Uniform National Discharge Standards (UNDS): Rulemaking Process
In 1996, Congress passed legislation amending the Clean Water Act to control discharges that are incidental to the normal operation of vessels of the Armed Forces. The legislation tasked the EPA and the Department of Defense (DOD) to establish national standards. The EPA and the DOD have agreed to establish performance standards in batches. This is referred to as batch rulemaking.
- How are the EPA and the Department of Defense (DOD) identifying and evaluating discharges?
- What discharges require marine pollution control devices (MPCDs)?
How are the EPA and the Department of Defense (DOD) identifying and evaluating discharges?
|Phase I||Identify and
May 10, 1999
|Phase II||Establish MPCD
|DOD Only Rule||Completed One
Year After Phase II
On May 10, 1999, the EPA and the DOD published the Phase I final rule in the Federal Register (64 FR 25126(13 pp, 216 K); 40 CFR Part 1700(7 pp, 196 K, About PDF)). The Phase I rule identified all discharges incidental to the normal operation of vessels of the Armed Forces, and characterized each discharge to determine if it required control. The determination was made based on the potential of the discharge to have an environmental impact. The rule determined the types of vessel discharges that require control by a marine pollution control device (MPCD) and those that do not require control. The EPA and the DOD identified 39 discharges, 25 of which would require control by an MPCD.
The rule also established the mechanism by which states can petition the EPA to review whether or not a discharge should require control, and the processes the EPA and the states must follow to establish no-discharge zones.
What discharges require Marine Pollution Control Devices (MPCDs)?
Discharges Requiring Control
Standards for these discharges will be developed in three batches.
Phase II: Batch One
- Aqueous film-forming foam
- Chain locker effluent
- Distillation and reverse osmosis brine
- Elevator pit effluent
- Gas turbine water wash
- Non-oily machinery wastewater
- Photographic laboratory drains
- Seawater cooling overboard discharge
- Seawater piping biofouling prevention
- Small boat engine wet exaust
- Welldeck discharge
Phase II: Batch Two
- Catapult water brake tank & post-launch retraction exhaust
- Controllable pitch propeller hydraulic fluid
- Deck runoff
- Firemain systems
- Hull coating leachate
- Motor gasoline compensating discharge
- Sonar dome discharge
- Submarine bilgewater
- Surface vessel bilgewater/oil-water separator
- Underwater ship husbandry
Phase II: Batch Three
- Clean ballast
- Compensated fuel ballast
- Dirty ballast
Discharges Not Requiring Control
- Catapult wet accumulator discharge
- Cathodic protection
- Freshwater layup
- Mine countermeasures equipment lubrication
- Portable damage control
- Drain pump wet exhaust
- Refrigeration and air conditioning condensate
- Rudder bearing lubrication
- Steam condensate
- Stern tube seals and underwater bearing lubrication
- Submarine acoustic countermeasures launcher discharge
- Submarine emergency diesel engine wet exhaust
- Submarine outboard equipment grease and external hydraulics
The rationale for the determinations of requiring control is documented in the Technical Development Document (TDD) for Phase I UNDS.
In Phase II, the EPA and the DOD, in consultation with the U.S. Coast Guard, are developing standards for each discharge that was determined to require control in Phase I. The EPA and the DOD have agreed to establish performance standards in batches, rather than promulgating standards for all 25 discharges at one time.
The batch rulemaking approach allows the EPA and the DOD to conduct technical analyses and develop discharge standards in three batches. A major advantage of this approach is that it speeds up the implementation of performance standards, thus more quickly realizing the goals of UNDS. On February 3rd, 2014, the EPA and the DOD published proposed discharge performance standards for the eleven discharges in Batch One. The proposed rule can be found at the Federal Register, 79 FR 6117 (19 pp, 295 K, About PDF).
The EPA and the DOD must consider the following seven statutory factors in determining whether it is reasonable and practicable to require the use of an MPCD:
- Nature of the discharge
- Environmental effects of the discharge
- Practicability of using the MPCD
- Effect of an MPCD on the operation of a vessel
- Applicable United States law
- Applicable international standards
- Costs of MPCD installation and use
Conducted federal and tribal consultations in March 2013
Published Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in 2014
- Developed Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) National Consistency Determination
- Conducting Endangered Species Act consultation
Conducted federal and tribal consultations in March 2016
- Anticipate publication of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in Fall 2016
In Phase III, the DOD, in consultation with the EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard, will establish regulations governing the design, construction, installation and use of MPCDs onboard vessels of the Armed Forces. These regulations must meet the performance standards promulgated in Phase II. The Phase II performance standards do not become effective, nor does the preemption of state regulation of Armed Forces vessel discharges become effective, until Phase III standards have been promulgated.