|
|
|||||||||
|
OTAG Technical Supporting Document
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Part 1: Overview1. BackgroundThis report was prepared by the Ozone Transport Assessment Group (OTAG) Air Quality Analysis (AQA) Workgroup to aid the deliberations of the OTAG Policy Group with policy-relevant information. The ozone problem addressed by the workgroup stems from the existence of nonattainment areas in the OTAG domain and the fact that some nonattainment areas experience considerable influx of ozone (O3) across their boundaries. The analysis of data from more than 600 monitoring stations shows that the highest average concentrations of ozone (6080 ppb) within the domain roughly coincide with the highest emissions densities of anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) near major metropolitan areas and along the industrial Ohio River valley. The ozone levels at the edges of the OTAG domain correspond to the tropospheric background range of 3050 ppb. A 10-year trends analysis shows a decline of the number of 120-ppb and 80-ppb exceedances in the northeast. However, the reductions of these exceedances over the entire domain is less pronounced, particularly if one disregards the anomalous high ozone year of 1988. Low wind speeds (< 3 m/sec) enable the accumulation of ozone near local source areas. High winds (> 6 m/sec) reduce the concentrations but contribute to the long-range transport of ozone. The average range of ozone transport implied from an array of diverse methods is between 150 miles and 500 miles. However, the perceived range depends on whether one considers the average concentrations (300500 miles) or peak concentrations (tens of miles at 120 ppb). The relative importance of ozone transport for the attainment of the new 80 ppb 8-hour standard is likely to be higher due to the closer proximity of nonattainment areas. The modeling results have been evaluated based on model performance and the representativeness of the selected modeling periods compared to climatological conditions. The model simulations have captured the large-scale features of each episode. The model, however, had a tendency to underpredict (1020 ppb) the daily maximum regional ozone concentrations in the north and overpredict in the south. The transport wind fields and the average ozone concentration pattern during the four episodes (36 days) are representative of OTAG domainwide episodes that occur three to eight times a year. Stagnation over multistate areas, followed by swift transport, is an important characteristic of O3 episodes that are prevalent over the central portion of the OTAG domain, where the NOx emissions are also high. The modeling periods are not particularly representative of the highest ozone concentrations occurring locally. In particular, high O3 events over the Gulf states are underrepresented in the modeling periods. The anthropogenic ozone in the OTAG domain originates from within the domain and, therefore, it is controllable with measures inside the domain. The strong weekly cycle of peak ozone concentrations together with the observed parallel 10-year trends of ambient ozone and precursor emissions in some subregions suggest that ozone reductions are feasible. Urban areas contribute to their own ozone problems, and VOC controls appear to be effective for "peak shaving" of the 120-ppb standard. NOx emissions reductions are likely to be effective for regional ozone reductions and for attaining the 80-ppb standard. Emissions in the central part of the OTAG domain along the industrial-urban Ohio River valley appear to be associated with many regional-scale ozone episodes. Reductions in that area could benefit many receptor areas downwind. The AQA Workgroup recommends preserving the air quality analysis infrastructure and the stakeholder-based approach. Future monitoring and assessment programs should set as further goals the quantification of ozone source attribution, flow across political boundaries, and routine evaluation of photochemical models. 2. IntroductionThe AQA Workgroup was formed to provide assessments of air quality and meteorological data relevant to OTAGs mission. The workgroup placed special emphasis on ozone transport because some nonattainment areas experience considerable influx of ozone across their boundaries, and they cannot demonstrate attainment by local measures alone. Specifically, the workgroups purpose statement read as follows:
The workgroup process entailed the development of individual work products and the presentation of results at workgroup meetings, which was followed by open review by the group. The workgroup collectively developed policy-relevant summaries and subjected these summaries to repeated group reviews. This process was greatly facilitated by the early development of an interactive Internet Web site, which has been used to communicate data sets, analytical tools, results, interpretations, and critical feedback. The workgroup members were affiliated with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), state agencies, industry (power and transportation), consultant firms, and academia. The specific activities undertaken by this group included reviewing existing air quality studies and analyses; developing analyses and visualizations of air quality and meteorological data to help in the understanding of ozone formation and transport; comparing modeling results with available air quality data; and integrating air quality analyses and modeled results into conceptual interpretations of ozone transport for use in policy development. The multiple types of analyses included spatial and temporal pattern and trends analyses, trajectory and residence time analyses, correlation and cluster analyses, detailed evaluations of intensive field studies (Southern Oxidants Study (SOS) and North American Regional Strategy for Tropospheric Ozone-Northeast (NARSTO-NE)), and comparison of model results with the data. The efforts of the Regional and Urban Scale Modeling (RUSM) and AQA Workgroups were intended to provide complementary input to support OTAG policy development. The modeling effort evaluated the effects of future control strategies using photochemical grid modeling for specified episode periods. The air quality analysis results assessed the ozone problem using long-term measurements from monitoring networks. A comparison of the modeling results for the four modeling episodes with corresponding observations and with climatological values provided a good indication of the strengths and weaknesses of photochemical grid modeling, including simulation performance and representativeness. The air quality assessments helped "set the stage" for the Policy Group by providing broader perspectives on the current ozone problem and its characteristics. While modeling is uniquely suited for evaluating the consequences of future emissions scenarios, the complexities of the ozone problem are such that comparisons with data are a necessity. The combination of modeling and air quality analysis results can help to improve confidence, and identify uncertainties, in the outcome of future control scenarios. The paragraphs that follow present the major policy-relevant results, conclusions, and recommendations of the AQA Workgroup. Part I of this chapter is divided into the following major categories:
In each major category, a set of policy-relevant technical questions are posed, followed by brief statements of pertinent results. The supporting materials for this part of the report can be found in Part II: Summary and Integration of Results and in Part III: Summaries of Individual AQA Workgroup Analyses, all accessible through the AQA Workgroup Web site at: http://capita.wustl.edu/OTAG/. 3. Origins and Patterns of the Ozone Problem in the OTAG DomainWhat Is the OTAG Ozone Problem?Recent health and ecological studies suggest that adverse biological effects can result from ozone exposures at any level above natural background. All sections of the OTAG region periodically experience ozone levels higher than the natural background, and they share a common interest in addressing the ozone problem. However, the severity, frequency, and duration of high ozone events exhibit complex patterns and source receptor relationships, such that the most efficient strategies to reduce local or regional ozone exposures are not obvious. Control strategies depend directly on how the OTAG ozone problem is defined. Current federal health standards focus on peak 120-ppb, 1-hour concentrations; proposed health standards focus on 80-ppb, 8-hour averages. Ecological effects result from chronic exposures accumulated over the entire growing season. The spatial pattern of the current (19931995) exceedances (120-ppb, 1-hour) shows that the following major metropolitan areas exceed the current standard: the Washington, D.C.-New York corridor, Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Houston, and St. Louis (Figure 4-1). Other metropolitan areas throughout the OTAG region also remain in nonattainment with the current standard. Virtually all areas where exceedances of the current standard occur are confined to the near vicinity (less than 150 miles) of metropolitan areas. In contrast, areas exceeding the proposed 8-hour, 80-ppb ozone standard are more numerous, extend further from metropolitan areas, and include a large portion of the central OTAG domain. The distances between nonattainment areas projected under this proposed standard are significantly shorter than those under the current standard and, therefore, the likelihood is greater that one area influences the exceedances in its neighboring nonattainment areas. What Is the Pattern of Ozone Precursor Emissions?Ozone precursors are VOCs and NOx from area and point sources. Anthropogenic area sources of both VOCs and NOx are most dense in large urban metropolitan areas (e.g., the Washington, D.C.