An official website of the United States government.

We've made some changes to EPA.gov. If the information you are looking for is not here, you may be able to find it on the EPA Web Archive or the January 19, 2017 Web Snapshot.

Superfund Redevelopment Initiative

Superfund Redevelopment Success Stories & Case Studies

SRI develops three types of reuse reports that explore reuse success stories at Superfund sites: Beneficial Effects Economic Case Studies, in-depth case studies of  site reuse and Site Redevelopment Profiles.

A Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study gathers more complete information related to reuse, employment and other beneficial effects. While national impact estimates may underestimate jobs, a local beneficial effects case study can obtain detailed information about economic benefits for every company present on the site, in addition to unique economic benefits provided by particular uses, such as alternative energy. Each beneficial effects economic case study includes a technical appendix that provides an overview of the approaches, assumptions and methodologies used to obtain estimates on local beneficial effects.

In-depth case studies explore Superfund reuse stories from start to finish. Their purpose is to see what redevelopment strategies worked, acknowledge reuse barriers and understand how communities overcame the barriers to create new reuse outcomes. The case studies identify innovative tools and approaches such as green remediation, renewable energy, smart growth and ecological revitalization. Each case study concludes with important lessons learned that may help other communities interested in reusing Superfund sites.

Site Redevelopment Profiles summarize site backgrounds and reuse efforts and highlight success stories as useful examples for the redevelopment of other sites.

The searchable table below contains all three types of reuse reports.

You may need a PDF reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA’s About PDF page to learn more

