Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Emergency Response Research

Radiological Decontamination – Indoor Residential Query Results

Please Note: The page you are viewing is intended for internal use in supporting SAM Method Queries. It is not intended to provide information to users of the ESAM or SAM web areas.

Please note: The web page you are viewing requires JavaScript. If you are unable to use the query on this web page, the information can also be found in the published PDF version of the Evaluation Report. In addition, due to the complexity of some tables and graphics, some of our products are not amenable to a screen reader.

Radiological Decontamination Query Tool
  • Urban Wide-Area
  • Indoor Residential
  • Outdoor Residential

  • Back to: Radiological Decontamination Query Tool

If you have trouble accessing information contact Amelia McCall (McCall.Amelia@epa.gov) and alternative accommodations will be made.

The information provided in the indoor residential low tech decontamination report includes information on simple methods citizens can use as guidance to assist in decontaminating the interior of their homes after a radiological contamination incident. Eight common household surfaces were chosen that were contaminated using (Cs)-137 and rubidium (Rb)-86.

The surfaces included sealed hardwood flooring, laminate flooring, carpet, painted wood trim, sealed granite countertop, laminate countertop, porcelain toilet tank cover, and wood furniture.

Decontamination methods were selected based on availability and ease of use by homeowners and by contractors hired by the homeowners or commercial property owners. These methods would also be applicable for the remediation of commercial properties that need decontamination.

Disclaimer:  The information provided through this query represents information that is currently available in the published U.S. EPA Evaluation Report. Links and citations are provided for the full content of the report, along with the corresponding query results. Mention of trade names, products, or services does not convey EPA approval, endorsement or recommendation.


  • Acronyms and Abbreviations
  • Definitions
  • Decontamination Technologies and Indoor Surfaces Tested (PDF) (1 pg, 801 KB)

loading gif
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Standard Broom:  Went over surfaces multiples times with minimal visible improvement after first 2 passes
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  40% ± 16%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  100% ± 2%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >99%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  98% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Repeated sweeping of the same surface did not improve the visible cleanliness
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
ASFM:  Significant activity on the broom and dust pan broom
SFM:  Minimal activity; activity goes with particles into waste as there was little activity on brooms or pans
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 broom
Light Loading:  1 broom
ASFM:  1 broom
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Standard Broom:  Went over surfaces multiples times with minimal visible improvement after first 2 passes
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

 The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  >27% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  >99%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >99%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  >99%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Repeated sweeping of the same surface did not improve the visible cleanliness
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
ASFM:  Significant activity on the broom and dust pan broom
SFM:  Minimal activity; activity goes with particles into waste as there was little activity on brooms or pans
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 broom
Light Loading:  1 broom
ASFM:  1 broom
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Broom with Dust Pan 
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
Description:
HDX, Model 7-660, Home Depot, Atlanta, GA
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

