Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Cancer
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Emergency Response Research

Evaluation and Testing of Outdoor Sampling and Analysis Methods

EPA conducts research to develop methods and technologies to rapidly and cost-effectively remediate areas affected by a bioterrorism attack. Methods for detection of biological agent following an incident include swab and wipe sampling, vacuum sampling, and grab sampling.  Agent detection is done using bioagent-specific analytical method(s). These

US Coast Guard Port
U.S. Coast Guard Port

detection and detection methods have been evaluated for their application in indoor environments; however, their performance, when utilized in an outdoor environment, is largely unknown. Determining the performance of available sampling and analysis methods for outdoors is a high priority.

The U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) bases and ports are a potential terrorist target. By the nature of their mission and location, bases and ports have unique surfaces and environments (e.g., salt encrusted surfaces) that could affect the performance of sampling and analysis methods. Additionally, standard USCG maintenance activities, such as mopping and spraying surfaces, might provide an opportunity to collect samples in novel ways.

This project task is evaluating sampling and analysis methods targeting Bacillus spores in outdoor setting relevant to a USCG  base.  Certain outdoor surface materials would be expected to be encountered in a wide-area contamination incident involving a USCG base. Coupons (samples) of these materials are being use in the evaluation.  The first phase of this task is to evaluate traditional sampling methods, such as sponge wipe sampling for non-porous surfaces and MicroVac™ sampling for porous surfaces.  The second phase will evaluate composite sampling methods utilizing USCG cleaning methods, such as rinsing and mopping. The following is a list of the material/sample methods pairs chosen for this research:

Material Surfaces – Traditional Methods

  • Marine grade aluminum – Sponge wipe
  • Marine grade aluminum, with sea salt spray –Sponge wipe
  • Non-skid tread – MicroVac
  • Non-skid tread, with sea salt spray – MicroVac
  • Tempered glass, with sea salt spray – Sponge wipe
  • Gravel – Grab / Extract
  • Bilge water – Aqueous grab sample

Material Surfaces – Composite methods

  • Marine grade aluminum, non-skid tread – Rinse water or mop material
  • Asphalt roofing shingles – Wash-Off or rain water
  • Marine grade aluminum, non-skid tread, with sea salt spray – Rinse water or mop material

Samples are to be inoculated with known concentrations of Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki (Btk) spores (as a surrogate for B. anthracis) and analyzed using two existing EPA methods, culture and rapid viability polymerase chain reaction (RV-PCR). Coupons will be inoculated with two relatively low levels of Btk spores (10 colony forming units (CFU)/cm2 and 1,000 CFU/cm2) to challenge the recovery efficiency of the sampling methods and the detection capability of the analytical methods.  Samples will be collected over four time points: 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Emergency Response Research

  • Research Topics
    • Cleanup and Remediation
    • Communities, Resilience & Remediation
    • Contaminant Detection and Sampling & Analysis
    • Contaminant Fate, Transport & Exposure
    • COVID-19 Research
    • Oil Spill Research
    • Waste Management
    • Water Security
    • Wildland Fire Research
  • Models, Tools, & Applications
  • Outreach & Training
    • Webinar Series
    • Engagement Opportunities
    • Decon Conference
    • Technical Support to States & Territories
  • Publications
Contact Us About Emergency Response & Homeland Security Research
Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on July 18, 2024
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.