Site Name/Report Link Type of Report State Region Year
Abex Corporation (PDF)(8 pp, 267 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Virginia 3 2011
Aerojet General Corp. (PDF)(14 pp, 3.5 MB) In-Depth Case Study California 9 2010
Aidex Corporation (PDF)(7 pp, 899 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Iowa 7 2015
Airco Plating Company (PDF)(9 pp, 1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Florida 4 2016
Allied Paper/Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River (PDF)(16 pp, 1.7 MB) In-Depth Case Study Michigan 5 2014
American Creosote Works (Winnfield Plant) (PDF)(10 pp, 934 K) In-Depth Case Study Louisiana 6 2013
American Cyanamid Co. (PDF)(15 pp, 3.2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New Jersey 2 2018
Bayou Verdine (PDF)(10 pp, 6.7 MB) In-Depth Case Study Louisiana 6 2016
Big River Mine Tailings/St. Joe Mineral Corp. (PDF) (429 pp, 12 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Missouri 7 2018
Benfield Industries (PDF) (7 pp, 365 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study North Carolina 4 2012
Blackburn & Union Privileges (PDF)(8 pp, 2.1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Massachusetts 1 2019
BMI-Textron and Trans Circuits, Inc. (PDF) (10 pp, 509 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Florida 4 2014
Boise Cascade/Onan Corp./Medtronics, Inc. (PDF) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Minnesota 5 2017
Brick Township Landfill (PDF)(14 pp, 6 MB) In-Depth Case Study New Jersey 2 2015
Brunswick Naval Air Station (PDF)(28 pp, 3.7 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Maine 1 2019
Bunker Hill Mining & Metallurgical Complex (PDF)(172 pp, 8.9 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Idaho 10 2017
Calhoun Park Area (PDF)(17 pp, 1.8 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study South Carolina 4 2014
California Gulch (PDF) (13 pp, 1.1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Colorado 8 2014
Camilla Wood Preserving (PDF)(12 pp, 6.8 MB) In-Depth Case Study Georgia 4 2013
Chemical Commodities, Inc. (PDF)(18 pp, 2.2 MB) In-Depth Case Study Kansas 7 2015
Chevron Questa Mine (PDF)(16 pp, 6.7 MB) In-Depth Case Study New Mexico 6 2013
Chisman Creek (PDF)(9 pp, 3.4 MB) In-Depth Case Study Virginia 3 2017
Coalinga Asbestos Mine (PDF)(21 pp, 1.3 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study California 9 2015
Commencement Bay Near Shore/Tide Flats (PDF)(14 pp, 8.5 MB) In-Depth Case Study Washington 10 2017
Continental Steel (PDF)(24 pp, 4.2 MB) In-Depth Case Study Indiana 5 2018
Davie Landfill (PDF) (57 pp, 1.2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Florida 4 2014
Davis Timber Company (PDF)(14 pp, 7.6 MB) In-Depth Case Study Mississippi 4 2016
Davisville Naval Construction Battalion Center (PDF)(31 pp, 4.4 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Rhode Island 1 2018
Del Amo (PDF)(44 pp, 1.5 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study California 9 2013
Del Amo (PDF)(14 pp, 1.3 MB) In-Depth Case Study California 9 2015
East Helena (PDF)(16 pp, 14.7 MB) In-Depth Case Study Montana 8 2019
Eastland Woolen Mill (PDF)(8 pp, 2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Maine 1 2019
Ecosystem Services at Superfund Sites (PDF)(27 pp, 2.2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Multiple Multiple 2017
E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc. (Newport Pigment Plant Landfill) (PDF)(9 pp, 708 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Delaware 3 2014
Flat Creek IMM (PDF)(30 pp, 2.8 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Montana 8 2019
FMC Corp. (Yakima Pit) (PDF) (7 pp, 772 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Washington 10 2014
Former Spellman Engineering (PDF)(14 pp, 1.9 MB) In-Depth Case Study Florida 4 2011
Fort Devens (PDF) (27 pp, 1.64 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Massachusetts 1 2018
General Electric Co./Shepherd Farm (PDF) (10 pp, 1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study North Carolina 4 2017
General Mills/Henkel Corp. (PDF) (11 pp, 877 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Minnesota 5 2014
Goldisc Recordings, Inc. (PDF)(10 pp, 1.9 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New York 2 2015
H.O.D. Landfill (PDF)(16 pp, 1.2 MB) In-Depth Case Study Illinois 5 2014
Havertown PCP (PDF)(11 pp, 2.1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Pennsylvania 3 2017
Highway 71/72 Refinery (PDF)(14 pp, 2.3 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Louisiana 6 2015
Indian Island (PDF)(25 pp, 12.7 MB) In-Depth Case Study California 9 2018
Industri-Plex (PDF) (21 pp, 1.6 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Massachusetts 1 2014
Iron Horse Park (PDF)(9 pp, 2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Massachusetts 1 2017
Joslyn Manufacturing & Supply Co. (PDF)(12 pp, 670 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Minnesota 5 2016
Kansas City Structural Steel (PDF)(9 pp, 2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Kansas 7 2015
Kansas City Structural Steel (PDF)(12 pp, 6 MB) In-Depth Case Study Kansas 7 2016
Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. (PDF)(9 pp, 2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New Hampshire 1 2016
Kennecott (South Zone) (PDF) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Utah 8 2017
Koppers Coke (PDF) (10 pp, 612 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Minnesota 5 2012
Lexington County Landfill (PDF) (8 pp, 784 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study South Carolina 4 2014
Libby Asbestos (PDF)(18 pp, 2.8 MB) In-Depth Case Study Montana 8 2014
Liberty Industrial Finishing (PDF) (8 pp, 833 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New York 2 2014
Liberty Industrial Finishing (PDF)(3 pp, 1.6 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New York 2 2019
Lindsay Manufacturing Co. (PDF)(7 pp, 860 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Nebraska 7 2017
Longhorn Army Ammunition Plant (PDF)(12 pp, 4.4 MB) In-Depth Case Study Texas 6 2017
Loring Air Force Base (PDF)(18 pp, 5.7 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Maine 1 2018
Macalloy Corporation (PDF) (9 pp, 389 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study South Carolina 4 2012
MacGillis & Gibbs Co/Bell Lumber & Pole (PDF)(14 pp, 844 K) In-Depth Case Study Minnesota 5 2010
Martin-Marietta Sodyeco, Inc. (PDF)(16 pp, 5.7 MB) In-Depth Case Study North Carolina 4 2015
Materials Technology Laboratory (US Army) (PDF) (11 pp, 1.8 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Massachusetts 1 2018
Many Diversified Interests, Inc. (PDF)(12 pp, 3.1 MB) In-Depth Case Study Texas 6 2008
Midvale Slag (PDF)(18 pp, 1.9 MB) In-Depth Case Study Utah 8 2011
Midvale Slag (PDF)(38 pp, 3.1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Utah 8 2015
Milltown Reservoir Sediments (PDF)(14 pp, 2.3 MB) In-Depth Case Study Montana 8 2011
Murray Smelter (PDF) (10 pp, 1.0 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Utah 8 2012
North Penn Area 12 (PDF) (6 pp, 448 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Pennsylvania 3 2014
North Ridge Estates (PDF) (13 pp, 2.2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Oregon 10 2018
Northwest Pipe & Casing/Hall Process Company (PDF)(10 pp, 1.1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Oregon 10 2015
Onondaga Lake (PDF) (12 pp, 2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New York 2 2018
Pacific Sound Resources (PDF) (12 pp, 1.3 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Washington 10 2013
Pease Air Force Base (PDF) (37 pp, 2.2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New Hampshire 1 2018
Pepper Steel & Alloys, Inc. (PDF)(9 pp, 2.5 MB) In-Depth Case Study Florida 4 2018
Peterson/Puritan, Inc. (PDF) (19 pp, 1.3 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Rhode Island 1 2014
Peters Cartridge Factory (PDF)(3 pp, 1.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Ohio 5 2019
Phoenix-Goodyear Airport Area (PDF)(18 pp, 968 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Arizona 9 2015
PJP Landfill (PDF)(11 pp, 2.2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New Jersey 2 2016
PMC Groundwater (PDF) (13 pp, 1.2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Michigan 5 2014
Quincy Smelter (PDF)(16 pp, 6 MB) In-Depth Case Study Michigan 5 2017
Raymark Industries, Inc. (PDF)(9 pp, 1.3 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Connecticut 1 2016
Reilly Tar & Chemical Corp. (Indianapolis Plant) (PDF)(14 pp, 5.8 MB) In-Depth Case Study Indiana 5 2014
Reynolds Metals Company (PDF)(10 pp, 1.9 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Oregon 10 2019
Roebling Steel Co. (PDF)(14 pp, 1.3 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New Jersey 2 2016
Rocky Mountain Arsenal (PDF)(16 pp, 8.9 MB) In-Depth Case Study Colorado 8 2018
RSR Corporation (PDF)(56 pp, 3.7 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Texas 6 2015
San Fernando Valley (Area 1) (PDF)(30 pp, 5.8 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study California 9 2018
Sherwood Medical Co. (PDF)(8 pp, 1  MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Nebraska 7 2015
Silver Bow Creek/Butte Area (PDF)(17 pp, 6 MB) In-Depth Case Study Montana 8 2014
SMS Instruments, Inc. (PDF) (6 pp, 1.1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New York 2 2014
Sola Optical USA, Inc. (PDF)(7 pp, 727 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study California 9 2016
Solitron Microwave (PDF) (7 pp, 607 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Florida 4 2012
South Andover (PDF) (11 pp, 398 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Minnesota 5 2011
South Bay Asbestos Area (PDF)(15 pp, 766 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study California 9 2015
South Point Plant (PDF) (14 pp, 4.3 MB) In-Depth Case Study Ohio 5 2009
South Point Plant (PDF) (15 pp, 1.1 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Ohio 5 2014
Southside Sanitary Landfill (PDF) (6 pp, 255 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Indiana 5 2011
State Marine of Port Arthur/Palmer Barge Line (PDF)(9 pp, 777 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Texas 6 2017
Strother Field Industrial Park (PDF)(12 pp, 1.4 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Kansas 7 2015
