. Frank monitoring support liaison.)c  BPc  Crouchc  2/97 7/97c  2/14/97c  2/97 8/97c  2/97c   c   c     ATTAINMENT DATES  Woodard  BP  Williams  7/97    8/97            c  CLASSIFICATIONS Byrd/ Nikbakht BP Skelton 1/97 7/97 1/24/97 2/97 8/97 2/97         CONTROL STRATEGIES Rosendahl (support from Reinders and Damberg.)- NRS/BP- Johnson/ Vernet-  5/97 7/97- 3/21/97- 4/97 6/97 8/97- -  -  - Incl. national/ regional measures.    CONTROL TECHNOLOGY POINT AND AREA SOURCES Spells/ Woodard NRS Lamb  7/97 3/21/97 4/97 8/97        - GENERAL ECONOMIC INCENTIVES Rodriquez NRS Belanger 7/97 9/97  8/97 10/97       !  GENERAL MOBILE SOURCE ISSUES FUELS, I/M, VEHICLE AND ENGINE STDS Hawk BP  5/97  6/97      !   INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS Meyer NRS Shaver 1/97 9/97 1/24/97 2/97 10/97 2/97     x   INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION Johnson NRS/BP Lamb/ Kappelman 5/97 9/97  6/97 10/97      Includes regional haze issues.   MAINT. PLANNING/ CONTINGENCY MEASURES Cole/ Nikbakht BP Skelton 7/97  8/97      Incl. SIP revisions and emergency episodes.   MODELING REQMNTS, EMISS. INV. AND STMNTS.? Pace/ Meyer ? NRS/ST? Russell/ Jeffries? 5/97 9/97? ? 6/97 10/97? ?  ?  ?    MONITORING SIP's Byrd BP Nicholson 5/97  6/97      Monitoring incentives to be handled by ad hoc monitoring group.  ? NSR/PERMITTING deRoeck BP/NRS Schaefer/ Craigw  5/97 9/97w  w  6/97 10/97w  w   w   w      PRESIP RFP Mayer NRS Doughtery  5/97  3/21/97  4/97 6/97            w  PM DESIGNATIONS Blais BP (none)         Not scheduled for further SC discussion.     RAMP's/AOI's Pace/Meyer NRS Theiler  2/7/97 2/97 2/97       !  REASONABLE FURTHER PROGRESS Silvasi/ Mayer NRS/BP PierceSandner/ Phelps 1/97 5/97 1/24/97 3/21/97 2/97 4/97 6/97 2/97     Incl. concept of risk reduction as a measure of progress.!   REWARDS AND SANCTIONSe Mayere BP/NRSe Gerritson/ Doughertye 2/97 5/97e 2/14/97e 2/97 6/97e 2/97e  e  e    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT North BP Brisini         x  e TRADING  Rodriguez  NRS  Belanger  2/97 7/97 9/97 2/7/97 2/97 8/97 10/97 2/97        TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY Sargeant NRS  5/97  6/97         | ddx35ffffv ddxx& |  [1] See Section VI for a description of the issue paper contents. [2] Lead work group listed first. [3] See Section V for list of issue paper liaisons. [4] A: Subcommittee reached consensus supporting the recommendations presented in the issue paper.  B: Subcommittee could not reach consensus on the recommendations, but agrees with the range of options presented in the issue paper. , C:, Subcommittee could not reach consensus or agree on a limited set of options./  ) D:) Subcommittee could not reach consensus or agree on a limited set of options but did reach consensus on issue paper principles.,  x '3'3StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  3'3'StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  |D ^ ddxx& ddx V : ^ ,   ?x #x6X@`7Q#X@#V. PHASE II ISSUE PAPER WORK GROUP LIAISONS #MP6X@`7I@#   ISSUE PAPERQ  BASE PROGRAMS LIAISONQ NATIONAL/ REGIONAL STRATEGIES LIAISONQ  SCIENCE/ TECHNOLOGY LIAISONQ  COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH LIAISON AOI's, CONTROL REGNS Zeldin, Lawler  (1) Moore Q AREA AND MOBILE SOURCE INCENTIVES   (1)    AREAS AT RISK  (1)  Chock   AREA OF VIOLATION BOUNDARIESO   (1)O  SalmonO  MooreO    ATTAINMENT DATES\  (1)\ Dougherty\ Cabaniss\   O  CLASSIFICATIONSi  (1)i Feldcampi Andrewsi   \  CONTROL STRATEGIESv  (1)v  (1)v Raov  i  CONTROL TECHNOLOGY POINT AND AREA SOURCES Vernet  (1)  (1)  v  GENERAL ECONOMIC INCENTIVES Crouch  (1) McNeil   GENERAL MOBILE SOURCE ISSUES FUELS, I/M, VEHICLE AND ENGINE STDS,  (1), , ,   INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS9 Brisini9  (1)9 Rao9   , INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATIONF  (1)F  (1)F ScruggsF  9 MAINT. PLANNING/ CONTINGENCY MEASURES  (1) Lowrey  F MODELING REQMNTS, EMISS. INV. AND STMNTS.j  j  (1)j  (1)j   MONITORING SIP'sw  (1)w Lambw Andrewsw   j NSR/PERMITTING  (1)  (1) McNeill   w PRESIP RFP Lee  (1)     PM DESIGNATIONS  (1)  Cass    RAMP's/AOI's   (1)     REASONABLE FURTHER PROGRESS  (1)  (1) Ziman    REWARDS AND SANCTIONS  (1)  (1) Ziman    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT  (1)      TRADING   (1)    TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY! Ralston!  (1)! !  Q Y ddx V : ddx"  Y   (1)~# Not applicable. See Section IV for list of project leads and coleads."~# 0*(( 3'3'StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  '3'3StandardrJet 5L.>APE T ddx"  !ddx , T " VI. SUMMARY OF CRITICAL IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES AND THEIR RESOLUTION   ISSUE PAPER TITLE: AOI's, CONTROL REGIONS DESCRIPTION:   MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.        2.     3.   - ISSUE PAPER TITLE: AREA AND MOBILE SOURCE INCENTIVES- DESCRIPTION: This paper will address the use of incentive programs to achieve emission reductions from area and mobile sources and/or provide compliance flexibility. Topics will likely include the types of incentive programs applicable to area and mobile sources, on a local, regional and national scale, implementation issues, and technical considerations.2  MAJOR ISSUES:6 ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: 9  1.C C C  6  2.@ @ @ C  3.= = = -@ ISSUE PAPER: AREAS AT RISK-= DESCRIPTION: This paper will explore options for determining when the air quality of an area is approaching the national ambient air quality standards. The premise of this paper will be that it is preferable for areas that are not violating a standard, but are in danger of doing so, to act affirmatively to avoid further deterioration in air quality.j MAJOR ISSUES:n ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: q 1.{ { {  n 2.x x x { 3.u u u x 4.r r r -u ISSUE PAPER: AREA OF VIOLATION BOUNDARIES-r DESCRIPTION: This paper will discuss options for defining the boundaries of AOV's. This could be based on monitored data or, where available, on a combination of both monitored and modeled data and refined by analytical methods, including modeling, reviewing source and emissions data, and using statistical tools. This paper will also discuss coAOV's as areas where both PMfine and ozone violations occur. MAJOR ISSUES:( ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: x + 1.        2.        3.     4.   - ISSUE PAPER: ATTAINMENT DATES- DESCRIPTION: This issue paper will explore options for establishing attainment dates that allow adequate time for planning, rule adoption and implementation of measures to reduce emissions. The pros and cons of firm dates and specific consequences for failing to meet planning deadlines will be discussed.1 MAJOR ISSUES5 ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: 8 1.B B B  5 2.? ? ? B  3.< < < ?  4.9 9 9 -<  ISSUE PAPER: CLASSIFICATIONS-9  DESCRIPTION: The Classifications Issue Paper will address three main questions: 1. Should classifications, based on the severity of air quality violations, be used as part of designations? 2. How should the classification system be modified, if at all? and 3. Will the current concept of attainment and nonattainment designations and classifications be workable under a regional scale approach, and if not, what approach can be used? f  MAJOR ISSUES ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.     2.    3.    4.   - ISSUE PAPER: CONTROL STRATEGIES- DESCRIPTION: This issue paper will recommend a process to be used by the responsible air quality planning authority for allocation of control responsibilities among national, prescribed, and discretionary required measures. This paper will also attempt to produce a list of suggested national measures and suggested prescribed measures, which the FACA Subcommittee should consider and potentially recommend to EPA.  