Conformity Adequacy Review: Region 8
State Implementation Plans (SIP) Submissions that EPA has Found Adequate or Inadequate
Region 8: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming
For more information about adequacy review, return to the main adequacy page.
Contact: For the Region 8 contact person (name, phone number, email address), see EPA’s Regional Contacts for State and Local Transportation.
Colorado | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission | Finding (date budgets apply) | Additional Information/ Comments |
Aspen | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (11/18/2013) Letter (8/2011) (pdf) FR Notice (5/2012) (pdf) (243 KB, May 25, 2012) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Adequate (9/4/2002) Letter (8/2002) (pdf) FR Notice (8/2002) (pdf) (128 KB, published August 20, 2002) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
Canon City | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (8/17/2011) Letter (5/2011) (pdf) FR Notice (7/2013) (pdf) (284 KB, published July 10, 2013) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Adequate (7/31/2000) FR Notice (5/2000) (pdf) (233 KB, published May 30, 2000) | Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |||
Colorado Springs | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (8/17/2011) Letter (3/2011) (pdf) FR Notice (8/2011) (pdf) (161 KB, published August 2, 2011) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
maintenance plan 1998-2009 budgets | Inadequate (4/29/1999) | Determination made under old process | ||
maintenance plan 2010 budget and beyond | Adequate (4/29/1999) | Determination made under old process | ||
Denver | 2008 8-hour ozone | reasonable further progress | Adequate (6/8/2023) Letter 5/2023 (pdf) FR Notice (5/2023) (pdf) (276 KB, published May 9, 2023) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
attainment plan | Adequate (4/2/2018) Letter (1/2018) (pdf) FR Notice (3/2018) (pdf) (184 KB, published March 16, 2018) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process | ||
1997 8-hour ozone | attainment plan | Adequate (3/19/2010) Letter (1/2010) (pdf) FR Notice (4/2010) (pdf) (144 KB, published April 1, 2010) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
pm10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (6/28/2007) Letter (5/2007) (pdf) FR Notice (6/2007) (pdf) (146 KB, published June 13, 2007) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
Adequate (10/29/2001) Letter (9/2001) (pdf) FR Notice (10/2001) (pdf) (128 KB, published October 12, 2001) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (6/28/2007) Letter (5/2007) (pdf) FR Notice (6/2007) (pdf) (146 KB, published June 13, 2007) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
Adequate (8/18/2000) Letter (7/2000) (pdf) FR Notice (8/2000) (pdf) (152 KB, published August 3, 2000) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
Fort Collins | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (6/11/2012) Letter (8/2011) (pdf) FR Notice (5/2012) (pdf) (243 KB, published May 25, 2012) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
maintenance plan | Adequate (1/15/2003) Letter (1/2003) (pdf) FR Notice (2/2003) (pdf) (131 KB, published February 4, 2003) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
Greeley | carbon monoxide | limited maintenance plan | Adequate (8/17/2011) Letter (3/2011) (pdf) FR Notice (8/2011) (pdf) (161 KB, published August 2, 2011) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
maintenance plan | Adequate (1/20/2004) Letter (10/2003) (pdf) FR Notice (1/2004) (pdf) (131 KB, published January 5, 2004) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
Lamar | PM10 | second maintenance plan | adequate 10/20/2014 Notice of adequacy (10/2014) (pdf) (204 KB, published October 3, 2014) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process |
maintenance plan | Adequate (11/12/2002) Letter (9/2002) (pdf) FR Notice (10/2002) (pdf) (132 KB, published October 28, 2002) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
Longmont | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (6/28/2007) Letter (5/2007) (pdf) FR Notice (6/2007) (pdf) (146 KB, published June 13, 2007) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Inadequate (5/14/1999) | Determination made under old process | |||
Pagosa Springs | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (8/17/2011) Letter (3/2011) (pdf) FR Notice (8/2011) (pdf) (161 KB, published August 2, 2011) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Adequate (8/18/2000) Letter (7/2000) (pdf) FR Notice (8/2000) (pdf) (152 KB, published August 3, 2000) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
Steamboat Springs | PM10 | second maintenance plan | Adequate 10/20/2014 FR Notice (10/2014) (pdf) (204 KB, published October 3, 2014) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
maintenance plan | Adequate (11/12/2002) Letter (9/2002) (pdf) FR Notice (10/2002) (pdf) (132 KB, published October 28, 2002) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | ||
Telluride | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (8/17/2011) Letter (3/2011) (pdf) FR Notice (2/2011) (pdf) (161 KB, published August 2, 2011) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Adequate (8/18/2000) Letter (7/2000) (pdf) FR Notice (8/2000) (pdf) (152 KB, published August 3, 2000) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Montana | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission | Finding (date budgets apply) | Additional Information/ Comments |
Montana | PM 10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (10/12/2018)
Letter (7/2018) (pdf)
FR (9/2018) (pdf) (207 KB, published September 27, 2018) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (11/13/2017 FR Notice (9/2017) (pdf) (248 KB, published September 14, 2017) | Budgets found adequate through the SIP approval process. | |
Adequate (6/16/2006) Letter (5/2006) (pdf) FR Notice (6/2006) (pdf) (144 KB, published June 1, 2006) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Utah | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission | Finding (date budgets apply) | Additional Information/ Comments |
Ogden | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (6/10/2005) Letter (5/2005) (pdf) FR Notice (5/2005) (pdf) (144 KB, published May 26, 2005) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (4/29/1999) | Determination made under old process | |
Provo (Utah County) | carbon monoxide | attainment demonstration | Adequate (8/4/2004) Letter (6/2004) (pdf) FR Notice (7/2004) (pdf) (139 KB, published July 20, 2004) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
PM10 | attainment demonstration (2010 & 2020 budgets) | Adequate (10/16/2002) Letter (9/2002) (pdf) FR Notice (10/2002) (pdf) (128 KB, published October 1, 2002) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
carbon monoxide | attainment demonstration | Inadequate (5/14/1999) | Determination made under old process | |
Salt Lake City Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (6/15/2005) Letter (5/2005) (pdf) FR Notice (5/2005) (pdf) (139 KB, published May 31, 2005) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
Utah portion of Logan UT-ID Area | PM2.5 | attainment demonstration | Adequate (9/28/2015) FR Notice (9/2015) (pdf) (186 KB, published September 11, 2015) | Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process |