Contaminated Sediments Technical Advisory Group
On this page:
- Site Designations and CSTAG Applicability
- Site Meetings
- Stakeholder Participation
- CSTAG Operating Procedures
Remedial actions at large contaminated sediment sites can be challenging, so EPA established a two-tiered designation to ensure that Superfund site managers appropriately consider sediment management principles in risk management decisions.
These designations determine which sites are subject to review by the Contaminated Sediments Technical Advisory Group (CSTAG). CSTAG:
- Helps remedial project managers and on-scene coordinators appropriately investigate and manage sites in accordance with risk management principles.
- Encourages national consistency in sediment-site management by providing a forum for exchanging technical and policy information.
- Provides a mechanism for monitoring and evaluating progress at a number of the largest or most complex sediment sites.
Site Designations and CSTAG Applicability
Tier 1 includes all sites or areas where the proposed or selected sediment action will address more than 10,000 cubic yards or five acres of contaminated sediment. At these sites, the EPA regional office describes for EPA headquarters how it considered the 11 sediment management principles in its decisions.
Tier 2 status is limited to a small number of Tier 1 sites that are large, complex or controversial. CSTAG provides a review and advisory function for Tier 2 sites.
EPA typically identifies sites as Tier 2 during the National Priorities List listing process or later as additional information becomes available. The sites are then subject to CSTAG reviews until the record of decisionrecord of decisionA public document that explains the cleanup method that will be used at a Superfund site, based on EPA studies, public comments, and community concerns. or equivalent is signed.
Afterwards, CSTAG may review site progress during informal updates.
Early involvement is fundamental to CSTAG’s effectiveness. Therefore, a first meeting is typically held shortly after listing on the National Priorities List or a Tier 2 determination.
CSTAG site reviews are generally conducted in person so members can gather information to develop recommendations. During the initial meeting, CSTAG reviews site data and the application of sediment management principles. CSTAG will also meet with stakeholders and tour the site.
Following the initial meeting, there are periodic updates until CSTAG holds a meeting — or a joint National Remedy Review Board and CSTAG meeting — before the proposed plan is drafted.
Following site meetings (but not following informational updates), CSTAG will provide the EPA regional office with written comments and recommendations regarding the application of EPA’s risk management principles for sediment site managers and the contaminated sediment remediation guidances.
Although CSTAG meetings are not public, key stakeholder groups with significant site involvement can give short presentations to CSTAG during the first site meeting. These stakeholder groups usually include the lead state agency, the lead potentially responsible party, the lead trustee, tribes, and recognized community groups.
Stakeholder presentations or written comments should focus on how EPA is or should be addressing contaminated sediment management principles or guidance at the site.
CSTAG Operating Procedures
EPA established CSTAG under OSWER Directive 9285.6-08, Principles for Managing Contaminated Sediment Risks at Hazardous Waste Sites (Feb. 12, 2002) (PDF)(11 pp, 72 K).
CSTAG is comprised of scientists, engineers and site managers with expertise in sediment site management and evaluation.
CSTAG members provide unbiased technical advice and objectively evaluate site-specific information from a scientific and technical perspective.
CSTAG membership has changed over time. It currently includes one representative from each EPA regional office, two representatives from EPA’s Office of Research and Development, three representatives from EPA’s Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation, and one representative from the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
Members participate in monthly conference calls and two to four meetings per year.
Karl Gustavson (Chair) (email@example.com)
Marc Greenberg (firstname.lastname@example.org)Matt Lambert (email@example.com)
|Region 1||Kymberlee Keckler (firstname.lastname@example.org)||617-918-1385|
|Region 2||Doug Tomchuck (email@example.com)||212-637-3956|
|Region 3||Randy Sturgeon (firstname.lastname@example.org)||215-814-3227|
|Region 4||Craig Zeller (email@example.com)||404-562-8827|
|Region 5||Jim Saric (firstname.lastname@example.org)||312-886-0992|
|Region 6||Gary Baumgarten (email@example.com)||214-665-6749|
|Region 7||None currently assigned|
|Region 8||Sara Sparks (firstname.lastname@example.org)||406-782-7415|
|Region 9||Wayne Praskins (email@example.com)||415-972-3181|
|Region 10||Allison Hiltner (firstname.lastname@example.org)||206-553-2140|
Barbara Bergen (email@example.com)Lawrence Burkhard (firstname.lastname@example.org)
|ACE ERDC||Earl Hayter (email@example.com)||864-656-5942|