MAJOR ISSUES ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.   1 xff22  2.    3.    4.   - ISSUE PAPER: CONTROL TECHNOLOGY POINT AND AREA SOURCES- DESCRIPTION: The purpose of the Opportunity Matrix issue paper is to identify emission control techniques with multipollutant control potential for consideration in the development of integrated control strategies.$ MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.     2.    3.    4.   -  ISSUE PAPER: GENERAL ECONOMIC INCENTIVES-  DESCRIPTION: This paper addresses special applications of non-trading economic incentives not covered in either the area and mobile source incentives issue paper or the trading issue paper. Some of these special applications of economic incentives presented in this paper are covered in other issue papers, but will be collected in the special applications paper for comprehensiveness and integration.  MAJOR ISSUES:] ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: ` 1.j j j  ] 2.g g g j 3.d d d g 4.a a a -d ISSUE PAPER: GENERAL MOBILE SOURCE ISSUES FUELS, I/M, VEHICLE AND ENGINE STDS-a DESCRIPTION: The general mobile source issue paper will discuss issues surrounding vehiclerelated federal measures (emission standards for cars, trucks, nonroad engines and fuels) as well as local control measures, such as clean fuel fleets and inspection and maintenance programs. The intent of this issue paper is to address all mobile source issues other than conformity, economic incentives and sustainable development, which will be treated in other papers. MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.$ $ $   2.! ! ! $ 3.    xff22-! ISSUE PAPER: INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS- DESCRIPTION: This paper will identify options and make recommendations on the need for new/modified institutional mechanisms to ensure development and implementation of strategies to reduce regional transport of ozone, particulate matter, and regional haze, and their precursors. - MAJOR ISSUES1 ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: 4 1.> > >  1 2.; ; ; > 3.8 8 8 ; 4.5 5 5 -8 ISSUE PAPER: INTEGRATED IMPLEMENTATION-5 DESCRIPTION: b  MAJOR ISSUES:\ ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: _  1.i i i  \  2.f f f i  3.c c c f  4.` ` ` -c ISSUE PAPER: MAINT. PLANNING/CONTINGENCY MEASURES-` DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this issue paper is to address the issue of implementing maintenance plans and contingency measures in both attainment and nonattainment areas under the new ozone and PM NAAQS. Maintenance plans are developed to ensure continued attainment of the air quality standards. Contingency measures are needed either to promptly correct any violation of the NAAQS, or to assist an area in meeting reasonable further progress or in attaining the NAAQS by a certain date. MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.# # #   2.      # 3.     4.   - ISSUE PAPER: MODELING REQMNTS, EMISS. INV. AND STMNTS.- DESCRIPTION: G MAJOR ISSUES:A ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: xff22 D 1.        2.        3.     4.   - ISSUE PAPER: MONITORING SIP's- DESCRIPTION: The development of regional approaches (e.g., Areas of Influence/Areas of Violation approach) to air quality management introduces new variables into the ambient air monitoring program. This issue paper will address the broad concepts of how monitoring networks may be designed to better reflect this type of regional scale approach and program integration, including regional/transport assessment, particulate matter speciation, and ozone precursor monitoring. 