Sullivan's Ledge (PDF)(14 pp, 3.5 MB) In-Depth Case Study Massachusetts 1 2015
Tar Creek (Ottawa County) (PDF) In-Depth Case Study Oklahoma 6 2015
Tex Tin Corp. (PDF) In-Depth Case Study Texas 6 2018
Tucson International Airport Area (PDF)(27 pp, 1.6 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Arizona 9 2016
Universal Oil Products (Chemical Division) (PDF) (11 pp, 1.2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New Jersey 2 2013
Vasquez Boulevard & I-70 (PDF)(147 pp, 4.3 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Colorado 8 2017
Vertac, Inc. (PDF) (9 pp, 610 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Arkansas 6 2012
Vertac, Inc. (PDF) (12 pp, 5.8 MB) In-Depth Case Study Arkansas 6 2013
Waste Disposal, Inc. (PDF) (13 pp, 752 K) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study California 9 2014
Waite Park Wells (PDF)(17 pp, 2 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Minnesota 5 2018
Wells G&H (PDF) (40 pp, 2.3 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study Massachusetts 1 2018
Welsbach & General Gas Mantle (PDF)(10 pp, 1.8 MB) Beneficial Effects Economic Case Study New Jersey 2 2015
Wyckoff Company/Eagle Harbor (PDF)(16 pp, 10.7 MB) In-Depth Case Study Washington 10 2016
31 Water Street (PDF)(2 pp, 2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Massachusetts 1 2017
Charles George Reclamation Trust Landfill (PDF)(2 pp, 686 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Massachusetts 1 2017
Eastland Woolen Mill (PDF)(2 pp, 1.7 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Maine 1 2019
Elizabeth Mine (PDF)(2 pp, 562 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Vermont 1 2019
Iron Horse Park (PDF)(3 pp, 1.7 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Massachusetts 1 2019
Kearsarge Metallurgical Corp. (PDF)(3 pp, 1.8 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New Hampshire 1 2019
Raymark Industries, Inc. (PDF)(2 pp, 603 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Connecticut 1 2017
Re-Solve, Inc. (PDF)(2 pp, 755 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Massachusetts 1 2019
Rose Hill Regional Landfill (PDF)(2 pp, 1.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Rhode Island 1 2019
Solvents Recovery Service of New England (PDF)(2 pp, 1.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Connecticut 1 2017
West Kingston Town Dump/URI Disposal Area (PDF)(2 pp, 1.5 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Rhode Island 1 2019
W.R. Grace & Co., Inc. (Acton Plant) (PDF)(2 pp, 1.5 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Massachusetts 1 2017
Asbestos Dump (PDF)(2 pp, 1.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New Jersey 2 2019
Chemical Insecticide Corp. (PDF) (1 pg, 1.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New Jersey 2 2017
Diamond Alkali  (PDF)(1 pg, 367 K) Site Redevelopment Profile New Jersey 2 2014
Hiteman Leather Company (PDF)(2 pp, 1.6 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New York 2 2019
Landfill & Development Co. (PDF)(2 pp, 1.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New Jersey 2 2019
Lipari Landfill (PDF)(2 pp, 1.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New Jersey 2 2019
Marathon Battery Corp. (PDF) (3 pp, 2.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New York 2 2019
Onondaga Lake  (PDF)(3 pp, 2.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New York 2 2019
PJP Landfill (PDF)(3 pp, 3.7 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New Jersey 2 2018
Roebling Steel Co. (PDF) (3 pp, 2.9 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New Jersey 2 2019
Syosett Landfill (PDF)(3 pp, 2.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New York 2 2019
Welsbach & General Gas Mantle (PDF)(3 pp, 910 K) Site Redevelopment Profile New Jersey 2 2020
Dixie Caverns Landfill (PDF)(2 pp, 1.9 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Virginia 3 2017
Fort Detrick Area B Ground Water (PDF)(2 pp, 630 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Maryland 3 2017
Havertown PCP (PDF)(2 pp, 1.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Pennsylvania 3 2019
Ryeland Road (PDF)(2 pp, 1.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Pennsylvania 3 2019
Sharon Steel Corp. (Fairmont Coke Works) (PDF)(3 pp, 2.6 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile West Virginia 3 2018
Whitmoyer Laboratories (PDF)(2 pp, 1.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Pennsylvania 3 2019
Valmont TCE (PDF)(2 pp, 1.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Pennsylvania 3 2017
York County Solid Waste Landfill (PDF) (2 pp, 1.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Pennsylvania 3 2019
BMI-Textron and Trans Circuits, Inc. (PDF)(3 pp, 2.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Florida 4 2019
Camilla Wood Preserving (PDF)(3 pp, 2.8 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Georgia 4 2019
Davis Timber Company (PDF)(3 pp, 2.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Mississippi 4 2019
Florida Steel Corporation (PDF)(2 pp, 1.7 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Florida 4 2018
