Moss Landing Air: What air monitoring activities did you do during the January fire response?
Return to: Frequently Asked Questions

During the Fire
At the request of local agencies, EPA conducted perimeter and community air monitoring beginning the morning January 17.
- We had nine air monitors set up at and around the property.
- The monitors looked for mineral acid gases like hydrogen fluoride and particulates.
- After smoke subsided, EPA consulted with Monterey County and transferred air monitoring stations to Vistra to continue monitoring.
- We shared our air monitoring data with state and local officials.
- Please visit Monterey County’s “Moss Landing Vistra Battery Fire” dashboard for more information about their response to the fire.
EPA's air monitoring data was provided to local agencies for analysis to inform public health decisions.
Related Questions
- Moss Landing Air: What were the results of EPA's air monitoring from January 17 to 20?
- Moss Landing Air: What did you test for during the fire?
- Moss Landing Air: What air monitoring technology did you use?
- Moss Landing Air: Are you requiring any air monitoring or sampling during Vistra’s battery removal work?
- Moss Landing Air: Is there a difference between air monitoring and air sampling?
- Moss Landing Air: What particulate sizes did EPA monitor during the initial response in January?
- Moss Landing Air: Can you detect nanoparticles in the air with the instrumentation you used during the initial response?
- Moss Landing Air: What happened with the spike in particulate matter at air monitoring station 9 the morning of January 18, which resulted in a 1.275 mg/m3 reading for PM10?