1 MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.     2.     3.     4.   -  ISSUE PAPER: NSR/PERMITTING-  DESCRIPTION: This issue paper describes various options for addressing emissions increases from new and modified major stationary sources as part of the Spatially Integrated Plan to attain and maintain compliance of the proposed O3 and PM NAAQS. The options examine different approaches for integrating (and possibly improving) the fundamental new source review requirements with the proposed AOI/AOV designation structure and planning process. It is desired that the selected option should be costeffective, offer ample flexibility for regional implementation, and encourage real reductions via market incentives.  MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.     2.    3.    4.   - ISSUE PAPER: PRESIP RFP- DESCRIPTION: This paper will address issues associated with reasonable further progress requirements during the preSIP phase for the proposed ozone and fine particulate NAAQS. The preSIP phase is defined as some period of time up to when the State Implementation Plan has been approved by EPA. The areas covered by this paper include all areas that potentially violate or potentially contribute to a violation of the new/revised Ozone and PM2.5 standards.* MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:.xff22  1.        2.        3.     4.   - ISSUE PAPER: PM DESIGNATIONS- DESCRIPTION: 1 MAJOR ISSUES:+ ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: . 1.8 8 8  + 2.5 5 5 8 3.2 2 2 -5  ISSUE PAPER: RAMP's/AOI's-2  DESCRIPTION: _  MAJOR ISSUES:Y ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION: \  1.f f f  Y  2.c c c f 3.` ` ` c 4.] ] ] -` ISSUE PAPER: REASONABLE FURTHER PROGRESS-] DESCRIPTION: This paper addresses implementation issues associated with reasonable further progress requirements for the proposed ozone and PM2.5 NAAQS. MAJOR ISSUES:  ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:   1.      2.    3.    4.      - ISSUE PAPER: REWARDS AND SANCTIONSxff22-  DESCRIPTION: The Economic Incentives and Disincentives as an Adjunct to Sanctions paper covers a range of options to encourage States to develop and implement effective plans for attaining the NAAQS. The Act contains four sanctions that EPA can impose on States after a State has been given an 18month warning: 1) removing 105 funds, 2) removing highway funds, 3) increasing offset ratios for New Source Review and 4) development of a Federal Implementation Plan. This issue paper will explore additional options to encourage States to develop and implement SIPs that 1) that increase in effect over time, 2) that are clearly environmentally beneficial, 3) can be imposed on a shorter time frame, and 4) that use rewards rather than punishments.  MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.     2.    3.   - ISSUE PAPER: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT- DESCRIPTION:  MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:   1.      2.     3.     4.   -  ISSUE PAPER: TRADING- DESCRIPTION:  MAJOR ISSUES: ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:  1.     2.    3.    4.   - ISSUE PAPER: TRANSPORTATION CONFORMITY- DESCRIPTION: The transportation conformity issue paper will discuss whether transportation conformity should apply in areas of violation or areas of influence or both, as well as how the geographic boundaries within which conformity applies would be determined. Also included will be a discussion of how transportation conformity should be demonstrated, if the areas subject to transportation conformity are much larger than metropolitan area boundaries or include rural areas. (The general conformity provisions of the CAA will by handled in another forum.) MAJOR ISSUES:+ ISSUE RESOLUTION/SUBCOMMITTEE DIRECTION:xff22 . 1.        2.        3.     4.   