Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Risk Assessment

Guidance for Applying Quantitative Data to Develop Data-Derived Extrapolation Factors for Interspecies and Intraspecies Extrapolation

Related Information
  • Federal Register Notice: June 9, 2011
  • Federal Register Notice: September 7, 2011
  • Public Comments
  • Recommended Use of Body Weight 3/4 as the Default Method in Derivation of the Oral Reference Dose

Summary

The mission of EPA is to protect human health and the environment. In support of its regulatory actions, the Agency relies on toxicological data often generated with animal models. To relate animal toxicological data to humans, assessors extrapolate animal response data to the central tendency of humans (interspecies) followed by further extrapolation of the central tendency value to sensitive groups and lifestages (intraspecies). In the absence of data, the Agency has employed standard default values to complete these extrapolations.
 
This guidance outlines approaches for developing factors for inter- and intraspecies extrapolation based on data describing toxicokinetic and/or toxicodynamic properties of a particular agent. The guidance document was primarily developed to instruct EPA toxicologists and risk assessors on this methodology and in doing so promote consistency to the way that this method is used but also to provide transparency to stakeholders and other interested parties.
 

Background

This guidance extends several principles contained in US and International guidance. The explicit addressing of toxicokinetics as one half of the default factor for interspecies extrapolation was established in the EPA's Reference Concentration Methodology (1994). The subdivision of both inter- and intraspecies uncertainty factors was established by the World Health Organization's International Programme on Chemical Safety in 2005. In 2011 EPA established body weight scaling as the default method for the interspecies toxicokinetic extrapolation for orally encountered contaminants. The Develop Data-Derived Extrapolation Factors (DDEF) approach is consistent with that recommended in the 2005 Cancer Guidelines and by the National Academies of Science, in that it guides an assessment of potentially reliable data before default values for uncertainty factors are invoked. 
 
Recognizing that toxicokinetic extrapolation involves characterizing the relationship between applied dose and target tissue concentration, this document uses target tissue concentrations to link the evaluation of toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics. It provides the Agency’s initial guidance on quantification of toxicodynamic events, and does so in a manner consistent with policies and practices established for toxicokinetic evaluations. In doing so, this document employs the International Program on Chemical Safety (IPCS) framework of subdividing the factors for interspecies and intraspecies extrapolation into toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic components and guides the identification, evaluation, computation and application of non-default extrapolation factor values for application in health risk assessment. 
 
An appendix to this document contains case study examples taken from the Integrated Risk information System (IRIS) and from Program Office records. The case studies present the application of principles contained in this document to data and modeling studies for actual chemicals and should serve as instructional aides.
 
This guidance has undergone public comment and independent peer review that was organized, convened and conducted by an EPA contractor in 2011. The peer review report and response to peer review comments are attached below.
 
The Charge Questions were developed for the External Reviewers of the document. 
 

  • Guidance for Applying Quantitative Data to Develop Data-Derived Extrapolation Factors for Interspecies and Intraspecies Extrapolation (pdf) (3.28 MB, September 2014, R-14-002F)
  • Charge Questions for External Reviewers of the Document: Application of Quantitative Data to Develop Data-Derived Extrapolation Factors for Interspecies and Intraspecies Extrapolation (Draft) (pdf) (17.08 KB)
  • External Review Draft: Guidance for Applying Quantitative Data to Develop Data-Derived Extrapolation Factors (DDEF) for Interspecies and Intraspecies Extrapolation (pdf) (999.73 KB, May 2011, 100-J-11-001)

Risk Assessment

  • About Risk Assessment
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
    • Conducting a Human Health Risk Assessment
    • Human Health Risk Models and Tools
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
    • Conducting an Ecological Risk Assessment
    • Ecological Risk Models and Tools
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
    • Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)
    • Regional Removal Management Levels for Chemicals (RMLs)
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
    • Superfund Human Health Risk Topics
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part A
      • Supplement to RAGS Part A: Community Involvement in Superfund Risk Assessments (1999)
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Volume III: Part A
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part B
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Part C
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part D
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part E
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part F
    • Superfund Ecological Risk Topics
      • Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund
      • Ecological Soil Screening Level (Eco-SSL) Guidance and Documents
    • Additional Superfund Risk Topics
      • Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)
      • Regional Removal Management Levels for Chemicals (RMLs)
  • Where you live
Contact Us About Risk Assessment
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on October 10, 2024
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.