Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Six-Year Review of Drinking Water Standards

Evaluating Analytical Method Improvements for Six-Year Review of Drinking Water Standards

Laboratory Analysis
Technological improvements in analytical methods feasibility are considered during Six-Year Review. This process involves:
  • evaluating contaminants for which the current maximum contaminant levelThe highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water as delineated by the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. These levels are based on consideration of health risks, technical feasibility of treatment, and cost-benefit analysis. (MCL) was limited by analytical feasibility at the time the MCL was established and
  • assessing the availability of any newer improved methods.

This means the Agency might have chosen a lower MCL when the drinking water standard was set, but it would not have been possible to reliably and consistently measure at that level. If newer, more precise laboratory methods are now available, it may be possible to lower the MCL in the future.

The evaluation of analytical method improvements consists of determining whether there have been advances in laboratory technology to enable a revision to the "quantification level" for a regulated contaminant. The quantification level is the level at which most laboratories can reliably and consistently measure a chemical contaminant in drinking water.

EPA reviews and approves analytical methods to measure contaminant levels under a separate regulatory process. Therefore, Six-Year Review does not include a review to determine whether the approved analytical methods can be revised. Rather, Six-Year Review considers improved EPA analytical methods if they are presently available.

Six-Year Review of Drinking Water Standards

  • Statutory Requirements
  • Learn About Six-Year Review Elements
  • Six-Year Review 4
  • Six-Year Review 3
  • Six-Year Review 2
  • Six-Year Review 1
Contact Us About the Six Year Review of Drinking Water Standards
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on June 20, 2024
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.