-New York corridor, Chicago, Atlanta, Dallas-Ft. Worth, Houston, and St. Louis). The largest, elevated point sources of (predominantly) NOx emissions are prevalent in industrial regions including the Ohio River valley (Figures 4-2(a) and (b)). Anthropogenic NOx area sources tend to have strong diurnal and weekly cycles, while point sources typically vary less in time. VOC emissions from both anthropogenic and biogenic sources are heavily influenced by sunlight and temperature; therefore, they tend to exhibit stronger diurnal and seasonal variations than NOx emissions. What Are the Spatial Patterns of Ozone?The AQA workgroup evaluated the regional ozone concentration patterns using a comprehensive data set of more than 600 monitoring stations from routine EPA and research networks. The entire data set includes 102 urban sites, 259 suburban sites, and 238 rural or remote sites (13 sites in the network are not classified). During the summer ozone season, the OTAG domain is periodically ventilated by air coming from outside the domain where ozone concentration averages range between 20 ppb and 50 ppb, corresponding to typical tropospheric background levels measured in the northern hemisphere (Figures 4-3(a) and (b)). It is reasonable to assume that in the absence of anthropogenic emissions, the average summertime ozone concentration would be approximately 2050 ppb throughout the OTAG domain. Thus, with the notable exception of the Canadian border along the Windsor-Quebec corridor, there are no significant external source impacts on the domain, at least on a regional scale. Large sections of the domain experience average daily maximum ozone levels of 6080 ppb, which is double the tropospheric background. The highest average concentrations are observed near major metropolitan areas and in a large central subregion of the of OTAG domain along the Ohio River (Figures 4-3(a) and (b)). What Is the Range of Ozone Concentrations?Ozone exhibits strong day-to-day variation that can be quantified by examining "cleaner" and "dirtier" days across the domain (Figures 4-4(a) and (b)). The urban impact is virtually undetectable during cleaner, low-ozone days (i.e., the lowest 10th percentile of all measured ozone concentrations). However, even these cleanest days exhibit a broad area of higher average ozone (> 40 ppb) from Illinois to Pennsylvania relative to the remainder of the OTAG domain. During the dirtier, high-ozone days (the 90th percentile) the urban influence is very pronounced but confined to about 100200 miles from major metropolitan areas. It is therefore observed that urban areas make substantial local contributions to the highest 1-hour daily maximum ozone concentrations as well as exhibit the highest range in ozone concentration as measured by difference between 90th and 10th percentiles. How Does Ozone Vary in Time?Ozone exhibits temporal variability over hourly, diurnal, synoptic (35 days), weekly, seasonal, and long-term (520 years) time scales. The ozone changes on weekly and long-term scales are caused primarily by anthropogenic emissions changes; changes at the hourly, diurnal, synoptic, and seasonal scales are also influenced by meteorology. Ten-year trends show that the number of 120-ppb, 1-hour exceedances has declined markedly over the past decade in areas like the northeastern Ozone Transport Region (OTR) (Figure 4-5(a)) and southern California. The percentage reductions of the 80-ppb, 8-hour exceedances were less. These areas have also experienced substantial emissions reductions of both VOC and NOx. For the OTAG region as a whole, improvements have been much less dramatic (Figure 4-5b). If 1988 is considered an anomalous ozone year, the OTAG region has experie nced relatively small changes in the number of 120-ppb and 80-ppb exceedances and OTAG-wide average ozone concentration over the past 10 summers (Figure 4-5(b)). Evidently, historical reductions of VOC and NOx emissions have been successful in reducing pe ak ozone levels on a local or subregional scale. However, broader control approaches may be necessary to reduce the more regionally distributed 80-ppb, 8-hour average ozone levels. 4. Ozone Transport in the OTAG DomainOzone Transport: Beneficial or Harmful?Atmospheric conditions can exert a powerful influence on the distribution of pollutant concentrations in space and time. Low wind speeds lead to the buildup of high local pollutant concentrations (Figure 4-6(a)). Strong ventilation with high wind speed s prevents the local buildup near the sources (Figure 4-6(b)), but contributes to long-range transport and regional ozone, particularly during directionally persistent wind conditions. For southern urban areas where episodes are caused by local stagnation , ozone levels decline rapidly with increasing wind speed (Figure 4-7(a)). In northern cities, which are more heavily influenced by transport, ozone levels decrease much less rapidly with increasing wind speeds. Vertically, ozone transport takes place in synoptic (> 800 m), channeled (200800 m), and near surface (< 200 m) flow regimes (Figure 4-7(b)). The potential for transport from elevated (> 100m) emissions sources is substantially higher th an for low-level sources, due to higher wind speeds aloft, particularly at night during channeled, "nocturnal jet" conditions. Examination of dispersion conditions during locally high-ozone days (90th percentile) shows that dispersion in the southeast is typically poor due to stagnating air masses (Figure 4-8(a)). However, the western and northern sections of the domain exper ience stronger and more persistent southerly observation and westerly winds, respectively. This observation supports the notion that ozone exceedances in the central and southeastern areas are predominantly "homegrown," while exceedances in oth er sections of the OTAG domain are also influenced by regional transport. In contrast, on low-ozone days, transport is predominantly from the outside (e.g., Canada and the Gulf of Mexico) into the OTAG domain (Figure 4-8(b)). The widespread, regional-scale ozone transport episodes result from several days of stagnation over the central portion of the OTAG domain, followed by strong unidirectional flow, generally to the northeast. Three (1988, 1991, 1995) out of four episodes chosen for OTAG modeling were such stagnation-followed-by-transport regional episodes. In summary, the "good news" about transport is that it can disperse, or clean up, the ozone formed in an area during a stagnation event. The central and southeastern portions of the OTAG domain, which experience relatively more stagnation, ca n benefit from this aspect of transport. The "bad news" about transport is that it can carry significant ozone concentrations from one portion of the domain to another, causing influx of regional ozone across the boundaries of the nonattainment areas, particularly over the midwestern and northeastern portions of the domain. AQA Workgroup researchers have assessed the transport issue based on examination of meteorological data, trajectory analyses, and field observations of ozone and ozone precursors. These analyses have not estimated ozone transport at future times. What Are the Implied Ranges of Ozone Transport?The distances of ozone impact deduced from multiple types of analysis range from 150 miles to 500 miles (Figure 4-9(a)). The directly attributable influence of specific urban areas can be traced 150200 miles before the urban-industrial plumes mer ge indistinguishably into the regional ozone pool. Ozone and precursors transported at night can have a significant impact hundreds of miles downwind the next day. Statistical correlation analyses of the regional ozone pattern suggest ozone transport distances of up to 300500 miles, but it is not clear to what extent this actually represents transport of ozone and/or precursors, or is a meteorological corre lation. Time-lagged correlation analyses also suggest linkages between ozone concentrations separated in time by 12 days. Interpretation of such a time-lagged correlation as an ozone lifetime of 12 days corresponds to a transport distance of a bout 400 miles. While an estimate of ozone impact distance based on any single method is rather uncertain, the coinciding range of the various methods increases confidence in the accuracy of these estimated ozone transport distances. The perceived distance of ozone impact can vary considerably depending on the measures used to describe the ozone impact. In general, the spatial scale of perceived ozone transport decreases rapidly with an increasing concentration threshold (or incre asing percentiles of the ozone distribution). For example, the average daily maximum ozone has a scale of impact of hundreds of miles, while ozone exceedances of 1-hour, 120-ppb thresholds may extend only to tens of miles. This finding underscores the not ion that an 8-hour, 80-ppb ozone standard will implicate larger areas and longer transport scales than the 120-ppb, 1-hour standard. 5. Air Quality Comparisons to UAM-V Episodic Model ResultsHow Do Model Results Compare to Measured Concentrations?From the point of view of AQA Workgroup, the utility of modeling results as a foundation for policy making can be evaluated using two criteria: (1) model performance during the selected (36-day) episodes and (2) the representatives of these episode con ditions for "typical" or climatological conditions. Visual comparison of maps of measured and modeled ozone values shows that the simulations capture the large-scale dynamic and spatial features of each episode. Although not seen in every episode, the model appears to have tendencies to underpredict da ily maximum ozone levels in the northern portion of the domain by 1020 ppb (Figures 4-10(a) and (b) and 4-11(a)), where high ozone is frequently associated with strong, synoptic-scale flows. The model tends to overpredict the ozone for the southern portion of the domain where high ozone is typically associated with local stagnation. Further, aircraft measurements in the northeast for a few simulation days indicate that ozone levels above the surface layer (> 200 m) may be underpredicted by the m odel. One possible interpretation of these observations (although not the only one) is that transport impacts may be understated by the model. This interpretation, and the generally longer scales of transport indicated by the climatological air quality an alyses, should be kept in mind when analyzing model results regarding transport distances. Comparison of model predictions to ozone precursor data, while limited by the availability of measurements, shows marginal to poor agreement, especially for isoprene from biogenic VOC emissions. In addition, comparison of modeled and observed carbon mo noxide (CO) (a tracer of automotive emissions) shows poor agreement for the 1995 episode. Comparison of ozone to total reactive nitrogen ratios in non-urban locations tends to agree with model predictions. The ability of the model to capture the large-scale features of the ozone concentration patterns and non-urban ozone to total reactive nitrogen ratios suggests that the Urban Airshed Model, Version V (UAM-V) is a useful tool for evaluating the gener al features of future large-scale control options. However, the limitations of model applications, such as those suggested by these analyses, reinforce the notion that modeling results should be interpreted not as definitive or absolute, but rather as on e part of a full assessment. The full assessment, relative to the mission of OTAG, would thus include modeling, air quality analysis, and information relating to control strategy feasibility and cost. How Does Transport During Modeling Episodes Compare to Episodes in General?The transport conditions during the selected OTAG modeling episodes are similar to transport during OTAG domainwide regional ozone episodes in general (Figure 4-12(a)). Such episodes are characterized by slow meandering transport over Kentucky, Tenness ee, and West Virginia, with a strong clockwise transport around this region of stagnation. However, the transport during OTAG modeling periods differs significantly from the conditions of highest local ozone concentrations (Figure 4-12(b)). The main difference is that the net transport speeds are predominately higher during the OTAG modeling episodes, and the direction of net transport over the Illinois-Pennsylvania corridor is from the west, rather than the typical southwesterly flow. What Kind of Episodes Do Model Results Represent?Within the OTAG domain, high-ozone concentration (above 80 ppb or 120 ppb) can occur during regional, subregional, or local episodes. The OTAG domainwide regional episodes are caused by slow-moving or recirculating airmasses over the center of the OTAG domain (Figure 4-9(a)). Coincidentally, the central Ohio River region is a high NOx emissions area (Figure 4-2(b)). A regional episode is defined here as the condition when the daily maximum ozone concentration averaged over all the OTAG domain monitorin g sites exceeds 70 ppb (Figure 4-9(b)). All four periods selected for OTAG modeling are regional. During the 1988 episode, the OTAG domain average ozone exceeded 70 ppb for 9 consecutive days with an OTAG domain average peak of 103 ppb. The 1991 and 1995 episodes lasted for approximately 6 days with peaks between 80 ppb and 90 ppb. The 1993 episode is best characterized as a subregional episode over the southeast because the OTAG domain-average ozone barely exceeded 70 ppb on 1 day. The pattern of average measured ozone concentration (Figure 4-10(a)) shows that during the four modeling episodes ozone is high over the industrial midwest, Pennsylvania, and New Jersey, and low along the Gulf coast. The OTAG domain-scale regional episodes occur about three (1993) to eight (1988) times, covering approximately 10 percent of the April-to-September ozone season. Multiday ozone accumulation causes about one-half of the OTAG-wide recorded 120-ppb excee dances to occur during these regional episodes. However, these episodes account for only 30 percent of the 80-ppb exceedances. Hence, their role for the proposed new standard is diminished compared to the old standard. How Do Model Episode Concentrations Compare to Episodes in General?The modeled impacts derived from any specific historical episodic periods cannot be taken as representative of the full range of meteorological flow conditions that may be anticipated in the future. However, the average ozone during the four modeling p eriods (Figure 4-10(a)) appear to be typical for regional ozone episodes that occur three to eight times during every ozone season. The average modeled episode concentrations are within about 5 ppb of the averages for climatological (19911995) re gional episode conditions. The concentrations during the OTAG modeling episodes do not appear to be representative of high concentrations that occur locally. A measure of modeling period overall representativeness is a comparison with the highest ozone (90th percentile) concentr ations (Figure 4-4(b)). In the Pennsylvania-New Jersey region, the modeling periods roughly correspond to the 90th percentile values. However, near the Gulf coast (including Texas) the modeling episodes represent only approximately the 60th percentile o f ozone. Thus, the high ozone concentrations in the Gulf coast belt and Texas are underrepresented in the OTAG domain modeling selection days (Figure 4-11(b)). This should be kept in mind when using the episode simulations for policy development. 6. Air Quality Management Implications of the Data Analysis ResultsIs Ozone Controllable by Measures Within the OTAG Domain?Ozone is indeed controllable by measures within the OTAG domain. The high ozone concentrations in excess of the tropospheric background originate from within the OTAG region (Figures 4-13 (a) and (b) and 4-14); tropospheric background levels of ozone a re found at nearly all of the borders of the OTAG domain (Figure 4-3(a)), with the exception of the Windsor-Quebec corridor. This finding means that the high ozone concentrations are not due to external influences but contributed by sources internal to th e OTAG domain. Furthermore, the high ozone concentration regions roughly coincide with the pattern of anthropogenic precursor emissions as modified by atmospheric dispersion. Consequently, it can be inferred that most of the excess ozone concentrations o bserved within the domain result from anthropogenic emissions within the domain. Is There Evidence That Precursor Emissions Changes Cause Ozone Concentration Changes?Empirical evidence suggests that anthropogenic emissions changes do cause changes in ambient ozone concentrations. The data show a pronounced weekly cycle of ozone exceedances, with the 1-hour, 120-ppb exceedances on Sundays reduced by a factor of 3 compared to Friday exceedances. This reduction is most pronounced in urban areas, while in the central portion of the OTAG domain, the weekly ozone cycle is virtually nonexistent (Figures 4-15(a) and (b)). Hence, any control scenario that simulates the w eekday-weekend emissions changes would be effective in reducing the 1-hour, 120-ppb exceedances. It should be noted that the 8-hour, 80-ppb exceedances show less weekly fluctuation, indicating that such a control scenario would be less effective in reduci ng exceedances of the new standard. While this natural "emissions control" experiment provides interesting results, the workgroup does not have good information on the actual emissions changes that occur between weekdays and weekends. Examination of long-term trends of ozone as well as NOx and VOC emissions show that the largest ozone declines occur over approximately the same geographic area where simultaneous VOC and NOx emissions reduction occur. This observation provides furthe r evidence, but not proof, that emissions reductions cause declines of ozone concentrations. Do Air Quality Data Suggest High-Leverage Means for Controlling Ozone?Looking at spatial pattern, temporal pattern, and transport considerations, some general control approaches appear to have higher leverage. Clearly, urban nonattainment areas contribute significantly to their own ozone problems as well as to downwind a reas within their area of influence, 150500 miles away. Evidently, urban VOC controls are effective for peak shaving near metropolitan areas. Spatial pattern analysis indicates that the central area of the OTAG domain along the Ohio River is chronically exposed to moderately high ozone levels (Figures 4-4(a) and (b)). Forward and backward trajectory analyses (Figures 4-13(a) and (b)) and sur face wind-ozone rose analyses (Figure 4-14) implicate the central portion of the OTAG domain for being involved in transport-related ozone events more than any other portion of the domain, although the percentage of impact cannot be quantified from this t ype of analysis. Nonetheless, controls implemented in this area may be effective in reducing ozone transport more often than controls elsewhere. Furthermore, given the density of NOx-rich point sources in this portion of the domain and the observation tha t regional ozone formation appears to be determined by the magnitude of NOx emissions, it follows that NOx controls may be more effective for regional ozone reductions. This suggestion is consistent with regional modeling results to date. 7. Recommendations To Foster Future Air Quality AnalysesA sizable data analysis infrastructure has been created by the OTAG process, which consisted of a community of analysts, data resources, and a set of new analysis methods and tools. The associated communications capabilities through regular meetings, c onference calls, mailing lists, and Web sites have proven to be an effective way of integrating scientific research and policy-making. Efforts should be made to maintain this data analysis and communications infrastructure in the future. EPA is in the process of reviewing its current attainment status and trend networks, and it is involved in the planing of future monitoring programs. Now that the ozone transport problem has been recognized, the workgroup urges the Agency to consider e nhancing the existing monitoring and assessment programs to allow (1) quantification of ozone formation and source attribution, (2) quantification of transport across political boundaries, and (3) routine evaluation of photochemical model performance. Additional data are needed over less-populated areas, along key political boundaries, as well as for ozone aloft (including ridgetops and tall buildings). Spatially representative sampling and more accurate measurement methods (notably for totally reac tive nitrogen (NOy)) should be pursued. Co-located measurements of ozone, precursors, and fine particle composition are needed to better understand pollutant interactions and source contributions. The workgroup recommends further development of data analysis methods to quantify ozone transport and to better evaluate the performance of photochemical models. In particular, the analysis of the Photochemical Analysis Monitoring System (PAMS) network data should be enhanced and used in the evaluation of control strategy effectiveness. Finally, because of the inherent scientific uncertainties in air quality analysis and modeling and the multiple legitimate interests of the participants, the workgroup recommends the continued development of and a commitment to the stakeholder-based ai r quality management process undertaken through OTAG.
Part II: Summary and Integration of Results1. IntroductionBackgroundDuring the summer months, high ground-level ozone concentrations are observed within and downwind of many of the large urban areas in the eastern United States. Peak hourly average concentrations exceed the current National Ambient Air Quality Standar ds (NAAQS) for ozone, which is 0.12 ppm, and peak 8-hour average concentrations rise above the recently proposed revised ozone NAAQS level of 0.08 ppm. Figure 4-16 shows counties containing monitors with design values in excess of the current 1-hour NAAQ S; Figure 4-17 shows those areas with design values in excess of the proposed 8-hour standard. In the east, violations of the 1-hour standard are restricted to the northeast urban corridor, the Lake Michigan area, and the immediate vicinity of other majo r urban areas. The number and geographic extent of counties violating the 8-hour standard are significantly greater. A significant feature of ozone concentrations in the east is that, in contrast to other parts of the country, ozone concentrations well in excess of the 3040 ppb tropospheric background level are observed throughout most of the eastern United States, including locations outside of the major urban nonattainment areas. As a result of these large-scale elevated ozone events and the pr oximity of nonattainment areas to one another, many states have found that NAAQS attainment cannot be achieved with any reasonable level of local emissions control measures and, therefore, that a regional, multistate emissions control strategy is necessar y. The Ozone Transport Assessment Group was formed to deal with this issue. Air Quality Analysis Workgroup ActivitiesWithin OTAGs Modeling and Assessment Subgroup, the Air Quality Analysis Workgroup was formed to evaluate and perform analyses of air quality and meteorological data relevant to OTAGs mission. Data analyses conducted by AQA Workgroup member s complement work performed under the auspices of the RUSM Workgroup. AQA Workgroup members contributed numerous analyses, as listed in Table 4-1. Some of the analyses were based on ozone and precursor data from intensive field measurement programs such as the Nashville/Middle Tennessee Ozone Study and the NARSTO-NE Study that provide detailed spatial and temporal coverage of ozone, ozone precursors, and meteorological conditions both at the surface and aloft during a limited number of individual ozone episode events. Other analyses were based on research-grade ozone and precursor monitoring programs conducted over multiyear periods at a limited number of locations, such as the Southern Oxidants Study/Southeastern Consortium Intermediate Oxidant Networ k (SOS/SCION) network. Still other analyses were based on the routine ozone and meteorological data collected at regular time intervals at a large number of sampling sites located throughout the OTAG domain. The latter two types of analyses were designe d to identify major features of the ozone climatology within the OTAG domain that provide insights into ozone/precursor relationships and transport issues. A major advantage of these results is that, in contrast to modeling studies and analyses based on intensive measurements of individual ozone episodes, they provide information on ozone, ozone/precursor relationships, and ozone and precursor transport over the full range of meteorological conditions in the OTAG domain. Analyses contributed by AQA Workgroup members were presented and discussed
during monthly workgroup meetings. Comments made during these meetings
frequently resulted in significant revisions and additions. Formal written
reports are currently availab le for many of the analyses. Most of these
reports have been posted on the AQA Workgroup Web site (http://capita.wustl.edu/OTAG)
Unfortunately, because of resource constraints, it was not possible to prepare summaries for all of the analyses presented to or discussed by the workgroup. Table 4-1 indicates which analyses were summarized and which were not. Although the following discussion is based primarily on the analyses for which summaries were prepared, references are made in some cases to major results from some of the other studies. It should be recognized, however, that these results were not subjected to the same AQA W orkgroup review process as those from studies for which summaries are provided here, although in some cases these studies may have been reviewed by other groups. For clarity, references shown in bold in the following sections are among those for wh ich summaries were prepared; these summaries can be found in Part III: Summaries of Individual AQA Workgroup Analyses. Overview of Regional Ozone and Transport in the Eastern United StatesThe regional nature of elevated ozone episodes in the eastern United States has long been recognized (see, e.g., NRC, 1991; OTC, 1994; SOS, 1995; Husar, 1996a). A review of measurement studies and statistical data analyses conducted by the Natio nal Research Council (NRC, 1991) identified elevated ozone events on spatial scales exceeding 600,000 km2 lasting from a few days to as long as a week, with concentrations exceeding at least 80 ppb for a major portion of each day. The most wide spread regional episodes were found to be associated with slow moving, high pressure weather systems that produced high temperatures, light winds, limited vertical mixing, and mostly clear skies. Air movement around the high, the slow (typically eastward or northeastward) migration of the high, and the influence of transient weather features on the fringes of the high can result in transport of elevated ozone and precursor concentrations over significant distances. Within this regional "sea" of elevated ozone, imbedded urban ozone plumes consisting of significantly higher concentrations can be found. Surface and aloft observations have shown that these urban plumes can be distinguished over a period of 12 hours covering an area of up to 8,000 km 2 (NRC, 1991). Given the observational evidence cited above, it is clear that transport mechanisms acting to produce the large-scale regional ozone excess above tropospheric background in the eastern United States have the potential to contribute significantly to exc eedances of the current 1-hour or proposed 8-hour ozone standards. The direction and spatial extent of transport and the relative contribution of transported ozone and precursors to individual ozone exceedances is highly variable. On one hand, some episo des, such as the July 1115, 1995, Nashville episode analyzed by Meagher (1996) may be entirely local and not involve any transport. During this episode, ozone concentrations in downtown Nashville reached 138 ppb, more than 55 ppb above the d aily maximum value at any surrounding site and approximately 80 ppb above values near the boundary of the metropolitan area. On the other hand, as indicated by Blumenthal et al. (1997), a number of 1-day and multiday transport mechanisms have been observ ed along the coastal plain in the northeast, some or all of which may be involved in any given ozone exceedance episode. These mechanisms include
2. Boundary layer synoptic flows occurring within the daytime planetary boundary layer but above the surface layer at heights (typically 8001500 meters(m) above the Earths surface, where surface influences are less important and syno ptic scale pressure gradient forces are relatively more important. 3. Channeled nighttime flows in low-level jets that form under stable conditions just above the nocturnal boundary layer (typically 200800 m above sea level under episode conditions in the northeast) and are enhanced by the channeling effe cts of major terrain features (such as the Appalachian Mountains in the northeast). Within any given episode, each of the above flow features may be characterized by different directions, average speeds, and temporal and spatial variations. Surface flows are typically more sluggish and more localized than the synoptic flows, and they exhibit a strong diurnal pattern. In most cases, winds are calm or near calm during the nighttime and early morning hours under episode conditions. Surface flows are thus primarily involved in near-field transport whereas the synoptic flows are capable of transporting material for 2 or more days over considerably longer distances. The relatively high-speed channeled nighttime flows can move material long distances overnight close to the surface where it is available to be mixed down to the surface as t he mixing depth increases the next morning. From surface and upper air observations of winds and back trajectory calculations during northeastern ozone episodes, Blumenthal and co-workers concluded that near-surface transport along the urban corridor can cover distances of 50250 km from morning until evening, boundary layer synoptic flows can transport material 200600 km across the Appalachian Mountains in a 24-hour period, and channeled nighttime flows such as those observed by Ray et al. (19 97) can transport material 200400 km overnight. While not all of the three basic flow regimes described above will be important at all locations, some or all may play important roles in ozone and precursor transport in various nonattainment regions throughout the OTAG domain. Thus, the factors contributing to transport are quite complex. The AQA Workgroup conducted analyses designed to identify the relative contributions of these transport mechanisms to ozone exceedances at different locations in the OTAG domain. 2. Integrated Summary of Workgroup AnalysesAnalyses conducted by the AQA Workgroup provide information in six key areas:
An integrated summary of AQA Workgroup analysis results as they pertain to these six key areas is provided in the following sections. This summary is followed by a discussion of recommendations for future analyses. Summaries of individual analyses are provided in the final section of this report. Spatial and Temporal Pattern of Ozone in the OTAG DomainTo better understand the temporal and spatial patterns of regional ozone levels associated with transport impacts in the eastern United States, an integrated set of ozone monitoring data from both the primarily population-oriented Aerometric Informatio n Retrieval System (AIRS) network (consisting of the National Ambient Monitoring Station and the State and Local Ambient Monitoring Station networks) and several rural networks Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNet), Interagency Monitoring of PROte cted Visual Environments (IMPROVE), SCION, Eulerian Model Evaluation and Field Study (EMEFS) was constructed (Husar and Husar, 1996). Analyses of this database (Husar, 1996a, b, c) revealed the following key features:
Although no effort was made to estimate the flux of ozone and precursors across the OTAG domain boundary, these observations suggest that, with the possible exception of the international border along the Quebec-Windsor corridor, air masses entering th e OTAG domain contain little or no ozone burden above tropospheric background levels (and precursor fluxes into the domain are likely to be equally negligible). Thus, ozone concentrations above approximately 35 ppb observed within the OTAG domain must be generated by sources within the domain. Because of the pervasive influence of anthropogenic activities, present-day monitoring data cannot provide any information on the likely range of concentrations that would be observed in the OTAG domain in the abs ence of any anthropogenic influences. While seasonal mean daily maximum concentrations along some parts of the OTAG boundary where anthropogenic influences are minimized are in the 3040 ppb range as noted above, climatic conditions and biogenic inv entories within the central portion of the domain differ markedly from those in these boundary regions and may conspire to produce somewhat higher "natural" background ozone concentrations. On the other hand, some modeling estimates of pre-indu strial ozone levels suggest that lower values might be expected in the absence of any anthropogenic influence (e.g., Levy et al., 1997), but these estimates have not been reviewed for this report. Additional findings from the spatial and temporal pattern analyses include the following:
