Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Guidance
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Water Quality Criteria

Common Effects Methodology Regional Stakeholder Meeting January 11 -22, 2010

Related Information

Common Effects Methodology for Pesticides

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency held six regional public meetings in January 2010 to solicit stakeholder input on its initial thinking regarding a common effects assessment process as well the scope and content of future white papers. The meetings were held in the EPA regions: Regions 2, 4, 5, 7, 9 (Oakland, CA) and 10.

The five presentations for the regional meetings laid out the need for this effort, the process the EPA would use, and the agency’s initial thinking on major issues regarding common effects assessments using available data in an effort to solicit stakeholder input on the EPA's initial thinking regarding a common effects assessment process.

  • Development and Evaluation of Ecotoxicity Predictive Tools (pdf) (5.3 MB, January 2010)
  • Development of Common Effects Methodology for OW and OPP (pdf) (3.25 MB, January 2010)
  • Methods for Developing Community Level Benchmarks for Aquatic Animals (pdf) (7.45 MB, January 2010)
  • Methods for Incorporating Aquatic Plant Effects into Community Level Benchmarks (pdf) (4.72 MB, January 2010)
  • Next Steps (pdf) (1.17 MB, January 2010)

Water Quality Criteria

  • Aquatic Life Criteria Table
  • Human Health Criteria Table
  • Human Health Toxics Criteria and Methods
  • Recreational Criteria and Methods
  • Aquatic Life Toxics Criteria and Methods
  • Nutrient Water Quality Criteria
  • Biological Water Quality Criteria
  • Other Aquatic Life Water Quality Resources
Contact Us about Water Quality Criteria
Contact Us about Water Quality Criteria to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on September 17, 2025
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.