Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Managing and Transforming Waste Streams – A Tool for Communities
  3. Contract Language
  4. Case Studies

Zero Waste Case Study: Fresno

Contact

City of Fresno
Jerry Schuber Sr.

jerry.schuber@fresno.gov
Assistant Director of Public Utilities
(559) 621-1801
City of Fresno Trash Disposal & Recycling

HF&H Consultants, LLC
Rob Hilton

rchilton@hfh-consultants.com
Senior Project Manager
(925) 977-6959
HF&H Consultants

On this page:
  • Partnership
  • Contractual Arrangements
  • Procurement Best Practices
  • Contracting Best Practices
  • Advantages
  • Disadvantages/Omissions

Partnership

The City of Fresno has adopted an ambitious Zero Waste Action Plan. In 2005, the Fresno City Council passed a mandatory recycling ordinance requiring all multifamily and commercial customers to recycle. The sole service provider for trash collection, the City of Fresno Solid Waste Management Division phased-in recycling services to 2,500 multi-family complexes (approximately 30,000 units) and 4,000 businesses. In 2010 the city decided to privatize these operations as a cost saving measure.

The contractors transport trash to an independently owned transfer station before delivery to the county-owned landfill. This transfer station has a fairly robust diversion program where they sort out a lot of cardboard, wood, beverage containers and other large or valuable recyclables.

Contractual Arrangements

Fresno Franchise Agreements

Multi-Family and Commercial Solid Waste, Recyclable Materials, and Organic Materials Services (pdf)

Fresno established two exclusive franchise areas, released a Request for Proposals (RFP) and awarded contracts to Allied Waste Services and Mid-Valley Disposal covering different service areas.

The two 10-year contracts provide for collection and processing of recyclable materials and collection of trash from all multifamily and commercial customers. Contract conditions include:

  • City approves maximum allowable rates based on proposals.
  • Contractors perform billing and pay city fees.
  • Compensation is adjusted annually using index-based system during most rate years and a cost-based review of contractor’s actual costs every three to five years during contract term.
  • Liquidated damages can be assessed by the city for service delivery omissions.
  • Customers may also subscribe for collection of compostable materials including food scraps, yard trimmings and food-soiled paper.

Procurement Best Practices

  • Separate Collection from Disposal Contracts
    The contractors transport trash to an independently owned transfer station where beverage containers, cardboard, wood, and other large or valuable recyclables are sorted out before delivery to the county-owned landfill.
  • Provide Draft Contract in the Request for Proposals (RFP)
    The draft contract was included in the RFP and proposers were asked to submit suggested changes or exceptions to the contract as a part of their proposals. This effort can expedite negotiations and clarify key business points.
  • Multiple Evaluation Criteria
    Evaluation criteria and weighting of the criteria were included in the RFP to ensure that proposers understood the city’s priorities. Cost was less than half of the total points and the “lowest price” proposal was not selected by the council.
  • Mandatory Commercial Recycling
    The multifamily and commercial program was a key program in the RFP.

Contracting Best Practices

  • Education and Outreach
    The RFP required twice annual technical assistance visits to multi-family properties and annual visits to commercial properties.
  • Environmentally Preferable Purchasing
    Proposers were encouraged to identify environmental enhancements they could incorporate into their operations, including Green Business certification, environmentally preferable purchasing and local purchasing. Each contractor committed to these enhancements in their proposals, which were incorporated into the contracts.
  • Align Cost of Service To Rates
    Contractors are compensated for all services delivered to the customer, including recycling and organic materials collection. Subsidies for recycling services were eliminated from commercial and multifamily rates.
  • Innovations Clause
    Proposers were encouraged to submit one or more proposals for service enhancements, innovations, or cost-saving approaches. Provisions allow for changes in scope, at city direction, for implementation of innovative services, changes in collection methods, new requirements for customers, expansion of public education or implementation of pilot programs.

Advantages

  • Maximizes Zero Waste Results: The city used numerous best practices and innovative approaches to maximize zero waste opportunities associated with the private sector agreements.
  • Low Cost: The city initially provided commercial recycling services to increase competition and demonstrate cost-effectiveness and then transitioned to commercial franchises to promote zero waste innovation and focus city operations on residential services.

Disadvantages

  • Potentially Inadequate Incentives: Service fees for trash, recycling and organics collection reflect costs of service, but may not provide enough incentives to customers to maximize recycling and composting. In addition, the trash collection-focused revenue model may not provide enough incentives to the contractors to maximize diversion from landfills and incinerators.

Managing and Transforming Waste Streams – A Tool for Communities

  • About the Tool
    • How to Use the Tool
    • Terms & Definitions
    • Filter Descriptions and Qualitative Rankings
    • Featured Cities and Counties
  • The Planning Tool
  • Featured Examples and Resources
    • Browse by Topic
    • Examples and Resources (#1-50)
    • Examples and Resources (#51-100)
  • Contract Language
    • Case Studies
      • Austin, TX
      • Berkeley, CA
      • Boulder, CO
      • Fresno, CA
      • Napa, CA
      • Renton, WA
      • San Diego International Airport
      • San Francisco, CA
      • San Francisco International Airport
      • San Jose, CA
      • Seattle, WA
    • Full Contracts and Agreements
      • Berkeley, CA
      • Renton, WA
    • Contracting Best Practices
      • Align Costs to Rates
      • Commercial Bins
      • Direct Materials to Markets
      • Disposal Payments
      • Education and Outreach
      • Incentives and Penalties
      • Increase Diversion
      • Innovations Clause
      • Market Organic Materials
      • Multi-Family Customers
      • Purchasing Preferences
      • Separate Compensation from Rates
      • Source Separation
    • Procurement Best Practices
      • Collaborative Negotiation vs. New Procurement
      • Local Government Billing or Lockbox
      • Mandatory Recycling and Composting
      • Minimum Zero Waste Standards
      • Process Integrity Guidelines
      • Publicly Owned Facilities
      • Separate Contracts
      • Separate Technical and Price Evaluation
      • Start Early
    • Sample Contract and Franchise Agreement Clauses
Contact Us
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on March 14, 2025
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.