Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Environmental Economics

Working Paper: Welfare Analysis in a Two-Stage Inverse Demand Model: An Application to Harvest Changes in the Chesapeake Bay

Paper Number: 2017-04

Document Date: 7/2017

Author(s): Chris Moore; Charles Griffiths

Subject Area(s): Fisheries, Modeling, Water Pollution

JEL Classification:

D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
D61 - Allocative Efficiency; Cost–Benefit Analysis
Q11 - Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis; Prices
Q22 - Fishery; Aquaculture

Keywords: Two-stage budgeting, Inverse demands, Compensating surplus

Abstract: Like many agricultural commodities, fish and shellfish are highly perishable and producers cannot easily adjust supply in the short run to respond to changes in demand.  In these cases, it is more appropriate to conduct welfare analysis using inverse demand models that take quantities as given and allow prices to adjust to clear the market.  One challenge faced by economists conducting demand analysis is how to limit the number of commodities in the analysis while accounting for the relevant substitutability and complementarity among goods.  A common approach in direct demand modeling is to assume weak separability of the utility function and apply a multi-stage budgeting approach.  This approach has not, however, been applied to an inverse demand system or the associated welfare analysis.  This paper develops a two-stage inverse demand model and derives the total quantity flexibilities which describe how market clearing prices respond to supply changes in other commodity groups.  The model provides the means to estimate consumer welfare impacts of an increase in finfish and shellfish harvest from the Chesapeake Bay while recognizing that harvests from other regions are potential substitutes.  Comparing the two-stage results with single-stage analysis of the same data shows that ignoring differentiation of harvests from different regions, or the availability of substitutes not affected by a supply shock, can bias welfare estimates.

This paper is part of the Environmental Economics Working Paper Series.

  • Welfare Analysis in a Two-Stage Inverse Demand Model: An Application to Harvest Changes in the Chesapeake Bay (pdf) (1.55 MB, 07/31/2017)

Environmental Economics

  • Overview of Environmental Economics
    • Seminars and Workshops
    • CGE Modeling for Regulatory Analysis
    • Current Opportunities, Grants and Solicitations
  • EPA Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses
    • SAB 2020 Review of Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses
  • Environmental Economics Reports
    • Working Paper Series
    • Journal Articles and Book Chapters
  • Current Environmental Economic Topics
    • Climate Change
    • Mortality Risk Valuation
  • EPA Datasets
  • EPA Handbook on Land Cleanup and Reuse
  • Peer Review of TSD: Social Cost of Greenhouse Gas Estimates (2023)
  • Retrospective Study of the Costs of EPA Regulations
Contact Us About Environmental Economics
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on September 13, 2024
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.