Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Risk Assessment

Multi-criteria Integrated Resource Assessment (MIRA)

On this page:

  • Overview
  • Tools
  • Steps

MIRA Overview

MIRA is an approach that facilitates stakeholder engagement for collaborative multi-objective decision making. MIRA is designed to facilitate and support an inclusive, explicit, transparent, iterative learning-based decision process.

The process is used to:

  • Create an Environmental Index
  • Rank environmental elements such as counties, watersheds or alternative decision options (using many indicators)

What kinds of analytical problems can MIRA handle?

  1. Policy/decision problems with many and diverse stakeholder interests
  2. Mix of quantitative and qualitative data/information, including chemical and non-chemical stressors and human health and ecosystem/ecosystem services
  3. Data/model uncertainties as well as decision uncertainty
  4. Policy/decision problems that utilize highly technical, expert information as well as stakeholder values
  5. Rank ordering and comparing things

MIRA is designed on these decision analytic principles:

  1. Consideration of Stakeholders
  2. Context
  3. Criteria and their metrics
  4. Significance of the data metrics
  5. Value judgments

Why should you use MIRA?

Tame vs. Wicked Problems

Tame problems:

  • Have a right answer
  • Have objective measures of success
  • Are fact-driven
  • Have a knowable truth (even if we don’t know it now or if there is uncertainty about it).

Wicked problems are:

  • Multi-dimensional, i.e., Hard to define because of diverse stakeholder perspectives,
  • Have no single right answer; only better or worse conditions
  • Have solutions often have to be discovered through learning
  • Values-driven
- Wicked problems. Rittel and Webber (1973)

Simple way to think about tame vs. wicked:

  • Resolving tame problems helps us understand what is happening in the environmental system.
  • Resolving wicked problems means we are deciding what we want to do within the environmental system. 

Environmental problems are complex and deciding what to do about them is complicated by diverse stakeholder perspectives, a combination of science, economic and socially relevant data/information, and sometimes, regulatory constraints. Defining the problem and finding the necessary common ground in which to make policy decisions are difficult. This is a wicked problem.

What’s wicked got to do with it?

All decision making problems are wicked problems. Environmental decision making problems typically also contain tame problem components (i.e., we want to use scientific data in decision making). Knowing which components are tame vs. wicked in the environmental decision making problem flags those components that are best resolved with mathematical and scientific data and models (elegant solutions) vs. those components that are best resolved with facilitated stakeholder discussion and the application of values (clumsy solutions).

Examples of Wicked Environmental Problems: Global climate change, Sustainability, Environmental risk management

Tame Problems are those that can be clearly defined and agreed to by all stakeholders and have a clear right answer. A math problem is an example of a tame problem. Tame problems can be very complex. Going to Mars is an example of a tame but complex problem.

Environmental Solutions: MIRA facilitates "clumsy" solutions

Clumsy solutions are those that exhibit the following features:

  • Stakeholder-inclusive
  • Transparent
  • Learning-based
  • Iterative

Elegant solutions address tame problems. Examples of elegant solutions are the answer to an algebra problem, the experimental results from a toxicological study, or the engineering design of the Mars landing vehicle.

Learn more about how clumsy solutions work from Vermeij et al. 2006. Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World: The Case of Climate Change. Public Administration 84 (4): 817-843 and about how MIRA facilitates clumsy solutions.

MIRA Tools

The diagram below illustrates the tools in the MIRA Toolbox:

This illustration shows how the MIRA modules connect with each other and with outside information.