Transport AnalysesSeveral analyses conducted by the AQA Workgroup focused on identifying the spatial and temporal extent and magnitude of the transport of ozone and precursors. Measurements of ozone, precursors, and meteorological conditions conducted as part of both t he 1995 SOS Nashville/Middle Tennessee Ozone Study, and the 1995 NARSTO-NE Field Study were analyzed for this purpose (Edgerton and Hartsell, 1996; Edgerton, 1997a; Ray et al., 1997; Vukovich, 1996; Blumenthal et al., 1997; Hudischewskyj and Dougla s, 1997). In addition, long-term data sets of routine air quality and meteorological measurements were used to examine spatial ozone and temperature correlation patterns and to compute air parcel trajectories (Poirot and Wishinski, 1996a, b, c; Wishinski and Poirot, 1996; Schichtel and Husar, 1996, 1997). Daily back trajectories ending at 23 monitoring sites located throughout the OTAG domain were computed using seven summers (19891995) of three-dimensional gridded wind fields and va riations in the trajectory patterns with ozone concentrations at the receptor sites were analyzed. Principal findings of these analyses are summarized below. One-day transport of ozone within plumes from urban areas and major power plants has been demonstrated using aircraft data (NRC, 1991 and references therein). In addition, impacts of distinct power plant plumes and urban plumes have been noted at seve ral rural sites in the southeast (Edgerton and Hartsell, 1996). Aircraft measurements of NOx, O3, and the products of NOx oxidation (NOz) made within the Cumberland and Johnsonville power plant plumes located near Nashville (Meagher, 1996) indicated that, during these summer daytime measurement periods, essentially all of the NOx is converted to NOz within 30100 km of the source. Thus, ozone production due to NOx in the plume ceases within 100 km of the power plant. These results differ somewhat from those in the earlier Tennessee Plume Study in which aircraft measurements of the Cumberland plume conducted in August 1978 indicated ozone production continuing beyond 110 km to at least 160 km (Gillani and Pleim, 1996). Dif ferences in the distance estimates between these two studies may be related to differences in mean plume transport wind speeds, as well as to other meteorological and air quality factors. It is important to note that, under the right conditions, power pl ant plumes may travel relatively long distances overnight with little loss of NOx and thus be available to participate in photochemical reactions at distant locations on the following day. Trainer et al. (1993) shows that ambient O3/NOz concent ration ratios provide a measure of the efficiency of ozone production, i.e., essentially the amount of ozone produced during the lifetime of each nitrogen dioxide (NO2) molecule. Planetary boundary layer measurements of O3/NOz ratio s from aircraft and surface sites made within the power plant plumes and the Nashville urban emissions plume indicate that ozone formation efficiency as measured by this ratio is 6570 percent greater in the urban plume as compared to the power plant plumes (Meagher, 1996). Thus, on a per-unit emissions basis, urban area source NOx emissions may be more important to same-day ozone formation than elevated point source NOx emissions. Conditions during ozone episodes are conducive to longer transport distances over 12 day periods in the northeastern portion of the OTAG domain (coinciding with higher average wind speeds and a more organized flow pattern) than in the southeaster n portion of the domain, where average wind speeds are lower and the flow pattern is less well organized. Evidence of this fact can be found in the "source regions of influence" and residence time analyses conducted by Schichtel and Husar(19 97, 1996), and in the residence time analysis, autocorrelations, and lagged inter-regional correlations computed by Poirot and Wishinski (1996a, b, c). Analyses of the July 1115 ozone episode in Nashville (Meagher, 1996) indicate that this episode was primarily a result of local emissions; the area of high ozone (with concentrations up to 80 ppb above a 60- to 70-ppb regional background) was restricted to the immediate metropolitan area and did not extend away from it in any direction. However, the frequency of such "homegrown" episodes versus regional episodes was not examined. Porter et al. (1996) present spatial correlation results for the short-term (deseasonalized) ozone component that suggest a spatial scale of 560640 km (350400 miles) for same-day formation and transport. Schichtel and Husars s ource regions of influence analysis indicate a scale of 300600 km (for 1-day transport times) and 4501000 km (for 2-day transport times) in the northern half of the OTAG domain. In the southern half of the domain, 1-day scales were found to b e somewhat less: 200400 km (for 1-day transport times) and 300800 km (for 2-day transport times). Similarly, analysis of typical transport distances and trajectory residence times for days in the upper 20 percent of daily maximum ozone in eac h portion of the OTAG domain show relatively large transport distances and short residence times in the northeast and short transport distances and long residence times in the south. Interpretation of these results is subject to two important caveats: 1. Given the somewhat weak but nevertheless significant correlations of Porters short-term ozone component with temperature and the likely influence of other meteorological factors on day-to-day variations in the short-term ozone component, it i s not possible to distinguish the degree to which the spatial scales implied by this analysis are representative of actual ozone and precursor transport or merely representative of correlations in meteorological conditions between locations. 2. The spatial scales obtained from Schichtel and Husars source regions of influence analysis represent the typical distances air parcels are estimated to travel over 1- and 2-day intervals and provide no information on the relative contribution s of precursor sources to ozone concentrations at the given downwind distances. Trajectory model results do not show actual spatial transport scales but do indicate potential source regions along the pathways of air parcels associated with above-average ozone at receptor sites. Back trajectory analyses conducted by Poiro t and Wishinski (1996a, b, c) indicate that air parcels originating outside of the OTAG domain are associated with below-average ozone at various locations throughout the domain. In contrast, air parcels associated with above-average ozone concentrat ions at these receptor sites predominantly originate from the heart of the OTAG domain. Remarkably, this was found to be the case no matter where in the domain the receptor site waslocated. Of course, it should be noted that the trajectory analysis does not take into consideration atmospheric chemical processes, the injection of precursor emissions, or the deposition of material along the trajectory path. Therefore, although these results provide consistent circumstantial evidence that emissions from th e central portion of the domain contribute in some way to above-average ozone events throughout the domain, the relative contribution of precursor emissions along various portions of the trajectory paths leading to the receptor sites (i.e., emissions ori ginating near the upwind end of the trajectory versus emissions originating near the receptor site) are not known. Development of Control StrategiesComparisons of historical trends in ozone and precursor concentrations with trends in precursor emissions levels can provide insights into the relative effectiveness of control strategies. Unfortunately, trends in the annual extreme ozone concentration s of interest are sensitive to the influences of interannual variations in meteorological conditions, movement of monitoring sites, missing data, and random fluctuations in concentrations that can make identification of consistent trends difficult. Furth ermore, high-quality data on ambient precursor trends is extremely limited and estimates of precursor emissions are subject to potentially significant biases. Despite these difficulties, several important features can be noted in the trends of ozone and precursor emissions between the early to mid-1980s and the mid-1990s as described below. Many of the analyses presented here were summarized by Morris (1996). After adjusting for meteorological variations, ozone concentrations decreased significantly in all of the major metropolitan areas in the northeast urban corridor from Washington, D.C., to Boston between 1984 and 1995. Total declines were less in Wash ington and Baltimore than in the other cities (Chinkin et al., 1996; Rao et al., 1995). Porter et al. (1996) showed declines in deseasonalized, temperature-adjusted daily maximum 1-hour ozone concentrations between 1985 and 1995 at a majority of monitoring sites throughout the OTAG domain, although increases were noted for a signif icant minority of sites. No inter-regional differences in trends can be discerned from the Porter et al. report. However, a similar analysis of 19831992 trends for the northern half of the OTAG domain (Rao et al., 1995) showed statistically signif icant downward trends at most northeastern sites. Trends were also exclusively or predominantly negative in all parts of Pennsylvania, Ohio, West Virginia, Kentucky, North Carolina, Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois, and Indiana. Mixed or positive trends were n oted in Michigan, Maryland, Tennessee, and Missouri. Wolff and Korsog (1994) showed that ozone trends based on various peak hourly statistics (such as the annual maximum 1-hour value and the 95th percentile of 1-hour values) between 1980/1981 and 1993 showed declines in most northeastern cities (one moni toring site was selected to represent each city). Negative trends were also found in Detroit, Chicago, and Atlanta, but a positive trend was noted in Grand Rapids. Trends computed for Boston were somewhat unreliable due to missing data from 1980 to 1983 . These trends were not adjusted for variations in meteorological conditions. In contrast to trends based on peak 1-hour statistics, Wolff and Korsog (1994) found trends based on running 8-hour averages to be zero or positive in Detroit, Grand Rapids, Atlanta, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C. Chinkin et al. (199 6) reported lower percent reductions in number of exceedances of a 100-ppb threshold than for higher thresholds. Thus, trends in exceedances of an 8-hour, 80-ppb threshold are generally less negative than trends in exceedances of a 1-hour, 120-ppb th reshold. In some cases the 8-hour trends are positive as compared to negative 1-hour trends. EPAs annual trends report (EPA, 1994) includes total NOx, VOC, and CO emissions by EPA region for 19851994. VOC emissions declined sharply in all regions after 1988, reaching a total reduction of 1015 percent below 1985 levels by 199 1. In contrast, NOx emissions, while decreasing by 5 percent between 1989 and 1991 in Region I, increased by more than 5 percent in Regions IV and V. Thus, the largest ozone declines occurred over approximately the same