Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Great Lakes Monitoring

Great Lakes Open Lakes Trend Monitoring Program: Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT)

Mean total DDT concentration (ppb) in lake trout/walleye from 1991 through 2009.
Mean total DDT concentration (ppb) in lake trout/walleye from 1991 through 2009.
In 1972, the U.S. banned the use of Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), a synthetic insecticide. DDT levels in the Great Lakes top predator fish have declined since the chemical became illegal. Lake DDT levels remain well below the 1987 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement goal all through the Great Lakes basin.

Based on information collected at Environment Canada monitoring locations, yearly rates drop by 6.8% in Lake Superior, 7.1% in Lake Huron, 7.5% in Lake Erie, and 7.3% in Lake Ontario. This dip seems to be in line with past rate drops. Yearly rates drop using U.S. EPA information are a little lower at 4.5% in Lake Superior, 5.9% in  Lake Michigan, 5.9% in Lake Huron, 6.0% in  Lake Erie, and 6.7% in Lake Ontario. Rate drops at the U.S. monitoring stations seem to be falling faster in Lakes Michigan, Huron, and Ontario compared to the past, while rates remain level with past trends in Lakes Superior and Erie.

Great Lakes Monitoring

  • Great Lakes Monitoring
    • Great Lakes Water Quality Monitoring Program
    • Integrated Atmospheric Deposition Network
    • Great Lakes Biology Monitoring Program
    • Great Lakes Fish Monitoring and Surveillance Program
  • EPA's Research Vessel Lake Guardian
  • Great Lakes Coastal Wetland Monitoring Program
    • Why Monitoring of the Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands is Important
    • How the Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands are Monitored
    • Where Great Lakes Coastal Wetlands Occur
    • Great Lakes CWMP Results and Major Findings
    • How the CWMP Data are Being Used
  • Cooperative Science and Monitoring Initiative (CSMI)
    • About Cooperative Science and Monitoring Initiative (CSMI)
    • 2021 Surveys Conducted on Lake Guardian
    • 2019 Surveys Conducted on Lake Guardian
Contact Us About Great Lakes Monitoring
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on September 16, 2024
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.