An official website of the United States government.

We've made some changes to EPA.gov. If the information you are looking for is not here, you may be able to find it on the EPA Web Archive or the January 19, 2017 Web Snapshot.

National Aquatic Resource Surveys

Xeric Ecoregion - National Lakes Assessment 2012 Results


Key Results

A total of 2,180 lakes in the Xeric ecoregion are represented in the National Lakes Assessment (NLA). Of these lakes, about 11% are natural and 89% are man-made. 

Trophic State and Key Stressors

The NLA uses trophic state as an important indicator of lake condition and assesses the extent of key stressors in the nation’s lakes.

  • In the Xeric ecoregion, 20% of lakes are rated as most disturbed based on trophic state, 30% are eutrophic, 27% are mesotrophic, and 22% are oligotrophic.
  • The most widespread stressors assessed are phosphorus (39% of lakes), riparian vegetation cover (32%) and nitrogen (31%).

Top of Page


Photo of a lake in the Xeric ecoregion that was sampled during the National Lakes Assessment 2012Utah lake sampled during the NLA 2012. Photo: Ben Brown.

Human Use Condition

Cyanobacteria is one of three algal toxin related indicators presented in the NLA (see also chlorophyll a and microcystins). It serves as a proxy for the presence of algal toxins.

  • Based on cyanobacteria cell counts, 16% of lakes in the Xeric ecoregion are in the most disturbed condition (i.e., pose a high risk of exposure to algal toxins).

Top of Page


Change from 2007 (for lakes >4 hectares)*

  • For the Xeric ecoregion, the NLA reports a 31% decrease in the proportion of lakes in most disturbed condition between 2007 and 2012 based on the condition of benthic macroinvertebrates.
  • There was also a 17% decrease in the proportion of lakes in the most disturbed condition for both nitrogen and the lake drawdown exposure indicator.

To access more indicator graphics please visit the interactive NLA Dashboard.

Top of Page

* The change analysis is based on information from two points in time – 2007 and 2012.  The change in condition analysis only considers lakes 4 hectares and larger because smaller lakes were not sampled in 2007.