Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Coal Ash

Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Part B Implementation

The CCR Part B Final Rule, published on November 12, 2020, allowed a limited number of facilities to demonstrate to EPA or a Participating State Director that, based on groundwater data and the design of a particular surface impoundment, the unit has and will continue to ensure there is no reasonable probability of adverse effects to human health and the environment. The regulations state that facilities had until November 30, 2020 to submit applications to EPA for approval, but since the effective date for the final rule was December 14, 2020, EPA accepted revisions or applications until December 14, 2020. EPA is updating this webpage with the current status of the demonstrations received in the table below.

This information is current as of 3/24/2025

On this page:

  • EPA's Review of Submitted Demonstrations
  • Facilities that Have Submitted Demonstrations for Alternate Liners
  • Information about the November 30, 2021 deadline 
  • EPA Contact Information

EPA's Review of Submitted Demonstrations

On January 11, 2022, EPA determined that the seven applications were complete, and one facility withdrew its application. Another facility withdrew its application in the fall of 2022. Five more facilities withdrew their applications in 2023 and 2024.

EPA Denied Coronado Generating Station’s Application

On January 16, 2025, EPA announced the denial of the alternate liner demonstration application Coronado Generating Station in St. Johns, Apache County, Arizona, submitted in 2020. The decision advances EPA’s commitment to protect groundwater from coal ash contamination. EPA denied the application because Coronado Generating Station failed to demonstrate that their surface impoundment complies with applicable requirements of the CCR regulations.

  • Read the denial in the docket.

On March 20, 2025, EPA approved the Salt River Project’s request to extend the deadline to cease using the Coronado Generating Station Evaporation Pond due to grid reliability and resource adequacy concerns. To allow time for design, permit, and construction of alternative disposal capacity, the new deadline is September 30, 2026. Read through the extension approval letter. (pdf) (148.62 KB) . 

EPA Proposed Six Determinations

On January 25, 2023, EPA proposed determinations on six Part B demonstrations. All six proposals are proposed denials. The comment periods began on February 8, 2023, when the proposed determinations were posted in Regulations.gov. EPA extended the comment period deadline to April 10, 2023. Access the proposed determinations in the memos opening the dockets for public comments:

  • Belle River Power Plant, China Township, Michigan.
  • Coal Creek Station in Underwood, North Dakota.
  • Conemaugh Generating Station in New Florence, Pennsylvania.
  • Coronado Generating Station in St. Johns, Apache County, Arizona.
  • Martin Lake Steam Electric Station in Tatum, Texas.
  • Monroe Power Plant, Monroe, Michigan.

Read the announcement of these proposals.


Facilities that Have Submitted Alternate Liner Demonstrations

Facility Name Location Received by EPA on Current Status Status updated on Facility Website Docket / Correspondence Comment Period Start Date Comment Period End Date
Conemaugh Pennsylvania 12/7/2020 Complete, Withdrawn 7/26/2024 Website EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0281 2/8/2023 4/10/2023
Martin Lake Texas 11/25/2020 Complete, Withdrawn 2/29/2024 Website EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0284 2/8/2023 4/10/2023
Coronado Arizona 11/30/2020 Complete, Denied 1/16/2025 Website EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0285 2/8/2023 4/10/2023
Monroe Michigan 11/30/2020 Complete, Withdrawn 2/29/2024 Website EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0283 2/8/2023 4/10/2023
Belle River Michigan 11/30/2020 Complete, Withdrawn 10/30/2023 Website EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0282 2/8/2023 4/10/2023
Coal Creek North Dakota 11/30/2020 Complete, Proposed Denial 1/25/2023 Website EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0280 2/8/2023 4/10/2023
Apache Arizona 11/30/2020 Withdrawn 1/25/2023 Website Letter dated 1/25/2023 (pdf) (272 KB) Not applicable Not applicable
Brame Energy Center Louisiana 12/14/2020 Withdrawn 10/20/2021 Website Not applicable Not applicable Not applicable

Information about the November 30, 2021 Deadline

Under the Part B rule, facilities with an approved application to conduct an alternative liner demonstration have until November 30, 2021 to conduct the work and submit that demonstration. As EPA has not yet issued approvals and denials for submitted Part B applications, the time to conduct the demonstration work is narrowing, such that a facility may have difficulty completing the demonstration in the time between an approval and the November 30, 2021 deadline. Below is a frequent question about this deadline:

Question: Does the delay in EPA’s issuing decisions make it such that facilities will need to perform the work for a demonstration without knowledge of whether their applications are approved or denied?

Response: EPA is aware of this issue, which has arisen as a result of unanticipated delays in making determinations on the Part B applications that have been submitted. EPA is weighing possible solutions to this issue and intends to take actions to ensure that any facility approved to conduct a demonstration has the same amount of time anticipated by the current regulation to initiate and complete the demonstration after an approval.


EPA Contact Information

If you have any questions regarding demonstration package submissions, contact:

Michelle Lloyd at Lloyd.Michelle@epa.gov or 202-566-0560
Jason Mills at Mills.Jason@epa.gov or 202-566-0215

Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on March 24, 2025
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.