geographic area where simultaneou s VOC and NOx reductions occurred. In general, ozone trends were less negative or of mixed signs in the south and midwest, areas that experienced increases in NOx emissions. Chinkin et al. (1996) compared correlation coefficients for NOx and VOC emissions versus ambient ozone for metropolitan areas in the northeast and found somewhat better correlations between VOC and ozone as compared to NOx, although the statistical significance of these comparisons was not explored. The correlation coefficie nts were low overall, indicating that annual emissions changes fail to explain a significant percentage of the variability in meteorologically adjusted ozone trends. The above results do not lend themselves to formulation of a definitive conclusion regarding causal relationships between changes in VOC and NOx emissions and ambient ozone concentrations. When looking at emissions and ozone trends from the mid-1980s t o the mid-1990s for various ozone trend measures at various locations, the most consistently (although by no means universally) identifiable feature is the simultaneous decline in peak ozone concentrations and VOC emissions between 1988 and 1991. This re sult by itself, however, does not indicate that the observed decrease in ozone is attributable in whole or even in part to the drop in VOC, although it is reasonable to conclude that VOC decreases contributed at least partially to the ozone decline outsid e of biogenic-dominated southern locations. Comprehensive analyses of ambient NOx or VOC concentration trends, which might validate the emissions trends, have not been conducted. Rich Poirot of the Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation has not ed examples of apparent discrepancies between ambient nitric oxide (NO) and NO2 concentration trends, nitrate deposition trends, and NOx emissions trends, which warrant further investigation. In particular, EPA (1995) reported a 3-percent incr ease in national total NOx emissions between 1985 and 1994; over the same period, the national composite NO2 concentrations decreased by 9 percent. In addition, future ozone/precursor trend relationships may differ from those of the past. For example, if the ozone peak downwind of an urban area results from the superposition of an ozone plume generated under VOC-limited conditions by the urban ar ea with a regional background "cloud" of elevated ozone formed largely under NOx-limited conditions, then urban VOC reductions, such as those that occurred between the mid-1980s and mid-1990s, may reduce the total ozone peak by reducing the urba n areas contribution. However, as the peak is lowered, the regional, NOx-limited contribution to the total peak becomes relatively more important. Thus, future VOC reductions may be less effective at reducing ozone concentrations than in the past. This effect would be magnified for exceedances of an 8-hour average ozone standard as compared to a 1-hour standard because the 8-hour averages are less sensitive to sharp 1-hour concentration peaks downwind of urban areas. Impact of an 8-Hour Ozone StandardEPAs proposed revisions to the ozone NAAQS is based on an 8-hour average daily maximum concentration instead of the 1-hour daily maximum measure used in the current standard. Although closely related, spatial and temporal patterns of peak 8-hour averages, the role of transport, and the response of 8-hour values to control strategies are somewhat different than for 1-hour averages. AQA Workgroup analyses of these issues produced the following principal findings:
No analyses of the relative effectiveness of various control strategies for 1-hour versus 8-hour ozone have been conducted by the AQA Workgroup. Relative effectiveness is dependent on the complex interaction of many factors and can be expected to vary significantly from one situation to the next. Representativeness of OTAG EpisodesAn issue of concern in the interpretation of control strategy modeling results is the degree to which the set of episodes selected for modeling represent the full range of conditions under which ozone episodes occur. If certain types of episodes are n ot well represented by the selected episodes, model results may give a misleading picture of control strategy impacts. The AQA Workgroup examined the representativeness of episodes modeled by the RUSM Workgroup ("OTAG episodes") from two perspe ctives:
2. How do forward and backward trajectories computed as part of the "source regions of influence" and "trajectory residence time" analyses discussed above compare between OTAG episode days and high-ozone days in general? While the general spatial patterns of daily maximum ozone concentrations during the modeled episodes in 1988, 1991, 1993, and 1995 are similar to the pattern of 90th percentile daily maximum concentrations for all days during the 19911995 ozone s easons, there are clear differences from episode to episode (Figure 4-18). Generally speaking, the 1991 and 1995 episodes are more similar to each other than the 1993 episode, which is characterized primarily by high ozone levels in the south with lower values elsewhere. Similar results are seen in the comparisons of transport vectors and normalized residence times between the modeled episodes in each year (Figures 4-19(a)(d)). Each episode is characterized by different regions of high residence times; the 1993 episode differed markedly from the other two, with high residence times in the south and low residence times in the north. OTAG Model EvaluationAlthough the primary model evaluation studies for OTAG were conducted by the Regional and Urban Scale Modeling Workgroup, the AQA Workgroup also conducted several diagnostic comparisons of observed and predicted ozone and ozone precursor concentrations that shed light on the suitability of the OTAG photochemical model results for evaluation of regional control strategy impacts (Hartsell and Edgerton, 1996; Edgerton, 1997b; Morris et al., 1997; Imhoff, 1996; Lurmann et al., 1997). The principal findings of the RUSM Workgroup and AQA Workgroup analyses are discussed below. OzoneComparisons of observed surface ozone concentrations with model predictions for all four modeled episodes (1988, 1991, 1993, and 1995) were conducted under EPA sponsorship (OTAG, 1996). Results of this analysis indicated "generally good agreement between simulated and observed values; [with] no large positive or negative biases." (ibid., p. 61). Comparisons of observed and predicted concentration fields indicate that the overall spatial and temporal ozone patterns appear to have been p roperly simulated (OTAG, 1996; Husar and Schichtel, 1996). However, the model results show a regional bias underprediction of concentrations on average in the northern half of the domain and an overprediction in the southern half of the domain. Furtherm ore, for some episodes and in some regions, a "bias creep" was observed in which concentrations were underpredicted on average at the beginning of the episode and overpredicted at the end of the episode. Comparisons of observed surface ozone concentrations during the July 1995 episode with concentrations predicted by the OTAG UAM-V runs for a suburban and a rural site near Nashville reveal a fair amount of scatter but no bias. However, comparisons alo ft indicates that the model consistently underpredicts ozone concentrations above the mixed layer. This result is consistent with underpredictions aloft during the morning hours along the western boundary of the northeast urban corridor noted by Lurmann, 1997. There are several possible reasons for this outcome; current analyses do not allow the workgroup to distinguish among them. Comparisons of observed and modeled ozone for nine rural sites in the south and northeast for the July 1995 episode reveal a tendency for the model to overestimate the frequency and duration of ozone values in the 80100 ppb range for these rural sites. If confirmed by analyses for a larger group of sites, this finding would indicate a potential problem with using OTAG results to provide boundary conditions for urban scale modeling. IsopreneComparisons of observed mid-afternoon isoprene concentrations at monitoring sites located in various parts of the OTAG domain with predicted surface layer isoprene concentrations for corresponding model grid cells reveal a tendency for the model to ove rpredict isoprene (Morris et al., 1997; Edgerton, 1997b). More than three-fourths of the sites examined in these studies exhibit biases greater than ±25 percent and nearly half the sites exhibit mean biases of greater than ±50 per cent of mean observed values. Nearly all the biases over ±50 percent are overpredictions. No geographic pattern in the magnitude or sign of the bias is evident in the results, and the magnitude of the overpredictions greatly exceed the level of bias one might expect from comparing a near surface concentration with a (50 m) vertically averaged value for the model grid cell. These results point to a potentially significant problem with the UAM-V/Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (1995) (BEIS2) mode ling system: If isoprene emissions in the OTAG inventory are significantly overestimated (for whatever reason), the overrepresentation of biogenic VOCs would cause the model to underestimate the expected response to anthropogenic VOC controls. In additi on, the model would tend to be overly sensitive to NOx controls in all but the largest urban areas. Other PrecursorsAn analysis of CO/NOy and VOC/NOy ratios at a Nashville urban site during 1995 found good agreement between measured and modeled ratios, indicating consistency between the modeled and ambient CO/NOx and VOC/NOx emissions ratios around this site (Imhoff, 1996). The intercepts at zero NOy from these analyses are indicative of the background concentrations of CO and VOC; the analyses indicated that the model tends to underestimate the CO background and overestimate the VOC background at thi s site. The discrepancy between the apparent background for VOC of 90 ppb in the model compared to near zero in the ambient data possibly indicates that a source of VOC (but not CO and NOy) is overestimated in the model. The tendency for the model to un derestimate the CO background at this urban site is surprising given that the model had a tendency to overpredict CO at two rural sites in Georgia and Tennessee; however, these findings are not necessarily inconsistent. The tendency to over predict CO at the rural sites may be indicative of emissions or atmospheric mixing problems in this region. ChemistryComparisons of observed and predicted ozone production efficiencies based on O3/NOz ratios show good agreement at rural site near Nashville in 1995; both observed and predicted O3/NOz ratios are about 6, suggesting ozone formation is NOx limited (Imhoff, 1996). At a Nashville suburban site, both the observed and (particularly) modeled O3/NOz ratios show more variability, making it difficult to draw conclusions about model performance for this location. The aver age observed O3/NOz ratio (approximately 3) is lower for the suburban site than the rural site, suggesting ozone formation is relatively less NOx limited and more VOC limited at the suburban site. Similarly, a comparison of modeled and observe d O3/NOy relationships reveal good agreement across nine rural sites in the south and northeast in 1995; both observed and predicted O3/NOy ratios are about 9, suggesting ozone formation is NOx limited (Hartsell and Edgerton, 1996). The good performance of the model chemistry for O3/NOy (and O3/NOz) relationships under NOx-limited conditions supports the use of the model for evaluating regional control strategies. This finding is particularly rel evant to OTAG because ozone formation is NOx limited over much of the OTAG domain. 3. Recommendations for Additional AnalysesFurther work is recommended in a number of different areas as outlined below. The OTAG infrastructurethe community of analysts brought together by the OTAG process and associated communications capabilities (regular meetings, conference calls, W eb sites, and mailing lists)has proven to be a valuable resource for conducting policy-relevant research, and efforts should be made to maintain this infrastructure in the future. The following specific actions are recommended for future inquiry:
Several AQA Workgroup members also suggest that the current ozone, ozone precursor, and meteorological monitoring network be reconfigured and enhanced to better address the issue of regional elevated ozone events, ozone and precursor transport, and pho tochemical model evaluation. Currently, there is a lack of routine air quality and meteorological data suitable for analysis of transport over a broad range of episode conditions. In particular, the current monitoring network is primarily focused on the larger metropolitan areas, whereas spatial coverage in less populated areas or along boundaries of political jurisdictions is quite limited. The current monitoring network is also primarily geared towards monitoring ozone attainment status and trends. Measurements of ozone aloft or of ozone precursors are quite limited. Such measurements are needed both for transport assessments and to better evaluate the performance of photochemical models used to estimate control strategy impacts. |
Table 4-1. Technical Analyses Considered by the Air Quality Analysis Workgroup
|
Summary |
Written Report Available |
Internet Document* |
|
|
1. Spatial and Temporal Pattern of Ozone and Precursors |
|||
|
Spatial Pattern of Daily Maximum Ozone Over the OTAG Region (Husar, 1996a) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Pattern of 8-Hour Daily Maximum Ozone Over the OTAG Domain (Husar, 1996b) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Weekly Pattern of Ozone Over the OTAG Region (Husar, 1996c) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Spectral Decomposition of Ozone Time Series (Porter et al., 1996) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Seasonal Pattern of Ozone Over the OTAG Region (Husar, 1997) |
N |
Y |
Y |
|
Historical Perspective on the Climatological Potential for "Local" Pollution Episodes (Poirot and Wishinski, 1997) |
N |
Y |
Y |
|
Ozone Exceedances Data Analysis: Representativeness of 1995 (Chinkin et al, 1996) |
Y |
Y |
N |
|
Ozone Measurement Trends Studies in the Northeast |
Y |
Y |
N |
|
SOS Nashville/Middle Tennessee Ozone Study (Meagher, 1996) |
Y |
Y |
N |
|
2. Transport of Ozone and Precursors |
|||
|
Air Trajectory Analysis of Long-Term Ozone Climatology (Poirot and Wishinski, 1996a, b, c; Wishinski and Poirot, 1996) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Source Regions of Influence for High and Low Ozone Conditions in the Eastern U.S. (Schichtel and Husar, 1997, 1996) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Ozone/Tracer/NOy Relationships at Three SOS/SCION Sites (Edgerton and Hartsell, 1996) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Analysis of Ozone, NOy, and Tracer Data from a Site in South-Central Pennsylvania (Edgerton, 1997a) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Analysis of Low-Level Jets Using NARSTO-NE Data |
N |
Y |
N |
|
Intra-Annual and High Frequency Variations at SOS/SCION Sites (Vukovich, 1996) |
N |
Y |
N |
|
Transport and Mixing Phenomena Related to Ozone Exceedances in the Northeast U.S. (Blumenthal et al., 1997) |
N |
Y |
Y |
|
Classification of Ozone Episodes for Four Southern Cities According to Transport Characteristics (Hudischewskyj and Douglas, 1997) |
N |
Y |
Y |
|
3. Model Performance Evaluation |
|||
|
A Comparison of Modeled and Measured Ozone, NOy, and CO at Nine Regional Monitoring Stations During the 1995 OTAG Episode (Hartsell and Edgerton, 1996) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Ambient Monitoring Sites for OTAG (Time Series) Model Evaluation (Poirot, 1996) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Comparison of OTAG UAM-V/BEIS2 Modeling Results With Ambient Isoprene Observations (Edgerton, 1997b; Morris et al., 1997) |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
Comparison of SOS Nashville Data to OTAG 1995 Base Model (Imhoff, 1996) |
Y |
N |
N |
|
Evaluation of the UAM-V Model Performance in the Northeast Region for OTAG Episodes (Lurmann et al., 1997) |
N |
Y |
Y |
|
4. Episode Representativeness |
|||
|
Episode "Representativeness" (Preliminary View from Backward Trajectory Perspective) (Poirot and Schichtel, 1996) |
N |
N |
N |
|
Comparison of Ozone Distributions During OTAG-Modeled Episodes With Climatological Distributions (Husar, 1997b) |
N |
N |
N |
Distributions of the biases across sites are summarized in Table 4-3.
Table 4-3. Distribution of Bias Across Sites3
|
Analyses |
Within ±25% |
Within ±50% |
Underprediction greater than 50% |
Overprediction greater than 50% |
||||
|
No. of Sites |
Percent of Sites |
No. of Sites |
Percent of Sites |
No. of Sites |
Percent of Sites |
No. of Sites |
Percent of Sites |
|
|
Morris et al. |
2 |
13% |
8 |
53% |
1 |
7% |
6 |
40% |
|
Edgerton |
2 |
12% |
6 |
38% |
1 |
6% |
9 |
56% |
|
1In the Morris et al. study, bias is defined as the average of the differences (predicted minus observed values) expressed as a fraction of the mean observed value; in the Edgerton study, bias is defined as the mean percent difference. 2 Gross error is defined as the average absolute difference (predicted minus observed values) in both studies. 3In this comparison, bias is defined as the average of the differences (predicted minus observed) expressed as a fraction of the mean observed value in both studies. Findings. Afternoon observations included in the analysis showed a wide range of concentrations from near zero to more than 60 parts per billion based on carbon content); mean values across the network ranged from 2 ppbC to nearly 30 ppbC. Compar isons with predictions matched in time showed a wide range of prediction errors. Bias and gross error results are summarized in Table 4-2. Results are quite similar for both studies with maximum positive biases (overpredictions) being larger in an absolu te sense than the maximum negative biases (underpredictions). Bias was within ±50 percent at just 6 of the 16 sites examined by Edgerton, with all but one of the remaining sites (Brookhaven, New York) exhibiting overpredictions. While bias was within ±25 percent at just two sites in each study, slight ly better agreement overall was found by Morris et al.; slightly more than half of the 15 sites examined showed biases within ±50 percent. One site (Ware, Massachusetts) was underpredicted by more than 50 percent, while overpredictions of more than 50 percent were exhibited at the remaining six sites. Thus, more than three-fourths of the sites examined in these studies exhibited biases greater than ±25 percent, and nearly half the sites exhibited mean biases of greater than ±50 percent of mean observed values. Nearly all the biases greater than ±50 percent were over predictions.4 Edgerton found no discernable geographic pattern of bias. Edgertons analysis of residuals (mean differences as a function of mean predict ed values indicates a fairly strong linear relationship, (correlation coefficient, r2, of 0.78) with a positive slope: of the eight sites with mean predicted concentrations below 10 ppbC, the model underpredicted on average at three sites; for the eight sites with mean predictions above 10 ppbC, all but one exhibited over predictions on average. While this relationship is partially a reflection of the lack of correlation between observed and predicted isoprene concentrations, the strength of the correlation between the differences and predicted values in this case suggests that some additional factor is contributing to the relationship. Thus, in an absolute sense, model performance is worse at sites with high mean isoprene concentrations (e. g., in the southeast) than at sites with low mean concentrations. Morris et al. did not conduct a similar analysis of residuals. Edgerton examined two potential sources of bias between observations made at a fixed point roughly 10 m above the surface and model predictions made for a 50 m deep grid cell:
2. The use of temperature measurements made at roughly 1.5 m above ground level to estimate isoprene emissions from forest canopies located further above the ground where cooler temperatures can be expected as a result of near adiabatic or super adiaba tic lapse rates typical of sunny summer afternoons (which would cause predicted isoprene values to be greater than observed). In some cases, forest canopy temperatures may also be lower than the near-surface observations because of enhanced evapotranspiration. Edgertons review of the isoprene profile estimates of Andronache and Chameides (1994) indicates that observati ons taken at 10 m should be only about 26 percent higher than the 1050 m layer average. As for the temperature effect, Edgerton states that daytime vertical temperature gradients in rural eastern U.S. environments as measured at CASTNet meteo rological monitoring sites are typically -0.5°C to -1.0°C between 2 m and 9 m. If this is assumed to be the same order of magnitude as the temperature difference between 1.5 m and the vegetation canopy, it could cause a possible overestimation of emissions on the order of 715 percent. Thus, the influence of vertical gradients in isoprene and temperature appear to be negligible compared to the relatively large biases between observed and predicted isoprene concentrations found in these st udies. Of course, this fact does not rule out the possibility of other temperature-related problems such as biases in the 1.5 m measurements used to generate gridded wind fields for the model. Limitations. Comparison of observed and predicted isoprene concentrations are primarily limited by the spatial representativeness of the monitoring data as well as the ability of the model to characterize vegetation within a grid cell. Isopren e emissions exhibit strong spatial and temporal variations due to differences in the amount of plant material and species mix and the response of plants to changes in environmental conditions. In addition, isoprene is highly reactive and undergoes rapid transformation once released. Thus, measurements made at fixed locations with varying degrees of exposure to isoprene sources can provide only an approximate indication of the volume average concentration represented by the model predictions. Additional analysis of both the ambient measurements and the land use and temperature data input to the model are needed to better diagnose the factors contributing to the prediction errors noted in these two studies and to rectify the apparent inconsistencies betw een these results and the emission flux measurements used to support development of BEIS2 (see Guenther et al., 1996 and references therein). If the underlying formulation of BEIS2 is sound as suggested by the earlier studies, then the OTAG overpredictio ns point to a potential problem with the procedures used to calculate the OTAG biogenic inventory. It should also be noted that isoprene represents only one component of the total biogenic VOC inventory, although it is the dominant species. Similar comp arisons for other biogenic species are not included in these studies (and may be difficult or impossible to do for some species that are not unique to biogenic sources or are difficult to measure accurately). Scientific Implications. Because isoprene is so abundant