Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Chemicals, Toxics, and Pesticide
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Radon
    • Research
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Guidance
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • Our Mission and What We Do
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Labs and Research Centers
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Organization Chart
    • EPA History

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. TRI National Analysis
  3. Pollution Prevention

Measuring the Impact of Source Reduction

From 1991 to 2023, more than 24,000 industrial facilities reported implementing 480,000 unique source reduction activities to TRI. During this time, TRI chemical releases declined steadily. EPA looked closer at the data to find out how facilities achieved this reduction in releases and how much of the decrease could be attributed to source reduction.

To quantify the contribution of source reduction projects to reduced chemical releases, EPA conducted an analysis that accounted for other factors that could have influenced releases. For example, releases can decrease due to changes in the types and quantities of goods produced, outsourcing of manufacturing, and passage of pollution regulations. Results of the analysis show that the average source reduction project caused a 16% decrease in chemical releases in the year the project is implemented, with reductions continuing in subsequent years. To learn more about the methodology and results of this analysis, see the TRI Measuring the Impact of Source Reduction page.

 

Looking more closely at the five source reduction categories reported to TRI shows that the effects of a project vary based on the type of source reduction implemented. The source reduction categories resulting in the largest first-year decreases in releases were:

  • Material Substitutions and Modifications with declines of 19%.
  • Product Modifications with declines of 13%.

The analysis also estimated the total impact of these source reduction projects on the overall quantity of chemical releases reported to TRI. The graph below shows this cumulative effect of source reduction. The solid green line shows actual releases reported to TRI, and the dashed blue line shows an estimate of what releases would have been if no facilities implemented source reduction. EPA estimates that TRI source reduction activities eliminated 23 billion pounds of chemical releases between 1991 and 2023.

 

Although these estimates have important limitations, they indicate that source reduction has been an effective tool for reducing chemical releases at industrial facilities that report to the TRI Program.


Previous Next

This page was published in August 2025 and uses the 2023 TRI National Analysis dataset made public in TRI Explorer in October 2024.

TRI National Analysis

  • TRI Program Home
  • Introduction
    • TRI Data Considerations
  • Pollution Prevention
    • Source Reduction Activities
    • Source Reduction Activities by Chemical & Industry
    • Measuring the Impact of Source Reduction
    • Green Chemistry & Engineering Activities
    • Reported Barriers to Source Reduction
    • Source Reduction Activities by Parent Company
  • Waste Management
    • Trends in Waste Management
    • Waste Management by Chemical & Industry
    • Non-Production-Related Waste Managed
    • Waste Managed by Parent Company
  • Releases of Chemicals
    • Trends in Releases
    • Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Air Releases
      • Air Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Water Releases
      • Water Releases by Chemical & Industry
    • Land Disposal
      • Land Disposal by Chemical & Industry
  • Chemical Profiles
    • Lead
    • Mercury
    • Dioxins
    • Ethylene Oxide
    • Carcinogens
    • PFAS
  • Sector Profiles
    • Manufacturing Sectors
      • Manufacturing Waste Management Trend
    • Chemical Manufacturing
      • Chemical Manufacturing Waste Management Trend
    • Automotive Manufacturing
      • Automotive Manufacturing Waste Management Trend
    • Wood Products Manufacturing
      • Wood Products Waste Management Trend
    • Electric Utilities
      • Electric Utilities Waste Management Trend
    • Federal Facilities
      • Federal Facilities by Industry
      • Waste Management by Federal Facilities
  • Where You Live
    • EPA Regions
    • States & Metropolitan Areas
    • Watersheds
    • Tribal Communities
  • TRI Connections
  • Data Dashboard
  • National Analysis Archive
Contact Us About the TRI National Analysis
Contact Us About the TRI National Analysis to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
Last updated on August 20, 2025
  • Assistance
  • Spanish
  • Arabic
  • Chinese (simplified)
  • Chinese (traditional)
  • French
  • Haitian Creole
  • Korean
  • Portuguese
  • Russian
  • Tagalog
  • Vietnamese
United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility Statement
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions
  • Site Feedback

Follow.