An official website of the United States government.

We've made some changes to If the information you are looking for is not here, you may be able to find it on the EPA Web Archive or the January 19, 2017 Web Snapshot.

Project-Level Conformity and Hot-Spot Analyses

This page contains policy guidance, technical guidance, and other resources issued by EPA to assist agencies in completing project-level conformity analyses, including particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) and carbon monoxide (CO) "hot-spot" analyses.

You may need a PDF reader to view some of the files on this page. See EPA’s About PDF page to learn more.

PM Hot-spot Analyses: Guidance

  • Transportation Conformity Guidance for Quantitative Hot-spot Analyses in PM2.5 and PM10 Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas
    EPA has released final guidance for modeling the local air quality impacts of certain transportation projects on the PM2.5 and PM10 national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This guidance is to be used by state and local agencies to conduct quantitative PM "hot-spot analyses" for new highway and transit projects that involve significant diesel emissions. This guidance describes how to estimate project emissions using EPA's MOVES model, California's EMFAC model, and other methods. It also outlines how to apply air quality models (such as AERMOD and CAL3QHCR) for PM hot-spot analyses. The guidance also includes a list of additional resources that may assist agencies in conducting quantitative PM hot-spot analyses.

    Update of November 2015: This guidance has been updated to reflect MOVES2014 and its subsequent minor revisions such as MOVES2014a, to revise design value calculations to be more consistent with other EPA programs, and to reflect guidance implementation and experience in the field. Please see the November 2015 guidance change bulletin below for more information.

    Contact: Laura Berry at


    In California, either EMFAC2011 or EMFAC2014 can be used until December 14, 2017, when the EMFAC2014 grace period will end:

    • Project sponsors using EMFAC2011 can find guidance in Section 5 of EPA's PM Hot-spot Guidance, above. The guidance also includes examples of using EMFAC2011 in Appendices G and H.
    • Project sponsors using EMFAC2014 can find guidance in Section 5.2 of EPA's PM Hot-spot Guidance, above, for characterizing a project in terms of links, and otherwise should refer to CARB's Project-Level Handbook (PDF) Exit(39 pp, 1.32MB, April 30, 2014). The remainder of Section 5, Appendices G and H do not apply for using EMFAC2014, but all other sections of EPA's hot-spot guidance are relevant.

  • Previous Guidance Change Bulletins:

Top of Page

CO Hot-spot Analyses: Guidance

  • Using MOVES2014 in Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Analyses (PDF)(55 pp, 603K, EPA-420-B-15-028, March 2015)
    This guidance describes how to use the MOVES2014 emissions model to estimate CO emissions from transportation projects, including roadway intersections, highways, transit projects, parking lots and intermodal terminals. This guidance can be applied when using MOVES2014 to complete any project-level quantitative CO analysis, including hot-spot analyses for transportation conformity determinations, modeling project-level emissions for SIP development, and completing NEPA analyses.
    Contact: Technical questions about this guidance can be directed to
  • Note: All new quantitative CO hot-spot conformity analyses outside of California must be based on MOVES2014a or MOVES2014, as the grace period for MOVES2014 has ended. See the Federal Register notice (PDF)(5 pp, 230K, published October 7, 2014) and EPA's latest MOVES policy guidance for details.

Top of Page

CO Hot-spot Analyses: FHWA Categorical Finding

  • 2017 CO Categorical Hot-Spot Finding for Intersection Projects – Updated with MOVES2014a

    On July 17, 2017, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) announced the availability of an updated carbon monoxide categorical hot-spot finding for certain projects involving a large urban intersection. Where a project’s parameters fit the conditions of the categorical hot-spot finding, project sponsors may be able to rely on the categorical hot-spot finding in place of doing their own CO hot-spot analysis as part of a project-level conformity determination in CO maintenance areas outside of California. The interagency consultation process should be used to determine whether the CO categorical hot-spot finding applies to a particular project, and any project-level conformity determination that relies on FHWA’s finding would be subject to public involvement requirements (40 CFR 93.105).

    EPA requested additional receptors in this analysis to help demonstrate that the receptors in fact do include the location of highest concentration, and thus the analysis meets the requirements of the Clean Air Act. These additional receptors are shown in the Technical Documentation, Figure 5.