Former Spellman Engineering (PDF)(3 pp, 2.5 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Florida 4 2019
Henry's Knob (PDF)(2 pp, 2.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile South Carolina 4 2017
Hercules 009 Landfill (PDF)(2 pp, 2.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Georgia 4 2019
Landia Chemical Company (PDF)(2 pp, 1.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Florida 4 2019
Martin-Marietta Sodyeco (PDF)(3 pp, 2.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile North Carolina 4 2019
North Carolina State University (Lot 86, Farm Unit #1) (PDF)(2 pp, 2.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile North Carolina 4 2017
Pepper Steel & Alloys, Inc. (PDF)(3 pp, 3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Florida 4 2018
Pioneer Sand Company (PDF)(2 pp, 1.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Florida 4 2018
Raleigh Street Dump (PDF)(3 pp, 2.8 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Florida 4 2019
Woolfolk Chemical Works (PDF)(3 pp, 1.6 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Georgia 4 2018
Celotex Corporation (PDF) (3 pp, 1.9 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Illinois 5 2019
Continental Steel (PDF)(3 pp, 1.5 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Indiana 5 2018
DuPage County Landfill/Blackwell Forest Preserve (PDF)(3 pp, 2.9 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Illinois 5 2019
Johns-Manville Corp. (PDF)(2 pp, 996 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Illinois 5 2017
MacGillis & Gibbs/Bell Lumber & Pole (PDF)(3 pp, 3.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Minnesota 5 2019
Plainwell Paper portion of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo (PDF)(3 pp, 2.6 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Michigan 5 2019
South Point Plant (PDF)(2 pp, 1.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Ohio 5 2019
Southside Sanitary Landfill (PDF)(3 pp, 2.9 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Indiana 5 2019
Bayou Bonfouca (PDF)(3 pp, 2.8 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Louisiana 6 2018
Chemical Recycling Inc. (PDF)(2 pp, 1.5 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Texas 6 2019
Eagle-Picher Henryetta (PDF)(3 pp, 1.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Oklahoma 6 2019
Eagle Rock Lake/Chevron Questa Mine (PDF)(2 pp, 1.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile New Mexico 6 2017
Molycorp Inc., (PDF)(1 pg, 128 K) Site Redevelopment Profile New Mexico 6 2011
Mosley Road Sanitary Landfill (PDF)(2 pp, 1.7 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Oklahoma 6 2018
Palmer Barge Line (PDF)(3 pp, 2.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Texas 6 2018
Pantex Plant (PDF)(1 pg, 1.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Texas 6 2016
RSR Corporation (PDF)(3 pp, 1.5 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Texas 6 2019
Tar Creek (Ottawa County)  (PDF) (1 pg, 673 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Oklahoma 6 2015
Tex Tin Corp. (PDF)(3 pp, 846 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Texas 6 2017
Cherokee County (PDF)(3 pp, 2.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Kansas 7 2019
John Deere (Dubuque Works) (PDF)(2 pg, 1.4 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Iowa 7 2018
Kansas City Structural Steel (PDF) (2 pp, 1.6 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Kansas 7 2019
Oronogo-Duenweg Mining Belt (PDF)(3 pp, 4.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Missouri 7 2018
PCB Inc.-Missouri (PDF)(4 pp, 5.7 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Missouri 7 2019
Peoples Natural Gas (PDF)(3 pp, 2.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Iowa 7 2018
Midvale Slag (PDF)(1 pg, 64 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Utah 8 2010
Milltown Reservoir Sediments (PDF)(1 pg, 722 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Montana 8 2017
Murray Smelter (PDF)(1 pg, 106 K) Site Redevelopment Profile Utah 8 2011
Aerojet General Corp. (PDF)(3 pp, 4.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile California 9 2018
Del Monte Corp. (Oahu Plantation) (PDF)(2 pp, 1.2 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Hawaii 9 2019
Jibboom Junkyard (PDF)(2 pp, 678 K) Site Redevelopment Profile California 9 2018
Pemaco Maywood (PDF)(4 pp, 1.5 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile California 9 2019
Tuluwat Site (PDF)(2 pp, 1.6 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile California 9 2017
South Bay Asbestos Area (PDF) (2 pp, 2.3 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile California 9 2019
Bunker Hill Mining & Metallurgical Complex (PDF)(4 pp, 4.1 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Idaho 10 2018
North Ridge Estates, Operable Unit 1 (PDF)(3 pp, 1.6 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Oregon 10 2018
Oeser Company (PDF)(3 pp, 2.5 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Washington 10 2019
Reynolds Metals Company (PDF)(2 pg, 1.8 MB) Site Redevelopment Profile Oregon 10 2017

Top of Page