An official website of the United States government.

We've made some changes to EPA.gov. If the information you are looking for is not here, you may be able to find it on the EPA Web Archive or the January 19, 2017 Web Snapshot.

CADDIS Volume 3

Quantile Regression: EPT Taxa Richness vs. Metal Toxicity Units for Colorado Streams

Plot

  1. Analysis: Quantile regression
  2. Independent variable: Metal Toxicity Units
  3. Dependent variable: EPT taxa richness
  4. Key: dot=observation; line= 90th quantile
  5. Sample size: n = 37

Model

  1. EPT taxa richness = 22.565 - 8.708*(Metals-Toxicity Units)
  2. Date: 12 November, 2006
Variable Estimate Lower CL Upper CL Test Type Statistic p
Intercept 22.565 17.087  28.043 T value  8.362  
Metal Toxicity Units -8.708 -16.112 -1.303 T value -2.387 0.022
WALD        Chi2 5.700 0.017
Likelihood Ratio       Chi2 9.787 0.002

Data Analysis

  1. Model generated using SAS Proc QUANTREG with the smoothing algorithm. The WALD and Likelihood test statistics were used to test the linear null hypothesis, H0: slope=0.
  2. Analysis for sites classified as pH neutral, but with strong AMD input.
  3. Metal Toxicity Units (TU) were calculated as sum of the ratios of each measured metal concentration with the criterion for that metal.
  4. Replicate visits to a site were not excluded from the data set.

Data Origin

  1. Agency: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  2. Program: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP)
  3. Project: Colorado Metals Belt Stream Assessment (EPA Region 8)
  4. Filenames: Files benmet, fishmet and chem downloaded from the Surface Waters Information Management (S.W.I.M.S.) database web site

Sampling Design

  1. Data collected 1994 through 1995.
  2. Analyzed metals and metalloids: aluminum, arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, manganese, nickel, lead, selenium, silver, zinc.
  3. A description of the sampling methods may be found in the EMAP West Methods Manual for Streams found on the S.W.I.M.S. database web site.

Top of Page