How the MIRA modules connect with each other and with outside information:

Data Collection Manager

  • allows users to store, sort, and retrieve data such as source emissions, demographics, and environmental quality values

Geostatistical Indicators Module

  • allows users to take spatial fields (i.e., maps) and collapse them into a single number in order to compare one map to another in making a decision

Programmatic and Budget Decision Analysis Module

  • provides a way to organize all decision criteria (i.e., indicators), include expert opinions and include what's important to stakeholders in making a decision
  • Model Outputs
    outputs from Cause and Effect Models (from EPA and non-EPA sources) become inputs into MIRA; connects science with decision making (via the MIRA Decision Analysis Module)
  • Data for Environmental Modeling (D4EM):
    D4EM interfaces National, Regional, State, Local and user defined databases with modeling systems, such as FRAMES.
  • Framework for Risk Analysis for Multimedia Environmental Systems (FRAMES):
  • FRAMES allows models to communicate with each other, facilitating the passage of data, resulting in the simulation of complex environmental processes.
  • Supercomputer for Model Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation (SuperMUSE):
  • SuperMUSE combines a software and hardware to allows analysts to select one or more components of the MIRA-FRAMES architecture depending on their analytical needs and also give them the capability to perform model uncertainty and/or sensitivity analysis.
  • Mechanistic Models:
    Explicitly include the mechanisms or processes between the state variables; unlike empirical models. The parameters in mechanistic models should be supported by data and have real-world interpretations (EPA, 2009b). Examples are Fate and Transport models like Air Quality Models (AERMOD, CMAQ) and Water Quality Models (HSPF, SWAT)
  • Empirical Models:
    Rely upon the observed relationships among experimental data typically because information about the underlying mechanism is not understood or available. These can be thought of as ‘best-fit’ models whose parameters may or may not have real-world interpretation. Examples are probabilistic models like regression models and exposure models.
  • Integrated Modeling:
    A systems analysis-based approach to environmental assessment. It includes a set of interdependent science based components (models, data, and assessment methods) that together form the basis for constructing an appropriate modeling system. The constructed modeling system is capable of simulating the environmental stressor-response relationships relevant to a well specified problem statement. (Integrated Modeling for Integrate Environmental Decision Making, EPA100/R-08/010) An example is integrated environmental modeling Technologies (iemTechnologies)developed by EPA’s National Exposure Research Laboratory (NERL). It is a suite of tools for integrated environmental modeling, including Data for Environmental Modeling (D4EM), Framework for Risk Analysis for Multimedia Environmental Systems (FRAMES), and Supercomputer for Model Uncertainty and Sensitivity Evaluation (SuperMUSE).

Steps of the MIRA Process

There are just 6 steps to the MIRA process, they include:

  1. Initialize/Define the Context
  2. Initialize/Define the Criteria/Narratives/Data and Organization of Indicators applicable to the Context
  3. Initialize/Apply significance to the data
  4. Initialize/Apply values
  5. Learning via iteration
  6. Understanding the consequences of each choice (i.e., decision uncertainty)

The diagram below illustrates the steps in the MIRA process.

Illustration showing the 6 step process to a multi-criteria integrated resource assessment (MIRA),
MIRA Process Flow

MIRA Applications

The MIRA Applications page has been archived. Search for it at EPA Archives

Risk Assessment

  • About Risk Assessment
  • Human Health Risk Assessment
    • Conducting a Human Health Risk Assessment
    • Human Health Risk Models and Tools
  • Ecological Risk Assessment
    • Conducting an Ecological Risk Assessment
    • Ecological Risk Models and Tools
  • Risk Assessment Guidance
  • Risk Tools and Databases
    • Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)
    • Regional Removal Management Levels for Chemicals (RMLs)
  • Superfund Risk Assessment
    • Superfund Human Health Risk Topics
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part A
      • Supplement to RAGS Part A: Community Involvement in Superfund Risk Assessments (1999)
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Volume III: Part A
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part B
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS) Part C
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part D
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part E
      • Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS): Part F
    • Superfund Ecological Risk Topics
      • Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund
      • Ecological Soil Screening Level (Eco-SSL) Guidance and Documents
    • Additional Superfund Risk Topics
      • Regional Screening Levels (RSLs)
      • Regional Removal Management Levels for Chemicals (RMLs)
  • Where you live
Contact Us About Risk Assessment
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on June 24, 2024
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.