Navy labs modified reports after they were issued – is this normal?
Validating data can result in revisions. This is normal and an indication the lab is performing the appropriate data quality checks. The data validation process can take a long time. Regulators have access to and review both the validated and unvalidated data.
Related Questions
- Is the Navy required to investigate and remediate all confirmed releases from the Red Hill Facility, even those before the 2021 JP-5 releases?
- Will remedial options besides natural attenuation be considered?
- Is the Navy currently considering any active remediation technologies?
- Where is the Navy required to sample for historical releases during site assessment?
- What data governance practices are in place to avoid irregularities and to build trust in the data?
- Is there a remediation standard the Navy must comply with?
- Why are sample numbers missing from the groundwater samples collected between May and November of 2021?
- Why are sample numbers missing from the groundwater samples collected between May and November of 2021?
- Why would regulators allow a drinking water well to operate or reopen within a mile of the Red Hill Release?
- Navy labs modified reports after they were issued – is this normal?
- Did delays in reporting results between May and November 2021 prevent regulators from conducting in-depth analysis of water contaminants and impacts to Red Hill Shaft?
- Why are sample numbers missing from the groundwater samples collected between May and November of 2021?
- Has potential contamination from the Oily Waste Disposal Facility been characterized?