in the OTAG domain and it is highly reactive, significant errors in isoprene predictions have the potential to introduce significant errors into predictions of the sensitivity of ozone to anthropogenic VOC and NOx controls. Isoprene is a highly reactive primary species with emissions that vary strongly as a function of solar insolation, temperature, and land cover. As a result, one might expect relatively large differences between volum e average predictions made for a 12 km by 12 km by 50 m deep grid cell and measurements made at a single fixed location within that cell. Measurement errors would also contribute to these differences. Results of these studies bear out this expectation, showing much larger differences between UAM-V/BEIS2 isoprene predictions and corresponding observations than is the case for ozone, even when the comparison is limited to the afternoon hours when high emissions rates and strong turbulent diffusion should act to minimize the expected differences. This expectation not withstanding, the magnitude of the prediction errors and the tendency towards over predictions indicates a potentially serious problem with the UAM-V/BEIS2 modeling system. The fact that ove rpredictions occur at many of the rural sites examined by Edgerton is especially troublesome; overpredictions at some urban sites could be explained by the fact that the corresponding modeling grid cells include vegetation cover beyond the urban boundarie s. Isoprene emissions rate biases for tall forest canopies introduced by the use of inappropriately high near-surface temperatures in BEIS2 do not appear to be large enough to explain the observed overpredictions, although other potential sources of error in the temperatures used to drive the model have yet to be explored. Policy Implications. Incorrect representation of biogenic VOC emissions in the OTAG UAM-V/BEIS2 modeling system would result in errors in the models predictions of ozone concentrations and the models responses to anthropogenic emission control strategies. If isoprene emissions in the OTAG inventory are significantly overe stimated (for whatever reason), the overrepresentation of biogenic VOCs would cause the model to underestimate the expected response to anthropogenic VOC controls. In addition, the model would tend to be overly sensitive to NOx controls in all but the la rgest urban areas. Additional References Andronache, C., and W.L. Chameides, 1994. "Vertical Distribution of Isoprene in the Lower Boundary Layer of the Rural and Urban Southern United States," Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 99, pp. 1698916999. Guenther, A., P. Zimmerman, L. Klinger, J. Greenberg, C. Ennis, K. Davis, W. Pollack, H. Westberg, G. Allwine, and C. Geron, 1996. "Estimates of Regional Natural Organic Compound Fluxes From Enclosure and Ambient Measurements," Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 101, p. 1345. 4The large underprediction at the Brookhaven National Laboratory site in Long Island noted by Edgerton is likely due to the relatively large portion of the corresponding modeling grid cell that is over water where there are no isoprene emission s. Comparison of SOS Nashville Data to OTAG 1995 Base ModelParticipants. Robert E. Imhoff, Tennessee Valley Authority, Knoxville, Tennessee. References. Imhoff, R.E., 1996. Summary of, and slides from, presentation given to the OTAG AQA Workgroup meeting at Cherry Hill, New Jersey, August 1996. Purpose. To use ambient data from the 1995 Nashville SOS study to evaluate how well the OTAG air quality modeling for July 918, 1995, simulates atmospheric chemistry and physics in a southern environment. Methodology. UAM-V results for the July 918, 1995, OTAG D2 basecase were obtained from the New York State Department of Environmental Quality. Model results were compared to three ambient data sets. The first data set was morning surfac e CO, NOy, and VOC concentration data for an urban site in Nashville for June 19 to July 28, 1995. The measured species ratios were compared to their relative proportions in the emissions inventory. The second data set was for ozone, NOx and NOy at a su burban and a rural site. Ozone productivity (i.e., the relationship of O3 to NOz where NOz = NOy NOx and where O3/NOz is the number of ozone molecules produced per NOx molecule lost) was assessed at these two sites by compari ng measurements and model results during the 1100 to 1800 daytime period when the atmosphere was well mixed. The third data set was for vertical profiles of ozone over a suburban site near Nashville. The accuracy of vertical mixing processes in the mode l was assessed by comparing measured and modeled ozone profiles. The ozone sonde data were collected by Georgia Institute of Technology, the remainder of the data were collected by the Tennessee Valley Authority. Findings. For morning surface concentration data at the Nashville urban site, measured CO/NOy slopes were 7.7 for June 19 to July 28 and 10.6 for July 918. The modeled slope for July 918 was 12.6, and the emissions inventory slopes were 8.2 for mobile sources and 7.5 for all sources combined. The apparent background of CO in the ambient data was 150200 ppb, compared to approximately 100 ppb in the model. The measured VOC/NOy slope for July 918 was 2.5, compared to a m odeled slope of 2.9. The apparent background of VOC in the ambient data was quite close to zero, compared to approximately 90 ppb in the model. Agreement between the modeled and ambient CO/NOy and VOC/NOy slopes was reasonably good. Modeled CO/NOy slop es would be expected to be higher than inventory slopes because VOC oxidation is a secondary source of CO, and because NOy is deposited more rapidly than CO. Comparing observed and modeled ozone concentrations at the suburban and rural sites revealed a fair amount of variability between the model and observed ozone on a day-to-day basis, but no indication of bias overall. At the rural site, the model estim ated the ozone productivity very well, with least squares regressions for both model and observations showing O3/NOz slopes of about 6, which was consistent with NOx-limited ozone formation. At the suburban site, there was more variability in both observed and, in particular, modeled O3/NOz ratios. The observed ozone productivity (least squares regression slope about 3.5) was lower than at the rural site, which was consistent with ozone formation being less NOx limited at the subur ban site than at the rural site. The model ozone productivity at the suburban site was about 4.3 on July 917, which is similar to the observed ozone productivity (approximately 3.5). However, on July 18 the model O3 concentrations were much lower than on July 917 resulting in lower O3/NOz ratios. Further investigation of the model performance for the suburban site (Youth) on July 18 showed that the model predicted high concentrations of NOx (1015 ppb) between 1100 and 1800, which was contrary to the observations. In other words, the mode l predicted that Youth was affected during the middle of the day by a substantial source of fresh NOx that was not observed on July 18 or July 917. As a result of this error, the model predicted ozone formation at the Youth site to be VOC limited o n July 18, whereas the observations showed the site to be more NOx limited. Therefore, the model sensitivity to VOC versus NOx emissions control around the Youth site would likely be opposite to that predicted by the observations for this day. The comparison of observed and modeled vertical profiles for ozone showed that the model consistently overestimated the surface and Layer 4 ozone concentrations (measured Layers 2 and 3 were not available for comparison because the resolution of the so nde was too coarse in these layers). The model consistently estimated a slight increase in ozone from Layer 1 through Layer 4, with a sharp drop above Layer 5. The top of the models mixed layer was in Layer 5 during this period. The models estimated ozone concentration in Layers 6 and 7 were consistently too low. One possible cause is that the previous days mixed layer in the model was too low and thus material was not mixed to Layers 6 and 7. Another possibility is that the model do es not handle localized mixing due to convective cells which were common during the meteorological conditions prevalent during this period. These cells can inject significant amounts of air from near the surface above the mixed layer. Once above the mix ed layer, the material can have long residence times. Another possibility is that the "Topcon" concentration used at the upper boundary in the model (35 ppb) is too low. Limitations. The modeled NOy used in these comparisons does not include organic nitrates (Carbon Bond species NTR) because NTR concentrations were not saved in the OTAG model runs. Therefore, UAM-V NOy concentrations are always biased low. Ho wever, the magnitude of bias is not well known and likely varies in time and space depending on the age of NOy (the bias might be as high as 20 percent for aged airmasses). Accounting for the missing contribution of NTR to modeled NOy may (1) further imp rove agreement between the observed and modeled CO/NOy and VOC/NOy ratios for the urban site, (2) further improve agreement between observed and modeled ozone productivity at the suburban site, but (3) degrade agreement between observed and modeled ozone productivity at the rural site. Scientific Implications. The relatively good agreement between modeled and ambient CO/NOy and VOC/NOy ratios supports the overall validity of these parameters in the emissions inventory. However, the discrepancy between the apparent background for VOC of 90 ppb in the model compared to near zero in the ambient data possibly indicates a source of VOC in the model that is not also a source of CO. Further investigation is needed to identify the source of this discrepancy. The modeled and observed ozone productivities were consistent at the rural site, and they were consistent at the suburban site on all but one day. The generally good agreement in ozone productivity suggests that the model chemistry performs well for rural and suburban sites in the Nashville area. However, the inability of the model to correctly predict the ozone productivity at the suburban site on July 18 cautions that OTAG model performance is subject to important day-to-day variabilities that have the potential to influence emissions control decisions. The discrepancy in the vertical ozone profile data may suggest that the model is not properly distributing mass vertically or that the top boundary concentration for ozone is too low. Underestimating vertical mixing may ten d to overestimate concentrations at the surface, even though the chemistry and emissions inventory are accurate. Underestimating the top boundary concentration for ozone might have a small impact of biasing surface ozone concentrations low. While no pre diction bias for surface ozone was noted at the sites examined in this study, it is interesting to note that, overall, the model was found to overpredict surface ozone in the southeastern United States (OTAG, 1996). Policy Implications. Although not conclusive, this study raises the possibility that the UAM-V model runs do not treat concentrations in the upper layers of the modeling domain properly, thereby introducing errors in the estimated impact of tr ansport on downwind areas. The inability of the model to correctly predict the influence of NOx emissions on ozone formation at the suburban site on 1 day sends a cautionary message for the use of OTAG model results at suburban, and presumably urban sites. Further technical analyses are necessary to resolve these issues. |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|