Will remedial options besides natural attenuation be considered?
Yes. The Navy will be required to submit a remediation plan. As with any site, the regulators will require multiple remedial alternatives to be considered and evaluated by the Navy. However, additional data about impacts to the vadose zone are needed before plans can be developed and before regulators can make informed decisions about remediation. Regulators will rely on site-specific data collected from site assessment and site investigation to evaluate any proposed remedial options based on the best available science and technology. We will consider the limitations of all remedial options and seek a suite of different techniques to optimize clean-up.
Related Questions
- Is the Navy required to investigate and remediate all confirmed releases from the Red Hill Facility, even those before the 2021 JP-5 releases?
- Is the Navy currently considering any active remediation technologies?
- Where is the Navy required to sample for historical releases during site assessment?
- What data governance practices are in place to avoid irregularities and to build trust in the data?
- Is there a remediation standard the Navy must comply with?
- Did delays in reporting results between May and November 2021 prevent regulators from conducting in-depth analysis of water contaminants and impacts to Red Hill Shaft?
- Navy labs modified reports after they were issued – is this normal?
- Why would regulators allow a drinking water well to operate or reopen within a mile of the Red Hill Release?
- Why did the Navy’s lab change the sample matrix on the laboratory reports from “drinking water” to “groundwater” in September and October of 2021?
- Why does it take so long before laboratory reports are finalized?
- Why are sample numbers missing from the groundwater samples collected between May and November of 2021?
- Has potential contamination from the Oily Waste Disposal Facility been characterized?