Learn the Issues
-
Certification Statement for Correction
Does the certifying official have to sign a certification statement for a correction to a Risk Management Plan? If so, does that certification apply to the entire RMP or just for the correction being made? Yes, the certifying official must sign a digital certification statement in RMP*eSubmit, and it will…
-
Atmospheric conditions used for off-site consequence analyses
What atmospheric conditions must a source assume when performing the offsite consequence analyses required under 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart B? For the worst-case release analysis, 1.5 meters per second wind speed and F atmospheric stability class must be assumed, unless the stationary source owner or operator can demonstrate that…
-
Double wall tanks and "passive mitigation"
Performance of the hazard assessment required under 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart B, includes analysis of both worst-case release scenarios (40 CFR §68.25) and alternative release scenarios (40 CFR §68.28). In each of these analyses, passive mitigation systems may be taken into consideration. If a tank has a "double wall,"…
-
How must an owner estimate the population when defining off-site impacts?
How must an owner or operator estimate the population when defining off-site impacts as part of the facility’s risk management plan (RMP)? The owner or operator must estimate the residential population within a circle with its center at the point of the release and a radius determined by the distance…
-
Voluntary Implementation and Submission of RMP
Pursuant to the risk management program regulations in 40 CFR Part 68, owners and operators of a stationary source that have more than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance in a process must implement and submit a risk management plan (RMP) to EPA. If the risk management program regulations…
-
Updating RMP with Change in Ownership
Pursuant to the risk management program regulations in 40 CFR §68.10, an owner or operator of a stationary source that has more than a threshold quantity of a regulated substance in a process must prepare a risk management plan (RMP). If a facility changes owner, but the manufacturing operations have…
-
Program levels and the difference in worst-case release analysis requirements
The preamble to the Risk Management Program Rule ( 61 FR 31668; June 20, 1996) states that "one worst-case release scenario will be defined to represent all toxics, and one worst-case release scenario will be defined to represent all flammables held above the threshold at the source" ( 61 FR…
-
How may state and local rules be more stringent?
In what ways may state and local rules be more stringent? Does this document ( General Risk Management Program Guidance) provide guidance on state and local differences? States and localities may impose more detailed requirements, such as requiring more documentation or more frequent reporting, specifying hours of training or maintenance…
-
Statutory authority and regulatory source for the risk management program
What is the statutory authority and the regulatory source for the risk management program regulations that are codified in 40 CFR Part 68? The risk management program regulations were promulgated pursuant to the §112(r) accidental release prevention provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. The regulatory sources…
-
Submitting Annual Certification for Operating Procedures to EPA
The owner or operator of a facility who must prepare a Risk Management Plan (RMP) for a Program 3 process is required to develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information (40 CFR…
-
RMP Executive Summary Elements
The owner or operator of a stationary source subject to 40 CFR Part 68 must include an Executive Summary in their Risk Management Plan. What elements must be included in the RMP Executive Summary? Pursuant to 40 CFR §68.155, the Executive Summary must briefly describe the following: accidental release prevention…
-
How to deregister facility from risk management program
How do I deregister my facility from the risk management program? If a facility is no longer subject to the risk management program, the facility owner or operator must deregister within six months (40 CFR §68.190(c)). To deregister, you should submit a letter to the RMP Reporting Center within six…
-
Do I have to conduct incident investigations of releases resulting from theft?
The incident investigation provisions of 40 CFR Part 68 (§§68.60 and 68.81) require facilities to investigate incidents that resulted in or could reasonably have resulted in a catastrophic release. Are covered facilities required to perform incident investigations of releases resulting from theft of covered substances, such as anhydrous ammonia? If…
-
Do the OSHA PSM training requirements satisfy RMP personnel training?
Under the risk management program regulations at 40 CFR Part 68, sources with Program 2 and Program 3 covered processes are required to develop prevention programs that include personnel training. Will compliance with the training requirements under OSHA's Process Safety Management standard (PSM) satisfy the training requirements under 40 CFR…
-
Does compliance under OSHA's PSM demonstrate compliance with the risk management program?
The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAAA) mandated the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to develop a regulatory program to protect workers from the risk of accidents that involve hazardous chemicals. OSHA promulgated its Process Safety Management Standard (PSM) on February 24, 1992 (57 FR 6356), codified at…
-
Comprehensiveness and format of a management system
What is a management system (40 CFR §68.15(a))? How comprehensive must it be? Is there a standard format? The management system required under Subpart A of 40 CFR Part 68 is essentially a system defined by facility managers for integrating the implementation of the risk management program elements and assigning…
-
Guidance for on-site compliance evaluations under CAA §112(r)
CAA §112(r)(6)(L) provides employees and employee representatives with rights to participate in EPA CAA §112(r) compliance evaluations. What formal guidance is available from EPA regarding the involvement of facility employees and employee representatives in EPA and delegated Agency on-site compliance evaluations conducted under CAA §112(r)? The EPA Office of Land…
-
Is there an EPA enforcement policy for violators of CAA §112 and the risk management program rule?
Yes, EPA has issued a Final Combined Enforcement Policy for section §112(r) Risk Management Program.
-
Complying with process safety information (PSI) resulting from new and updated recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP)
My Program 3 process was built prior to new and updated recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP) for my industry. Do I need to implement the new industry practices to comply with process safety information (PSI) requirements under 40 CFR §68.65? EPA expects owners and operators to regularly…
-
Hot Work Definition and Requirements
Facilities subject to the Program 3 Prevention Program requirements in 40 CFR Part 68 must include in their Risk Management Plan the date of the most recent review or revision of hot work permit procedures in Section 7.13. What is considered hot work and what are the requirements related to…