    See FHWA’s CO categorical hot-spot finding website for more information about the finding.  Questions about applicability of the finding can be addressed to the appropriate EPA Regional staff or contact

Top of Page

Emissions Models and Methods

Top of Page

Air Quality (Dispersion) Models

  • Recommended Air Quality (Dispersion) Models for PM Hot-spot Analyses
    The following is a summary of recommended air quality models for completing PM hot-spot analyses for different types of transportation projects. This is a reproduction of Exhibit 7-2 of the Quantitative PM Hot-spot Guidance.
    Type of Project Recommended Model(s)
    Highway and intersection projects AERMOD, CAL3QHCR
    Transit, freight, and other terminal projects AERMOD
    Projects that involve both highway/intersections and terminals, and/or nearby sources AERMOD

    See Section 7 of the guidance for complete information on selecting an appropriate air quality model. See below for which model versions are currently approved for regulatory use.

Approved Versions of Air Quality (Dispersion) Models
Please refer to EPA’s web page Air Quality Dispersion Modeling - Preferred and Recommended Models for the currently approved versions of air quality (dispersion) models for quantitative PM hot-spot analyses, as recommended by EPA's "Guideline for Air Quality Models" (Appendix W to 40 CFR Part 51). ​

Top of Page

Tools for Completing Project-level Analyses

  • Tool to generate EMISFACT portion of an AERMOD input file
    EPA has developed a MySQL script called "MOVES2AERMOD" to automate the process of generating the EMISFACT portion of an AERMOD input file using MOVES output. The tool is intended to be used as part of a quantitative PM hot-spot analysis and can be run directly through the MOVES GUI. To obtain the tool and for more information, see the MOVES tools page.

Top of Page

Training and Other Resources

  • Quantitative PM Hot-spot Analysis Training
    EPA and DOT have developed a three-day training course on implementing EPA's guidance. This technical, hands-on course is geared toward state and local agencies and focuses on using emission models (including EPA's MOVES model) and air quality models (AERMOD and CAL3QHCR) for quantitative PM hot-spot analyses. The PM hot-spot analysis training page provides the latest training materials and other information. 
  • MOVES Model Information and Training
    • The EPA's MOVES page provides complete information about the model, including downloads, technical guidance, and tools.
    • The MOVES listserv provides updates on MOVES and other mobile source emissions models. Sign up here.
    • EPA has developed a two-day, hands-on course geared toward state and local agencies who will use MOVES for developing SIPs and regional conformity analyses, as well as a shorter web-based course for people interested in a general overview of MOVES. The MOVES training page contains information about this and other MOVES training information, courses, and webinars.
  • Air Quality Model Information
    • More information about dispersion models (including AERMOD and CAL3QHCR), meteorology preprocessors, and related tools, guidance, and outreach can be found on EPA's Support Center for Regulatory Atmospheric Modeling (SCRAM) website.
    • The SCRAM RSS feed provides updates on recent posting and additions to the SCRAM website. Sign up here.
  • Presentations
  • Additional conformity-related training information and presentations.

Top of Page

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

  • EPA FAQs
    The following are frequently asked questions about conducting hot-spot analyses for transportation conformity purposes. EPA will update these periodically.
  • Federal Highway Administration PM2.5 FAQs
    FHWA has developed a series of FAQs specifically for PM2.5 project-level conformity and hot-spot analyses. These FAQs were coordinated with EPA. The FHWA PM2.5 Project-Level Conformity and Hot-Spot Analyses FAQs webpage has more information.

Top of Page

Contact Information

  • EPA Regional Conformity Contacts
    EPA regional conformity staff are the primary EPA contacts for project sponsors completing project-level analyses for conformity purposes and should be contacted first for information and questions about these analyses. For the complete list of contacts by region, please see State and Local Transportation Regional Contacts.
  • Technical questions about using MOVES for project-level analyses can be directed to
  • EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards maintains a list of state air quality modeling staff who have experience that may be useful to a project sponsor when completing a hot-spot analysis, including running the selected air quality model and finding representative background data for a project. See OAQPS's state contacts page for more information.

Top of Page