 The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  44% ± 17%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  98% ± 4%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >97%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  97% ± 2%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Did not draw particles into towel, tended to push the particles, making containment more difficult; notably more effective than dry paper towel on ASFM removal.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on cloths
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  2 cloths
Light Loading:  2 cloths
ASFM:  2 cloths
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
Description:
HDX, Model 7-660, Home Depot, Atlanta, GA
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  83% ± 4%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  88% ± 2%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  89% ± 2%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  98% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Did not draw particles into towel, tended to push the particles, making containment more difficult; notably more effective than dry paper towel on ASFM removal.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on cloths
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  5 cloths
Light Loading:  2 cloths
ASFM:  4 cloths
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Cloth
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
HDX, Model 7-660, Home Depot, Atlanta, GA
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  42% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  >98%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >98%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Did not draw particles into towel, tended to push the particles, making containment more difficult; notably more effective than dry paper towel on ASFM removal.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on cloths
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  3 cloths
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  3 cloths
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
Description:
Brawny®
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  3% ± 13%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  98% ± 4%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  96% ± 4%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  98% ± 4%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Paper towels seemed to work better than the dry cloth in collecting particles.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  on paper towels
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  6 paper towels
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  3 paper towels
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
Description:
Brawny®
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  71% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  99% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  98% ± 1%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Paper towels seemed to work better than the dry cloth in collecting particles.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on paper towels
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  5 paper towels
Light Loading:  5 paper towels
ASFM:  8 paper towels
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  4 covers with approximate surface area of 0.4 m2 per cover
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Brawny®
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  8% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  >99%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >99%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Paper towels seemed to work better than the dry cloth in collecting particles.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  on paper towels
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  6 papers towels
Light Loading:  2 papers towels
ASFM:  2 papers towels
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Sweeper®, Disposable Refill Cloths
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  64% ± 8%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  >99%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >96%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Sometimes the particles went over top of the Swiffer® pad because there were so many particles. Also, the pad would get loaded quickly, requiring frequent pad changes.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on pads. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  3 pads
Light Loading:   NA
ASFM:  1 pad
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Sweeper®, Disposable Refill Cloths
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  59% ± 7%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  93% ± 4%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  93% ± 9%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 2%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Sometimes the particles went over top of the Swiffer® pad because there were so many particles. Also, the pad would get loaded quickly, requiring frequent pad changes.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on pads. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  3 pads
Light Loading:  NA
ASFM:  2 pads
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Swiffer®
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Shark®, NV352 Navigator Lift-Away Pro Bagless Upright Vacuum
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  22% ± 4%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  82% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  85% ± 3%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  87% ± 3%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Nose of the vacuum was not that close to the surface and sat off the surface of the laminate floor, but on the carpet it seemed to work better.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  in canister. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 vacuum
Light Loading:  1 vacuum
ASFM:  1 vacuum
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  139 m2 
Heavy Loading:  1 vacuum (6 kg), 37 kg SFM (82% potential removal)
Light Loading:   1 vacuum (6 kg), 3.7 kg SFM (87% potential removal)
ASFM:  No information provided in report 
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Shark®, NV352 Navigator Lift-Away Pro Bagless Upright Vacuum
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  14% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  99% ± 0%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  98% ± 1%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  98% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Nose of the vacuum was not that close to the surface and sat off the surface of the laminate floor, but on the carpet it seemed to work better.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  in canister. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 vacuum
Light Loading:  1 vacuum
ASFM:  1 vacuum
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  46 m2 (heavy & light SFM); 47 m2 ASFM
Heavy Loading:  1 vacuum (6 kg), 37 kg SFM (97% potential removal)
Light Loading:   1 vacuum (6 kg), 3.7 kg SFM (98% potential removal)
ASFM:  No information provided in report 
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Dry Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Dusters Kit
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  0% ± 18%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  99% ± 2%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  99% ± 2%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  98% ± 3%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Clung to some of the particles, easier to contain the particles, easier to direct the particles into a pile than what was possible with the dry cloth; plastic handle did not allow much leverage; poor particle removal from furniture and ASFM from wood trim, furniture and toilet tank cover.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on pads
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  3 pads
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  3 pads
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Dusters Kit
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  39% ± 2%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  >99%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  98% ± 1%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Clung to some of the particles, easier to contain the particles, easier to direct the particles into a pile than what was possible with the dry cloth; plastic handle did not allow much leverage; poor particle removal from furniture and ASFM from wood trim, furniture and toilet tank cover.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on pads
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  5 pads
Light Loading:  3 pads
ASFM:  4 pads
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Electrostatic Pad
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Dusters Kit
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  61% ± 7%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  72% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  80% ± 4%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Clung to some of the particles, easier to contain the particles, easier to direct the particles into a pile than what was possible with the dry cloth; plastic handle did not allow much leverage; poor particle removal from furniture and ASFM from wood trim, furniture, and toilet tank cover
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on pads
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  4 pads
Light Loading:  2 pads
ASFM:  2 pads
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Wet paper towel by spraying before wiping
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  84% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  85% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  87% ± 3%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Dampened paper towel with 3 - 4 sprays of Formula 409® before wiping surfaces. Seemed to function well and was convenient to use.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >94%  on paper towels; trace activity on technician's gloves
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  7 paper towels
Light Loading:  3 paper towels
ASFM:  3 paper towels
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  2 m2
Heavy Loading:  36 g in damp paper towels; 400 g SFM (12 paper towels at 85% potential removal)
Light Loading:  18 g in damp paper towels; 40 g SFM (6 paper towels at  87% potential removal)
ASFM:  18 g in damp paper towels (6 paper towels at 84% potential removal)
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Wet paper towel by spraying before wiping
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  14% ± 2%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  100% ± 0%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Dampened paper towel with 3 - 4 sprays of Formula 409® before wiping surfaces. Seemed to function well and was convenient to use.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >94%  on paper towels; trace activity on technician's gloves
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  8 paper towels
Light Loading:  3 paper towels
ASFM:  4 paper towels
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Formula 409® with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Polish Oil
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
SAS Dutch Glow®, 12 oz. Amish Wood Milk Furniture:  Sprayed lightly on top of ASFM and SFM
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  59% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >99%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Polish was sprayed gently on top of SFM and then wiped clean; seemed to do a good job of allowing particles to be collected in rag
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on polish rag
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  3 cloths
Light Loading:  1 cloth
ASFM:  3 cloths
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  10 m2
Heavy Loading:  3 kg dry cloths, 2 kg SFM  (50 dry cloths at 100% potential removal)
Light Loading:  2 kg dry cloths, 200 g SFM (17 dry cloths at  99% potential removal)
ASFM:  3 kg dry cloths  (50 dry cloths at 59% potential removal)
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Sweeper® Wet Mopping Cloths
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  94 ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  96% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  No information provided in report
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Pad is good quality as it is quilted and the 15-cm mop face was a good size for the surfaces that were decontaminated. Light and easy to use, no electrical needs; all surfaces decontaminated to greater than 92%.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
 Activity >99% on pads. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 Swiffer® + 3 pads
Light Loading:  NA
ASFM:  No information provided in report
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  47 m2 
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  162 g pre-wet pads (54 pre-wet pads at 94% potential removal)
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Sweeper® Wet Mopping Cloths
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  92% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  92% ± 6%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  93% ± 6%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Pad is good quality as it is quilted and the 15-cm mop face was a good size for the surfaces that were decontaminated. Light and easy to use, no electrical needs; all surfaces decontaminated to greater than 92%.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
 Activity >99% on pads. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 Swiffer® + 4 pads
Light Loading:  NA
ASFM:  1 Swiffer® + 2 pads
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:   No information provided in report
Light Loading:   No information provided in report
ASFM:   No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Pads on Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Disinfecting Wipes, Clorox®
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  89% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  93% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  92% ± 6%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  95% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Wipe size made decontamination difficult; the wipes were always doubled up to decontaminate.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  on wipes
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
Description:
Disinfecting Wipes, Clorox®
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM: No information provided in report
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  98% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >98%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Wipe size made decontamination difficult; the wipes were always doubled up to decontaminate.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  on wipes
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  5 wipes
Light Loading:  2 wipes
ASFM:  2 wipes
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Disinfecting Wipes, Clorox®
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  0% ± 16%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  94% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  91% ± 3%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Wipe size made decontamination difficult; the wipes were always doubled up to decontaminate.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  on wipes
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  12 wipes
Light Loading:  2 wipes
ASFM:  3 wipes
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
Description:
Disinfecting Wipes, Clorox®
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  95% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  99% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  100% ± 0%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Wipe size made decontamination difficult, the wipes were always doubled up to decontaminate.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  on wipes
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  4 wipes
Light Loading:  3 wipes
ASFM:  4 wipes
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  4 covers with approximate surface area of 0.4 m2 per cover
Heavy Loading:  36 g in damp wipes, 180 g SFM (12 wipes at 99% potential removal)
Light Loading:  24 g in damp wipes, 18 g SFM (8 wipes at 100% potential removal)
ASFM:  36 g in damp wipes (12 wipes at 95% potential removal)
 
Decontamination Technology:
Pre-wet Disposable Wipe
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Disinfecting Wipes, Clorox®
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  69% ± 11%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  99% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  96% ± 7%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Wipe size made decontamination difficult; the wipes were always doubled up to decontaminate.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  on wipes
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  5 wipes
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  3 wipes
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Wet Jet:  Sprayed on top of the deposited SFM or ASFM
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  92% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  97% ± 2%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  97% ± 2%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Sometimes left the flooring too wet for experimental setup as there was not enough room to continue to push/dry up the water. Easy to use and sprays evenly and easy.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
 Activity >99% on pads. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  3 pads
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  46 m2 (heavy & light SFM); 47 m2 ASFM
Heavy Loading:   No information provided in report
Light Loading:   No information provided in report
ASFM:   No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Swiffer® Wet Jet:  Sprayed on top of the deposited SFM or ASFM
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  93% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  >99% 
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  100% ± 2%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Sometimes left the flooring too wet for experimental setup as there was not enough room to continue to push/dry up the water. Easy to use and sprays evenly and easy.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
 Activity >99% on pads. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  4 pads
Light Loading:  2 pads
ASFM:  2 pads
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:   No information provided in report
Light Loading:   No information provided in report
ASFM:   No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Spray Agent with Swiffer® Mop
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Brawny®:  Wet paper towel by spraying before wiping
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  76% ± 7%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  >99%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  >99%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Dampened paper towel with 3 - 4 sprays of water before wiping surfaces. If the paper towel was too saturated, the paper towel did not move as freely across the surfaces.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on paper towels
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  5 paper towels
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  3 paper towels
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
Description:
Brawny®:  Wet paper towel by spraying before wiping
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  8% ± 2%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  95% ± 5%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  91% ± 3%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  99% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Dampened paper towel with 3 - 4 sprays of water before wiping surfaces. If the paper towel was too saturated, the paper towel did not move as freely across the surfaces.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on paper towels
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  8 paper towels
Light Loading:  2 paper towels
ASFM:  3 paper towels
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Paper Towel
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
PVA Blue Sponge Mop:  Wet sponge prior to decontamination
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  73% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  99% ± 0%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  99% ± 1%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  97% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Flat sponges worked acceptably, but did not pick up the particles very well, just pushed the particles.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on sponges. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 sponge mop
Light Loading:  1 sponge mop
ASFM:  1 sponge mop
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house:  46 m2 (heavy & light SFM); 47 m2 ASFM
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
PVA Blue Sponge Mop:  Wet sponge prior to decontamination
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  86% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  98% ± 3%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  96% ± 3%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  98% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Flat sponges worked acceptably, but did not pick up the particles very well, just pushed the particles.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99% on sponges. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 sponge mop
Light Loading:  1 sponge mop
ASFM:  1 sponge mop
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Water with Sponge Mop
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Carpet:  TrafficMASTER; Thoroughbred II-Color Chestnut Texture Carpet, PureColor solution-dyed BCF Polyester texture  
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Hoover® Commercial SteamVac Spotter/Carpet Cleaner
Hoover® SteamVac SpinScrub Carpet Cleaner with Clean Surge
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  53% ± 11%
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  92% ± 1%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  88% ± 4%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  93% ± 1%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Had to apply the correct amount of water. If too much water was added, a muddy puddle was created on the laminate flooring and would have to apply the vacuum to the floor more often to remove the water.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  in reservoir. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1   vacuum
Light Loading:  1 vacuum
ASFM:  1 vacuum 
Waste Summary:
Estimated area in house: 139 m2 
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  1 vacuum (10 kg), 32 kg wastewater
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Countertop:  Wilsonart; Jeweled Coral Quarry Laminate Countertop
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Laminate Flooring:  TrafficMASTER; Eagle Peak Hickory 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
Description:
Hoover® Commercial SteamVac Spotter/Carpet Cleaner
Hoover® SteamVac SpinScrub Carpet Cleaner with Clean Surge
EPA Technology Evaluation Report (Research details):
U.S. EPA. Evaluation of Low-Tech Indoor Remediation Methods Following Wide Area Radiological/Nuclear Incidents. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/021, 2017.

https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id=530686&Lab=NHSRC
Testing Method:
Once contaminated with a heavy SFM loading, an initial pass for a decontamination method in a single direction or standard "sweeping action" where particles were collected at one end of the surface was performed. Method was applied to the surface in a way that resulted in two complete passes over the entire surface.

The first pass took place in one direction, implementing an "S" pattern (or back and forth) across the surface, covering the entire surface, then a second pass (using the same pattern) occurred in the perpendicular direction, so the entire surface had been treated a second time.
% Removal:

Aqueous simulated fallout material (ASFM)

Simulated fallout material (SFM)
ASFM:  No information provided in report
SFM Heavy Load Cs-137:  46% ± 12%
SFM Heavy Load Rb-86:  34% ± 8%
SFM Light Load Cs-137:  100% ± 0%
Area Decontaminated (m2/person day):
No information provided in report
Efficacy Observations:
No information provided in report
Operational Summary:
Had to apply the correct amount of water. If too much water was added, a muddy puddle was created on the laminate flooring and would have to apply the vacuum to the floor more often to remove the water.
Method Cost (non-labor):
No information provided in report
Fate of Activity:
Activity >99%  in reservoir. Background activity on handle.
Waste Stream:
Heavy Loading:  1 vacuum
Light Loading:  1 vacuum
ASFM:  1 vacuum 
Waste Summary:
Heavy Loading:  No information provided in report
Light Loading:  No information provided in report
ASFM:  No information provided in report
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Painted Wood Trim:  Finished Elegance; MDF Molding Board
Area tested: 0.5 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Granite Countertop:  Discount Granite; Luna Pearl
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Sealed Hardwood Flooring:  High Gloss Santos Mahogany, 12-cm wide planks, click locked 
Area tested:  1.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Toilet Tank Cover:  White, porcelain (vitreous china)
Area tested:  0.4 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
 
Decontamination Technology:
Wet Vacuum
Indoor Surface:
Wood Furniture:  Shipyard Sofa Table;  wood finish, sealed with nutmeg color
Area tested:  0.6 m2
No information is available for the selected technology and indoor surface combination at this time.
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on January 7, 2025
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.