Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Risk Management Program (RMP) Rule

Criteria for selecting alternative release scenarios

As part of the hazard assessment, owners and operators of Program 2 and Program 3 covered processes must identify and analyze alternative release scenarios (40 CFR §68.28). What criteria should be used when selecting an alternative release scenario?

The owner or operator of a stationary source subject to the risk management program regulations at 40 CFR Part 68 must analyze one alternative release scenario to represent all flammables in a covered process and one alternative release scenario for each toxic in a covered process. The owner or operator must choose a scenario that is more likely to occur than the worst-case release scenario and that will reach an endpoint off site (40 CFR §68.28 (b)), unless no such scenario exists. Even if no alternative release scenario reaches an off-site endpoint, the source is still required to perform an alternative release scenario that is more likely to occur than the worst-case scenario. When selecting an alternative release scenario, the source shall consider releases that have been documented in the five-year accident history and failure scenarios identified through the process hazard analysis or hazard review (40 CFR §68.28). Sources should consider several types of events listed under 40 CFR §68.28(b)(2), where applicable.

Risk Management Program (RMP) Rule

  • About RMP
    • Publications
    • Training Resources
    • Frequent Questions
  • Guidance and Fact Sheets
    • Guidance for Facilities
    • Guidance for Implementing Agencies
    • Guidance for Inspections
  • Submitting an RMP
    • RMP*Comp
    • RMP*eSubmit
      • RMP*eSubmit User's Manual
    • Resubmit, Correct or Withdraw
  • Accessing RMP Information
    • Federal Reading Rooms
    • Vulnerable Zone Indicator System
  • General Duty Clause
Contact Us about the Risk Management Program Rule
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on February 20, 2025
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.