xff22 '3'3StandardrJet 5L.>A'3'3StandardrJet 5L.>APE  #x6X@`7Q#X@##x6X@`7Q#X@# ^ !ddx ,  Addx^%  ^  VII. SCHEDULE OF FY 1997 FACA SUBCOMMITTEE MEETINGS @ DATEH LOCATIONH ISSUE PAPERSH OTHER TOPICS@` 2/1921/97 Washington, DC Regional Air Management Partnerships (RAMP's)/Areas of Influence (AOI's) Area of Violation Boundaries Classifications General Economic Incentives Institutional Mechanisms Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) Rewards and Sanctions Coordination and Work Group Status Reports Monitoring Ad Hoc Group Report NAAQS Update (evening session) NAAQS RIA Update (evening session) PM Monitoring Issues (evening session)` H 4/79/97 Falls Church, VA Control Strategies Control Technology Matrix PreSIP RFP RFP p Coordination and Work Group Status Reports Issue Paper Linkage Discussion Overview of Acid Rain Program Overview of Mobile Source Control Programs Update on Implementation Timelinex  6/911/97P Durham, NCP Area and Mobile Source Incentives Areas At Risk Control Strategies General Mobile Source Issues Fuels, I/M, Vehicle and Engine Standards Integrated Implementation Modeling Requirements, Emission Inventories and Statements. Monitoring SIP's NSR/Permitting PreSIP RFP Reasonable Further Progress Rewards and Sanctions Transportation Conformity Coordination and Work Group Status Reports (other topics to be determined)x` 8/1214/97P Portland, OR P Area of Violation Boundaries Attainment Dates Classifications Control Strategies Control Technology Point and Area Sources General Economic Incentives Maintenance Planning and Contingency Measures Trading` Coordination and Work Group Status Reports (other topics to be determined)x`  10/1416/97 or 10/2123/97 (to be determined) Areas of Influence, Control Regions General Economic Incentives Institutional Mechanisms Integrated Implementation Modeling Requirements, Emission Inventories and Statements NSR/Permitting Trading  Coordination and Work Group Status Reports (other topics to be determined) H '3'3StandardrJet 5L.>A3'3'StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  |D Y Addx%  addx(p Y  #x6X@`7Q#X@#VIII. SCHEDULE OF FACETOFACE WORK GROUP MEETINGS @ DATE LOCATION COMMENTS@ 1/9/97 1/10/97( RTP, NC( Joint meeting of the Base Programs, National and Regional Strategies, and Science and Technology work groups 1/30/97 1/31/97  RTP, NC  1/30 Joint meeting of Base Programs, National and Regional Strategies, and Science and Technology work groups. 1/31 individual Base Programs, National and Regional Strategies, and Science and Technology work groups. 2/19/97 Washington, DC Meetings held in conjunction with the Subcommittee meeting.p 3/13/97 3/14/97 Durham, NC Joint meeting of the Base Programs and the National and Regional Strategies work groups.x 4/97 Falls Church, VA Meetings to be held in conjunction with the Subcommittee meeting.(H 5/15/97 5/16/97X Durham, NCX Joint meeting of the Base Programs and the National and Regional Strategies work groups. Representatives of Science and Technology work group also to attend.(P 6/97 RTP, NC Meetings to be held in conjunction with the Subcommittee meeting.x 7/97 (to be determined)  8/97 Portland, OR (tentative)  Meetings to be held in conjunction with the Subcommittee meeting. 9/97! (to be determined)"   10/97# (to be determined)$ Meetings to be held in conjunction with the Subcommittee meeting. "$0*(( 3'3'StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  3'3'StandardHPLAS5L.PRS5x  |D O addx(p ddx O " IX. SCHEDULE OF NAAQS IMPLEMENTATION PUBLIC MEETINGS @ DATE LOCATION@P 1/28/97` Los Angeles, CAP@ 1/30/97 Seattle, WA@@` 1/31/97 Chicago, IL@@ 2/5/97 New York City, NY@@ 2/5/97` Salt Lake city, UT@@  2/6/97 Denver, CO@@`  2/6/97 Pittsburgh, PA@@  2/7/97  Hartford, CT@@  2/10/97` Houston, TX@@  2/11/97 Kansas City, MO@@` 2/11/97 Dallas, TX@@ 2/14/97  Atlanta, GA@