An official website of the United States government.

We've made some changes to EPA.gov. If the information you are looking for is not here, you may be able to find it on the EPA Web Archive or the January 19, 2017 Web Snapshot.

Superfund Redevelopment Initiative

Ready for Reuse (RfR) Determinations at Superfund Sites

A Ready for Reuse (RfR) determination provides a technical determination that a site is “ready for reuse” and will remain protective for that use, so long as any use limitations established by EPA continue to be met. An RfR Determination summarizes information about the site that supports the determination that all or a portion of a property at a site can support specified types of uses while remaining protective of human health and the environment.

Use of RfR Determinations has proven to be valuable for helping to eliminate confusion over what future uses are appropriate at a site. Developing an RfR Determination presents an opportunity not only to reaffirm the institutional controls (ICs) selected in a site’s decision documents, but also the potential to create an additional layer of IC protection.

For questions about an RfR Determination for a specific site, interested parties should contact that sites' Remedial Project Manager in the appropriate EPA Regional Office. 

You may need a PDF reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA’s About PDF page to learn more.

Example RfR Determinations Developed for Superfund Sites

Local officials, developers and EPA staff in Regional offices say that RfR Determinations have played an important role in the reuse of sites and serve many beneficial purposes. RfR Determinations provide information about land use restrictions and other institutional controls that protect remedies and make sure sites are reused safely. RfR Determinations can also help improve local economic conditions by encouraging reuse. Sites that have received RfR Determinations include:

Site State Region Year
Arlington Blending and Packaging (PDF) (23 pp, 579 K) Tennessee 4 2004
Augustus Hook (PDF) (18 pp, 1.3 MB) Indiana 5 2006
Big Tex Grain (PDF) (30 pp, 2.4 MB) Texas 6 2012
Conroe Creosoting Company (PDF) (16 pp, 781 K) Texas 6 2008
Eagle-Picher Henryetta Site, Central Plateau Area (PDF) (45 pp, 7.5 MB) Oklahoma 6 2015
Eastern Michaud Flats, FMC Plant Operable Unit (PDF) (29 pp, 12.8 MB) Idaho 10 2010
Harris Corporation (Palm Bay Facility) (PDF) (20 pp, 3.0 MB) Florida 4 2009
Escambia Wood - Pensacola (PDF)(96 pp, 9.7 MB) Florida 4 2018
H.O.D. Landfill  (PDF) (82 pp, 1.5 MB) Illinois 5 2003
Ingram Richardson (PDF) (19 pp, 2.4 MB) Indiana 5 2007
LCP Chemicals Operable Unit 3 Quadrant 1 (PDF) (15 pp, 3.3 MB) Georgia 4 2012
Midvale Slag (PDF) (103 pp, 10.1 MB) Utah 8 2008
MGM Brakes (PDF) (63 pp, 3.7 MB) California 9 2005
RSR Corporation Site - Dallas, TX Texas 6 2005
Sharon Steel Corp. (Midvale Tailings) (PDF) (31 pp, 1.7 MB) Utah 8 2004
Southern Maryland Wood Treating (PDF) (10 pp, 743 K) Maryland 3 2004
South Point Plant (PDF) (36 pp, 2.5 MB) Ohio 5 2004
Tex Tin (OU2) (PDF) (13 pp, 593 K) Texas 6 2003
White Farm Equipment Co. Dump (PDF) (26 pp, 1.1 MB) Iowa 7 2011

Top of Page