Aquatic Life Use Support (ALUS)
Biocriteria Links
Table 2. Hierarchy of Habitat Assessment Approaches for Evaluation of Aquatic Life Use Attainment
Level Of Info a Technical Components Spatial/Temporal Coverage Data Quality b 1 Visual observation of habitat characteristics; no true assessment; documentation of readily discernable land use characteristics that might alter habitat quality; no reference conditions Sporadic visits; sites are mostly from road crossings or other easy access Unknown or low precision and sensitivity; professional scientist (biologist, hydrologist) not required 2 Visual observation of habitat characteristics and simple assessment; use of land use maps for characterizing watershed condition; reference condition pre-established by professional scientist Limited to annual visits and non-specific to season; generally easy access; limited spatial coverage and/or site-specific studies Low precision and sensitivity; professional biologist or hydrologist not involved or only correspondence 3 Visual-based habitat assessment using standard operating procedures (SOPs); may be supplemented with quantitative measurements of selected parameters; conducted with bioassessment; data on land use compiled and used to supplement assessment; reference condition used as a basis for assessment Assessment during a single season usually the norm; spatial coverage may be limited or broad and commensurate with biological sampling; assessment may be regional or site-specific Moderate precision and sensitivity; professional biologist or hydrologist performs survey or provides oversight and training 4 Assessment of habitat based on quantitative measurements of instream parameters, channel morphology, and floodplain characteristics; conducted with bioassessment; data on land use compiled and used to supplement assessment; reference condition used as a basis for assessment Assessment during 1-2 seasons; spatial coverage usually broad and commensurate with biological sampling; assessment may be regional or site-specific High precision and sensitivity; professional biologist or hydrologist performs survey and assessment
NOTE: Table is based on use in lotic systems. With some modification, these approaches would apply to other waterbody types.
a Level of information refers to rigor of habitat assessment, where 1 = lowest and 4 = highest.
b Refers to ability of the habitat endpoints to detect impairment or to differentiate along a gradient of environmental conditions.
![[logo] US EPA](http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif)